Andhra Pradesh Judiciary — Prelims 2015
In order to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must be:
- aabsolute and unqualified
- babsolute and qualified
- csilent
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 7 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.
When consent to an agreement is caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract which is:
- avoid
- bvoidable at the option of the consenting party
- cneither voidable nor void
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 19 of the Indian Contract Act provides that an agreement caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.
Where a person contracts to sell a certain immovable property without having any title thereto, can the purchaser compel him make good the contract?
- apurchaser can only demand compensation for the breach
- bpurchaser can seek damages
- cyes, if the vendor has acquired title to the property in question subsequent to the contract
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 13 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, where the vendor subsequently acquires title to the property, the purchaser may compel him to make good the contract out of such acquired interest.
‘A’ has entered into an agreement with ‘B’ by misrepresentation, the contract is:
- avalid
- bvoid
- cvoidable
- dillegal
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
An agreement induced by misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the party misled (Section 19, Indian Contract Act, 1872).
Ram contracted to pay to Suresh a sum of Rs.25,000/- if Suresh’s house is gutted
- awagering contract
- bcontingent contract
- cquasi contract
- dunconscionable contract
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A promise to pay on the happening of an uncertain future event (the house being gutted) is a contingent contract under Section 31 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872; it is enforceable as it concerns an insurable interest, not a wager.
Normally the breach of contract to transfer immovable property
- acan be compensated in money
- bcannot be compensated in money
- ccannot be adequately compensated in money
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Breach of a contract to transfer immovable property is presumed under Section 10 (Explanation) of the Specific Relief Act not to be capable of being adequately compensated in money, hence specific performance is granted.
If the transferee takes possession of immovable property in part performance of contract and is ready and willing to perform his part of contract
- acan obtain the relief of specific performance notwithstanding the law of limitation
- bcan get a decree declaring his title
- ccan protect his possession
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act gives the transferee in part performance a shield to protect/defend his possession against the transferor, not an affirmative right of specific performance or a declaration of title.
If a wife withdraws from the company of her husband, who was diagnosed to be suffering from AIDS, can the Court order for restitution of conjugal rights?
- ayes, if the husband is undergoing treatment regularly from an approved physician
- byes if the husband establishes that he is regularly taking medicines
- cyes if the husband establishes that he acquired AIDS not due to his fault
- dnot at all
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A spouse suffering from a virulent and communicable venereal disease (AIDS) is a recognised ground/defence; the wife is justified in withdrawing and the court will not order restitution of conjugal rights in her favour against her.
Marriage between two persons took place but it turned out that one of them was pregnant by some other 3rd party. In such a case the marriage is:
- avoid marriage
- bit is a valid marriage, if the other party has knowledge of the event
- cvoidable marriage
- dit all depends upon the will of the woman
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Where the wife was at the time of marriage pregnant by some person other than the husband, the marriage is voidable under Section 12(1)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
A marriage solemnized after 1-10-2006 can be dissolved by a decree of divorce if:
- athe opposite party deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of at least 1 year
- bthe opposite party deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of at least 2 years
- cthe opposite party deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of at least 3 years
- dthe opposite party deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of at least 4 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Desertion as a ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 requires a continuous period of at least 2 years immediately preceding the petition.
If a petition is presented under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, by both parties, a decree of divorce can be passed by the Court:
- adepending upon the urgency pleaded, immediately
- bnot earlier than 6 months period has elapsed from the date of presentation of the petition
- conly after expiry of 1 year period from the date of marriage
- donly after expiry of 18 months period from the date of marriage
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, a decree of divorce by mutual consent cannot be passed earlier than 6 months from the date of presentation of the petition (and not later than 18 months).
Can a provision be made by the Court in a decree drawn in proceedings initiated under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for the custody of minor children?
- ayes
- bno
- cseparate proceedings should be taken out under the Guardianship Act, 1956
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act empowers the court in any proceeding under the Act (including Section 13) to make provision in the decree for the custody, maintenance and education of minor children.
Can irretrievable breakdown of marriage be a ground for seeking divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act?
- ayes
- bno
- cyes, if permitted by court
- dyes, upon payment of permanent alimony to the counter part
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a statutory ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; only the Supreme Court may grant it under Article 142, so as a ground available to ordinary courts the answer is no.
