Andhra Pradesh Judiciary — Prelims 2016
Two persons are within the degree of prohibited relationships, if they are related by
- aFull Blood
- bHalf or Uterine Blood
- cAdoption
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 3(g) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, two persons are within the degrees of prohibited relationship if related by full blood, half or uterine blood, or by adoption (and certain other categories). Hence all the above.
A contracts to pay B Rs,10,000/*, if B's house is burnt. This is
- aVoid contract
- bContingent contract
- cWager
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A promise to pay on the happening of an uncertain future event collateral to the contract (B's house being burnt) is a contingent contract under Section 31 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872; this is the textbook illustration of insurance/contingency, not a wager.
Abetting the commission of suicide is dealt with under
- aSection 306 IPC
- bSection 307 IPC
- cSection 308 IPC
- dSection 309 IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Abetment of suicide is punishable under Section 306 IPC. Section 307 is attempt to murder, 308 is attempt to culpable homicide, and 309 is attempt to commit suicide.
Section 75 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with
- aPrimary evidence
- bSecondary evidence
- cPublic document
- dPrivate document
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 defines public documents, and Section 75 provides that all other documents are private documents.
Admission is defined in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in
- aSection 16
- bSection 17
- cSection 18
- dSection 20
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Admission is defined in Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as a statement (oral, documentary or electronic) which suggests an inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact.
An Executive Magistrate is empowered to grant remand u/s 167 of the Cr.P.C., for a maximum period of
- a15 days
- b7 days
- c30 days
- d90 days
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 167(2)(b) Cr.P.C., an Executive Magistrate may authorise detention/remand for a term not exceeding seven days in the aggregate.
"A" and "B" jointly sued "C" for Rs.20,000/-. Whether "C" can set off for the debt due to him by "A" alone ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cNeither (a) nor (b)
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Order VIII Rule 6 CPC, a set-off requires mutuality—the debt must be due from all the plaintiffs to the defendant. Since the debt is due from A alone, C cannot set it off against a joint suit by A and B.
"A" makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box, but finds no jewels inside the box after it is opened. Which is the provision of law, under which, he may be held guilty ?
- aSection 511 IPC
- bSection 420 IPC
- cSection 379 IPC
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Attempting theft from an empty box is the classic illustration to Section 511 IPC (attempt to commit an offence)—the act constitutes a punishable attempt even though theft was factually impossible.
The act of a child under years of age is not an offence
- a5
- b7
- c14
- d18
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 82 IPC, nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age.
What will be the effect of mistake as to law in force on the agreement
- aNot voidable
- bVoidable
- cVoid
- dNot void
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 21 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract is not voidable because it was caused by a mistake as to any law in force in India (mistake of Indian law is no excuse).
In which of the following cases, the Spreme Court held that marriages of all persons should be made compulsorily registrable ?
- aseema Vs. Ashwinikumar
- bGieeta Jagdish Vs. Jagdish
- cDurga Tripati Vs. Arundati Tripati
- dFlamesh Chand Vs. Rameshwari Bai
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In Seema v. Ashwani Kumar (AIR 2006 SC 1158), the Supreme Court directed that marriages of all persons who are citizens of India belonging to various religions should be made compulsorily registrable in their respective States.
A marriage under the Hindu Marriages Act must be solemnized in accordance with customary rights of
- athe bride
- bthe bridegroom
- cboth the bride and the bridegroom
- deither the bride or the bridegroom
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 7(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a Hindu marriage may be solemnized in accordance with the customary rites and ceremonies of either party thereto.
robbery is dacoity when the minimum number of persons involved is
- a10
- b5
- c3
- d2
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 391 IPC, robbery is dacoity when committed by five or more persons conjointly; thus the minimum number is five.
Easernent is a right
- ain Rem
- bin Personam
- cNeither (a) nor (b)
- dsometimes in Rem and sometimes in Personam
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An easement is a right in rem—a real right annexed to the dominant tenement and available against the world, not merely against a specific person.
The expression "good faith" in Sec. 51 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is used in the light of
- athe Sale of Goods Act, 1930
- bthe General Clauses Act, 1897
- cthe Registration Act, 1908
- dthe Specific Relief Act, 1963
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 51 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, 'good faith' is understood in the sense given by the General Clauses Act, 1897, i.e. honestly, whether negligently or not.
