Assam Judiciary — Prelims 2023
SECRET:CLANDESTINE
- aOvert:Furtive
- bCovert:Stealthy
- cOpen:Closed
- dNews:Rumour
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
SECRET:CLANDESTINE are synonyms (both meaning hidden/concealed). Covert:Stealthy is the analogous synonym pair; both mean secret/furtive.
MALAPROPISM:WORDS
- aAnachronism:-Time
- bEllipsis: Sentence
- cJinja Anthropism:Apes
- dCatechism : Religion In each question three words in bold letters are given which have something in common among themselves. Out of the four given alternatives, choose the most appropriate description about these three words:
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A malapropism is a comic misuse of WORDS; analogously an anachronism is a misplacement in TIME. The relation (an error of category X) matches Anachronism:Time best.
India: Pakistan Bangladesh
- aJapan:China:Turkey
- bSri Lanka:Japan:India
- cIraq:Kuwait:Iran
- dCanada:California:Mexico
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
India is flanked by its neighbours Pakistan and Bangladesh (a central country with two bordering nations). Iraq:Kuwait:Iran mirrors this geographic-neighbour relationship most accurately.
Smile:Laugh:Cry
- aSit:Seep:Play
- bFrown:Anger:Temper
- cMorning:Night:Day
- dTouch:Catch:Release Choose the words similar to its meaning
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Smile:Laugh:Cry progresses through degrees/expressions of emotion. Frown:Anger:Temper similarly captures escalating emotional expression.
Calumniate:
- aTo accuse falsely
- bTo accuse truthfully
- cTo denounce
- dTo ditch
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
To 'calumniate' means to make false and defamatory statements about someone, i.e. to accuse falsely / slander.
COALESCE:
- aAssociate
- bConspire
- cCombine
- dCover Choose the words opposite to its meaning
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The instruction is to choose the opposite. 'Coalesce' means to combine/unite; its antonym among the choices is 'Cover' (the others are near-synonyms), or more aptly to separate—'Cover' is the intended opposite key.
Amiably:
- aSoft
- bAddicted
- cHateful
- dLovable
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
'Amiably' means in a friendly, agreeable manner; its opposite is 'Hateful'.
Adge:
- aMotto
- bHarangue
- cProverb
- dZenith
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'Adage' is a short well-known saying or maxim; among the options 'Motto' (a short maxim/saying) is the closest synonym, while proverb is also close but motto/adage best match as a pithy saying.
One who is not easily pleased by anything:
- aMaiden
- bPessimist
- cVulnerable
- dFastidious
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
'Fastidious' describes one who is very hard to please and excessively attentive to detail.
A group of three powerful people:
- aTrio
- bTritium
- cTrivet
- dTriumvirate GENERAL KNOWLEDGE
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A 'triumvirate' is a group of three powerful people who jointly hold authority.
After it was approved by the Assembly, the copies of the Constitution were photolithographed in dehradun by which Government body?
- aSurvey of India
- bMinistry of Culture
- cMinistry of Law and justice
- dMinistry of Home Affairs
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The handwritten Constitution was photolithographed (reproduced) at the Survey of India offices in Dehradun, which printed 1,000 copies.
Pragyan rover of the Chandrayaan 3 mission, has confirmed the presence of which element on the moon’s surface?
- aPotassium
- bChlorine
- cSulphur
- dSodium
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Chandrayaan-3's Pragyan rover, via its LIBS instrument, confirmed the presence of sulphur on the lunar surface near the south pole (Aug 2023).
As per the J&K Reorganisation Bill passed, who has the authority to appoint two Kashmiri migrants to the legislative assembly?
- aPrime Minister
- bLieutenant Governor
- cVice President
- dDGP of J&K
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under the J&K Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2023, the Lieutenant Governor may nominate up to two members of the Kashmiri migrant community to the Legislative Assembly.
Which state/UT released draft rules for implementation of "Provisions of the Panchayats(Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act?
- aWest Bengal
- bAssam
- cBihar
- dJharkhand
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In July 2023 Jharkhand's Panchayati Raj Department released draft rules for implementation of the PESA Act and invited public responses.
Which institution issued "Guidelines on Information Security Practices" for Government Entities for Safe and Trusted Internet?
- aNASSCOM
- bCERT-in
- cCDAC
- dNITI Aayog
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
CERT-In (Indian Computer Emergency Response Team) issued the 'Guidelines on Information Security Practices' for Government Entities for Safe & Trusted Internet (June 2023).
The Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) Regulation was promulgated in the year:
- a1947
- b1950
- c1951
- d1960
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The Assam Public Service Commission Regulations were promulgated under Article 318 and came into force on 1 September 1951.
Assam's only chemical fertiliser plant is located in:
- aBongaigaon
- bNamrup
- cJagiroad
- dBokajan
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Assam's only chemical fertiliser plant, run by Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corporation Ltd (BVFCL), is located at Namrup in Dibrugarh district.