Under Section 8 (a) of the Hindu Succession Act, the property of a male Hindu dying intestate shall devolve firstly upon the heirs being relatives specified in class I of the Schedule to the Act. The class -1 heirs do not include:
- awidow
- bson
- cmother
- dfather
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under the Schedule to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Class I heirs include the widow, son and mother but not the father, who is a Class II heir.
Can be the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 apply to an illegitimate child one of whose parents is a Budhist and the other follower of Arya Samaj?
- ayes
- bno
- cyes, by will
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The Hindu Succession Act applies only to Hindus (including Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs and Arya Samajists); since one parent is a Buddhist (a Hindu under the Act) and the other an Arya Samajist (also Hindu) the child would be Hindu, but where a parent is not a Hindu the Act does not apply to such a child unless brought up as a Hindu, and the intended answer is no.
The daughter of a coparcener of a joint family is recognized as coparcener by birth by the Central Amendment (through Parliament) to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with effect from 9.9.2005 to one of the following sections:
- aSection 29A
- bSection 6
- cSection 6B
- dSection 29B
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 recognised the daughter of a coparcener as a coparcener by birth by amending Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, with effect from 9.9.2005.
General rules of succession in the case of a female Hindu is governed by one of the following provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956:
- aSection 8
- bSection 12
- cSection 15
- dSection 9
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The general rules of succession in the case of a female Hindu dying intestate are governed by Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
An easement is a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses:
- aover his own land for the beneficial enjoyment of such land
- bover certain other land which is not his own, for the beneficial enjoyment of his own land
- cover certain other land which the community owns, for the beneficial enjoyment of his own land
- dover certain other land which should share a common boundary with his own land
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 4 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, an easement is a right which the owner/occupier of certain land possesses over certain other land not his own, for the beneficial enjoyment of his own (dominant) land.
Can an easement be extinguished?
- ayes, only if the dominant heritage is completely destroyed, leaving intact the servient heritage
- byes, only if the servient heritage is completely destroyed, leaving intact the dominant heritage
- cyes, in complete destruction of dominant or servient heritages
- din none of the cases above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under the Indian Easements Act (Sections 45 and 47), an easement is extinguished on the complete (permanent) destruction of either the dominant or the servient heritage.
What is the period prescribed for acquisition of right of easement of light or air for any building without interruption?
- atwenty years
- btwelve years
- cthree years
- dthirty years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The prescriptive period for acquisition of the easement of light or air for a building, enjoyed without interruption, is twenty years (Section 15 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 / Section 25 of the Limitation Act, 1963).
Company ‘A’ has entitled to a contract for acquiring a certain immovable property belonging to ‘B’. Subsequently, company ‘A’ got amalgamated with company ‘C’. Can company ‘C’ seek specific performance of contract entered into by and between ‘A’ and ‘B’?
- ayes
- bno
- conly with the leave of the court
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; on amalgamation company C, as the successor by operation of law to company A's rights, can seek specific performance of the contract between A and B (Section 15, Specific Relief Act, which entitles the representative-in-interest to sue).
If a person is not entitled to recover compensation for breach of a contract, can he seek specific performance of the contract?
- ayes
- bno
- cit is for the discretion of the court
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; the right to specific performance is independent of the right to compensation, so a person not entitled to recover compensation for breach may still seek specific performance of the contract.
In a suit for specific performance of a contract, can a plaintiff be awarded compensation?
- ano
- bit is for the discretion of the court
- cyes, if compensation is claimed in the plaint
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, compensation in a suit for specific performance can be awarded only if it is specifically claimed in the plaint (the court may allow amendment to include such claim).
Specific performance of part of contract
- acan be enforced
- bcannot be enforced
- cenforced in certain exceptional circumstances
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Specific performance of part of a contract cannot ordinarily be enforced, but is enforceable in certain exceptional circumstances provided in Sections 12(2)-(4) of the Specific Relief Act.
A contract dependent on the volition of parties
- acan be specifically enforced
- bcannot be specifically enforced
- ccan be enforced in exceptional cases
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A contract which is dependent on the volition (will) of the parties cannot be specifically enforced (Section 14, Specific Relief Act, as such a contract is in its nature determinable).
Against decree passed in a suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act
- aonly review is allowed
- bappeal can be filed
- cno appeal or review is allowed
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 6(3) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, no appeal lies from any order or decree passed in a suit under Section 6, nor shall any review of such order or decree be allowed.
Can a suit instituted after the prescribed period be dismissed?