Secondary evidence of a document under the Indian Evidence Act means
- acopy of the document
- boral account of the contents of the document
- cboth (a) and (b)
- dOnly (a) and not (b)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 63 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, secondary evidence includes both certified/other copies of a document and oral accounts of the contents given by a person who has himself seen it.
A co-defendant in a case
- acannot be cross examined by another co-defendant in any circumstance
- bcan be cross examined by another co-defendant
- ccan be cross examined by another co-defendant when their interests are adverse to each other
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A co-defendant may be cross-examined by another co-defendant only where their interests are adverse to each other; absent adverse interest there is no right of cross-examination.
The remedies available against an ex parte decree is
- aAppeal
- bReview
- capplication to set aside
- dall the three
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Against an ex parte decree the defendant has three remedies: appeal (Section 96), review (Order XLVII), and an application to set aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC—hence all three.
Rescission cannot be granted-------
- aWhere restitution to the original position not possible
- bWhere the contract stands ratified
- cIn severable contracts
- din all the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, rescission may be refused where the plaintiff has ratified the contract, where parties cannot be restored to their original position, or where third-party rights/severable contracts make it inequitable—hence in all the above situations.
Where there is a conflict between marshalling and contribution, Sec.82 of the Transfer of Property Act provides that
- aContribution prevails
- bMarshalling prevails
- cSubrogation prevails
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The proviso to Section 82 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 provides that where there is a conflict between marshalling and contribution, the rule of marshalling prevails.
An agreement not supported by consideration is called
- aNudum Pactum
- bConsensus Ad Idem
- cQuid Pro Quo
- dNoscitur A Sociis
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An agreement made without consideration is a 'nudum pactum' (a bare or naked promise), which is generally void under Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
For his commission or remuneration, an agent has a
- aGeneral lien
- bParticular lien
- cNo lien at all
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 221 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agent has a particular lien over the goods/property of the principal in his possession for his commission, remuneration and disbursements; he has no general lien absent contract.
A time barred debt can be claimed as
- aCounter claim
- bFresh suit
- cSet off
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A time-barred debt cannot be the subject of a fresh suit, but it can be pleaded by way of set-off (it bars the remedy, not the debt itself), as recognised under Order VIII Rule 6 CPC.
The offence of conspiracy is complete as soon as the parties have agreed to do an illegal act. This is
- aTrue
- bPartly True
- cFALSE
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 120A IPC, criminal conspiracy is complete the moment two or more persons agree to do an illegal act (or a legal act by illegal means); no overt act is needed except for conspiracies other than to commit an offence. The statement is True.
How many types of punishments are prescribed in the 1PC
- a3
- b4
- c5
- d6
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 53 IPC prescribes five kinds of punishment: death, imprisonment for life, imprisonment (rigorous or simple), forfeiture of property, and fine.
The use of force by itself wjll not convert the theft into robbery. This is___
- aTrue
- bPartly True
- cFALSE
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 390 IPC, theft becomes robbery only if force/fear is used 'for that end' (to commit the theft); mere use of force unconnected to the theft does not convert it, so the statement is True.
The Protection Officer under the Domestic Violence Act works under the control and supervision of the
- aDistrict Collector
- bFamily Court
- cMagistrate
- dState Government
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Sections 8-9 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Protection Officers are appointed by and function under the control and supervision of the Magistrate, who exercises jurisdiction over their duties.
The burden of proof as to ownership under the Indian Evidence Act lies on
- athe owner
- bthe tenant
- cthe person who asserts it
- dIn all these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Sections 101-103 of the Indian Evidence Act, the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts the affirmative of an issue (e.g., one who asserts ownership), not on ownership/tenancy status per se.
An appeal under the AP Land Encroachment Act shall be made ordinarily before the expiry of
- a30 days of the date of the order
- b60 days of the date of the order
- c90 days of the date of the order
- d120 days of the date of the order
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 10 read with the limitation in the AP/Telangana Land Encroachment Act, 1905, an appeal shall not be brought after the expiration of 60 days from the date of the order complained of.