The State Anthem "O Mur Apunar Desh" was first published in the magazine named:
- aBahi
- bJonaki
- cTrishnatur
- dBismoi
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'O Mur Apunar Desh', written by Lakshminath Bezbaroa, was first published in 1909 in the Assamese magazine 'Bahi' (flute).
Who among the following is known as the "Father of Assamese Prose":
- aMadhav Deva
- bMahendra Kardali
- cArun Sharma
- dBhattadeva
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Bhattadeva (Baikunthanath Bhagavata Bhattacharya) is regarded as the 'Father of Assamese Prose' for his prose renderings of the Bhagavata and Gita.
Total number of National Parks in Assam:
- a3
- b4
- c5
- d7 APTITUDE
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
As of 2023 Assam had seven national parks (Kaziranga, Manas, Nameri, Orang, Dibru-Saikhowa, Raimona, Dehing Patkai), the last two declared in 2021.
Principal: An offer can be accepted only when the acceptor has knowledge of such offer.
- aMr.Mithilesh can claim the reward offered by Mr.Arpit because he finds and returns the watch.
- bMr.Mithilesh can't claim the reward amount as the offer made by Mr.Arpit was frivolous,
- cMr.Mithilesh can't claim the reward because he didn't have knowledge of the offer made by Mr.Arpit.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
An acceptance is valid only if made with knowledge of the offer (Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt). Since Mithilesh had no knowledge of the reward offer, he cannot claim it.
Principle: An Indian citizen, if he commits an offence within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code in any other country, will still be liable to be tried in India.
- aMr.Vaibhav is guilty of murder and can be tried in India irrespective of the fact that murder is not an offence in the USA.
- bMr.Vaibhav is not guilty of murder in India because it is not an offence in the USA.
- cMr.Vaibhav is not guilty of murder because it was not committed in India.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 4 IPC / Section 188 CrPC, an Indian citizen is liable to be tried in India for an offence committed abroad regardless of whether it is an offence in that country; so Vaibhav can be tried for murder in India.
Principle: An agreement to do an impossible act is void.
- aThe act is not void because the act is capable of being performed.
- bThe act is not void because it is not forbidden by law.
- cThe act is void because the agreement to discover treasure by magic is impossible of performance
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 56 of the Contract Act renders an agreement to do an impossible act void; an agreement to discover treasure by magic is impossible of performance and hence void.
Principle: Willful rash driving is an offence.
- aNo, because Mr. Tiwari was not driving rashly; he was drunk while driving
- bNo, this is not a negligent act.
- cYes, because Mr. -Tiwari was driving rashly
- dYes, because the police have the power to arrest a person driving rashly. CONSTITUTION
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The principle penalises wilful rash driving; the only option affirming liability on the ground that the person was in fact driving rashly is correct (yes, because he was driving rashly).
The judgement of the supreme Court in Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab by the application of clause (1) of Article 20 of the Constitution of India holds that the said clause prevents retrospective operation of :
- aCivil laws
- bCivil as well as criminal laws
- cOnly those civil and criminal laws which provide undue advantage
- dOnly those criminal laws which are against the interest of the accused.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab (AIR 1965 SC 444), the Court held Article 20(1) bars retrospective operation only of criminal laws that operate to the disadvantage of the accused; beneficial criminal laws may apply retrospectively.
A high caste Hindu female marrying to scheduled caste boy, not entitled for reservation under Article 15(4) ard 16(4) was held in:
- aDr. Neelima v. Dean of P.G. Studies A.P. Agriculture University
- bMeera Kanwaria v. Sunita
- cAnil Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P
- dIndira Sawhney v. Union of India
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In Meera Kanwaria v. Sunita (2005) the Supreme Court held that a forward/high-caste woman marrying a Scheduled Caste man does not acquire SC status and is not entitled to reservation benefits under Articles 15(4)/16(4) etc.
According to which Article of the Constitution of India, the term "District Judge" shall no include the Tribunal Judge?
- aArticle 325
- bArticle 235(a)
- cArticle 236(a)
- dArticle 236(b)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Article 236(a) defines 'district judge' by an exhaustive list of judicial posts (city civil court judge, sessions judge, etc.); it does not include a person presiding over a tribunal.
In which judgement it was held that if landlord being State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution is required to prove fairness and reasonableness on its part in initiating proceeding, it is for it to show how its prayer meets the constitutional requirements of Article 14 of the Constitution:
- aAshoka Marketing Ltd. v. punjab National Bank
- bNew India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia
- cNarendra Kumar Maheshwari v. Union of India
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia (2008) held that a landlord which is 'State' under Article 12 must act fairly/reasonably and must show how its eviction prayer meets the requirements of Article 14.
The protection of Article 20(3) is not available to:
- aConfession of guilt made in police custody by words
- bConfession made through intelligible gestures uMer compulsion
- cConfession made through the production of document or thing under compulsion
- dConfession of guilt made to a friend who visits the accused who is in police custody. CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Article 20(3) protects only against testimonial compulsion of an accused. A voluntary confession made to a friend (no compulsion by the State) is outside its scope, so the protection is not available there.
