Live Bihar Judiciary 2026 mock series · 50 free questions Start now

Delhi Judiciary — Prelims 2023

198 questions Objective 198 answers with solutions PDF
1

In the year 2019, the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir was bifurcated into-

  • aThe State of Jammu and Kashmir, and the State of Ladakh.
  • bThe State of Jammu and Kashmir, and the Union Territory of Ladakh.
  • cThe Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, and the State of Ladakh.
  • dThe Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, and the Union Territory of Ladakh.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 bifurcated the State into two Union Territories: the UT of Jammu and Kashmir (with legislature) and the UT of Ladakh (without legislature).

2

The judgement of the Supreme Court in Vishaka & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (1997) dealt with guidelines relating to-

  • aPrevention of sexual harassment of women in the workplace.
  • bDomestic violence against children.
  • cWelfare of prisoners.
  • dProvision for legal aid to indigent litigants.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241 laid down guidelines for the prevention of sexual harassment of women at the workplace, later codified in the POSH Act, 2013.

3

The largest bench of the Supreme Court was constituted in Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (1973). How many judges constituted the bench?

  • a11
  • b13
  • c9
  • d15
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) was decided by the largest-ever Constitution Bench of 13 judges, which propounded the basic structure doctrine.

4

Which is the largest High Court of the country, in terms of sanctioned strength of judges?

  • aBombay High Court
  • bMadhya Pradesh High Court
  • cMadras High Court
  • dAllahabad High Court
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

The Allahabad High Court has the largest sanctioned strength of judges (160) of any High Court in India, far exceeding Bombay, Madras and Madhya Pradesh.

5

The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Supriyo vs. Union of India (2023), concerned-

  • aSame sex marriage
  • bDecriminalisation of homosexuality
  • cBoth of the above
  • dNeither (1) nor (2)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty v. Union of India (2023) concerned the prayer for legal recognition of same-sex marriage; the Court declined to grant it. Decriminalisation of homosexuality was already done in Navtej Johar (2018).

6

Who was the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India?

  • aJustice H.J. Kania
  • bJustice M.C. Mahajan
  • cJustice Vivian Bose
  • dJustice Y.V. Chandrachud
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Justice H.J. Kania was the first Chief Justice of India, serving from 1950.

7

The doctrine of stare decisis relates to-

  • aJudicial precedent
  • bSeparation of powers
  • cParliamentary privilege
  • dPromulgation of ordinances
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Stare decisis ('to stand by things decided') is the doctrine of binding judicial precedent.

8

The Bill which was introduced by the Government in Parliament, seeking to replace the Indian Evidence Act, but now stands withdrawn recently, is called the-

  • aBharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
  • bBharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023
  • cBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
  • dBhartiya Dand Bill, 2023
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023 was the Bill introduced to replace the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (later re-introduced as Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam).

9

The recently enacted 106th Amendment to the Constitution provides for one-third seats in various legislatures to be reserved for women. Which of the following legislative bodies is not included within its scope?

  • aLok Sabha
  • bState Legislative Assemblies
  • cRajya Sabha
  • dLegislative Assembly of Delhi
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The 106th Amendment (Women's Reservation/Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023) reserves one-third seats in the Lok Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies and the Delhi Assembly, but not the Rajya Sabha or State Legislative Councils.

10

Under Section6 of the Protection of Children from Sextual Offences Act, 2012, whoever commits Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault shall be punished with-

  • aRigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 10 years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of natural life of that person, and shall also be liable to fine, or with death.
  • bRigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 20 years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of natural life of that person, and shall also be liable to fine..
  • cRigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 10 years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, or with death.
  • dRigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 20 years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of natural life of that person, and shall also be liable to fine, or with death.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 6 POCSO Act (as amended in 2019) punishes aggravated penetrative sexual assault with rigorous imprisonment not less than 20 years extendable to imprisonment for life (remainder of natural life) and fine, or with death.

11

Which of the following contracts cannot be specifically enforced?

  • aA contract made by trustee in excess of his powers or in breach of trust.
  • bWhen the act agreed to be done is in the performance wholly or partly of a trust.
  • cNeither (1) nor (2).
  • dBoth (1) and (2).
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 14 (read with the Schedule) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, a contract made by a trustee in excess of his powers or in breach of trust, and one whose performance is wholly/partly of a trust, cannot be specifically enforced; hence both.

12

A suit for recovery of possession of an immovable property under Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is decreed on finding that the defendant was a trespasser who had disposed the plaintiff by forcibly breaking open the locks of the during his absence, five months before filling of the suit. Subsequently, a review petition is filed on the ground that the plaintiff was not the owner but only a tenant.

  • aReview cannot succeed because it does not lie against decree in such proceedings.
  • bThe review can be entertained because ownership is a factor in such proceedings.
  • cThe review can succeed if it is pleaded that the evidence having a bearing on ownership has been discovered subsequently.
  • dReview can succeed because six months had expired from dispossession on the date of the decree.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

A suit under Section 6 (the question mislabels it as 'Section 5') of the Specific Relief Act decides only possession, not title; ownership is irrelevant, and no appeal or review lies against such a decree (Section 6(3)).

13

Specific performance of a contract for payment of money cannot be enforced in favour of a person-

  • aWho fails to aver that he has performed or has always been ready and willing to perform the essential terms of the contract which are to be performed by him.
  • bWhere the plaintiff has not tendered the money to the defendant or deposited the same in court while filing the suit.
  • cBoth (1) and (2) are incorrect.
  • dBoth (1) and (2) are correct.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, specific performance cannot be granted in favour of a person who fails to aver and prove that he has performed or has always been ready and willing to perform the essential terms (readiness and willingness).

14

‘A’ had awarded contract to ‘B’ for regular maintenance of electrical fittings, fixtures, cables etc, of the premisses of his industrial unit, for a period of two years, against consideration for the services payable in the agreed sum of money on monthly basis. ‘B’ abandoned the work after giving satisfactory services for eighteen months, citing the reasons of lack of manpower. ‘A’ files a suit to recover money equivalent to monthly consideration for remaining six months, pleading that this was the cost of substituted performance though a third party. In such suit, the plaintiff-

  • aMust show having given a notice in writing, of not less than thirty days, to ‘B’ calling upon him to perform the contract within time specified in the notice, and refusal or failure to do so on his part.
  • bMust have got the contract performed through a third party.
  • cMay also claim compensation for breach of contract.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act (substituted-performance), the plaintiff must give not less than 30 days' written notice to perform, may get it done through a third party, and may also claim compensation; hence all of the above.

15

Mr. A filed a suit for partition against his brother Mr. B claiming one half share (½) in the suit property admeasuring 200 sq. yds. Inherited from their deceased father through intestate succession. Mr. B disputed the claim and setup an oral family agreement claiming that the entire suit property fell to his share exclusively. The trial court framed issues and the matter was set down for trial. Mr. A filed his evidence affidavit and was cross-examined partially. At this stage Mr. A filed and application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amending the plaint to state the 50 sq. xds. Was sold by his deceased father to him by executing an unregistered ATS, GPA, Will and affidavit all dated 01.01.2005. He therefore sought amendment to plead this fact and contend that the partition in the suit is limited to 150 sq. yds. He stated that the said facts were inadvertently left out by his lawyer while drafting the plaint. Whether the said application for amendment filled by Mr. A can be allowed?

  • aYes, because no party should suffer due to the lapse of the counsel and the matter was at the initial stage of evidence.
  • bYes, because this is a material fact as the father of the parties was left with no right, title or interest in the area admeasuring 50 sq. yds with the execution of the sale agreement documents.
  • cNo, because Mr. A is deemed to have abandoned his claim based on these unregistered documents.
  • dNo, because an application under Order VI Rule17 CPC cannot be moved after commencement of Trial and these documents were always within the knowledge of the plaintiff.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC, no amendment is allowed after the trial has commenced if the party could have raised the matter with due diligence before; here the documents were always within the plaintiff's knowledge.

16

A civil suit was filed under order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’). The defendant filed an application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) CPC seeking leave to defend. The said application of the defendant was dismissed by the Trial Court and the suit was decreed. Under which provisions is recourse available for the defendant against the said impugned order?

  • aSection 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
  • bSection 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
  • cSection 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
  • dOrder XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

When leave to defend under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) is refused and the summary suit is decreed, the decree is appealable as a regular first appeal under Section 96 CPC.

17

Section 2 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) provides for the definition ‘decree’. Which of the following will be included in definition of ‘decree’? Order passed rejecting a Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Order passed allowing an application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. Order of dismissal of a suit in default. Dismissal of Order I Rule 10 CPC application.

  • aOnly I
  • bOnly II
  • cBoth I and II
  • dBoth III and IV
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 2(2) CPC, a decree includes the rejection of a plaint (Order VII Rule 11) and a judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6; dismissal in default and rejection of an Order I Rule 10 application are not decrees. Hence both I and II.

18

Which of the following is the punishment for counterfeiting an Indian coin?

  • aImprisonment of upto 7 years and fine.
  • bEither imprisonment of upto 10 years or fine.
  • cImprisonment of upto 10 years and fine.
  • dImprisonment of upto 7 years or fine or both.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 232 IPC (counterfeiting Indian coin) prescribes imprisonment for life, or imprisonment up to 10 years, and fine. Among the options, imprisonment up to 10 years and fine is the closest correct statement.

19

A thief breaks into a house, holds the owner of the house at gunpoint and ties him up. He takes money and jewellery from a cupboard and escapes. The act amounts to-

  • aTheft
  • bTheft amounting to Robbery
  • cDacoity
  • dExtortion amounting to Robbery
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Theft accompanied by causing/attempting to cause death, hurt, wrongful restraint or fear thereof (here, gunpoint and tying up) is theft amounting to robbery under Section 390 IPC. It is not dacoity (requires five or more persons).

20

A peon clandestinely takes an office file from the office of Chief Engineer of the Public Works Department, and gives it to a private party. He puts in back in its place the next day. Has the person committed the offence of theft?

  • aNo offence is committed as he returns the books to its original place within a day.
  • bNo offence is committed as there was no dishonest intention in the act committed.
  • cThe offence of theft is committed as the file was taken with dishonest intent without consent.
  • dNo offence is committed as the book was returned and no loss has been caused to the owner of the book.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Theft (Section 378 IPC) is complete the moment a thing is dishonestly moved without consent; taking the file with dishonest intent constitutes theft even though it was later returned (wrongful gain/loss is enough).

21

Creating a false document amounts to Forgery only when:

  • aThere is an intent to cause injury to the public.
  • bThere is an intent to commit fraud on a public.
  • cThere is an intent to cause a person to enter into an implied agreement.
  • dD. all of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 463/464 IPC, making a false document is forgery when done with intent to cause damage/injury to the public or any person, to support any claim, or to commit fraud; hence all of the above.

22

A person enters another’s house without seeking permission. He has committed house if-

  • aHe entered with an intention to commit an offence.
  • bHe entered with an intention to annoy or insult the residents.
  • cHe entered with an intention to intimidate the residents.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

House-trespass (Sections 441/442 IPC) is committed where entry into another's property is with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy the person in possession; hence all of the above.

23

a married woman gives to an illegitimate child. To escape from societal shame, … the child outside the gates of an orphanage. Has the mother committed an offence ?

  • aShe has committed the offence of abandonment of child.
  • bAbandonment of child is not a punishable offence in India.
  • cAbandonment of child a punishable offence only for legitimate children.
  • dAbandonment of child is not a punishable offence if the mother is in a destitute.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Exposing/abandoning a child under twelve years by a parent or person having care, with intent to wholly abandon it, is an offence under Section 317 IPC; the mother has committed abandonment of child.

24

which of the following is considered to be a ‘Body Corporate’ under the Limited Partnership Act, 2008?

  • aA corporation sole.
  • bA company incorporated outside India.
  • cA co-operative society registered under any law for the time being in force.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 2(1)(d) of the LLP Act, 2008, 'body corporate' expressly excludes a corporation sole, a co-operative society, and other notified bodies, but expressly includes a company incorporated outside India.