Threat to commit suicide is___
- aCoercion
- bUndue influence
- cMisrepresentation
- dIntimidation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act, a threat to commit suicide amounts to coercion, as held in Chikham Ammiraju v. Chikham Seshamma (1917).
Assault can be caused by
- aMere words
- bMere gestures
- cMere preparations
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 351 IPC, assault is constituted by a gesture or preparation intending/knowing it will cause apprehension of criminal force; mere words by themselves do not amount to assault, so it is caused by gestures.
Where consent to an agreement is caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation, the contract Is____
- aValid
- bVoidable at the option of the party, whose consent was so caused
- cVoid Ab Initio
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 19 of the Indian Contract Act, where consent is caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation, the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.
The transfer of property pending suit is hit by the
- aDoctrine of lis pendens
- bDoctrine of sub judice
- cDoctrine of subrosa
- dDoctrine of res judicata
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Transfer of property during the pendency of a suit is hit by the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Which of the following is not a decree ?
- aRejection of a plaint
- bDismissal for default
- cBoth (a) and (b)
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 2(2) CPC, rejection of a plaint is expressly deemed a decree, whereas dismissal for default (Order IX) is not a decree; hence dismissal for default is not a decree.
Does a party to the suit have a right to summon the opposite party to give evidence ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cNone of the above
- d____
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; under Order XVI CPC a party is entitled to summon the opposite party as a witness to give evidence (subject to the court's process), so the answer is Yes.
Can the Court examine witnesses before framing of issues ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cNever
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; under Order XIV Rule 4 CPC the Court may, before framing issues, examine any person able to throw light on the matter or order production of documents, so it can examine witnesses before framing issues.
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that delay in Pronouncing the judgment amounts to denial of justice?
- aSurendra Singh Vs. State of UP
- bAnil Rai Vs. State of Bihar
- cState of UP Vs. Chandra Bhushan
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In Anil Rai v. State of Bihar (2001), the Supreme Court held that inordinate delay in pronouncing a reserved judgment amounts to denial of justice and laid down guidelines on timely pronouncement.
Can the Court allow the party to summon a witness, whose name is not included in the witness list ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cNever
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; the Court has discretion to permit a party to summon a witness even if the name is not in the list, in the interest of justice, so the answer is Yes.
Normally, the plaintiff, who succeeds, would be entitled to mesne profits for the period of__
- aone year
- btwo years
- cthree years
- dfour years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Order XX Rule 12 CPC, mesne profits inquiry runs only up to the expiration of three years from the date of the decree (whichever event first occurs), so a successful plaintiff is normally entitled for three years.
Whether in suit for specific performance, a third party to contract claiming independent title and possession is entitled to add as party to suit to adjudicate his case ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cSometimes
- d(a) and ©
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
No; in a suit for specific performance, a third party claiming independent title and possession is not a necessary or proper party, as his rights are not adjudicated in that suit (Kasturi v. Iyyamperumal, 2005).
After the Prliminary decree, whether The party is entitled to raise a fresh plea In the appeal filed against the final decree ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
No; once a preliminary decree is passed and not appealed, it becomes final on the matters decided, and a fresh plea on those matters cannot be raised in the appeal against the final decree.
Whether the Court has power to extend the time granted for the performance of any act after the time granted by it had expired under Section 148, CPC ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; under Section 148 CPC the Court may enlarge the time for doing any act even after the originally fixed period has expired (Mahanth Ram Das v. Ganga Das).
Whether the widow of the deceased Hindu is entitled to claim a share in the deceased husband's property after the remarriage
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; the widow's share vests in her on the husband's death under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and that vested right is not divested by her subsequent remarriage.
Can a plaint be amended after the suit has been disposed of, by invoking Sections 152 and 153, CPC ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cNone of the above
- d___
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
No; Sections 152 and 153 CPC permit only correction of clerical/arithmetical or accidental errors, not amendment of a plaint after the suit has been finally disposed of.
Is it permissible for the Court to pass more than one preliminary decree ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; the Court may pass more than one preliminary decree, especially in partition suits, as held in Phoolchand v. Gopal Lal (1967).
Limitation for filing an application u/s 152 and 153 of CPC ?