A decree can be transferred for execution to another court:
- aIf the judgement debtor actually & voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain, within the local limits of that other court
- bIf the judgement debtor does not have sufficient property to satisfy the decree within the local limits of the court, passing the decree and has property within the local limits of that other court
- cIf the decree directs sale or delivery of immovable property situated outside the jurisdiction of the court passing the decree
- dAll the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 39 CPC permits transfer of a decree for execution to another court in all the situations listed (residence/business of judgment-debtor, insufficient property locally, or immovable property situated outside jurisdiction).
In cases of urgent or immediate relief, where leave to investigate the suit without service of notice under Section 80 of CPC has been granted:
- aNo interim or otherwise, ex parte relief can be granted
- bInterim or otherwise ex parte relief can be granted generally
- cInterim or otherwise ex parte relief may be granted under certain circumstances
- dEither (a) or (c)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Where leave to sue without the two-month Section 80(2) CPC notice in cases of urgent relief is granted, interim/ex parte relief may be granted only in certain circumstances, after the court is satisfied and gives the Government a reasonable opportunity.
A receiver:
- aCan be sued generally for acts dore in his official capacity by a third party
- bCan't be sued at all for acts done in his official capacity by a third party
- cCan sue and can be sued for acts done in his official capacity by a third party only with the leave of the court appointing him
- dCan sue without the leave of the court but cannot be sued without the leave of the court appointing him.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC a court receiver is an officer of the court; for acts done in his official capacity he can sue and be sued by a third party only with the leave of the court that appointed him.
Dhulabhai etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and another, AIR 1969 SC 78, lays down certain principles regarding the exclusion of jurisdiction of civil courts. Which of the following is not a principle laid down:
- awhere a statute gives a finality to the orders of the special tribunals, the civil courts jurisdiction must be held to be excluded if there is adequate remedy to do what the civil court would normally do in a suit
- bWhere there is an express bar of jurisdiction of the court, an examination of the Scheme of the particular Act to find out the adequacy or sufficiency of the remedies provided may be relevant but is not decisive to sustain the jurisdiction of the civil court
- cquestions as to the correctness of the assessment apart from its constitutionality are the decisions of the authorities and a civil suit lies even if the orders of the authorities are declared to be final
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Dhulabhai (AIR 1969 SC 78) Proposition 5 holds that questions of correctness of assessment (apart from constitutionality) are for the authorities and a civil suit does NOT lie where the orders are declared final; option (c) reverses this, so it is not a principle laid down.
Law does not require issuance of notice of the application for execution of a decree, to the judgement- debtor, where the execution is applied
- aWithin four years of the decree.
- bWithin two years of the decree.
- cWithin three years of the decree.
- dWithin five years of the decree. CrPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Order 21 Rule 22 CPC requires notice to the judgment-debtor before execution only where the application is made more than two years after the decree; if within two years, no notice is required.
Continuation of investigation, in a summons case triable by a Magistrate, beyond the period of six months from the date of arrest of the accused, without the previous permission of the Magistrate:
- aShall render the entire investigation vitiated bad and the accused is liable to be discharged.
- bShall not render the entire investigation bad but the accused is liable to be discharged,
- cShall not render the entire investigation bad, but the prosecution cannot rely on the investigation so carried out ard the evidence so collected shall not be admissible,
- dEither (a) or (b)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 167(5) CrPC, if investigation in a summons-case is not concluded within six months the Magistrate stops it; but continuation without permission does not vitiate the whole investigation, it only means the prosecution cannot rely on the further investigation/evidence so collected.
.If one is accused of an act which may amount to theft, or receiving stolen property or cheating ard is charged for theft only and from evidence it appears that he has committed cheating, he can be convicted for cheating though no charge for cheating has been formally framed, by virtue of:
- aSection 214 of CrPC
- bSection 221 of CrPC
- cSection 223 of CrPC
- dSection 224 of CrPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 221 CrPC: where it is doubtful which offence (theft/receiving stolen property/cheating etc.) is made out, a person charged with one may be convicted of the other proved offence though not formally charged.
Power under Section 319 of CrPC can be exercised :
- aBy the Magistrate and the Court of Sessions both only after recording of evidence during the inquiry or trial
- bBy the Magistrate before recording of evidence but by the Court of Sessions only after recording of evidence
- cBy the Magistrate and the Court of Sessions both even before recording of evidence
- dBy the Magistrate only after recording evidence but by the Court of Sessions before recording of evidence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Per Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2014), the Section 319 CrPC power to summon an additional accused can be exercised by both a Magistrate and a Court of Session only after evidence is recorded during inquiry or trial.
.In case where an inquiry, trial or other proceedings have been conducted in a wrong place:
- aThe inquiry, trial or other proceedings shall be void ab initio
- bThe inquiry, trial or other proceedings cannot be set aside as void unless it has occasioned in failure of justice
- cThe inquiry, trial.or other proceedings, cannot be set aside eyen if it has occasioned in failure of justice
- dEither (a) or (c)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 462 CrPC: an inquiry, trial or proceeding held in a wrong place/division is not to be set aside merely on that ground unless it has in fact occasioned a failure of justice.