25

Sarita mischievously takes possession of Namrata’s land. Sarita gives it on rent to sanjay for a fixed period of time. After the expiry of the lease, Sanjay refuses to hand over vacant possession of the property to sarita. Thereafter, Sarita files a Suit for Eviction, which is resisted by Sanjay only on the ground that Sarita is not the owner of the property. Which of the following consequences are to follow ?

  • aSarita is entitled to a decree of eviction, since it is not open to Sanjay to Question her title over the property.
  • bSarita is not entitled to a decree of eviction since she is not the owner of the property. Only Namrata an maintain a suit for eviction against Sanjay.
  • cSanjay has to be evicted, but Sarita cannot be handled over possession over the property, since she is not the owner of the property.
  • dThe court should enquire from Namrata, if she wishes for Sanjay to continue in possession of the property, or to return the possession to Sarita, since ultimately, she is the owner of the property.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

A tenant inducted by the landlord (even a non-owner in settled possession) is estopped under Section 116 of the Evidence Act from denying the landlord's title during the tenancy; hence Sanjay cannot question Sarita's title and she is entitled to a decree of eviction.

26

What is the minimum number of witnesses required to prove a fact, under the Indian Evidence Act?

  • a1
  • b2
  • c3
  • dNo particular number is prescribed
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 expressly provides that no particular number of witnesses is required for proof of any fact.

27

Selvam went on a trek in the Himalayas, and went missing, and neither his family nor his friends heard from him for many years. What is the number of years after which it can be presumed that he is dead under the Indian Evidence Act?

  • a30 years
  • b7 years
  • c12 years
  • dNo particular number is prescribed.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, a person not heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him is presumed dead.

28

George is on trial for the murder of his neighbour Victoria. George informs his lawyer, Pankaj before the bail hearing he is in fact guilty of murder. Pankaj During the course of defending George also comes to learn that George is plotting to kill Sofia, who is his girlfriend. Which of the following is true ?

  • aGeorge’s confession to the murder of victoria is privileged communication, but his intention to murder Sofia is not protected from disclosure.
  • bGeorge’s confession in respect of murder of Victoria as well as his intention to murder Sofia are both privileged communications and protected from disclosures.
  • cNeither George’s confession in respect of murder of Victoria nor his intention to murder Sofia, are protected from disclosure, as there is no attorney client privilege in India.
  • dGeorge’s confession to the murder of Victoria is not a privileged communication. The issue of the intention to kill Sofia, will not arise unless and until Sofia is murdered.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 126 of the Evidence Act, the past confession to Victoria's murder is privileged, but the proviso excludes communications in furtherance of a future crime or fraud, so the plan to kill Sofia is not protected.

29

Which of the following constitutes secondary evidence?

  • aCopies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves ensure the accuracy of the copy.
  • bOral accounts of the contents of a document givenby a person who has seen such documents.
  • cBoth a. And b.
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 63 of the Evidence Act lists both mechanical copies ensuring accuracy and oral accounts by a person who has seen the document as secondary evidence.

30

Mr.D was a defendant in a suit for recovery of money. Summons sent for hearing dated 01.02.2019 to Mr.D through registered post was received back with postal endorsement of ‘refusal’. This was also the report of the process server attached with the Court. In view of this report, the Trial Court proceeded ex-parte against Mr.D on 01.02.2019. The ex-parte decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff on 01.02.2020 and the execution petition was filed. The executing court issued warrants of attachment for his bank accounts. At this juncture Mr.D filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying that ex-parte decree of the Trial Court be set aside on the ground that he was not duly served with the summons. Whether the said application of Mr.D can be allowed ?

  • aYer, because Mr.D is entitled to defend the suit on merits.
  • bNo, because Mr.D himself refused the summons and was therefore duly served.
  • cYes, because Trial Court ought to have issued fresh summons at the hearing dated 01.02.2019 and made a second attempt to serve Mr.D.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

A postal endorsement of 'refusal' corroborated by the process server's report constitutes good and sufficient service under Order V Rule 9/Order IX, so an application under Order IX Rule 13 on the ground of non-service fails.

31

Mr.A filed a suit for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent against Mr.Y in respect of a commercial shop basis legal notice dated 01.12.2022. Mr.Y filed a written statement stating that he is not a tenant in the premises and it is his son Mr.X who is the tenant in occupation of the said commercial shop. Mr.A filed an application for impleadment of Mr. X as defendants no.2 in view of the said averments made in the written statement. Both Mr.X and Mr.Y opposed the implement application on the ground that Mr.X cannot be impleaded in the present suit and a separate suit is to be filed. Is this impleadment application maintainable or not ?

  • aNo, as this is a separate cause of action and a fresh suit should be filed.
  • bNo, as the present suit is based on legal notice dated 01.12.2022 which was not addressed to Mr.X the proposed defendant.
  • cYes, in View of the defence raised by Mr.Y in his written statement which gives rise to a doubt, so as to enable the plaintiff for grant of the relief’s sought in the plaint.
  • dYes, as per Section 151 CPC.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC the court may add a person whose presence is necessary to effectually adjudicate; the defendant's plea that his son is the real tenant justifies impleading the son to grant complete relief.

32

A suit governed by Commercial Courts Act., 1015 was filed by Mr.A against Mr.C. Mr.C was served with summons of the said commercial suit on 30.06.2022. Mr.C was called on to file Written Statement through the said summons within 30 days, the same was filed by Mr.C on 10.11.2022 (after 132 days) with an application seeking condonation of delay of 102 days. It was stated in the application that he had met with an accident by the concerned commercial Court ?

  • aYes, because the defendant has shown sufficient cause for condoning the delay
  • bNo, Because the defendant statement is to be mandatorily filed within 120 days from the date of service of summons.
  • cNo, because the written statement has to be mandatorily filed within 90 days from the date of service of summons.
  • dYes, because Court has discretion to enlarge the time for filing written statement, subject to payment of costs to mr. A for the delay.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Order VIII Rule 1 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the written statement in a commercial suit must be filed within 120 days of service, an outer limit that is mandatory and beyond which the right to file is forfeited (SCG Contracts v K.S. Chamankar).

33

Mr.G a hostel owner rented out one of the rooms to Mr.H, at a yearly rent of Rs,1,20,000/- Mr.H defaulted for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 Mr. G after issuing legal notice dated 01.02.2019 for the arrears, filed a suit for recovery in 2019 for the rent due of the years 2017 and 2018 only. The said was decreed in favour of Mr.G on 01.11.2019. Whether Mr.G can file a subsequent suit for recovery of arrears of the year 2016 ?

  • aNo, as per Order II Rule 2 CPC.
  • bNo, as per Section 11 CPC
  • cYes, as per Order XX Rule 12 CPC
  • dYes, as per Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Order II Rule 2 CPC bars a subsequent suit for a portion of the claim (2016 arrears) that arose from the same cause of action and was omitted from the earlier suit.

34

as per section 299 of the Cr.P.C, witnesses for the prosecution can be examined by the Court in the absence of the accused where -

  • aThe accused intimidates or threatens the witnesses for the prosecution in any manner.
  • bThe accused is held guilty of committing criminal contempt of court.
  • cThe accused seeks exemption from appearence in the matter and consents to recording of evidence of prosecution witnesses in his absence as well as absence of his counsel.
  • dWhere the accused has abscounded, and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 299 CrPC permits recording of prosecution evidence in the accused's absence where the accused has absconded and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him.

35

The Witness Protection Scheme,20918 approved by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Mahender Chawla vs. Union of India, 2018 SCC Online SC 2679 is a scheme-

  • aProviding for assessment of threat perception to the life of a witness or his family members, during investigation/trial or thereafter.
  • bProviding for threat percptions to be assessed by the Investigation Officer which is binding on the Court.
  • cProviding for protection of a witness in a trial punishable with imprisonment for a term not less than 10 years, which may extend to imprisonment for life or death.
  • dDoes not provide for change of identity as also relocation of witness due to law and order being a State legislative subject.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 (approved in Mahender Chawla v Union of India) provides for assessment of threat perception to a witness or his family during investigation, trial or thereafter; threat is assessed by the competent authority (Head of Police via Threat Analysis Report), not binding on the court, and the scheme does provide identity change and relocation.

36

Before proceeding to record the statement of an adult victim of sexual assault, the Magistrate is duty bound to ascertain from the Investigating Officer (IO) as to the nature of allegations and its truthfulness in the opinion of the IO.

  • aStatement is not correct since the Magistrate should hear the PP/APP as well as support Person or legal aid counsel before proceeding to record the statement of the victim.
  • bStatement is not correct since the Magistrate is under a legal duty to ascertain the version of the incident in the words of the victim of crime and record her statement after satisfying that sh has not been tutored, or under any kind of thread , undue influence or coercion from anyone.
  • cStatement is correct and the Magistrate may refuse to record the statement of the victim of crime if she is and educated lady and has submitted written complaint.
  • dStatement is correct and shall only be recorded if the report of the medical examination of the victim has been conducted corroborating sexual assault.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The statement is incorrect: the Magistrate recording a victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC must record the incident in the victim's own words after satisfying that she is not tutored or under threat/influence, not rely on the IO's opinion of truthfulness.

37

When the Magistrate Court of Session takes cognizance under sections 190/193, CrPC, it takes cognizance of-

  • aThe offence
  • bThe offender
  • cBoth (1) and (2)
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

It is settled that a court takes cognizance of the offence and not the offender (R.R. Chari v State of U.P.); cognizance is of the offence.

38

Under which provision of law, the accused person is entitled to default bail on account of non- completion of investigation within the stipulated period-

  • aSection 437 CrPC
  • bSection 439 CrPC
  • cSection 167 IPC
  • dSection 167 CrPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Default/statutory bail for non-completion of investigation within the stipulated period is granted under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC.

39

X and Y, being both juristic entities have certain commercial disputes which have arisen under a contract which does not contain any arbitration clause. X wishes to resolve these disputes through arbitration and for this purpose seeks to have an arbitration agreement with Y. which of the following is a possible option for X for the purposed of bringing about an arbitration agreement?

  • aAddress a letter to Y proposing that the disputes be resolved through arbitration and calling upon Y to agree to the same.
  • bEnter into an oral agreement with Y for referring the disputed to arbitration.
  • cFile a civil suit praying that Y be directed to enter into an arbitration agreement with X.
  • dFile an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking reference of the disputes to arbitration.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires an arbitration agreement in writing; an agreement can be formed by an exchange of letters, so addressing a letter proposing arbitration and obtaining Y's agreement is a valid route. An oral agreement, a suit to compel agreement, or a Section 11 application (which presupposes an existing agreement) are not.

40

What is the date of commencement of arbitration proceedings in relation to a particular dispute?

  • aDate of first hearing before the arbitral tribunal.
  • bDate on which a request for that disputed to be referred to arbitration is received by the opposite party.
  • cDate on which a petition under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, is filed by one of the parties.
  • dDate on which arbitral tribunal is constituted.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arbitral proceedings commence on the date the respondent receives a request for the dispute to be referred to arbitration.

41

In an arbitral proceedings with 3 arbitrators, the arbitral award must be signed by-

  • aAll the 3 arbitrators.
  • bAny 2 arbitrators, which must include the presiding arbitrator.
  • cAny one arbitrator so long as the reason for any omitted signature is stated.
  • dAny 2 arbitrators so long as the reason for any omitted signature is stated.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 31(2) of the Act, in proceedings with more than one arbitrator the signatures of a majority suffice provided the reason for any omitted signature is stated.

42

An application under section 33 of the arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996, cannot seek-

  • aCorrection of any computation error in the award.
  • bCorrection of electrical or typographical error in the award.
  • cReviews of the award on the ground of an error apparent on the face of the record.
  • dInterpretation of a specific point or part of the award.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 33 of the Act permits correction of computation/clerical/typographical errors and interpretation of a part of the award, but not a review on the ground of an error apparent on the face of the record.

43

An appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would not be maintainable against-

  • aAn order refusing to refer the parties to arbitration under section 8.
  • bDismissal of a petition under section 34.
  • cRefusing any measure under section 9.
  • dAn order allowing an application under section 8.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 37 enumerates appealable orders; an order allowing (referring parties to arbitration under) Section 8 is not among them, whereas refusal to refer, refusal of Section 9 measures, and dismissal of a Section 34 petition are appealable.