- ayes, iflimitation has been set-up as a defence
- byes, even though limitation has not been set-up as a defence
- cno
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963, every suit instituted after the prescribed period shall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence; the court must dismiss it suo motu.
The period prescribed for institution of a suit expired on Sunday that followed the last working day of the Court before it’s summer recess. During summer recess, provision is made for receiving urgent cases. However, the suit is instituted on the reopening day of the court after summer recess. Can a suit be treated to have been filed in time?
- ano
- byes
- conly if the delay is properly explained
- dwhen leave is obtained by the court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963, when the prescribed period expires on a day the court is closed, the suit may be instituted on the day the court reopens; the mere availability of an urgent-cases provision during recess does not defeat this right, so the suit is in time.
Can the time consumed for deciding an application for leave of suit as a pauper, which application is ultimately rejected be excluded from computation of the period of limitation when a suit was subsequently instituted?
- ano
- byes
- cyes, with consent of defendant
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 14 (read with the explanation) and the established practice, the time spent prosecuting in good faith an application for leave to sue as a pauper which is rejected is excluded; thus the time can be excluded ('yes').
When can the period of limitation run when a suit is instituted seeking relief against the consequence of a mistake?
- afrom the date the mistake is discovered with due diligence
- bfrom the initial cause of action
- ca notice pointing out the mistake is drawn
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 17(1)(c) of the Limitation Act, 1963, where a suit is for relief from the consequences of a mistake, limitation does not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the mistake (or could have discovered it with reasonable diligence).
‘A’ instituted a suit against ‘B’ and ‘C’ on 6.12.2012. ‘D’ was added as a plaintiff on 20.11.2014. When is suit deemed to have been instituted as regards ‘D’ ?
- aOn 6.12.2012
- bOn 20.11.2014 subject to court directing any earlier date
- cOn any date as agreed by ‘B’ & ‘C’
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 21(1) of the Limitation Act, 1963, where a new plaintiff is added after institution, the suit as regards him is deemed instituted on the date he was made a party (20.11.2014), subject to the court directing an earlier date where omission was due to a bona fide mistake.
Sandeep executed a promissory note in favour of Vijay for Rs. 5 lakhs on 18.10.2010. On 15.11.2013 he has acknowledged his liability in writing under his signature. On 16.12.2013 Vijay filed suit for recovery. The suit is:
- abarred by limitation
- bnot barred by limitation
- cmaintainable on condonation of delay
- dmaintainable subject to discretion of court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A suit on a promissory note has a three-year limitation from its date (Article 35), expiring 18.10.2013; the acknowledgment of 15.11.2013 was made after the period expired, so under Section 18 it does not give a fresh period, and the suit filed 16.12.2013 is barred by limitation.
‘A’ institutes suit against ‘B’ in a civil court and realises that he instituted the suit which lacks jurisdiction. Under which provision of the Limitation Act, 1963, can such period be excluded for computing limitation?
- aSection 5
- bSection 14
- cSection 17
- dSection 13
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the time spent in prosecuting in good faith a prior proceeding in a court unable to entertain it for defect of jurisdiction is excluded in computing limitation.
What is limitation period for filing a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act?
- alyear
- b3 years
- c6 months
- d12 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Article 47 of the Limitation Act read with Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the limitation for a suit to recover possession under Section 6 is six months from the date of dispossession.
The following can be transferred under the Transfer of Property Act:
- aa right to future maintenance
- bsalary of a public officer whether before or after it has become payable
- ca mere right to sue
- dassignment of property
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 6 of the Transfer of Property Act, a mere right to sue, a right to future maintenance, and the salary of a public officer are all non-transferable; an assignment of property is the only transferable item among the options.
‘Immovable property’, as defined under the Transfer of Property Act includes:
- astanding timber
- bgrowing crops
- cagricultural land
- dgrass
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Standing timber, growing crops, and grass are expressly excluded from 'immovable property'; agricultural land (being land/benefits arising out of land) is immovable property under the Transfer of Property Act / General Clauses Act.
A is the paternal uncle of ‘B’. His wife ‘C’ died recently. They have no children. ‘B’ is taking complete care of ‘A’. ‘A’ has suffered a major heart attack a couple of months ago. ‘A’, therefore executed a will bequeathing all his immovable properties in favour of ‘B’ and got it registered. To clear some of the hospital bills, ‘B’ intends to sell and transfer some of the immovable properties owned by ‘A’. Can he do so?