- aOne year
- bTwo year
- cThree year
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
No limitation period is prescribed for an application under Sections 152/153 CPC, which can be made 'at any time'; hence none of the stated one/two/three-year periods applies.
Whether a party could be allowed to withdraw an admission made in the pleadings by way of amendment ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; courts may permit a party to withdraw or explain an admission made in pleadings by way of amendment in appropriate cases, the question of bona fides being addressed at trial (Akshaya Restaurant; Modi Spinning v. Ladha Ram).
The remedy of the plaintiff when the plaint is rejected
- aTo file a revision
- bto file a review
- cto file an appeal
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Since rejection of a plaint is a decree under Section 2(2) CPC, the plaintiff's remedy against rejection is to file an appeal.
Whether the interim order passed in a suit that was dismissed for default will revive after the suit is restored ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Yes; on restoration of a suit dismissed for default, the suit is restored to its original position and interim orders passed therein stand revived.
The Court can issue warrant for the arrest of the defendant to ensure his appearance under Section____of CPC
- a95
- b94
- c94(a)
- dOrder V Rule 1 CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 94(a) CPC (supplemental proceedings), the Court may issue a warrant to arrest the defendant and bring him before the Court to ensure his appearance/secure his presence.
The suit for damages for breach of act can be filed at the place__
- awhere contract was executed
- b'where the plaintiff resides
- cwhere the contract was to be performed
- dboth (a) and (b)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A suit for damages for breach of contract lies where the contract was to be performed, as part of the cause of action arises there (Section 20 CPC; place of performance).
In which of the following situations, the Court can grant exemption to the plaintiff from the necessity to substitute the legal representative of any defendant who died during the pendency of the suit and proceed to pronounce the judgment ?
- athe defendant has remained ex parte
- bthe defendant has failed to file written statement
- cthe defendant having filed the written statement, has failed to appear and contest at the hearing
- dall the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Order XXII Rule 4(4) CPC, the Court may exempt the plaintiff from substituting the LR of a defendant who failed to file a written statement, or having filed one failed to appear and contest, and pronounce judgment notwithstanding his death; all listed situations qualify.
Which of the following can exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court ?
- aset off
- bcounter claim
- cboth (a) and (b)
- dNeither (a) nor (b)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Neither a set-off (Order VIII Rule 6) nor a counter-claim (Order VIII Rule 6A) can exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court, so neither (a) nor (b).
U/S 10 of CPC, the earlier suit is liable to be
- aStayed
- bDismissed
- cRejected
- dNeither (a) nor (b) nor ©
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 10 CPC (res sub judice), it is the subsequently instituted suit that is stayed; the earlier/previously instituted suit proceeds and is neither stayed, dismissed nor rejected.
A counter claim can be set up in
- aMoney suits only
- bSuits for recovery of damages only
- cAll suits
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC a counter-claim may be set up in respect of any cause of action accruing to the defendant, and is not confined to money suits; it can be raised in all suits.
The guidelines regarding the arrest in cognizable offences punishable upto 7 years were issued by the Supreme Court in___
- aSania Vs. Ram Singh
- bKumar (a) Jaikumar Vs. State of TN
- cArnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar
- dSekar Vs. State
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) issued guidelines (read with Sections 41 and 41A CrPC) restraining mechanical arrest in cognizable offences punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years.
Imprisonment in execution of a decree is
- arigorous imprisonment
- bsimple imprisonment
- ceither (a) or (b)
- dNeither (a) nor (b)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Detention in civil prison in execution of a decree (Order XXI CPC) is in the nature of simple imprisonment, not rigorous imprisonment which is a criminal sentence.
Right of private defence is available
- aagainst all members of an unlawful assembly
- bwhen a reasonable apprehension of the danger to the body arises from an attempt
- cthreat to commit an offence though offence might not have been committed
- dall the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Sections 96-106 IPC the right of private defence extends to all members of an unlawful assembly, arises on reasonable apprehension of danger from an attempt or threat, and exists even though the offence may not be completed; all the above.