44

It is legally impermissible for an arbitral tribunal to comprise of-

  • a3 arbitrators
  • b4 arbitrators
  • c5 arbitrators
  • d7 arbitrators
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 10 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires that the number of arbitrators shall not be an even number; thus 4 arbitrators is legally impermissible while 3, 5 and 7 are valid.

45

A settlement agreement arrived at during the conciliation proceedings under Part III of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, stands on the same footing-

  • aAs an order made under section 9.
  • bAn order made under section 17.
  • cA preliminary decree of a civil court of competent jurisdiction.
  • dAs an arbitral award rendered under section 30.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 74 of the Act, a settlement agreement reached in conciliation has the same status and effect as an arbitral award on agreed terms under Section 30.

46

What are the consequences in a case wherein the number of partners in a limited liability partnership falls below two partners and one partner still carries on business for more than six months, while having the knowledge of such a situation?

  • aThe person who knows he alone is the remaining partner and still carries on the business becomes personally liable for the obligations of the limited liability partnership incurred during that period.
  • bThe person who is the remaining partner and still carries on the business continues to stay jointly liable with the order partner for any liabilities or obligations of the limited liability partnership during that period.
  • cThe person who is the remaining partner and still carries on the business is not liable for any liabilities or obligations of the limited liability partnership during that period.
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 6(2) of the LLP Act, 2008, where the LLP carries on business with fewer than two partners for more than six months, the sole remaining partner who knows this and continues is personally liable for the LLP's obligations incurred during that period.

47

Under what circumstance can a Limited Liability Partnership be wound up by the Tribunal?

  • aIf, for a period of more than 6 months, the number of partners of the limited liability partnership is reduced below two.
  • bIf the limited liability partnership has acted against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state or public order.
  • cIf the tribunal is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the limited liability partnership be wound up.
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 64 of the LLP Act, 2008 lists all these circumstances (members below two for over six months, acting against sovereignty/integrity/security/public order, and just-and-equitable winding up) as grounds for winding up by the Tribunal.

48

For purpose of Limitation Act, 1963:

  • aHundi is not a Bill of Exchange
  • bCheque is not a Bill of Exchange
  • cBoth (1) and (2) are incorrect
  • dBoth (1) and (2) are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 2(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 defines 'bill of exchange' to include a hundi and a cheque, so both statements (that they are not bills of exchange) are incorrect.

49

A suit for recovery of money based on pronote is filed one day after expiry of period of limitation. There is neither any prayer by the p,laintiff for condonation of delay nor any objection taken in written statement by the defendant. Which of the following statements is correct?

  • aThe suit is liable to be dismissed.
  • bThe suit cannot be dismissed on the ground of bar of limitation because there is no issue raised.
  • cThe delay of one day is insignificant and can be ignored by the Court.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 a suit instituted after the prescribed period must be dismissed even though limitation is not set up as a defence; the bar operates by statute irrespective of pleadings.

50

Mark the correct statement with reference to the period of limitation.

  • aWhere the plaintiff claims to be a pauper, the suit is deemed to be insulted when his application for leave to sue as a pauper is allowed.
  • bA counterclaim, is deemed to be instituted on the same date as the suit in which the Counter claim is made.
  • cBoth a. And b. Are correct
  • dBoth a. And b. Are incorrect
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Both are correct: Section 3(2) of the Limitation Act provides a pauper's suit is instituted when the application for leave to sue as a pauper is presented (deemed instituted when allowed/presented), and a counterclaim is instituted on the date it is made; here both statements per the Act are correct (set-off/counterclaim treated as a plaint), making 'both correct' the best answer.

51

Following usual practice New Delhi Courts located at Patiala House Courts complex were closed post lunch on 25th January 2023 since security agencies cordoned off the area around Kartavya Path (previously known as Rajpath) and on 26th January, 2023 for Republic Day parade. On 27th January, 2023, ‘A’ filed a suit against ‘B’ for recovery of money, wherein the period of limitation had ended on 25th January, 2023, referring to above facts.

  • aThe suit is not barred by limitation.
  • bThe suit is barred by limitation and must be rejected.
  • cThe suit is barred by limitation but delay may be condoned upon sufficient cause being shown.
  • dAll of the above are correct.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963, when the prescribed period expires on a day the court is closed, the suit may be instituted on the day the court reopens. As the courts were closed on 25th (the day limitation ended) and 26th January, filing on 27th January is within time; the suit is not barred.

52

Sylvester is arrested under suspicion of having committed cheating and forgery. In what circumstances will his confession, made in the custody of a police officer, be proved against him?

  • aIf it is made in the presence of a police officer, above the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police.
  • bIf it is made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate.
  • cAll of the above.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, a confession made while in police custody is inadmissible unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate. Option (a) (a senior police officer) does not cure the bar.

53

As per the Indian Evidence Act, admissions-

  • aAre conclusive proof of facts.
  • bMay operate as estoppel against the persons who make them.
  • cBoth (1) and (2)
  • dNeither (1) nor (2)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 31 of the Indian Evidence Act, admissions are not conclusive proof of the matters admitted, but they may operate as estoppel. Hence only proposition (2) is correct.

54

How many years need to elapse before the electronic record in proper custody gives rise to a presumption, as to the correctness of the digital signature, under the Indian Evidence Act?

  • a5 years
  • b30 years
  • c3 years
  • dNo such period is prescribed
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 90A of the Indian Evidence Act allows the court to presume the correctness of the electronic/digital signature on an electronic record purporting to be five years old, produced from proper custody.

55

Communication during marriage between spouses is generally protected from disclosure, subject to exceptions, under which section of the Indian Evidence Act?

  • aSection 120
  • bSection 121
  • cSection 122
  • dSection 123
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 122 of the Indian Evidence Act protects communications made during marriage between spouses from compelled disclosure, subject to exceptions (consent, or suits/proceedings between the spouses).

56

Fill in the blank: When a man has not been heard of for seven years by those who would____have heard of him if he had been alive, the burden of proving that he is alive shifts to the person who affirms it.

  • aOrdinarily
  • bNormally
  • cUsually
  • dNaturally
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act uses the words 'who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive'; the burden of proving he is alive shifts to the person who affirms it.

57

Electronic record produced before court is treated as-

  • aOral evidence
  • bDocumentary evidence
  • cTechnical evidence
  • dUsual evidence
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act (definition of 'document', read with Section 65B), an electronic record produced before the court is treated as documentary evidence.

58

Evidence given by a dumb witness in writing or by sign language in open court, and reduced in writing, is-

  • aDocumentary evidence
  • bOral evidence
  • cInadmissible
  • dNo evidence
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 119 of the Indian Evidence Act, a witness unable to speak may give evidence by writing or signs in open court; such evidence is deemed to be oral evidence.

59

Burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on the person-

  • aFilling the suit or proceeding.
  • bDefendant/ Respondent.
  • cWhosever the court calls upon.
  • dWho would fail if no evidence at all was given on either side.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 102 of the Indian Evidence Act: the burden of proof lies on the person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side.

60

Which of the following is true for burden of proof in civil cases and criminal cases?

  • aIn civil cases, it is “preponderance of probabilities” and in criminal cases it is “beyond reasonable doubt”.
  • bIt is “preponderance of probabilities” in both kinds of cases.
  • cIt is “beyond reasonable doubt” in both kinds of cases.
  • dThere is no burden of proof concept in civil and criminal cases.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The settled standard of proof is 'preponderance of probabilities' in civil cases and 'beyond reasonable doubt' in criminal cases.

61

A decree for recovery of money of Rs. 10 Lakhs is passed against a company ABC limited. The decree holder files an execution petition and impleads Mr. A and Mrs. A as Respondent Nos.2 and 3 since they are the promoter directors of the company. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 seek their deletion. Is the application liable to allowed or disallowed?

  • aThe application is liable to be disallowed as they are proper parties.
  • bThe application is liable to be allowed as they were not the defendants in the suit before the Trial Court and are not liable for payment of the decretal amount.
  • cThe application liable to be allowed subject to their undertaking that they will pay the decretal amount if ABC limited fails to satisfy the decree.
  • dThe application is liable to be disallowed as they are jointly liable in law for the payment under the decree.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

A company is a separate legal person; the decree was against ABC Ltd. only. The promoter-directors were not defendants in the suit and cannot be made liable in execution, so their deletion application must be allowed (Section 47/Order XXI CPC; corporate veil not pierced).

62

Where would a suit for compensation for wrongs to a person be instituted, if the wrong is committed within territorial jurisdiction of one court and the defendant resides within the territorial jurisdiction of another court?

  • aPlace where the wrong took place
  • bPlace where the defendant resides
  • cPlace where the plaintiff resides
  • dEither of (1) or (2)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 19 CPC, a suit for compensation for wrong to person/movable property may be instituted either where the wrong was done or where the defendant resides or carries on business.

63

Upon institution of a suit, summons may be issued to the defendant to appear on such day-

  • aNot beyond 120 days from date of the institution of the suit.
  • bNot beyond 90 days from date of the institution of the suit.
  • cNot beyond 60 days from date of the institution of the suit.
  • dNot beyond 30 days from date of the institution of the suit.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Order V Rule 1(1) CPC, summons must call the defendant to appear and answer on a day not beyond thirty days from the institution of the suit.

64

The court may, on the application of the decree-holder, order execution of the decree-

  • aBy delivery of any property specifically decreed only to the extent of the property of the deceased which has come to his hands and has not been duly disposed of.
  • bBy attachment and sale or by the sale without attachment of any property.
  • cBy appointing a receiver.
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 51 CPC, the court may order execution by delivery of property specifically decreed, by attachment and sale (or sale without attachment), by appointing a receiver, and by other modes; hence all of the above.

65

Every decree for the payment of money may be executed by either-

  • aDetention in the civil prison of the judgement debtor.
  • bBy the attachment and sale of property of the judgement debtor.
  • cBoth (1) and (2)
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Order XXI Rule 30 CPC, a money decree may be executed by detention of the judgment-debtor in civil prison, or by attachment and sale of his property, or both.

66

Summary suits under Order 37 of CPC apply to the following classes of suits-

  • aSuits upon bills of exchange, hundies and promissory notes.
  • bSuits seeking recovery of liquidated debt based on written contract.
  • cSuits seeking damages for breach of contract.
  • dBoth (1) and (2)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Order XXXVII Rule 1 CPC applies to suits upon bills of exchange, hundies and promissory notes, and to suits for recovery of a liquidated debt/demand arising on a written contract; hence both (1) and (2).

67

If a suit, which does not seek any urgent relief, is filed against a public officer without issuance of prior notice, the court shall-

  • aReject the plaint
  • bReturn the plaint
  • cAccept the plaint
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 80 CPC, where a suit against a public officer (for an act in official capacity) is filed without the mandatory two-month prior notice and no urgent relief is sought, the plaint is liable to be returned to enable compliance.

68

at which of the following stages can the court add or strike out any party to a suit/

  • aBefore issuance of summons
  • bBefore framing of issues
  • cBefore commencement of trial
  • dAt any stage
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, the court may, at any stage of the proceedings, order that the name of any improperly joined party be struck out or that a necessary/proper party be added.

69

A person ‘X’ is appointed as the conciliatory to attempt conciliation of the disputes between party A and party B. The conciliation proceedings are terminated pursuant to which the parties seek adjudication of their through arbitration. Which one of the following is a possible scenario-

  • aX is appointed as the nominee arbitrator of party A in the arbitration proceedings.
  • bX is appointed as the sole arbitrator through a judicial order passed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • cX appears as a witness in the arbitration between party A and party B despite no consent of parties.
  • dX is appointed as the sole arbitrator with the consent of party A and party B.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 80 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the conciliator shall not act as arbitrator in the dispute unless the parties otherwise agree; with consent of both parties X may be appointed sole arbitrator.

70

a party filed an application for interim measures of protection before a Court, which was disposed of. The other party also wishes to file an application for interim measures of protection. He may do so-

  • aBefore the same court where the party had first filed an application for interim measures of protection.
  • bBefore the court within whose jurisdiction the seat of arbitration is situated.
  • cOnly before the High Court.
  • dAny Court of Original Jurisdiction.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Once a court is approached under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, that court alone has jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings (Section 42); the other party must also apply before the same court.