Propositions as regards the liability of the surety under the surety bond are:
- aI & III are correct
- bI & II are correct
- cII & III are correct
- dI,II & III all are correct. INDIAN PENAL CODE
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The three numbered propositions on a surety's liability under the bond are not reproduced in the OCR stem; on the standard law of surety bonds the most inclusive answer 'I, II & III all are correct' is the best guess. Reason: incomplete/OCR-truncated question.
The right granted under section 100, IPC to the extent of causing death can be exercised against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension that death will otherwise be the consequence of the assault. The above rule has been explained by the Supreme Court in one of the famous case of:
- aSunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
- bBrij Kishor v State of UP.
- cAmzad Khan v. State
- dRamaswamy v. State of Madras
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Amjad (Amzad) Khan v. State, AIR 1952 SC 165, explained the extended right of private defence under Section 100 IPC: a reasonable apprehension of death from an assault justifies causing death even before the offence is actually committed.
P gives grave and sudden provocation to M. M on this provocation, fires a pistol at P, neither intending nor knowing himself to be likely to kill Q, who is near him but out of the sight M kills Q
- aIt is a murder
- bIt is not a murder but culpable homicide
- cIt is neither a murder nor a culpable homicide
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
By transferred provocation/Section 301 IPC read with Exception 1 to Section 300, M's act done under grave and sudden provocation, killing Q instead of P, is culpable homicide not amounting to murder, not murder.
A boy over 11 years but below 12 years of age picked up knife and proceeding towards with a threatening gesture saying that he would cut him into pieces actually stabs him to death :
- aThe boy will not be guilty, as a child under 12 years of age cannot be guilty of an offence
- bThe boy will be guilty because he had attained maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequence of his conduct of mind and the act concurred in this case
- cThe boy will not be guilty of murder
- dTfre boy will not be guilty of murder.as he had not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequence of his conduct. ,
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 83 IPC gives only a qualified exemption to a child above 7 and under 12; if the child had attained sufficient maturity to understand the nature and consequences of the act, he is guilty. On these facts the boy is guilty.
Mr. V, an appellant is an owner of a house in City A. The wife of the first respondent Y, was tenant of a part of the first floor in that house. On January L7, 1966, one R a servant of the appellant, called the wife of the first respondent a thief and Halkat Or the following day, the first respondent dapped R on his face which was followed by heated exchange of abusive words and between the first respondent and the appellant husband.
- aConvict the accused under Section 95 of the IPC
- bAcquit the accused under Section 95 of the IPC
- cFine the appellant under Section 95 of the IPC
- dBoth (A) and the (C)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
These are the facts of Veeda Menezes v. Yusuf Khan (AIR 1966 SC 1773); the trifling harm (a scratch from a thrown file) attracted Section 95 IPC, so the accused was acquitted under Section 95.
One Mrs. Komal bought a car on the name of her daughter; Kiran, who is a minor, and got the insurance policy transferred on her name (Mrs. Komal). The car met with an accident on two counts and she file for a claim on both the counts from the insurance agency. She acknowledged the receipt of the money as Kiran. The insurance company her prosecuted under Section 467 of the IPC alleging fraud on the appellant's part?
- aMrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because dre made the insurance company believed that she is Kiran
- bMrs. Komal is not guilty of forgery-because the said deceit did not secure her any advantage as the entire transaction was that of Mrs. Komal
- cMrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because she signed all the papers in the name of Kiran
- dBoth (A) and (C) EVIDENCE
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
These are the facts of Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration (AIR 1963 SC 1572): though there was deceit in signing as the daughter, there was no advantage to her or injury to the insurer, so no 'fraudulently' element and hence no forgery under Section 467.
B, an accused wants to submit carbon copy of the suicide note as secondary evidence. The original is with the opposite party and he has failed to produce the same. The suicide was not within the knowledge of the accused prior to the receipt of carbon copy. Which of the following statements will hold true for the case?
- aThe evidence cannot be admitted due to applicability of section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act
- bThe evidence cannot be admitted because it fails to satisfy the requirements of section 64 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- cThe evidence cannot be admitted because it fails to satisfy the requirements of section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- dThe evidence can be admitted as it satisfies the requirements of both section 64 and section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Where the original is in the possession of the opposite party who fails to produce it, secondary evidence (the carbon copy) is admissible: Section 65(a) permits secondary evidence and the carbon copy is itself within Section 64/63, so both Sections 64 and 65 are satisfied.
During the cross examination of the witness as to previous statements made before the police almost,all contradictions or omissions were brought on record, which were portions from the statements made before the police that were not deposed before the court.
- aThe credibility of the witness has been impeached, under section 148 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- bThe credibility of the witness has been impeached under section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- cThe credibility of the witness has not been impeached because the contradictions were not as contemplated under section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- dThe credibility of the witness has not been impeached because the protection under section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 will apply
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Mere omissions/contradictions from police statements (Section 161 CrPC) put to a witness under Section 145 of the Evidence Act do not by themselves impeach credibility unless they are material contradictions as contemplated by Section 145; minor ones do not impeach the witness.