Withdrawal of suits is governed by
- aOrder XXIII Rule 1 of CPC
- bOrder XXIII Rule 3 of CPC
- c(a) and (b)
- dOrder XXIII Rule 3(A) of CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Withdrawal of suits (with or without leave to file a fresh suit) is governed by Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC; Rule 3 deals with compromise of suits.
Order passed under Order XXI Rule 97 by the Executing Court is
- aAppealable
- bRevisable
- cReviewable
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An order adjudicating an application under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC is, by Order XXI Rule 103, to be treated as a decree and is therefore appealable.
In the law of evidence, "fact" means and Includes
- aanything perceived by the senses
- bstate of things capable of being perceived by the senses
- cmental condition of a person of which, a person is conscious
- dall the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 'fact' includes anything capable of being perceived by the senses, any state of things so perceptible, and any mental condition of which a person is conscious; all the above.
X is accused of an offence of rape. He can be subjected to the following tests for investigation :
- aPolygraph test
- bNarco analysis test
- cBrain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test
- dNone
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Per Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010), narco-analysis, polygraph and BEAP tests cannot be involuntarily administered to an accused; without consent none of these tests may be used, so 'None'.
Which of the following charges cannot be compounded without permission of The Court, before which, the prosecution Is pending?
- aSection 298 of IPC
- bSection 426 of IPC
- cSection 491 of IPC
- dSection 338 of IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 491 IPC is compoundable only with the Court's permission under Table 2 of Section 320 CrPC; however Section 338 IPC (option d) is likewise compoundable only with permission, making the question ambiguous between (c) and (d).
A includes voluntary sexual intercourse with B, a married woman, without the consent of her husband. He is guilty of adultery. The married woman B is liable to be tried with A as an
- aAbettor
- bAdulteress
- cjointly as co-accused
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under the former Section 497 IPC (read with Section 198 CrPC), the wife was expressly not punishable even as an abettor of adultery, so she could not be tried with the man; none of the above.
A person accused of an offence before a Criminal Court can be called upon to give evidence on oath
- aupon a request in writing from the Public Prosecutor
- bby an application made by the complainant
- cby a direction of the Court
- dby the accused, on his own request in writing
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 315 CrPC an accused may be a competent witness for the defence and give evidence on oath only on his own written request; he cannot be compelled at the instance of the prosecution or court.
Section 34 of the IPC
- acreates a substantive offence
- bintroduces the principle of vicarious liability for an offence committed by the co-accused
- crecognises that the co-participant in a crime must be made liable for his act in the commission of the crime by the co-accused
- dboth (b) and ©
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 34 IPC is not a substantive offence but a rule of evidence embodying constructive/joint liability where a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention; both (b) and (c).
Test Identification parade pertains to the field of
- aInvestigation
- bTrial
- csatisfaction of the Investigating Officer that he is proceeding in the right direction
- da and c
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A Test Identification Parade is held during the investigation stage to test the investigation and is not substantive evidence; it pertains to the field of investigation.
Which of the following Criminal Minor Acts was amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013?
- aThe Immoral Traffic Act
- bThe Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000
- cThe Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
- dCriminal Procedure Code
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Among the special/minor Acts listed, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 amended the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Section 42/42A), besides the IPC, CrPC and Evidence Act.
Which of the following Acts is passed on the Supreme Court guidelines?
- aThe Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
- bThe Sexual Harassment of Women at Work Place Act, 2013
- cJuvenile Justice Act, 2000
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 was enacted to give statutory shape to the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan.
Which of the following new offences are introduced in the IPC by the Criminal Law (Amendment), 2013 ?
- aStalking
- bVoyeurism
- cAcid Attack
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 introduced into the IPC new offences of stalking (S.354D), voyeurism (S.354C) and acid attack (Ss.326A/326B); all the above.
Which of the following new section is inserted by the criminal law (Amendment) Act, 2013
- aSection 354 A of the IPC
- bSection 326 A of the IPC
- cSection 370 A of the IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 354A IPC (sexual harassment); Sections 326A and 370A were also inserted, but among the listed options 354A is a section newly introduced by the 2013 Act.
In which of the following cases, is a preliminary enquiry permitted by the supreme court in the Latha Kumari Judgment?