71

An Arbitral Tribunal shall-

  • aHave a lien on the arbitral award for only administration fee.
  • bHave a lien on the arbitral award for only legal fee.
  • cNot have a lien on the arbitral award for any unpaid costs of the arbitration.
  • dHave a lien on the arbitral award for any unpaid costs of the arbitration.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 39(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitral tribunal has a lien on the arbitral award for any unpaid costs of the arbitration.

72

under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitrator has to be appointed-

  • aWithin 30 days of the arbitration agreement.
  • bWithin 30 days of the arising of the dispute.
  • cWithin 30 days of the failure to resolve the dispute on their own by the parties.
  • dWithin 30 days of the receipt of request for appointment of arbitrator from the other party.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 11(4)/(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the appointment mechanism is triggered when a party fails to appoint/agree within thirty days from receipt of the request for appointment from the other party.

73

The factors that could disqualify an Arbitrator inter alia are- I. The Arbitrator is a partner in a law firm acting as a counsel for one of the parties. II. The Arbitrator has a commercial relationship with an affiliate of one of the parties.

  • aBoth I and II
  • bOnly I
  • cOnly II
  • dNeither I nor II
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule (and the IBA guidelines reflected therein), both an arbitrator being a partner in a law firm acting as counsel for a party and having a commercial relationship with an affiliate of a party are disqualifying; hence both I and II.

74

Which of the following is an incorrect statement?

  • aAn arbitral award is a contract.
  • bAn arbitral award must be in writing and signed.
  • cAn arbitral award includes an interim award.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

An arbitral award is not a contract; it is an adjudicatory determination (Section 31 requires it to be in writing and signed, and Section 2(1)(c) includes an interim award). Statement (a) is the incorrect one.

75

Section 473(1) CrPC puts fetters on the powers of Magistrate to grant bail to any accused person arrested in non-bailable offence when there appear reasonable for believing that he has been guilty of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, but the first provision thereto carves exception and provides that such accused can be released on bail if such person is-

  • aUnder the age of sixteen years
  • bA woman
  • cSick or infirm
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Though the stem mis-cites Section 473(1), the substance is the proviso to Section 437(1) CrPC, which permits release on bail even in such serious non-bailable offences if the accused is under sixteen years of age, or is a woman, or is sick or infirm; hence all of the above.

76

any Court alter or add to any charge at any time before-

  • aThe prosecution evidence is closed.
  • bThe recording of statement of the accused under section 313 CrPC.
  • cThe defence evidence is closed.
  • dJudgement is pronounced.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 216 CrPC, any court may alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced.

77

When a person is charged with an offence, and facts are proved which reduce it to a minor offence.

  • aHe will be acquitted of both, the charged offence, as well as the minor offence.
  • bHe will be tried afresh for the minor offence.
  • cHe may be convicted of the minor offence.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 222 CrPC, when a person is charged with an offence and facts proved reduce it to a minor offence, he may be convicted of the minor offence though not charged with it.

78

When does the trial of an offence commerce?

  • aWhen chargesheet is filed
  • bWhen charges are framed
  • cEhrn cognizance is taken
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

In a warrant/sessions case the trial commences when charges are framed; the Supreme Court (e.g. Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab) treats framing of charge as the commencement of trial, distinct from cognizance or filing of chargesheet.

79

A Court may impound a document under the following provision of law-

  • aSection 100 CrPC
  • bSection 101 CrPC
  • cSection 103 CrPC
  • dSection 104 CrPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 104 CrPC: 'Any Court may, if it thinks fit, impound any document or thing produced before it under this Code.'

80

After the police report is filed under section 173 CrPC, who can order further investigation ?

  • aOfficer in charge of a police station
  • bDistrict Police Chief
  • cMagistrate concerned
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Although Section 173(8) CrPC permits the officer in charge to conduct further investigation, the power to order/direct further investigation after a report under Section 173(2) rests with the Magistrate concerned.

81

what is the effect of compounding of the offences under Section 320 CrPC?

  • aThe accused is discharged of the offence
  • bThe accused is acquitted of the offence
  • cThe accused is held guilty of the offence
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 320(8) CrPC: the composition of an offence shall have the effect of an acquittal of the accused with whom the offence has been compounded.

82

under what provision can a person, not being an accused, be summoned to stand trial along with the accused, when during the course of any inquiry into, or trial of, an offence, it appears from the evidence that such person has committed an offence?

  • aSection 190 CrPC
  • bSection 193 CrPC
  • cSection 319 CrPC
  • dSection 317 CrPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 319 CrPC empowers the court to proceed against and summon any person, not being the accused, who appears from the evidence to have committed an offence, to be tried together with the accused.

83

For a conduct to be relevant which or constitutes some motives or preparation for any fact in issue or relevant fact, under Section * of the Indian Evidence Act, the conduct-

  • aMust be poor conduct.
  • bMust be subsequent conduct.
  • cMay be previous or subsequent conduct.
  • dConduct is irrelevant.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act, conduct of any party (or agent) which influences or is influenced by a fact in issue or relevant fact is relevant whether it is previous or subsequent.

84

A fact is said to be proved when a -

  • aWitness testifies to it.
  • bCourt believes it to exist.
  • cCourt decides to act upon it.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act: a fact is 'proved' when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought to act upon it.

85

a will can be proved under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act by calling-

  • aOne of the attesting witnesses.
  • bThe advocate who only drafted the will.
  • cThe stenographer who only typed the will
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act: a document required by law to be attested (such as a will) may be proved by calling at least one attesting witness; a drafter or stenographer is not an attesting witness.

86

if a court puts questions to a witness under section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, then-

  • aParties have a right to object to the questions.
  • bParties have a right to cross examine the witness upon any answer given on such questions.
  • cBoth a. And b.
  • dNeither a. Nor b.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act empowers the judge to ask any question in any form; the proviso expressly bars parties from objecting to such questions and from cross-examining a witness upon any answer given to such questions.

87

under the Indian Evidence Act Court must take judicialjudicial notice of-

  • aAll laws in force in India.
  • bAll seals of which English courts take judicial notice.
  • cAll public Acts passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 57 of the Indian Evidence Act lists facts of which the Court shall take judicial notice, including all laws in force in India, all seals of which English courts take judicial notice, and all public Acts passed by the UK Parliament.

88

Radhey is summoned by te Plaintiff only to produce a document. Which of the following statements is correct?

  • aHe can be cross examined by the Plained.
  • bHe can be cross examined by the Defendant.
  • cHe can be cross examined by the both the Plaintiff and Defendant.
  • dHe cannot be cross examined by either of them.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 139 of the Indian Evidence Act: a person summoned merely to produce a document does not become a witness by the mere fact of producing it and cannot be cross-examined unless and until he is called as a witness.

89

as per Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a consideration or object of an agreement is unlawful if-

  • aThe court regards it as immoral.
  • bIt of such a nature that, if permitted would defeat the provisions of any law.
  • cIt involves or implies injury to the person or property of another.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 renders consideration or object unlawful where, inter alia, it defeats the provisions of any law, involves injury to person or property of another, or the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy.

90

Sarita promises to deliver goods to Babita on a certain day on payment of Rs. 20,000. Sariita dies before that day. Under the India Contract Act, 1872-

  • aSarita’s representatives are bound to deliver the goods to Babita and Babita is bound to pay Rs. 20,000 to Sarita’s representatives, unless any contrary intention appears from the record.
  • bSarita’s re[presentatives are not bound to deliver the goods to Babita.
  • cSarita’s representatives are not bound to deliver the goods to Babita but Babita is bound to pay Rs.20,000 to Sarita’s representatives.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 37 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and its illustration: on the promisor's death before performance of such a contract, the promisor's representatives are bound to deliver the goods and the promisee is bound to pay, unless a contrary intention appears.

91

‘A’ filed a suit recovery of Rs.10 lakhs against ‘B’. It was B’s case that ‘A’ owed him Rs.20 lakhs but ‘B’ had not filed a suit to claim the said amount as the limitation period had expired. Which of the following is true?

  • aB cannot raise his claim as it is barred by limitation.
  • bB can raise his claim by of a separate counter claim.
  • cB can claim set off in the written statement.
  • dB gets a new cause of action for filing a fresh suit after filing of a’s suit.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Order VIII Rule 6 CPC a defendant may claim a legally recoverable set-off; a time-barred claim cannot be sued upon afresh or raised as a counterclaim, but here the option treats set-off in the written statement as the available course.

92

as per section 100(1) of CPC, should appeal lies to High Court on

  • aSubstantial question of law
  • bSubstantial question of fact
  • cBoth a. And b.
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 100(1) CPC provides that a second appeal lies to the High Court only if the case involves a substantial question of law.

93

a plaint, under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC, shall be rejected on which of the following conditions-

  • aWhere it does not disclose a cause of action
  • bWhere the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by any law
  • cBoth a. And b.
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Order VII Rule 11 CPC requires rejection of a plaint where it does not disclose a cause of action (clause a) and where the suit appears from the plaint to be barred by any law (clause d), among others.

94

where it appears to the court that there exist elements of a statement whichwhich may be acceptable to the parties, the court can refer the parties for which of the following-

  • aArbitration.
  • bConciliation
  • cMediation
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 89 CPC empowers the court, where it appears there exist elements of a settlement acceptable to the parties, to refer them to arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement/Lok Adalat, or mediation.

95

for the purpose of determining jurisdiction of a “commercial dispute” under the Commercial Courts Act, which of the following factors ought to be considered?

  • aTerritorial jurisdiction and Specific Value.
  • bOnly Specified value
  • cOnly territorial jurisdiction
  • dNeither territorial jurisdiction nor Specified Value.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Jurisdiction of a 'commercial dispute' under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 depends on the dispute meeting the 'Specified Value' (Section 12) and the court having territorial jurisdiction; both factors must be considered.

96

the defendant, instead of filing his written statement to a commercial suit, filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The application was dismissed by the Court, However, in the meantime 150 days had passed since the service of summons of the suit o the defendant. Defendant prayed that it be granted one week to file the Written Statement.

  • aThe court, exercising its powers under Section 151 of the CPc, shall grant defendant the time to file the written statement.
  • bAs it was the fault of the court that the application of the defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC remained pending for a long period, the Court shall grant extension of time to the defendant to file his written statement.
  • cThe court cannot grant extension of time to the defendant to file the Written Statement, as 120 days have passed from the service of the summons on the defendant.
  • dThe court shall condone the delay in filing the written statement as the defendant has shown sufficient cause for not filing the written statement within time.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under the Commercial Courts Act amendments to Order VIII Rule 1 CPC, the outer limit for filing a written statement in a commercial suit is 120 days from service of summons, beyond which the right is forfeited and the court cannot extend time (SCG Contracts v. K.S. Chamankar).

97

A nomination of an arbitrator is made by a person who is himself ineligible to act as an arbitrator under section 12(5) read with Seventh Schedule to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.In such a case-

  • aThe nominee cannot act as an arbitrator.
  • bSuch nomination would would be void ab initio
  • cBoth a. And b.
  • dSuch nomination is valid.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Per TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engineering and Bharat Broadband v. BSNL, a person ineligible under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule cannot act as arbitrator and is also de jure incapable of nominating an arbitrator, so the nomination is void.

98

a party seeking appointment of an arbitrator through the High Court or its destinate shall make a request under-

  • aSection 11(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • bSection 11(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • cSection 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • dSection 10 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the provision under which a party approaches the High Court (or Supreme Court) or its designate for appointment of an arbitrator on failure of the agreed appointment procedure.

99

The Preamble of the Constitution of India to secure to the citizens-

  • aJustice, liberty, equality and fraternity.
  • bJustice, liberty, security and prosperity.
  • cliberty , equality, fraternity and security.
  • dIndependence, justice, liberty and equality.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The Preamble resolves to secure to all citizens Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.

100

which of the following rights are not included under Article 19 of the Constitution?

  • aFreedom of speech and expression.
  • bRight to form associations or unions.
  • cRight to reside and settle anywhere in the world.
  • dRight to practise any profession.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Article 19 guarantees, inter alia, freedom of speech, association, profession, and residence within the territory of India; it does not include any right to reside and settle anywhere in the world.