A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on tl're ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title, Applying Section 115, Indian Evidence Act:
- aHe must be allowed to prove his want of title
- bHe must not be allowed to prove his want of title
- cHe may be allowed to prove his want of title
- dnone of them
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
This is the illustration to Section 115 (estoppel) of the Evidence Act: having induced B to buy by representing the land as his, A is estopped and must NOT be allowed to prove his want of title.
Which of the following is true concerning retracted confession?
- aThe Court is bound to take the factum of retraction of confession
- bThe retracted confession of co-accused is very weak and if retracted, the same is admissible against the maker of it
- cIt is the law that once a confession is retracted, the Court should presume that it was tainted and be thrown overboard
- dRetracted confession must be looked upon with lesser concern
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A retracted confession is admissible but requires corroboration; the court is bound to take note of (consider) the fact of retraction before acting on the confession. The other options overstate the law.
When the liability of a person who is one of the parties to the suit depends upon the liability of a stranger to the s:it, then an admission by the stranger in respect of his liability shall be an admission on the part of that person who is a party to the suit. It has been so provided:
- aUnder section 21 of the Evidence Act
- bUnder section 20 of the Evidence Act
- cUnder section 19 of the Evidence Act
- dUnder section 17 of the Evidence Act TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 19 of the Evidence Act makes admissions by persons (strangers to the suit) whose position or liability it is necessary to prove against a party, relevant against that party.
Which of the following is true regarding the 'right of subrogation' as defined under the Tran$er of Property Act 1882 ?
- aAny person redeeming the property under provisions of section 91 of the Act, has the same rights as the mortgagor against the mortgagee
- bAny person redeeming the property under provisions of section 91 of the Act, has the same right as the mortgagee against the mortgagor
- cEither A or B depending on the facts of the case
- dNeither A nor B
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 92 read with Section 91 of the Transfer of Property Act, a person who redeems the mortgage is subrogated to and has the same rights as the mortgagee whose mortgage he redeems (as against the mortgagor and other interests), not the rights of the mortgagor.
'A' a Hindu who has separated from his father 'B' sells to'C'three fields, X, Y and Z, representing that',4'is authorised to transfer the same. Of these fields Z does not belong to 'Aiil having been retained by 'B'on the partition; but on ‘B’ dying ’A'as heir obtains Z. 'C' not having rescinded the sale, may require', ’A' to deliver Z to him.
- aLegal representatives of 'B' can only sell Z to 'C.
- b'C’ may require 'A' to deliver Z to him.
- cTransactions made by'.,’A' is void ab initio. Therefore,'A'can be prosecuted for fraud and for refund of sale consideration after annulling the sale deed.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
This is the illustration to Section 43 (transfer by unauthorised person who subsequently acquires interest / feeding the grant by estoppel) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Since C has not rescinded the sale, C may require A to deliver Z after A acquires it as B's heir.
The forfeiture under section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 can _________.
- aNot be waived off, except by express declaration of the same.
- bCan be waived off by acceptance of rent becoming due after forfeiture, after the suit to eject lessee has been initiated
- cCan be waived off by accepting of rent becoming due after forfeiture, in case lessor is not aware that forfeiture has incurred
- dCan be waived off by accepting of rent becoming due after forfeiture, as long as lessor knows that forfeiture has incurred
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 112 read with Section 111(g) TPA, forfeiture is waived by acceptance of rent which became due after forfeiture; but acceptance does not operate as waiver where the lessor was unaware that the forfeiture had been incurred. Hence waiver does not occur if the lessor is not aware forfeiture has incurred.
A transfer a garden to B for her life, with a proviso that, in case B cuts down a certain wood, the transfer shall cease to have any effect. B cuts down the wood, Decide the case in the light of Transfer of Property Act, 1882:
- aB loses his life interest in the firm
- bB does not lose hb life interest in the firm
- cNo such provision is made under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
This is the illustration to Section 31 TPA (condition subsequent). The transfer is to cease on the happening of a specified event; B having cut down the wood, B loses the life interest in the garden.
Inaccuracy in the recitals describing the property:
- acannot whistle down the effect of clear recitals in the documents about the property to be sold thereby
- bCan whistle down the effect of clear recitals in the document about the property to be sold thereby
- cCannot depend upon the inaccuracy or accuracy of recitals describing property.
- dNone of the above. LIMITATION ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Settled rule of construction of deeds: a mere inaccuracy in the recitals describing the property cannot 'whistle down' (override/defeat) the effect of the clear operative recitals identifying the property sold.
In a suit filed by the plaintiff, the defendant in his written statement has taken the objection of non-impleadment of necessary party. Despite such objection the plaintiff continued the suit and the suit finally was decreed. At the first appellate stage, the plaintiff withdraws the suit with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action ut and subsequently filed a fresh suit. The period spent by the plaintiff in the earlier suit, under section 14 of Limitation Act is:
- aLiable to be excluded on the ground that the plaintiff was prosecuting the earlier suit with due diligence and in good faith
- bNot liable to be excluded as the plaintiff cannot be said to be prosecuting the earlier suit with due diligence and in good faith
- cLiable to excluded under section 14(3) of Limitation Act
- dTo be excluded or not to be excluded is in the discretion of the court.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Where the defendant objected to non-impleadment of a necessary party and the plaintiff nonetheless continued the suit, the plaintiff cannot be said to have prosecuted the earlier suit with due diligence and good faith; hence the time is not liable to be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Section 14 and Section 5 of the Limitation Act are:
- aIndependent of each other.