- amatrimonial disputes or family disputes
- bcommercial offences
- cmedical negligence cases
- dall the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. (2014) the Supreme Court illustratively listed matrimonial/family disputes, commercial offences and medical negligence cases as categories where a preliminary inquiry may be made; all the above.
In which of the following Judgments, has the Supreme Court ruled that the victim of a bigamous marriage Is entitled to maintenance ?
- aPinakin Mahipatray Rawl Vs. State of Gujarat
- bBadshah Vs.Sou. urmila Badshah godse
- cIndra sharma vs. V.K.V. Sharma
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In Badshah v. Sou. Urmila Badshah Godse (2014) the Supreme Court held that a woman deceived into a bigamous marriage by concealment of the first marriage is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.
The guidelines regarding the arrest of Judicial Officers by the Police were issued by the Supreme Court In
- aJoginder Kumar Vs. State of UP
- bM.C.Abraham Vs. State of Maharashtra
- dDelhi Judicial Services Association Vs. State of Gujarat
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Supreme Court issued guidelines on the arrest of judicial officers by the police in Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of Gujarat (1991).
What Is the maximum period of remand, which can be ordered under Sec. 309(2) of the Cr.P.C. ?
- a30 days
- b60 days
- c90 days
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The proviso to Section 309(2) CrPC bars remand to custody under that section for a term exceeding fifteen days at a time; since 15 days is not among the listed options, the answer is None of the above.
The right of private defence of property against robbery continues
- aas long as the offender causes or attempts
- bto cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint
- c(a) and (b)
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 105 IPC, the right of private defence of property against robbery continues as long as the offender causes or attempts to cause death, hurt or wrongful restraint, so both (a) and (b) together state the rule.
The common object of unlawful assembly can be gathered from
- anature of assembly
- bweapons used
- cthe behaviour of the assembly on or before the occurrence
- dall of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Common object of an unlawful assembly (Section 141/149 IPC) is inferred from the nature of the assembly, the weapons used, and the behaviour of members before or at the occurrence — all of the above.
Section 149 of IPC is a
- arule of evidence
- bspecific offence
- cdefinition clause
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 149 IPC creates no independent offence; it is a rule of constructive/vicarious liability and is treated as a rule of evidence, the act of one member being attributed to all in furtherance of the common object.
In the absence of substantive evidence,
- aCorroborative evidence can be used
- bCorroborative evidence has no worth
- cCorroborative evidence may be or may not be used as per the discretion of the Court
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Corroborative evidence only lends support to substantive evidence; in the absence of substantive evidence to corroborate, corroborative evidence has no independent worth.
Answers given by the accused U/S 313 of the Cr.P.C. are
- aEvidence
- bnot evidence
- cPresumptions
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Statements of the accused recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. are not evidence (not given on oath, not tested by cross-examination); they are only used to enable the court to appreciate the evidence and put incriminating material to the accused.
To the Rule of res gestae is applicable to
- acivil cases only
- bcriminal cases only
- ccivil as well as criminal cases
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Res gestae (Section 6 of the Evidence Act) applies to both civil and criminal cases, as facts forming part of the same transaction are relevant irrespective of the nature of the proceeding.
conduct of an accused is____
- aNot relevant against him
- bRelevant against the co-accused
- cNot relevant against the co-accused
- d___
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Conduct of an accused under Section 8 of the Evidence Act is relevant against himself but, by itself, is not relevant against a co-accused.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court issued guidelines to prevent acid attacks ?
- aLaxmi Vs. Union of India
- bPUCL Vs. Union of India
- cSakshi Vs. Union of India
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In Laxmi v. Union of India (2013), the Supreme Court issued guidelines regulating the retail sale of acid and granting compensation to acid-attack victims.
A bargain where one party agrees to assist another in recovering property and to share in the proceeds of the action is called
- aaccord and satisfaction
- bWager and betting
- cChamperty
- dConsideration
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A bargain to assist another in recovering property in return for a share of the proceeds is champerty (a champertous agreement).
In a lease of immovable property, what is transferred is
- aright to enjoy the property
- bmere possession alone
- cinterest in the property
- dmesne profits
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, a lease transfers a right to enjoy the immovable property for a term in consideration of rent/premium.