101

Which of the following rights are not guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution?

  • aRight to education.
  • bRight to minorities to establish and administrator educational institutions.
  • cRight to Constitutional remedies.
  • dRight to stand for election to Parliament.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Part III guarantees fundamental rights such as right to education (Art. 21A), minority educational rights (Art. 30) and constitutional remedies (Art. 32). The right to stand for election is a statutory right under the Representation of the People Act, not a fundamental right.

102

under Article 22 of the Constitution, every person who is arrested and detained in custody is to be produced before the nearest magistrate within-

  • aOne week after arrest.
  • bThree days after arrest.
  • cImmediately.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Article 22(2) requires an arrested person to be produced before the nearest Magistrate within 24 hours (excluding journey time). Since none of the options (one week / three days / immediately) state 24 hours, the correct choice is 'None of the above'.

103

the procedure for amendment of the Constitution under Article 368 of the Constitution requires an Amendment to be initiated by-

  • aIntroduction of a Bill in either House of Parliament.
  • bIntroduction of a Bill in only the Lok Sabha.
  • cIntroduction of a Bill in either House of Parliament or the legislative Assembly of any State.
  • dA Resolution of the concerned Government.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Article 368(2) provides that an amendment of the Constitution may be initiated only by the introduction of a Bill in either House of Parliament.

104

A. “Where one several persons jointly entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is under any legal disability, and a discharge can be given without the occurrence of such person, time run against them all.”

  • aB. “Where no such discharge can be given time will run as against such of them as do not suffer from any disability.”
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Question is OCR-broken: it reproduces only Statement A (sub-section (1) of Section 7, Limitation Act) and Statement B, but the answer options (true/false combinations) are misplaced into Q105. Both statements A and B correctly reproduce Section 7 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so both are correct; best-guess key letter 'a' for the first option block as displayed.

105

Statement “A” is correct and Statement “B” is incorrect. Statement “A” is incorrect and Statement “B” is correct. Both Statement “A” and Statement “B” are incorrect. Both Statement “A” and Statement “B” are correct. Mark the correct statement.

  • aIn computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be excluded.
  • bIn computing the period of limitation for an application for review of a judgement, the day on which the judgement complained of was praised, if pronounced in open court in the presence of the party, cannot be excluded.
  • cBoth a. And b. Are correct.
  • dBoth a. And b. Are incorrect.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Per Section 12(1), the day from which the period is reckoned is excluded (statement 'a' correct). Per Section 12(2)/the review proviso, the day on which judgment was pronounced is to be excluded in computing limitation for review, so statement 'b' (saying it 'cannot be excluded') is incorrect. Hence A correct, B incorrect.

106

in computing the period of limitation for any suit, the time during which the plaintiff had been prosecuting another civil proceeding against the defendant, in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, was unable to entertain it shall be excluded, but-

  • aIt is necessary that the other case was prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith.
  • bIt is not necessary that the other suit related to same matter in issue.
  • cIt is necessary that the defect only related to territorial jurisdiction.
  • dAll are correct.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963 excludes time spent prosecuting another civil proceeding only if it was prosecuted 'with due diligence and in good faith' in a court unable to entertain it for defect of jurisdiction or like cause.

107

where the suit is based upon fraud of the defendant, the period of limitation shall

  • aNot begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud or could, with reasonable diligence, have discovered it.
  • bBe deemed to be twelve years from the date of transaction.
  • cBoth a. And b. Are correct.
  • dBoth a. And b. Are incorrect.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 17, Limitation Act, 1963: where a suit is based on the defendant's fraud, limitation does not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. There is no fixed 12-year rule, so only 'a' is correct.

108

which of the following is not an essential requisite of a valid acknowledgement under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 ?

  • aIt must be made before the expiration of limitation period.
  • bIt must be signed by the person making the acknowledgment or by his duly authorised agent.
  • cIt must be made by the party against whom any property or right is claimed or by some person through whom he derives title or liability.
  • dIt must bear a date in writing.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 18, Limitation Act, 1963 a valid acknowledgement must be in writing, signed, and made before expiry of the period by the party/predecessor liable. It need not bear a date in writing (the date can be proved by other evidence), so 'd' is NOT an essential requisite.

109

‘A’ has been awarded a contract by an electricity distribution company to lay underground cables and junction boxes at appropriate places to replace the existing apparatus locality. ‘B’, a local resident protests against the work involving enlarging of the capacity of the junction box located near his property saying this would entail laying of connecting cables for more houses than before, requiring digging of the entire footpath facing his house and frequent visits by technicians for occasional repairs, disturbing his privacy, become a safety hazard and a nuisance. As work goes on, his complaints going unheeded, he files a suit against ‘A’ and the electricity distribution company food injunction against continuance of the work.

  • aThe injunction cannot be granted because the plaintiff ought to have also prayed for compensation in the alternative.
  • bThe injunction cannot be granted because the plaintiff is also to be beneficiary of the work undertaken.
  • cThe injunction cannot be granted because the suit is defective on account of misjoinder of the contractor.
  • dThe injunction cannot be granted because it would cause delay in completion of infrastructure products.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

An injunction will be refused where the plaintiff himself is a beneficiary of the work and the balance of convenience and public interest favour the lawful infrastructure work; the plaintiff being a beneficiary defeats his claim for restraining it.

110

In a case where the offender is not traced or identified, but the victim is identified, but the victim is identified and where no trial take place, the victim or his dependents cannot make an application to the State or the District Legal Services Authority for award of compensation.

  • aStatement is correct. Compensation could only be claimed out of the assets/belonging the accused.
  • bThe statement is correct since Section 2(wa) of the Cr.P.C. recognizes a victim only when the accused is charged for an offence.
  • cThe statement is not correct since Section 375A (4) of the Cr.P.C. enables the victim to seek compensation in such situations.
  • dThe victim can seek ex-gratia payment from the state by filling a writ petition.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 357A CrPC (Victim Compensation Scheme), where the offender is not traced/identified but the victim is, and no trial takes place, the victim or dependents may apply to the State/District Legal Services Authority for compensation. The statement denying this is therefore incorrect; option 'c' captures the enabling provision (mis-numbered as 375A(4) in the OCR but refers to Section 357A(4)).

111

A victim of sexual assault committed in a neighbouring State, escapes to Delhi and reports the matter to the police. The local refuses to register the Fir. An application is moved before the metropolitan Magistrate for a direction to the police to register the FIR.

  • aThe Magistrate can direct the local police to register zero FIR under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.,investigate and file final report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C.
  • bThe Metropolitan Magistrate cannot pass any direction as all crimes are local as per Section 177 and 178 of the Cr.P.C.
  • cThe Magistrate in Delhi can direct the local police of the neighbouring State where the offence is alleged to have been committed to register the FIR, investigate and file a report before him.
  • dThe Metropolitan Magistrate can direct the police to register a zero FIR in the local Police Station, but the police thereafter has to forward the FIR to the Superintendent of Police concerned of the neighbouring State for further investigation as per the law.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Per Lalita Kumari and the zero-FIR principle (and S. 460 CrPC saving), the police where the victim reports must register a zero FIR; the Magistrate having territorial competence over the place where the complaint is made can direct registration and investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, leading to a report under Section 173(2). Option 'a' best states this.

112

Section 162 of Cr.P.C. provides that -

  • aThe statement made by a person to a police officer during investigation and reduced to writing, shall be signed by the person making the statement.
  • bThe statement made by a person to a police officer during investigation and reduced to writing, may not be signed by the person making the statement.
  • cNo statement made by a person to a police officer during investigation and reduced to writing shall be signed by the person making the statement.
  • dStatement made by a person to a police officer during investigation and reduced to writing shall be signed by the person making the statement only if the police officer has obtained prior permission of the court to obtain signature thereon.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 162(1) CrPC expressly provides that no statement made to a police officer in the course of investigation, if reduced to writing, shall be signed by the person making it.

113

Aggrieved by the judgement and the decree passed in a Commercial Suit, the Defendant filed an appeal to the Commercial Division of the High Court. Which of the following is correct?

  • aThe period of limitation for filing such appeal shall be governed by Article 116 and 117 of the Limitation Act.
  • bThe period of limitation for filing such appeal shall be governed by Article 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Section 5 of the Limitation Act shall also not be applicable in case there is delay in filing of the appeal.
  • cThe period of limitation for filing such appeal shall be governed by Article Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, however , if there is a delay in filing the appeal, the same can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for sufficient cause shown.
  • dThere is no period of limitation prescribed for filing of the appeal.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 prescribes 60 days for appeal; the Supreme Court has held the Act does not exclude Section 5 of the Limitation Act, so delay can be condoned for sufficient cause (by way of exception, not rule). Hence option 'c'.

114

Disputes arising out of the following is not a ‘Commercial Dispute’?

  • aConstruction and infrastructure contract.
  • bPartnership agreement.
  • cJoint venture agreement.
  • dPartition of HUF properties.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 lists construction/infrastructure contracts, partnership agreements and joint-venture agreements as commercial disputes. Partition of HUF properties is not a commercial dispute.

115

‘A’ raises a claim of Rs.% crores in arbitration. ‘B’ raises a counter-claim of RS.2 crores in the said arbitration. A final award of Rs. 4 crores is passed in favour of ‘A’. ‘Specified Value’ for determining the jurisdiction of the Court shall be-

  • aRs. 5 crores
  • bRs. 7 crores
  • cRs. 3 crores
  • dRs. 4 crores
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 12(2) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 the Specified Value for an arbitration is the aggregate value of the claim and counter-claim. With claim Rs.5 crore (OCR 'Rs.%') + counter-claim Rs.2 crore, the aggregate Specified Value is Rs.7 crore. The final award amount is irrelevant.

116

In a Commercial Suit, an application seeking a Summary judgement, under Order XIIIA Code of Civil Procedure, can be filed the plaintiff-

  • aAlong with the plaint.
  • bBefore service of summons on the defendant.
  • cAfter summons has been served on the defendant and prior to framing of the issues in respect of the suit.
  • dAt any time before the finals judgement is passed.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Order XIII-A Rule 2 CPC (as inserted by the Commercial Courts Act), a summary judgment application may be made after summons has been served on the defendant but no later than the framing of issues.

117

in a Commercial Suit, along with the plaint, the plaintiff must file documents-

  • aThat support his case.
  • bThat support his case and can answer the defence that the defendants are likely to put up.
  • cThat are relating to any matter in question in the suit and can be easily located by him.
  • dThat are relating to any matter in question in the Suit are in his power, possession, control or custody as on the date of fitting the plaint, irrespective of whether the same is in support or adverse to his case.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Order XI Rule 1(1) CPC (commercial suits), the plaintiff must file a list and disclose on affidavit ALL documents relating to any matter in question that are in his power, possession, control or custody as on the date of filing, whether they support or are adverse to his case.

118

in a Commercial Suit relating to a movable property, the ‘Specified Value’ shall be determined by-

  • aThe market value of the movable property when it was purchased.
  • bThe market value of the moveable property at the time of filing of the Suit.
  • cThe amount that may be noticed by the valuation officer appointed by the Court.
  • dThe amount that may be determined by the Court after the parties have led their evidence on the same.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 12(1)(b) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015: where the relief relates to movable property, the Specified Value is the market value of the movable property as on the date of filing the suit.

119

A dispute arising of a construction and infrastructure contract, shall be a “commercial dispute”.

  • aThe above statement is true only if the relates to the construction of a commercial building.
  • bThe above statement is true only if the dispute is for recover of money under the contract.
  • cThe above statement is false.
  • dThe above statement is true.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 expressly includes 'construction and infrastructure contracts, including tenders' as a commercial dispute, unconditionally. The statement is true.

120

In view of Article 239AA of the Constitution, the National Territory of Delhi is a -

  • aState with a Legislative Assembly.
  • bUnion Territory with a Legislative Assembly.
  • cUnion Territory without a Legislative Assembly.
  • dState without a Legislative Assembly.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Article 239AA, the National Capital Territory of Delhi is a Union Territory with a Legislative Assembly.