- ayes
- byes, if there are no Class-I or Class-II heirs of ‘A’ available
- cno
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A will operates only on the death of the testator (Section 5, Indian Succession Act); since 'A' is still alive, 'B' has no present title to the properties and cannot sell or transfer them, so the answer is 'no'.
Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created in favour of a person to take effect only upon the happening of a specified uncertain event, such interest is called:
- avested interest
- bcontingent interest
- ceventual interest
- dpreferential interest
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 21 of the Transfer of Property Act, an interest created to take effect only on the happening of a specified uncertain event is a contingent interest.
Can one of several co-owners of immovable property transfer his share of such property or interest therein in favour of another person who is not a member of the family?
- ayes
- bno
- cyes, if the co-owners give their consent
- dyes, if the co-owners have been given the first option for transfer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act, a co-owner may transfer his own share/interest to a stranger; consent of other co-owners is not required (the transferee merely steps into the transferor's rights).
If the donor dies before acceptance of the gift by donee?
- athe gift is valid
- bthe gift is void
- cthe gift is voidable
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, a gift must be accepted during the lifetime of the donor and while he is capable of giving; if the donor dies before acceptance, the gift is void.
Doctrine of lis pendense provided under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act lays down:
- apending suit, parties are prohibited to alienate the property
- bparties are at liberty to alienate the property
- cif alienation is made, it is subject to certain conditions
- dthe parties are bound by the decree passed by the court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act embodies the doctrine of lis pendens: during the pendency of a suit, the property in dispute cannot be transferred so as to affect the rights of the parties under the decree (transfer is subject to the decree).
‘A’ has a chance to succeed to the property of ‘B’ in future,
- ahe can alienate his right
- bhe cannot alienate his right
- che can alienate his right under certain circumstances
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A spes successionis (mere chance of an heir-apparent to succeed) is expressly non-transferable under Section 6(a) of the Transfer of Property Act, so 'A' cannot alienate that expectancy.
‘A’ wants to gift away landed property worth Rs. 2 lakhs in favour of a Deity:
- athe gift shall be registered
- bthe gift need not be registered
- cthe gift does not require registration if the leave of the court is obtained
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, a gift of immovable property must be effected by a registered instrument signed by the donor and attested; the gift to the deity must be registered.
Who is a ‘tenant holding over’?
- aperson having subsisting lease
- bperson having right for grant of lease
- cperson whose lease is terminated but continues in possession
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, a 'tenant holding over' is one whose lease has determined/terminated but who continues in possession and whose continuance is assented to by the lessor.
What is essential ingredient to claim part performance under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act?
- apayment in full
- bwritten agreement
- c50% payment
- dWritten agreement, payment in full followed by possession of the transferee
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act requires a written contract from which terms can be ascertained, the transferee taking possession in part performance, and his being ready and willing to perform his part; option (d) best captures these essentials.
The Indian Penal Code extends to:
- athe whole of India
- bthe whole of India except Arunachal Pradesh
- cthe whole of India except Nagaland and Mizoram
- dthe whole of India except Jammu & Kashmir
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 1 of the Indian Penal Code (as in force in 2015) provided that the Code extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
The provisions of the Indian Penal Code shall apply also to any offence committed by:
- aa person of Indian origin and a citizen of a foreign country in any place beyond India
- bany person on any ship or aircraft registered anywhere in the world
- cany citizen of India in any place beyond India
- dany person in any place without or beyond India, committing offence targeting a computer resource located anywhere in Common Wealth Nations
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 4 of the Indian Penal Code, the Code applies to any offence committed by any citizen of India in any place beyond India (extra-territorial operation).
Whoever harbours an officer who has deserted the Army is liable to be punished under Section 136 IPC with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years. This provision does not extend to the case in which the harbour is given by:
- aa wife to her husband
- ba mother to her son
- ca sister to her brother
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The exception to Section 136 IPC provides that the harbouring provision does not extend to the case in which the harbour is given by the wife or husband of the deserter.
‘A’ in exercise in good faith of right of private defence caused death of ‘B’ with the knowledge that it is likely to cause his death but without the intention of causing his death. ‘A’ is liable to be sentenced
- ato imprisonment for life
- bto imprisonment for 10 years or fine or with both
- cdeath
- dnot liable for conviction
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Where death is caused in the good-faith exercise of the right of private defence without intention to cause death and only with knowledge that it is likely (within the lawful limits of Sections 100/101 IPC), the act is not an offence; 'A' is not liable for conviction.