Caveat venditor means
- aseller beware
- bbuyer beware
- clet the parties beware
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Caveat venditor literally means 'let the seller beware'.
Handing over the keys of the godown where the goods are stored is
- aconstructive delivery
- bsymbolic delivery
- cactual delivery
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Handing over the keys of a godown where goods are stored is symbolic delivery of those goods.
What is transferred in a mortgage is
- aOwnership
- bPossession
- cinterest
- d|right
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A mortgage (Section 58 TPA) transfers only an interest in the immovable property by way of security; ownership/possession is not necessarily transferred.
The principle of qua timet means
- asome past injury to the rights or interests of a person
- bsome future probable injury to the rights or interests of a person
- csome small injury not capable of valuation
- dsome small injury incapable of valuation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A quia timet action is brought in anticipation of some future probable injury to the rights or interests of a person before the wrong is actually committed.
U/S 13 of CPC, a foreign judgement can [be challenged on the grounds of
- acompetency of the court pronouncing the judgement
- bbeing obtained by fraud
- csustaining a claim founded on a breach of law in force in India
- d-all the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 13 CPC a foreign judgment is not conclusive (and can be challenged) where the court lacked competence, where it was obtained by fraud, or where it sustains a claim founded on a breach of any law in force in India — all the above.
the maxim 'Res-ipsa Loquitur' is
- arule of law
- brule of procedure
- crule of evidence
- drule of negligence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Res ipsa loquitur ('the thing speaks for itself') is a rule of evidence raising a presumption of negligence and shifting the evidential burden to the defendant.
Judgement on admission can be given
- aunder Order XII Rule 8 of CPC
- bunder Order XII Rule 6 of CPC
- cunder Order XII Rule 4 of CPC
- dunder Order XII Rule 2 of CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Judgment on admissions can be pronounced under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Compensatory costs under Section 35A of CPC can be imposed to the extent of
- aRs.3,000/-
- bRs.5,000/-
- cRs.10,000/-
- dwithout any limit
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Compensatory costs for false or vexatious claims/defences under Section 35A CPC are capped at Rs. 3,000 (or the limits of the court's pecuniary jurisdiction, whichever is less).
An admission constitutes a
- aSubstantive piece of evidence
- bCorroborative piece of evidence
- cConclusive proof
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An admission (Sections 17-21 Evidence Act) is a substantive piece of evidence, though not conclusive proof and rebuttable by the maker.
A caricature is a document within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act
- aTrue
- bNot True
- cPartly true
- dTrue in some conditions
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A caricature is a document within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act, as 'document' includes any matter expressed or described by means of marks/figures intended to be used for recording that matter — True.
Conditions when hearsay evidence may be admissible.
- awhen contemporaneous
- bwhen there is no interval enabling fabrication
- cboth (a) and (b)
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Hearsay is admissible where the statement is contemporaneous with the fact (part of res gestae, Section 6) and where there was no interval allowing fabrication — both (a) and (b).
After murder, the accused surrenders to the police with the severed head and gives confession. His conduct is relevant under Section
- a10 of the Evidence Act
- b8 of the Evidence Act
- c7 of the Evidence Act
- d11 of the Evidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The accused surrendering with the severed head and confessing is subsequent 'conduct', which is relevant under Section 8 of the Evidence Act.
Test Identification Parade conducted during investigation is relevant under Section
- a6 of the Evidence Act
- b8 of the Evidence Act
- cboth (a) and (b)
- d9 of the Evidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A Test Identification Parade conducted during investigation is relevant under Section 9 of the Evidence Act (facts establishing identity).
Extra judicial confession can be given before
- athe Investigating Officer
- bthe Judicial Magistrate
- ca police officer other than the Investigating Officer
- dVillage Administrative Officer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
An extra-judicial confession is one made to any private person and not to a magistrate or police officer; of the options, the Village Administrative Officer is such a private person.
An injunction cannot be granted when the plaintiff has no personal interest in the matter
- aTrue
- bFalse
- cPartly true
- dTrue under certain circumstances
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An injunction protects a legal right of the plaintiff; where the plaintiff has no personal interest in the matter, an injunction cannot be granted — True.
Practise Andhra Pradesh Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Andhra Pradesh Judiciary preparation guide.