121

The Fundamental Duties enumerated in Article 51A of the Constitution include the following-

  • aTo safeguard public property and to abjure violence.
  • bTo value and preserve the rich heritage of India’s composite culture.
  • cTo defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Article 51A enumerates all three duties listed: safeguarding public property and abjuring violence [51A(i)], valuing and preserving India's composite culture [51A(f)], and defending the country and rendering national service when called upon [51A(d)]. Hence 'all of the above'.

122

The minimum age for eligibility for election to the office of President of India is-

  • a35 years
  • b25 years
  • c21 years
  • d45 years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Article 58(1)(b) requires a person to have completed 35 years of age to be eligible for election as President of India.

123

Under Article 79 of the Constitution, Parliament for the Union of India consists of-

  • aThe President of India and the two Houses of Parliament.
  • bThe President of India, the two Houses of Parliament and the Council of Ministers.
  • cThe Council of States and House of the People.
  • dThe Council of Ministers and the House of the People.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Article 79 provides that Parliament for the Union consists of the President and the two Houses (Council of States and House of the People). The President is part of Parliament, so 'a' is the complete correct answer.

124

Does the Constitution provide for an opinion to be rendered by any court on a question of law or fact other than by way of adjudication of lis?

  • aNo
  • bYes, the High Courts can exercise advisory jurisdiction on a reference by the Governor of the concerned State.
  • cYes, the Supreme Court can exercise advisory jurisdiction on a reference of the President of India.
  • dYes, the Supreme Court can exercise advisory jurisdiction on a request by any Member of Parliament.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Article 143 confers advisory jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to render an opinion on a question of law or fact on a reference by the President of India.

125

Which of the following offices are not provided for in the Constitution of India?

  • aComptroller and Auditor General of India.
  • bAttorney General of India.
  • cElection Commission of India.
  • dSolicitor General of India.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

The CAG (Art. 148), Attorney General (Art. 76) and Election Commission (Art. 324) are all constitutional offices. The Solicitor General of India is a statutory/executive office not provided for in the Constitution.

126

The Preamble of the Constitution constitutes India as a “sovereign socialist secular democratic republic”. Which of these words were not in the original Preamble?

  • aSovereign, socialist
  • bSocialist, democratic
  • cSocialist, secular
  • dSecular, democratic
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The words 'Socialist' and 'Secular' were inserted into the Preamble by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment, 1976; 'Sovereign' and 'Democratic Republic' were in the original Preamble.

127

As per Section 52 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872-

  • aWhere the order in which reciprocal promises are to be performed is expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order.
  • bWhere the order is not expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order which the nature of the transaction requires.
  • cBoth (1) and (2)
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 52 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that reciprocal promises shall be performed in the order expressly fixed by the contract, and where not expressly fixed, in the order which the nature of the transaction requires. Both statements are correct.

128

As per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agreement in restraint of trade, or business, is to that extent-

  • aVoid
  • bVoidable
  • cEnforceable on the directions of the Government
  • dBoth (2) and (3)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 declares every agreement in restraint of trade void to that extent (subject to the sale-of-goodwill exception).

129

As per Section 22 of the Indian Act, 1872, a contract caused by mistake of one party as to a matter of fact is-

  • aNot void
  • bNot voidable
  • cNot legal
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 22 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that a contract is not voidable merely because it was caused by one party being under a mistake as to a matter of fact (unilateral mistake of fact).

130

Yash employs Aman to stab Amit, and agrees to indemnify him against all consequences of the act. Aman thereupon stabs Amit, and has to pay damages to Amit for the said act. Under section 224 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872-

  • aYash is not liable to indemnify Aman for those damages.
  • bYash is liable to indemnify Aman for those damage.
  • cYash is liable to provide surety to Aman for those damages.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 224 (non-liability of employer of agent to do a criminal act): where a person employs another to do a criminal act and agrees to indemnify him, the employer is NOT liable to indemnify the agent for the consequences. The illustration ('A employs B to beat C... A is not liable to indemnify B') is directly on point with stabbing Amit.

131

As per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability, of a third person in case of his default is called a contract of-

  • aGuarantee
  • bIndemnity
  • cBailment
  • dPledge
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines a 'contract of guarantee' as a contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability, of a third person in case of his default.

132

Under Section 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a continuing guarantee may at any time be revoked by the surety, as to future transactions-

  • aBy notice to the creditor.
  • bWithout any notice to the creditor.
  • cBy notice to the debtor.
  • dWithout any notice to the debtor.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: a continuing guarantee may at any time be revoked by the surety, as to future transactions, by notice to the creditor.

133

Dishonestly receiving or retaining any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property is punishable under Section-

  • a378 IPC
  • b379 IPC
  • c410 IPC
  • d411 IPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 411 IPC punishes dishonestly receiving or retaining stolen property knowing or having reason to believe it to be stolen. (Section 410 only defines 'stolen property'.)

134

Section 303 of the IPC, which provides that whoever, sentenced to imprisonment for life, commit murder, shall be sentenced to death, was struck down by the Supreme Court in-

  • aSelvi v. State of Karnataka (2010)
  • bMithu v. State of Punjab (1983)
  • cState of Tamil Nadu v. Nalini (1999)
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 303 IPC (mandatory death for murder by a life convict) was struck down as unconstitutional in Mithu v. State of Punjab, (1983) 2 SCC 277.

135

Where the police submits a final closure report under section 173 of CrP.C., to a Magistrate, that no incriminating material could be unearthed during the investigation against the accused, the Magistrate is-

  • aBound by the conclusion drawn by the police and cannot order re-investigation or de novo investigation.
  • bNot bound by the conclusion drawn by the police and may direct further investigation without hearing the accused or the complainant.
  • cBound by the conclusions drawn by the police and may refuse to issue process without hearing the complainant.
  • dNot bound by the conclusions drawn, but may issue notice to the accused to show cause why he should be tried as per the procedure prescribed by law.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

On a closure/final report under s.173 CrPC the Magistrate is not bound by the police conclusion; he may take cognizance and proceed, but must hear/notice the complainant before accepting closure. Among the options, (d) best reflects that the Magistrate is not bound and may proceed against the accused (Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police; Vishnu Kumar Tiwari).

136

Which of the following Sections deals with evidence of prosecution?

  • aSection 242 Cr.P.C.
  • bSection 243 Cr.P.C.
  • cSection 248 Cr.P.C.
  • dSection 249 Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 243 CrPC deals with evidence for the defence in a warrant case; however Section 242 CrPC governs 'Evidence for prosecution' in warrant cases. The settled answer keyed for 'evidence of prosecution' in the warrant-trial scheme is Section 242 CrPC.

137

An individual is facing charges under Section 376 IPC and Section 302 IPC. He avoided police arrest. Later, he surrendered to a Magistrate before whom neither report under Section 157(1) Cr. P.C., nor copies of entries in the police diary were filed, who remanded him to judicial custody. Can such person claim default bail after 90 days if no police report is filed?

  • aYes
  • bNo
  • cYes, but after 60 days if no police report is filed
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Sections 376 and 302 IPC are offences punishable with imprisonment for life/death, so the maximum custody period under the first proviso to s.167(2) CrPC is 90 days. If no police report is filed within 90 days, the accused is entitled to default bail. The manner of surrender/remand does not defeat this right.

138

Magistrate under Section 239 Cr.P.C can-

  • aFrame charge against the accused person.
  • bDischarge accused if charges are groundless.
  • cOpen trial for evidence.
  • dConvict the accused if the accused pleads guilty.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 239 CrPC empowers the Magistrate in a warrant case (instituted on police report) to discharge the accused if, upon consideration, the charge is groundless. (Framing of charge is under s.240.)

139

Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. enables the Court of the Officer Incharge of a Police Station to summon such document or other thing necessary or desirable for the purpose of any investigation, inquiry, trial or other proceedings. This provision also enables the accused to move an application for production or preservation of documents so as to assist him in his defence at the time of consideration of charge against him or recording of statement under section 313 Cr.P.C.

  • aStatement is wrong since section 91 does not confer any locus standi or legal right upon the accused to move any application.
  • bStatements is correct if the Court is satisfied that the material available with the investigator, not made part of the chargesheet, has a crucial bearing on the issue of framing of charge.
  • cStatement is correct. The court cannot pass orders to preserve certain records, even if the same would be destroyed in the ordinary course of business.
  • dStatement is correct since in the absence of specific powers, the Court does not have any inherent powers to do pass orders ex debito justitiae.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Per Nitya Dharmananda v. Gopal Sheelum Reddy (2018), though s.91 CrPC at the charge stage does not ordinarily give the accused a right to summon documents, the court may invoke it where material withheld from the chargesheet has a crucial bearing on framing of charge. Option (b) states this correctly.

140

Against an Award passed in a domestic arbitration at Delhi, a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, can be filed before-

  • aOnly the High Court
  • bAny District Court.
  • cBefore the Commercial Division of the High Court or the Commercial Court having territorial jurisdiction over such arbitration and depending on the specified value of the dispute.
  • dBefore any Civil Court having territorial and the pecuniary jurisdiction over the arbitration.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

A s.34 petition lies before the Commercial Division of the High Court or the Commercial Court having territorial jurisdiction over the arbitration, depending on the specified value (Arbitration Act read with the Commercial Courts Act, 2015).

141

The Committee gave their______to the decision. The blank in the above sentence can be correctly filled with-

  • aAssent
  • bAscent
  • cAccent
  • dDescent
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

'Assent' means agreement/approval ('gave their assent to the decision'). 'Ascent' = climb, 'Accent' = pronunciation, 'Descent' = downward movement/ancestry.

142

The Principal presided____the meeting. The blank in the above sentence can be correctly filled with-

  • aIn
  • bOver
  • cThrough
  • dFor
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The correct collocation is 'presided over the meeting'.

143

The expression “the jury is still out” means-

  • aFinal decision has not been made.
  • bThe court is on vacation.
  • cThe decision of the jury is still valid.
  • dThe composition of the jury has not been decided.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The idiom 'the jury is still out' means a final decision has not yet been reached.

144

The offender persist____telling lies. She reconciled____her family. He was sentenced____death. The blanks in the above sentences can be correctly filled in the order-

  • aWith, to, to
  • bIn, with, to
  • cOn, from, for
  • dFrom, with, for
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Correct prepositions: 'persists in' would be standard, but the only option with consistent fit for 'reconciled to' and 'sentenced to death' is (a) with/to/to; idiomatically 'persist with' is acceptable, and 'reconciled to' and 'sentenced to death' fix the answer.

145

I___the Bar licence since 2001. The correct option to fill the blank is-

  • aAm having
  • bHave had
  • cWas having
  • dHad been having
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

With 'since 2001' the present perfect is required: 'I have had the Bar licence since 2001.'

146

The poet made an___to his predecessors in his creative work. The truth has___us all. Many devices work on the principle of optical____. The blanks in the above sentences can be correctly filled in the order

  • aIllustration, alluded, allusion
  • bAllusion, alluded, illustration
  • cAllusion, eluded, illusion
  • dIllusion, eluded, allusion
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

'Allusion' (an indirect reference), 'eluded' (escaped/evaded us), 'illusion' (optical illusion). Hence Allusion, eluded, illusion.

147

which one of the following is spelt incorrectly?

  • aForce majeure
  • bAd valorem
  • cCertiorari
  • dUltra vires
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

All four terms as printed (force majeure, ad valorem, certiorari, ultra vires) are correctly spelt; the intended 'incorrect' option is ambiguous from OCR. Best guess (d) 'Ultra vires' as the keyed misspelling, but flagged as none appears clearly wrong.

148

A polemicist is:

  • aA person who is good at making forceful arguments.
  • bA person who known many languages.
  • cA person who studies cultures and societies.
  • dA person who studies the philosophy of law.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

A polemicist is a person skilled at or engaged in forceful, controversial argument or disputation.

149

in which of the following situations can a stay of subsequent suit be granted under section 10 of the IPC?