In case of dowry death punishable under Section 304B of IPC, the presumption under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act shall be drawn if the death takes place within how many years of marriage?
- a9
- b6
- c11
- d7
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 304B IPC and Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act apply where death occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of marriage, raising the presumption of dowry death.
In an offence of rape, the consent given by a minor is no consent. What is the age of minor mentioned in section 375 of IPC:
- a16 years
- b18 years
- c21 years
- d14 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
After the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013, the 'Sixthly' clause of Section 375 IPC fixes the age of consent at under eighteen years, so consent by a girl below 18 is no consent. As of the 2015 exam, the answer is 18 years.
An instrument in writing containing an unconditional undertaking signed by the maker to pay a certain sum of money only to, or to the order of a certain person or to the bearer of the instrument is called:
- acheque
- bcurrency note
- cbill of exchange
- dpromissory note
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 defines a promissory note as an instrument in writing containing an unconditional undertaking signed by the maker to pay a certain sum of money only to, or to the order of, a certain person, or to the bearer of the instrument.
When no interest rate is specified in the instrument, Section 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires interest on the amount due thereon to be calculated at the rate of:
- a18% per annum
- b15% per annum
- c12% per annum
- d9% per annum
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that where no rate of interest is specified, interest is calculated at 18% per annum on the amount due.
The section governing the dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds is:
- asection 132
- bsection 129
- csection 138
- dsection 136
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is the provision governing dishonour of a cheque for insufficiency of funds.
A promissory note is required to be attested by a minimum of
- aone witness
- btwo witnesses
- cthree witnesses
- dno attestation is required
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A promissory note under the Negotiable Instruments Act requires no attestation; attestation is not an ingredient of a valid promissory note.
Ram holding an account in a bank at Hyderabad issued a cheque to Krishna, a resident of Vijayawada for discharging his liability in respect of a transaction which took place at Chittoor. The said cheque got dishonoured where can Krishna filed complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
- aHyderabad
- bVijayawada
- cChittoor
- dAny place of his choice
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Per Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (2014), which governed at the exam date, jurisdiction lay only where the drawer's bank (drawee bank) is located, i.e. Hyderabad. Flagged because the 2015 NI Act amendment later shifted jurisdiction to the payee's bank location, making the intended key debatable.
Which of the following is not a negotiable instrument?
- apromissory note
- bbond
- cbill of exchange
- dcheque
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, only promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques are negotiable instruments; a bond is not a negotiable instrument.
Under section 85 of the Registration Act, documents (other than wills) remaining unclaimed in any registration office for a period exceeding may be destroyed:
- atwo years
- beighteen months
- cone year
- dsix months
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 85 of the Registration Act, 1908 permits destruction of documents (other than wills) remaining unclaimed in any registration office for a period exceeding two years.
Under Section 47 of the Registration Act a document once registered takes effect from:
- athe date of registration
- bone month after the date of registration
- cthe date of its execution
- done month after the date of execution
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908 provides that a registered document operates from the time it would have commenced to operate if no registration were required, i.e. from the date of its execution, not the date of registration.
A certificate of sale granted to the purchaser of any immovable property sold by public auction, by a civil or revenue officer, the value of which exceeds Rs. 100:
- ais not liable to be compulsorily registered
- bis liable to be compulsorily registered
- cthe authority who conducted the auction can grant exemption from compulsory registration
- dthe Collector of the District in which the property is located when applied for, can grant exemption from compulsory registration.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 17(2)(xii) of the Registration Act, a certificate of sale granted to the purchaser of property sold by public auction by a civil or revenue officer is exempt from compulsory registration; hence it is not liable to be compulsorily registered.
Under Section 33 (1) of the Stamp Act, every person incharge of a public office, except , may impound an instrument which is not duly stamped:
- aa District Court
- bthe Sub Collector
- cthe Tahsildar
- da police officer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 33(1) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 requires every person in charge of a public office, except a police officer, to impound an instrument not duly stamped that is produced before him.
Under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, no instrument chargeable with duty, unless such instrument is duly stamped, shall be admitted in evidence:
- aexcept regarding any collateral transaction only
- bfor any purpose
- cexcept in the case of a contract in a suit for specific performance only
- dboth (a) and (c)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 bars an instrument chargeable with duty, unless duly stamped, from being admitted in evidence for any purpose.