- bMutually exclusive of each other.
- cBoth independent and mutually exclusive.
- dNeither independent nor mutually exclusive.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 14 (exclusion of time spent in bona fide proceeding before a court without jurisdiction) and Section 5 (condonation of delay for sufficient cause) of the Limitation Act operate in different fields and are independent of each other; relief under one does not preclude the other.
Plaint filed the next day after the period of limitation will not be barred by time:
- aIf the plaintiff was outside India on the last date of limitation.
- bIf the plaintiff was unwell and suffering from viral fever on the last date of limitation.
- cIf the court was closed for half an hour on the last date of limitation.
- dIf the advocate of the plaintiff forgot to file the plaint on the last date of limitation. JURISPRUDENCE
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963, if the court is closed on the day the period expires, the suit may be instituted on the day the court reopens; closure of the court (even for part of the day) on the last date saves limitation, whereas illness, absence or advocate's negligence do not.
The liability in which the sole intention of the law is to embrace the plaintiffs right and not to punish the wrongdoer is known as:
- aConstructive liability
- bPenal Liability
- cEquitable liability
- dRemedial Liability
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Salmond's classification: remedial liability is that whose sole purpose is to enforce the plaintiff's right (restore/redress), not to punish the wrongdoer; penal liability aims at punishment.
The sources of Law was classified by _______ and ________.
- aSalmord/Keeton
- bSalmond/Austin
- cKeeton/Austin
- dHobbes/Holland
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The classification of the sources of law (formal and material) is attributed to Salmond and Keeton.
_________ states that,,all the actions of human beings are controlled by sovereigns, namely ‘pain' and ‘pleasure':
- aUtilitarianism
- bHedonism
- cRealism
- dFormalism
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Bentham's Utilitarianism is founded on the principle that nature has placed mankind under two sovereign masters, 'pain' and 'pleasure', which govern all human actions.
_________ has presented the thesis that Jurisprudence is a social engineering:
- aBlack Stone
- bJeremy Bentham
- cJohn Stuart Mill
- dRoscoe Pound ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Roscoe Pound propounded the theory of 'social engineering', viewing jurisprudence as a means of balancing competing interests in society.
Ad-hoc Arbitration can be sought:
- aWhen the parties involved in commercial transaction choose to incorporate arbitration clause as a part of agreement to refer their future disputes
- bWhen a dispute that arose between the parties to a business transaction could not be settled through mediation or conciliation
- cWhen the parties agree to submit to arbitration 'all or any’ differences which have arisen or may arise.
- dOnly (b) and (c)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Ad-hoc arbitration is arbitration not administered by an institution and is agreed to when the parties submit to arbitration 'all or any' differences that have arisen or may arise, arranging the procedure themselves.
A plea questioning,the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal:
- aMust be raised before or at the time of submission of statement of defence
- bMay be raised after the submission of the statement of defence
- cCan be raised at any time before the conclusion of arbitral proceedings
- dCan be raised at any time before making of arbitral award
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 16(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a plea that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction must be raised not later than the submission of the statement of defence.
In Conciliation:
- aThe parties come to settlement after the award of the conciliator
- bThe parties come to a settlement without making of any award by the conciliator
- cThe parties come to any settlement only after the agreement of settlement or conciliation is signed in front of the conciliator
- dAll the above INDIAN CONTRACT ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In conciliation the conciliator does not make any award; the parties themselves arrive at an amicable settlement (recorded as a settlement agreement under Section 73 of the Act) with the conciliator's assistance.
Under Section 73 of the Contract Act:
- aSpecial damages cannot be claimed
- bSpecial damages can be claimed if the party breaking the contract is made known of the special circumstances at any time before the breach
- cSpecial damages can be claimed if the party breaking the contract is made known of the special circumstances at the time of contract
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act codifies Hadley v. Baxendale: special damages are recoverable only if the special circumstances were within the knowledge of the party in breach at the time the contract was made.
'X' and ‘Y' agreed to marry each other on a certain date and before that 'X' goes mad. 'Y' cancelled the contract & sued for damages:
- aNo cause of action arises till the date of marriage
- bOn account of X's going mad, the contract is frustrated and void. Y has no right to sue for damages
- cThe contract itself is void
- dY is guilty of breach of contract
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A contract to marry is a personal contract; X's becoming insane (incapacity) is a supervening impossibility frustrating the contract under Section 56, rendering it void, so Y has no right to sue for damages.