  • aWhere the previous suit between the same parties is pending before a Court which prima facie does not have jurisdiction.
  • bWhere the first suit has reached the stage of final arguments.
  • cWhere the matters in issue in both the suits are substantially similar and it is pending between the same parties.
  • dWhere previous suit between the parties on same issue has been decided on merits.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 10 CPC (the stem mis-cites 'IPC') stays a subsequent suit where the matter in issue is directly and substantially the same as in a previously instituted pending suit between the same parties. Option (c) captures this.

150

Which of the following is not a legal entity and therefore cannot sue as a plaintiff in its own name?

  • aSole proprietorship firm
  • bRegistered Partnership firm
  • cHindu Undivided Family
  • dStatutory authority
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

A sole proprietorship firm is not a separate legal entity; it sues/is sued in the name of the proprietor. (A registered partnership firm may sue under Order XXX; HUF and a statutory authority can sue through their representatives.)

151

In which of the following situations, after the framing of issues, does the defendant have a right to begin evidence prior to the plaintiff in a civil suit in view of the provisions of Order XVIII Rule I of CPC?

  • aWhere the facts set out in the plaint are admitted by the defendant but the plaintiff’s entitlement to relief is contested in law or on the basis of additional facts asserted by the defendant.
  • bThe defendant seeks permission to lead evidence first due to the old age of his/her witness.
  • cEither party can elect to begin first and thereafter it is the discretion of the Trial Court.
  • dBoth (1) and (2)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC, the defendant has the right to begin where he admits the facts alleged by the plaintiff and contends that the plaintiff is not entitled to relief in point of law or on additional facts pleaded by him (burden of proof lies on him).

152

whether the service of summons through email without a copy of the plaint is valid service for reckoning the period of limitation for filing of the written statement?

  • aYes, the defendant must approach the court registry for obtaining the copy of plaint.
  • bNo, summons must be accompanied with a copy of the plaint.
  • cYes, the defendant must contact the plaintiff for the paper book.
  • dNo, service by email is not a valid service even if accompanied with a paper book.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Order V Rule 2 CPC mandates that every summons be accompanied by a copy of the plaint; service of summons by email without the plaint is not valid service and does not start the limitation clock for the written statement.

153

In which of the following situations is review maintainable under Section 114 of CPC?

  • aDiscovery of new evidence on question of fact, which despite due diligence, was not within the knowledge of party at the time when the decree was passed.
  • bChallenge to a finding of fact on the basis of unimpeachable evidence, which inadvertently could not be filed at the time of original hearing.
  • cWhere the decision on a question of law on which the judgement of the court is based, has been reversed by a Superior Court in another case.
  • dReappraisal of the evidence on record to find out the error in the finding of fact.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Order XLVII Rule 1 / Section 114 CPC, review lies on discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after exercise of due diligence, was not within the party's knowledge or could not be produced when the decree was passed. Review is not an appeal-in-disguise (rules out reappraisal of evidence).

154

Do civil Courts have power to grant status quo ante, when the defendant has dispossessed the plaintiff from the suit property, in violation of the subsisting interim injunction, during the pendency of the suit?

  • aYes, under order 39 rule 2A and section 1541 CPC.
  • bYes under section 94 CPC.
  • cNo, only the High Court can issue such direction in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
  • dNo, the plaintiff will have to file a fresh suit seeking possession.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

A civil court can restore status quo ante by directing redelivery of possession where the defendant disobeys a subsisting injunction; Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC empowers the court to grant such consequential relief, supplemented by its powers under Section 151 CPC.

155

‘A’ had advanced a loan or Rupees one lakh to ‘B’ On 01/01/2009 which was to be repaid on 31/12/2009 on 31/10/2012, a legal notice was issued by an advocate on behalf of ‘A’ and served on ‘B’ demanding immediate repayment of the debt. ‘B’, through an advocate engaged by him, send a reply to the advocate for ‘A’ on 30/11/2012 refusing to pay for want of resources. Citing this as acknowledgement of the debt, ‘A’ filed a suit for recovery on 01/02/2013. ‘B’ takes the plea of bar of limitation on grounds that: No subsequent event stops the time of three years once it had begun to run on 01.01.2010. Refusal to pay does not amount to acknowledgement. There is no acknowledgement in writing by ‘B’ since the re[ply was signed only by the advocate. There is no acknowledgement in writing by ‘B’ since the reply was not addressed to ‘A’.

  • aAll grounds are correct.
  • bAll grounds are incorrect.
  • cGrounds ‘A’ and ‘B’ are correct but Grounds ‘C’ and ‘D’ are incorrect.
  • dGrounds ‘A’ and ‘B’ are incorrect but Grounds ‘C’ and ‘D’ are correct.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

All grounds are incorrect: a fresh acknowledgement before expiry of limitation gives a fresh starting point (Sec. 18, Limitation Act); even a refusal in writing can constitute acknowledgement of the jural relationship of debtor-creditor; and an acknowledgement signed by a duly authorised agent (advocate) addressed to the creditor's agent is valid.

156

‘A’ with sexual intent touches the breast of ‘X’, a boy aged 12 years. Under the protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, ‘A’ has committed the offence of-

  • aSexual Assault
  • bAggravated Sexual Assault
  • cSexual Harassment
  • dNo Offence
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Touching the breast with sexual intent is 'sexual assault' under Section 7 POCSO Act, 2012, punishable under Section 8. No aggravating circumstance under Section 9 is shown, so it is simple sexual assault, not aggravated.

157

Which of the following is not a requirement for the medical examination of a child under Section 27 of the Protection of Children from Sexual offences Act, 2012?

  • aIn case the victim is a girl child, the medical examination shall be conducted by a woman doctor in the presence of the woman investigating officer.
  • bThe medical examination shall be conducted in the presence of the parent of the child or any person in whom the child reposes trust or confidence.
  • cIn case the victim is a girl child, the medical examinations shall be conducted by a woman doctor.
  • dThe medical examination shall be conducted in accordance with Section 164A Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 27(3) POCSO requires medical examination in the presence of the parent of the child OR any other person in whom the child reposes trust 'or in the absence' of such person, in the presence of a woman nominated by the head of the medical institution. Presence of a parent is not an absolute requirement, so option (b) as worded is not a strict requirement.

158

under the protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 the Special Court shall complete the trial, as fas as possible, within a period of-

  • a4 months from the date of taking cognizance of the offence.
  • b6 months from the date of taking cognizance of the offence.
  • c9 months from the date of taking cognizance of the offence.
  • d1 year from the date of taking cognizance of the offence.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 35(2) POCSO Act, 2012 directs the Special Court to complete the trial, as far as possible, within one year from the date of taking cognizance of the offence.

159

under Section 24 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, the Statement of a child victim shall, as far as practicable, be recorded by a-

  • aWoman police officer not below the rank of an Inspector.
  • bPolice officer not below the rank of an inspector.
  • cWoman police officer not below the rank of a Sub-Inspector
  • dWoman officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of police.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 24(1) POCSO Act, 2012 requires that the statement of a child be recorded, as far as practicable, by a woman police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector.

160

A person commits sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix, who is major, by making false promise that he would marry her, but after she gets pregnant, he refuses to do so. Which of the following statements is correct?

  • aNo offence of rape is committed as the consent of prosecutrix was there.
  • bOffence of rape is committed as consent was obtained under misconception of fact.’
  • cNo offence of rape is committed as the prosecutrix was major.
  • dBoth (1) and (3)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Where sexual intercourse is obtained on a false promise of marriage made in bad faith, the consent is vitiated as it is given under a misconception of fact (Sec. 90 IPC); the offence of rape is made out (Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra).

161

‘A’ commits house-trespass in order to commit an offence punishable with life imprisonment. The act of ‘A’ is punishable with-

  • aImprisonment which may extend to life.
  • bImprisonment not exceeding 10 years with fine.
  • cImprisonment not exceeding 3 years, or fine, or both.
  • dImprisonment not exceeding 7 years with fine.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 449 IPC: house-trespass in order to commit an offence punishable with death is punishable with imprisonment for life or up to 10 years; Section 450 IPC: house-trespass to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment for life is punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years. Among the options 'imprisonment which may extend to life' best fits an offence punishable with life imprisonment (Sec. 449).

162

‘X’ installed a live-naked wire in a drain between his field and that of the neighbour with an intention of preventing animals from entering his field. The neighbour was electrocuted and he died. ‘X’ has committed an offence under Section-

  • a302 IPC
  • b304 Part I
  • c304 Part II IPC
  • d307 IPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Installing a live naked wire to keep out animals, resulting in death of a person, is culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC (knowledge that the act is likely to cause death, without intention to cause death) - per Cherubin Gregory v. State of Bihar.

163

The constitutional validity of the death penalty was upheld by the Supreme Court in the ease of-

  • aJagmohan Singh v. State of UP, 1973
  • bRajendra Prasad v. State of Punjab, 1979
  • cMachhi Singh v. State of Punjab, 1983
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The constitutional validity of the death penalty was upheld by a five-judge bench in Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P. (1973) 1 SCC 20, holding capital punishment not violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21.

164

The offence of stalking is punishable under section____of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • a354 C
  • b354 D
  • c354 A
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Stalking is defined and made punishable under Section 354D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (inserted by the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013).

165

The sentence which can be imposed upon a convict for default in payment of fine cannot exceed_____of the maximum sentence fixed for the offence. Fill in the blank.

  • aHalf
  • bOne-third
  • cOne-fourth
  • dOne-fifth
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 65 IPC, the term of imprisonment imposed in default of payment of fine shall not exceed one-fourth of the maximum term of imprisonment fixed for the offence (where the offence is punishable with both imprisonment and fine).

166

A clerk or servant committing breach of trust is punishable under which provision of IPC?

  • aSection 406
  • bSection 407
  • cSection 408
  • dSection 409
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant is punishable under Section 408 IPC.

167

If a person entrusted with money diverts it for his personal gain without intending to deceive, which Section would likely be invoked?

  • aSection 420
  • bSection 406
  • cSection 420 & Section 406
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

A person entrusted with money who dishonestly diverts it for personal gain, without an inducement/deception, commits criminal breach of trust under Section 405/406 IPC, not cheating (Sec. 420 requires deception inducing delivery of property).

168

A attacks Z under grave and sudden provocation. B, who was passing by, having an intention to kill Z, also takes advantage and attacks Z who dies. What is the offence committed by them?

  • aMurder, as both had common intention to kill.
  • bBoth are guilty of offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
  • cBoth are guilty of causing grievous injury.
  • dA is guilty only of culpable homicide, while B is guilty of murder.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

A acts under grave and sudden provocation, so A is guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Exception 1 to Sec. 300 IPC). B, who acts with intention to kill and has no provocation, is guilty of murder; there is no common intention between them (Sec. 34 inapplicable).

169

What is the following is the punishment not specified under Section 153 IPC?

  • aDeatch
  • bRigorous Imprisonment with hard labour
  • cSimple Imprisonment with hard labour
  • dForfeiture of property
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 153 IPC (wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot) is punishable with imprisonment up to one year, or fine, or both (and forfeiture-type consequences in related provisions); death is not a punishment specified under it.

170

Ordinarily the duration of anticipatory bail granted to an accused under Section 438 CrPC-

  • aIs to operate only till the filing of the chargesheet.
  • bIs to operate till cognizance of the offence is taken.
  • cIs to operate till the accused is summoned.
  • dIs to operate without any restriction as to time and can also continue till the end of the trial.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Per Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) 5 SCC 1, anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is ordinarily not limited by time and can continue till the end of the trial, unless the court restricts it.

171

any person, aggrieved by a refusal on the part of an officer in charge of a police station to record the FIR relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, may send the substance of such information to-

  • aThe Chief Minister of the State.
  • bThe Chief Justice of the High Court
  • cThe Public Prosecutor
  • dThe concerned Superintendent of Police
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 154(3) CrPC, a person aggrieved by the refusal of an officer in charge of a police station to record an FIR may send the substance of the information to the Superintendent of Police concerned.

172

as per the decision of the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 2 SCC 1, preliminary inquiry may be made before registration of FIR, in the following category of cases-

  • aMatrimonial disputes
  • bCommercial offences
  • cMedical negligence cases
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

In Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. (2014) 2 SCC 1, the Supreme Court listed matrimonial/family disputes, commercial offences, medical negligence cases and corruption cases as categories where a preliminary inquiry may precede FIR registration - hence 'All of the above'.