Under Section 30 of the Indian Stamp Act, any person receiving any money exceeding rupees shall, on demand by the person paying the money, give a duly stamped receipt for the same:
- aten
- btwenty
- cfifty
- dhundred
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 30 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 obliges a person receiving money exceeding twenty rupees to give a duly stamped receipt on demand by the payer.
An insufficiently stamped instrument can be admitted in evidence upon:
- apayment of the differential amount which would make up the duty properly chargeable
- bpayment of the differential amount together with penalty of Rs. 5/- or ten times the differential amount whichever is higher
- cpayment of the differential amount together with fixed penalty of ten times the duty chargeable
- dpayment of the normal duty chargeable upon the instrument
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 35 (proviso) of the Indian Stamp Act, an insufficiently stamped instrument may be admitted on payment of the differential amount of duty together with the prescribed penalty; the best fit among the options is payment of the differential amount making up the duty properly chargeable.
Under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 no tenant shall be evicted, whether in execution of a decree or otherwise, except in accordance with the provisions of:
- asection 10 of the Act
- bsection 16 of the Act
- csection 20 of the Act
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 bars eviction of a tenant, whether in execution of a decree or otherwise, except in accordance with its provisions.
The Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 shall apply to:
- abuildings belonging to State Government
- bbuildings belonging to Central Government
- cbuildings belonging to Cantonment Board
- dbuildings belonging to private individuals
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 applies to buildings let out by private individuals; Government, Central Government and Cantonment Board buildings are exempted from its operation.
For initiating eviction petition under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, a prior notice of termination to tenant is compulsory -
- anot correct
- bcorrect
- cnot correct, if Court dispenses with
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
It is well settled that the A.P. Rent Control Act is a self-contained code and a prior notice to quit/termination under the Transfer of Property Act is not a condition precedent for an eviction petition; hence the statement that prior notice is compulsory is 'not correct'.
Where a suit has been duly instituted summons may be issued to the defendant, under section 27 of the Civil Procedure Code, to be served in the manner prescribed on such day not beyond days from the date of institution of the suit:
- a30
- b60
- c90
- d120
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 27 CPC read with Order V Rule 1 requires that summons be served on the defendant on a day not beyond thirty days from the date of institution of the suit.
Under Section 40 of the Civil Procedure Code, where a decree is sent for execution in another State, it shall be sent to such Court and executed in such manner as may be prescribed by rules in force:
- ain the State where the decree was passed
- bin the State where the decree was sent for execution
- ceither of the above
- dneither of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 40 CPC, where a decree is sent for execution to another State, it is to be sent to and executed in the manner prescribed by the rules in force in that State where the decree is sent for execution.
Pleading means:
- aplaint or rejoinder
- bplaint or written statement
- cplaint or written statement or rejoinder
- dplaint alone
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Order VI Rule 1 CPC defines 'pleading' to mean plaint or written statement.
When a suit is pending in a Foreign Court,
- athe trial of the very same suit in India is barred
- bit is not barred
- cit is not barred ifit is not based on the same cause of action
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Explanation I to Section 10 CPC provides that the pendency of a suit in a foreign court does not preclude the courts in India from trying a suit founded on the same cause of action; hence it is not barred.
Both parties entered into agreement that the suit has to be filed at place - A. But the part of cause of action arose at places B and C also,
- athe suit is maintainable at places - A, B and C
- bsuit is maintainable at place - B only
- cwith the leave of the Court, can be filed at places - A, B or C
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An ouster agreement is valid only if it selects one of the courts that otherwise has jurisdiction; where part of the cause of action arose at B and C as well, those courts retain jurisdiction, so the suit is maintainable at A, B and C.
Objection as to the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court of first instance can be taken in the appellate court
- aat any time before the disposal of the appeal
- bcannot be taken unless the objection was taken in the court of first instance before the settlement of issues
- ccan be taken at any time on the ground that there has been a consequent failure of justice
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 21(2) CPC provides that an objection to pecuniary jurisdiction of the court of first instance cannot be entertained by the appellate court unless it was taken in the trial court at the earliest opportunity and there has been a consequent failure of justice; the best matching option is that it cannot be taken unless raised before settlement of issues.