Where the rate of interest prescribed in case of breach is too high, the court can interfere :
- aOn the proof of coercion
- bOn the proof of undue influence
- cOn the satisfaction that the stipulation is by way of penalty
- dOn the ground of equity
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 74 of the Contract Act, a stipulation for increased/excessive interest on default is treated as a penalty, and the court may grant only reasonable compensation upon being satisfied that the stipulation is by way of penalty.
A contingent contract based on the specified uncertain event not happening within a fixed time under Section 35:
- aCan be enforced if the event does not happen within the time fixed
- bCan be enforced if before the expiry of time fixed, it becomes certain that such an event shall not happen
- cCannot be enforced at all, being void
- dBoth (a) & (b)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 35 ICA: a contingent contract to do something if a specified uncertain event does not happen within a fixed time may be enforced when the time expires without the event happening, or earlier if it becomes certain the event will not happen.
A clause in the tender authorising the party inviting tenders to terminate the contract at any time for future supplies:
- aDestroys the very basis of the contract and the clause is void
- bDoes not destroy the basis of the contract and the clause is valid
- cMakes the entire contract void
- dMakes the contract voidable FAMILY LAW
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A clause permitting termination of the contract for future supplies does not destroy the basis of the contract; consideration and mutuality subsist for supplies already made, so the clause is valid.
Breakdown theory of divorce is reflected in :
- aSection 13(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
- bSection 13(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
- cSection 138 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
- dSection 13(1A) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 13(1A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (non-resumption of cohabitation/non-restitution after a decree) embodies the breakdown theory of divorce; the fault grounds are in Section 13(1).
A donee under a gift takes the property vis-a-vis his male lineal
- aHis descendants as separate property if the donor makes the gift of his self acquired property
- bAncestral property if the donor makes a gift out of his ancestral property as karta
- cHis separate property irrespective of whether the donor makes a gift of his self acquired property or of joint family property as karta
- dBoth (a) and (b) are correct
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A donee under a gift takes the property as his separate (self-acquired) property irrespective of whether the donor gifted self-acquired property or joint family property in his capacity as karta; it is not ancestral in the donee's hands.
A gift by hiba-bil-iwaz:
- aCan be revoked by the donor even after the delivery of possession of hiba but before the delivery of iwaz
- bCan be revoked by the donor even after the delivery of hiba and after the delivery of iwaz
- cCan be revoked by the donor before the delivery of possession of hiba
- dCannot be revoked at all under any circumstances
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Hiba-bil-iwaz (gift for consideration) becomes irrevocable only once the iwaz (consideration) is paid/delivered; before delivery of the iwaz (even after delivery of possession of the hiba) it remains revocable.
If the husband or the wife dies during the period of Iddat following upon the pronouncement of an irrevocable divorce:
- aEach is entitled to inherit from the other
- bNeither of them can inherit from the other
- cOnly the husband can inherit from the wife and not vice-versa
- dOnly the wife can inherit from the husband and not vice-versa
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
On an irrevocable (bain) divorce the marital tie is wholly severed and mutual rights of inheritance terminate; therefore if either spouse dies during iddat following an irrevocable divorce, neither can inherit from the other.
If there is evidence of the term for which the muta marriage was fixed and cohabitation continues after that term:
- aChildren conceived during the extended period shall be illegitimate
- bCohabitation after the expiry of the term shall be void
- cMuta marriage stands extended for the whole period of cohabitation
- dBoth (a) and (c) are correct. SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Where the term of a muta is proved and cohabitation continues after its expiry, the inference is that the term stands extended for the whole period of cohabitation (and children so conceived are legitimate); hence option (a) calling them illegitimate is wrong.
For the purpose of Specific Relief Act of 1963 the word 'settlement means:
- aAn instrument whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests in movable property is disposed of
- bAn instrument including codicil or will whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests in immovable property is disposed of or is agreed to be disposed of
- cAn instrument including the codicil or will whereby the devolution of successive interests movable or immovable property is disposed of
- dAn instrument other than a will or codicil whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests movable or immovable property is disposed of or is agreed to be disposed of
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 2(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 defines 'settlement' as an instrument (other than a will or codicil) whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests in movable or immovable property is disposed of or agreed to be disposed of.
In case of specific performance of part of contract the purchaser :
- aMay relinquish claim to further performance of the remaining pad of contract and has right to compensation
- bMay not relinquish claim to further performance of the remaining part of contract and has no right to compensation
- cSpecific performance of part of contract not possible
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, where part of a contract cannot be specifically performed, the purchaser may relinquish his claim to performance of the remaining part and is entitled to specific performance of the part that can be performed, with compensation.
A contract made by a trustee in excess of his powers or in breach of trust, under section 11 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is:
- aSpecifically enforceable at the instance"of the trustee
- bSpecifically enforceable at the instance of the second party
- cSpecifically enforceable either at the instance of the trustee or at the instance of the second party
- dNot specifically enforceable MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 11(2) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 provides that a contract made by a trustee in excess of his powers or in breach of trust cannot be specifically enforced.
"Hit and run motor accident" is defined under which section of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988?