173

When the Court of Session passes a sentence of death, the sentence-

  • aCan be executed only after one month.
  • bCannot be executed unless confirmed by the High Court.
  • cCan be executed only after one year.
  • dCannot be executed unless confirmed by the Supreme Court.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 366 CrPC, when a Court of Session passes a sentence of death, it must submit the proceedings to the High Court, and the death sentence cannot be executed unless confirmed by the High Court (Sec. 368).

174

Against the order passed by the Court acquitting the accused, the following can prefer an appeal-

  • aThe public Prosecutor on the directions of the District Magistrate/State Government.
  • bThe victim.
  • cBoth a. And b.
  • dNone of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Against an order of acquittal, the State (through the Public Prosecutor) may appeal under Section 378 CrPC, and the victim has a right to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC - hence both.

175

Which one of the following orders can be passed after the conclusion of trial?

  • aOnly an order of acquittal
  • bOnly an order of conviction
  • cOrder of discharge
  • dEither an order of acquittal or conviction
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

At the conclusion of trial the court records either an order of acquittal or an order of conviction; discharge is an order passed before trial (at the charge stage), not after conclusion of trial.

176

‘X’ was acquitted by the trial. However, on appeal filed by the State, the High Court reversed the order of acquittal, convicted him and sentenced him to imprisonment for a term of ten years. The remedy available to ‘X’ will be-

  • aAppeal to the Supreme Court.
  • bWrit Petition before the High Court.
  • cWrit Petition before Supreme Court.
  • dAppeal before the Division Bench of the High Court.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Where the High Court reverses an acquittal and sentences the accused to imprisonment for 10 years or more, a statutory appeal lies to the Supreme Court as of right under Section 379 CrPC (and Art. 134(1)(a) of the Constitution).

177

Proclamation for person absconding is issued under-

  • aSection 81 CrPC
  • bSection 82 CrPC
  • cSection 83 CrPC
  • dSection 84 CrPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

A proclamation requiring an absconding person to appear is issued under Section 82 CrPC (attachment of property follows under Section 83).

178

Every offence shall ordinarily be inquired and tried by a Court-

  • aWhere the offence was committed.
  • bWhere the accused ordinarily resides.
  • cWhere the complainant or victim resides.
  • dWhere the accused person is arrested.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 177 CrPC: every offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed.

179

A civil suit for infringement of trademark with applications under Order 39 of CPC and order 26 Rule 9 CPC was filed by the plaintiff, during the subsistence of a Caveat filed by the defendant under Section 148A of CPC. The Court, however, without issuing notice to the defendant granted ex-parte ad-interim orders in favour of the plaintiff. Whether the court was correct in doing so?

  • aYes, the Court was correct since the reliefs sought are argent and any prior intimation to the defendant would have led to mischief.
  • bNo, since purpose of lodging a caveat is to grant an opportunity to defendant to show cause why any order(s) adverse to the defendant should not be passed.
  • cNo, as the Court has no power to grant an interim order without hearing the defendant.
  • dYes, as the Court has discretion to grant interim order ex-parte without hearing the defendant, where delay would defeat the interests of the plaintiff.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 148A CPC, once a caveat is lodged the court must serve notice on the caveator before passing any adverse interim order; granting ex-parte relief without such notice defeats the purpose of the caveat.

180

What is the limitation for filling of an application for leave to appear or defend in a summary suit filed under Order XXXVII of CPC?

  • a10 days
  • b15 days
  • c20 days
  • d30 days
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Order XXXVII Rule 3 CPC, the defendant must apply for leave to appear and defend within 10 days from service of the summons.

181

a executed an agreement with B at Delhi promising delivery of goods at Chandigarh. The goods were duly delivered by A at Chandigarh and accepted by B. The invoice recorded that Courts at Gurugram will have exclusive jurisdiction, as the registered office of A was located at Gurugram. Upon non-payment of money, A sued B at civil Court Gurugram. B objected to the territorial jurisdiction of the court at Gurugram. This suit at Gurugram- Is maintainable, in view of the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the invoice.

  • aIs maintainable, as A has its registered office at Gurugram.
  • bIs not maintainable as no part of cause of action arose in Gurugram.
  • cIs not maintainable, as B is not a resident of Gurugram.
  • dQ182: ‘L’ sues ‘T’ for the decree of possession of suit property and mense profits. ‘T’ fails to file
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

A part of the cause of action (defendant's registered office / and an exclusive-jurisdiction clause naming Gurugram) supports jurisdiction at Gurugram; an exclusive jurisdiction clause is valid where that court otherwise has jurisdiction, so the suit is maintainable.

182

Which one of the following sentences is grammatically incorrect?

  • aFewer than twenty students came for class.
  • bI ran quick to the bus stop.
  • cRahul is one of the brilliant boys who have taken the exam.
  • dEvery man and woman works for the good of the nation.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

"I ran quick to the bus stop" is grammatically incorrect; the adverb "quickly" is required to modify the verb "ran."

183

“Domination and inequities of power and wealth are perennial facts of human society.” With reference to the above sentence, the antonym of perennial will be-

  • aEnduring
  • bEphemeral
  • cPerpetual
  • dImperishable
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

"Perennial" means lasting/enduring; its antonym is "ephemeral" (short-lived). Options a, c, d are synonyms.

184

A person who can speak in a manner that the sound seems to come from a distance or from another source is called-

  • aAmbidextrous
  • bIconoclast
  • cSomnambulist
  • dVentriloquist
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

A person who can throw their voice so it seems to come from elsewhere is a ventriloquist.

185

Choose the correct spelling-

  • aAcquiesce
  • bAcquiesce
  • cAcquiesce
  • dAcquiesce
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

OCR-broken: all four options read identically as 'Acquiesce' (the correct spelling). Best guess option a as the correctly spelled word.

186

Derrick has the Midas touch and is doing well in his business. The underlined phrase means-

  • aTo be able to predict
  • bTo behave in a humble manner
  • cTo have the ability to make money
  • dTo not lose faith or courage
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

"The Midas touch" idiom means the ability to make money / succeed financially in whatever one undertakes.

187

He said, “ I am glad to be here this evening.” The above sentence can be written in indirect speech as-

  • aHe said that i am glad to be there that evening.
  • bHe said that he is glad to be here this evening.
  • cHe said that he was glad to be here this evening.
  • dHe said that he was glad to be there that evening.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Indirect speech requires back-shift of tense and adverbs: "am" to "was," "here" to "there," "this evening" to "that evening" — "He said that he was glad to be there that evening."

188

The drawstrings of the dress came_____. I certainly do not want to_____my original documents. It is emotionally draining to_____a parent. The blanks in the above sentences can be filled in appropriately with—

  • aLose; lise’ loss
  • bLose; loose; lose
  • cLoose; lose; lose
  • dLoose; loose; lose
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Drawstrings came 'loose' (adjective); 'lose' my documents (verb, to misplace); 'lose' a parent (verb, bereavement) — option c: Loose; lose; lose.

189

Res Ipsa loquitur means-

  • aThe principle behind a court judgement.
  • bReplacement of an old contract by a new.
  • cThe burden of proof.
  • dThe thing speaks for itself.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

'Res ipsa loquitur' is Latin for 'the thing speaks for itself,' a tort doctrine inferring negligence from the nature of the accident.

190

The term “ceteris paribus” means–

  • aAll other things remaining same.
  • bExtreme circumstances.
  • cAn admission of guilt.
  • dA position of authority.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

'Ceteris paribus' means 'all other things remaining the same / held equal.'

191

What was the total membership of the Constituent Assembly of India?

  • a250
  • b335
  • c389
  • d410
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The total membership of the Constituent Assembly of India under the Cabinet Mission Plan was 389 (292 provinces, 93 princely states, 4 chief commissioners' provinces).

192

A person is convicted under Section 279 IPC. He cannot be awarded the following sentence–

  • aOnly simple imprisonment up to six months.
  • bFine up to Rs. 1000/-, in default, simple imprisonment of 30 days.
  • cBoth simple or rigorous imprisonment up to six months and fine up to Rs. 1000/–.
  • dFine up to Rs. 1000/-, in default rigorous imprisonment of 90 days.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 279 IPC (rash/negligent driving) is punishable with imprisonment up to 6 months or fine up to Rs.1000 or both. A sentence cannot be one that combines a fine with a separate 90-day rigorous imprisonment in default beyond the statute's scheme; option d is the sentence that cannot be awarded.

193

A person held guilty of one of several offences specified in the judgement, but it is doubtful of which of the offences he is guilty. The offender shall be-

  • aPunished for all the offences mentioned in the judgement.
  • bHe shall not be punished for any offence as he is entitled to be acquitted by giving benefit of doubt.
  • cHe shall be punished for the offence for which lowest punishment is provided.
  • dHe shall be punished for the offence for which highest punishment is provided.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 72 IPC: where it is doubtful which of several offences the offender is guilty of, he shall be punished for the offence carrying the lowest punishment, if the same punishment is not provided for all.

194

An offence committed will be considered as an offence if, at the time of commission of offence, the offender-

  • aWas below 7 years of age.
  • bWas incapable of knowing the nature of offence being of unsound mind.
  • cWas incapable of knowing the nature of offence having voluntarily intoxicated himself.
  • dHad not intended to cause death and was done with the consent in good faith for person’s benefit.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Voluntary intoxication is no defence (Section 85/86 IPC); a person who voluntarily intoxicated himself is still liable, so this remains an offence. Options a (below 7, S.82), b (unsound mind, S.84) and d (S.92) are exceptions; only c is not exempt.

195

In which of the following circumstances is protection available for an act committed by a person compelled by threats, under Section 94 IPC?

  • aCommitting an offence under section 300 IPC under the threat of another, where the offender has a reasonable apprehension of instant death.
  • bCommitting an offence under section 121 IPC under the threat of another, where the offender has a reasonable apprehension of instant death.
  • cCommitting an offence under the threat of another, where the offender has a reasonable apprehension of grievous hurt.
  • dAll of above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 94 IPC's duress defence excludes murder and offences against the State punishable with death (so a and b are not protected); it applies where there is reasonable apprehension of instant death — but reasonable apprehension of grievous hurt (option c) is the protected circumstance available among the choices. Note: S.94 requires apprehension of instant death; option c is the best available answer as the others are expressly excluded offences.

196

A person abets an offence, if-

  • aA person abets the commission of offence.
  • bA person abets the commission of an act which if committed, would be an offence.
  • cThe act, which may otherwise amount to an offence, is not committed or that the requisite effect to cause offence is not caused.
  • dAll of the above.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 107/108 IPC: abetment covers instigating commission of an offence, abetting an act which if done would be an offence, and abetment is complete even if the act abetted is not committed or the effect is not caused (Explanation 2 to S.108) — all of the above.

197

‘Y’ instigates and provokes ‘Z’ to cause harm to ‘X” with a dagger on account of the feud between the latter two i.e, Z and X. However, Z decides otherwise.

  • aY has not committed an offence of attempt to murder as it was Z who was going to murder X.
  • bX has committed an offence of attempt to murder and Y cannot be held liable for the acts of another.
  • cY has not committed the offence of abetment.
  • dY has committed the offence of abetment.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Instigation to commit an offence is itself abetment (Section 107 IPC) and is punishable even though the person instigated (Z) decides not to act; Y has committed the offence of abetment.

198

Which of the following is not an ingredient under Section 304B IPC?

  • aPhysical assault resulting in injuries confining a woman to bed.
  • bWoman is subjected to harassment or cruelty for or in connection with demand for dowry.
  • cOffence occurred within seven years of marriage.
  • dThe offender is the husband or his relative.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 304B IPC ingredients are: death by burns/bodily injury or otherwise than normal within 7 years of marriage, and the woman was subjected to cruelty/harassment for dowry by husband or his relative. 'Physical assault confining a woman to bed' (option a) is not an ingredient of dowry death.

Practise Delhi Judiciary the smart way.

Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Delhi Judiciary preparation guide.

Open exam guide
Law Mock is an independent preparation resource and is not affiliated with any High Court, Public Service Commission, or government body. All exam information is sourced from official notifications and is updated periodically.