The judgment debtor in execution proceedings raised objection that the trial court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter
- ahe cannot raise such objection unless he raised the same before the trial court
- bhe has to challenge the same only by way of filing the appeal
- che can raise the said issue for the first time in executing court
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A decree passed by a court lacking inherent jurisdiction over the subject matter is a nullity and its validity can be challenged even at the stage of execution, so the objection can be raised for the first time in the executing court.
In a money suit the court granted interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree. The decree is silent about payment of further interest on principal sum from the date of decree to the date of payment. In such an event
- afurther interest can be granted at the rate of 12% per annum in the execution petition
- bfurther interest can be granted at the rate of 6% per annum in the execution petition
- cno such further interest can be granted as the court shall be deemed to have refused such further interest
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 34(2) CPC provides that where a decree is silent as to further interest from the date of decree to date of payment, the court shall be deemed to have refused such interest and no separate suit lies; hence no further interest can be granted in execution.
After pronouncing judgment the court found that there are some clerical and arithmetical mistakes
- ait cannot correct them and they can be corrected by appellate court only
- bit can correct if both parties agree for such correction
- cit can correct on its own without notice to the parties
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 152 CPC, clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees or orders may be corrected by the court at any time on its own motion (suo motu), without notice to the parties.
What is meaning of expression ‘indigent’?
- amade in India
- ba liberal and carefree person
- cdishonest person
- dpauper
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
'Indigent person' under Order 33 CPC is the modern term for a 'pauper' - one without sufficient means to pay the prescribed court fee.
A suit is filed against ‘A’ and his sons, daughters and wife for declaration of ownership of plaintiff and permanent injunction. ‘A’ dies pending suit. No application is filed for setting aside abatement and for substitution. Whether the suit abates?
- ano
- byes
- cno, if the Court passes order for addition of State
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Where the deceased defendant's legal representatives (sons, daughters, wife) are already on record as co-defendants, the suit does not abate; the surviving co-defendants who are LRs represent the estate (Order 22 Rule 4 CPC).
Application under Order 6, Rule 17 C.P.C., for amendment of written statement to withdraw admissions of plaintiff’s claim. Whether permissible?
- ayes
- bno
- cno, beyond 30 days from the date of filing of written statement
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Amendment of a written statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to withdraw or explain an earlier admission is permissible, as the proviso barring inconsistent pleadings is applied liberally to written statements (Modi Spinning v. Ladha Ram principle relaxed in later cases).
On completion of investigation, the officer incharge of a police station shall forward the police report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., to:
- aSessions Court
- bHigh Court
- cDistrict Collector
- dMagistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 173(2) CrPC, on completion of investigation the officer in charge forwards the police report to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence.
In the absence of a special order of a Magistrate, no police officer shall detain in custody a person arrested without warrant for a period exceeding hours, exclusive of the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the Court of the Magistrate.
- a12 hours
- b24 hours
- c36 hours
- d48 hours
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 57 CrPC (and Article 22(2) of the Constitution) prohibits detention of an arrested person beyond 24 hours without a Magistrate's special order, exclusive of journey time.
Under Section 125 Cr.P.C., a Magistrate can order a person to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of:
- ahis married daughter who has attained majority
- bhis brother
- chis sister
- dhis father
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 125 CrPC permits a maintenance order for a wife, minor/disabled children, and parents (father or mother); among the options only the father qualifies.
Maximum sentence prescribed for offences in a summons case is:
- atwo years
- bone year
- cthree years
- dfive years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A summons case under Section 2(w) CrPC is one not being a warrant case, i.e., an offence punishable with imprisonment not exceeding two years; thus the maximum sentence is two years.
Amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure can be made
- aby Parliament
- bby State Legislature
- cby both
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Criminal Procedure is in the Concurrent List (Entry 2, List III, 7th Schedule), so both Parliament and State Legislatures can amend the CrPC.
Cognizable offence means
- aoffence of serious nature
- bnon bailable offence
- cbailable offence
- dan offence where police officer may arrest without warrant
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 2(c) CrPC, a cognizable offence is one for which a police officer may arrest without a warrant.
In a complaint to the Magistrate
- aname of the accused shall be mentioned
- bname of the accused need not be mentioned
- cname of the accused need not be mentioned if the descriptive particulars of the accused are given
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A complaint need not name the accused if descriptive particulars sufficient to identify the accused are furnished; a complaint can be made against an unknown person.