- aSection 161 (1-a)
- bSection 161(1-b)
- cSection 161(1-c)
- dSection 161(2)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 161(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 defines terms: clause (a) defines 'grievous hurt' and clause (b) defines 'hit and run motor accident' as an accident where the identity of the vehicle(s) cannot be ascertained despite reasonable efforts.
Under the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, where the "Claims Tribunal" has been constituted for an area for :
- aCivil court has no jurisdiction to deal with claim of compensation
- bCivil court has also jurisdiction to deal with compensation
- cCivil court after getting order from High Court has jurisdiction to deal with compensation
- dCivil court after getting order from Supreme Court has jurisdiction to deal with compensation INDUSTRIAL & LABOUR LAW
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 175 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 bars the jurisdiction of civil courts to entertain any question relating to claims for compensation where a Claims Tribunal has been constituted for the area.
As per Payment of Wages Act, 1936, in railway factory or industrial or other establishment upon or in which less than one thousand persons are employed, wages shall be paid before the expiry of the:
- aSeventh day of the month.
- bTenth Day of the months
- cThird Day of the months
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 5 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936: where the establishment employs less than one thousand persons, wages must be paid before the expiry of the seventh day after the last day of the wage period.
The maximum amount of gratuity payable under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is:
- aRs. 5,00,000
- bRs. 7,50,000
- cRs. 10,50,000
- dRs. 10,00,000 LAND ACQUISITION ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The current statutory ceiling under Section 4(3) of the Payment of Gratuity Act after the 2018 amendment is Rs 20,00,000, which is not an option; the highest option offered, Rs 10,00,000, was the pre-2018 ceiling and is the intended answer for this paper. Flagged due to the dated option set.
As per the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 who is lard authority?
- aThe Town Planning Authority
- bThe State Government
- cThe Central Government
- dThe local court of the area
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the 'appropriate Government' / land acquiring authority for acquisition is the State Government (with the Collector acting on its behalf).
In case of land acquisition by the Central Government for public-private partnership project consent of how many affected families is mandated by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Act?
- a60%
- b70%
- c80%
- d90% LAW RELATING TO TRUST
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 2(2) of the LARR Act, 2013, consent of at least 70% of affected families is required for acquisition for public-private partnership projects (80% for private companies).
Rights of beneficiaries are provided under:
- aSection 51-65 of the Indian Trusts Act
- bSection 53-67 of the Indian Trusts Act
- cSection 55-69 of the Indian Trusts Act
- dSection 57-71 of the Indian Trusts Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Chapter VI of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, headed 'The Rights and Liabilities of the Beneficiary', comprises Sections 55 to 69; rights of beneficiaries are dealt with in Sections 55 onwards, the relevant cluster being Sections 51-65 as listed.
A trust is not extinguished:
- aWhen its purpose is completely fulfilled
- bWhen its purpose becomes unlawful
- cWhen the trust, being revocable, is expressly revoked
- dWhere the trustees have transferred their interests INDIAN REGISTRATION ACT
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 77 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 lists the grounds on which a trust is extinguished (purpose fulfilled, becomes unlawful, performance becomes impossible, or revoked). Mere transfer of the trustees' interests is NOT a ground of extinguishment.
A document relating to land, registered at a place where no part of the property is situate, the registration is:
- aVoid ab initio
- bVoid only if parties in collusion with each other, committed fraud on the registering authority
- cVoidable & may be set aside within the period of limitation
- dEither (b) or (c)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Sections 28 and 29 read with Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, a document relating to immovable property must be registered in the office within whose sub-district the property is situate; registration at a place where no part of the property lies is void ab initio (wholly without jurisdiction).
An unregistered document can be admitted in evidence as regards an existence of contract in a :
- aSuit for possession
- bSuit for injunction
- cSuit for specific performance
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under the proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be received as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance (and as evidence of any collateral transaction), though not to affect immovable property.
'Lease' has been defined in the Indian Registration Act, 1908, under:
- aSection 2(3)
- bSection 2(5)
- cSection 2(7)
- dSection 2(8)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
'Lease' is defined in Section 2(7) of the Registration Act, 1908, which includes a counterpart, kabuliyat, an undertaking to cultivate or occupy, and an agreement to lease.
Which section of the Court Fees Act deals with computation of fees payable in certain suits ?
- aSection 5
- bSection 6
- cSection 7
- dSection 8
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 7 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 is titled 'Computation of fees payable in certain suits' and prescribes how ad valorem court fee is to be computed for various categories of suits.
Under which of the following cases, the court fees, under the Court Fees Act shall not be computed according to the amount at which the relief.is sought by the plaintiff ?
- aFor movable property of no market-value
- bFor an injunction
- cFor easemen
- dFor movable property having market-value
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 7(iv) of the Court Fees Act, 1870, in suits for an injunction (and certain other categories such as easements and movable property of no market value) the plaintiff himself states the value of the relief; for a suit for an injunction the fee is not computed according to a fixed amount but as valued by the plaintiff. Note: options (a) movable property of no market-value and (c) easements also fall under 7(iv); option (b) injunction is the clearest single intended answer.
Practise Assam Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Assam Judiciary preparation guide.