Police report under the Code of Criminal Procedure means
- areport given to the police
- bcomplaint
- ccharge sheet
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
'Police report' under Section 2(r) CrPC means the report forwarded by a police officer to a Magistrate under Section 173(2), i.e., the charge sheet.
At the stage of consideration for application for discharge can the accused
- ahe has a right to summon
- bhe has no right to summon
- che can exercise such right with the permission of the court
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
At the stage of considering an application for discharge, the accused has no right to summon or produce his own evidence; the court considers only the record and documents under Sections 227/239 CrPC.
The investigating officer while recording statement of a witness under section 162 Cr.P.C.,
- ashall obtain the signature of the witness
- bshall not obtain the signature of the witness
- cit is left to the discretion of the Investigating Officer
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 162 CrPC expressly provides that statements recorded during investigation shall not be signed by the person making them; the IO shall not obtain the witness's signature.
After taking cognizance the Magistrate issued process to the accused
- ahe can reconsider his decision
- bhe has no power to reconsider his decision
- cin exceptional circumstances he can reconsider his decision
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Once a Magistrate has taken cognizance and issued process to the accused, he has no power to recall or review that order, as the CrPC confers no power of review on a criminal court (Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal).
An “admission” can be used against
- aa witness
- bparty who makes it
- copposite party
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 21 of the Indian Evidence Act, admissions are relevant and may be proved against the person who makes them (the party making it), not in his own favour (subject to exceptions).
Evidence of hostile witness
- acannot be taken into consideration for any purpose
- bit can be relied on by the prosecution
- cit can be relied on by the defence
- dit can be relief on by the prosecution as well as the defence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The evidence of a hostile witness is not wholly effaced; the portion that is creditworthy can be relied upon by both the prosecution and the defence.
Motive becomes more relevant in a case based on
- adirect evidence
- bcircumstantial evidence
- cdirect and circumstantial evidence
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Motive assumes greater significance in cases resting on circumstantial evidence, where it forms an important link in the chain, whereas in direct-evidence cases proof of motive is less material.
In an application seeking bail in a non-bailable offence
- anotice to the prosecution is not necessary
- bnotice is mandatory
- cnotice is mandatory only when the provision relating to the offence alleged so requires
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Notice to the Public Prosecutor before granting bail in a non-bailable offence is required only where the relevant provision (e.g., the proviso to Section 439(1)/Section 437A or special statutes) so mandates; it is not a general mandatory requirement.
Which of the statements is correct?
- aa related witness is unreliable
- ba related witness is reliable
- cevidence of related witness shall be subjected to strict scrutiny
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A related (interested) witness is not per se unreliable; the settled rule is that such evidence must be subjected to careful/strict scrutiny before being acted upon.
When the evidence is improperly admitted or rejected at the trial
- ait shall be ground for new trial
- bit shall not be ground for new trial
- cit shall be ground for new trial, when there was no sufficient evidence, other than the evidence which was objected to
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 167 of the Evidence Act, improper admission or rejection of evidence is not a ground for new trial if there was other sufficient evidence; it becomes a ground only where the rejected/admitted evidence was decisive and no other sufficient evidence existed.
In a criminal case, previous good character is
- anot relevant
- brelevant
- crelevant in rare cases
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 53 of the Indian Evidence Act, in criminal proceedings the fact that the accused is of good character is relevant.
Evidentiary value of report of handwriting expert?
- aconclusive
- bopinion subject to acceptance by court
- cnil, since irrelevant
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A handwriting expert's report under Section 45 of the Evidence Act is only an opinion; it is not conclusive and is subject to acceptance and corroboration by the court.
Rule 5 of the Criminal Rules of Practice enables cases relating to Juvenile Offenders and women to be tried:
- ain camera
- bopen court house
- cmobile courts
- dall the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Rule 5(3) of the AP Criminal Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1990 provides that cases relating to Juvenile Offenders and Women may be tried in camera.
Effect of death of the sole defendant in a money suit in between the date of conclusion of the hearing and that of the pronouncement of the judgment:
- asuit abates
- bsuit does not abate, judgment can be pronounced
- cjudgment cannot be pronounced, re-hearing of the suit
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Order 22 Rule 6 CPC, where a party dies between the conclusion of the hearing and the pronouncement of judgment, there is no abatement and judgment may be pronounced notwithstanding the death.
Practise Andhra Pradesh Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Andhra Pradesh Judiciary preparation guide.