Himachal Pradesh Judiciary — Prelims 2014
‘Duchess of Kingstone’s Case’ is a leading case on the subject:
- aForeign judgement
- bEx parte decree
- cRes judicata
- dInherent powers of the courts
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The Duchess of Kingston's Case (1776) is the celebrated leading authority on res judicata / estoppel by judgment, laying down that a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive between the parties on the matter directly decided.
Explanation VII to section 11 in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was inserted by:
- aCode of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976
- bCode of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999
- cCode of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Explanation VII to Section 11 CPC (extending res judicata to execution proceedings) was inserted by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976 (Act 104 of 1976).
Whether the pendency of a suit in a foreign court will preclude courts in India from trying a suit founded on the same cause of action?
- aYes
- bNo
- cOnly the High Court can try
- dOnly the Supreme Court can try
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 10 CPC, Explanation: the pendency of a suit in a foreign court does not preclude Indian courts from trying a suit on the same cause of action. So the answer is 'No'.
Which of the following sections of the Code of Civil Procedure stipulate the provision for ‘the place of institution of suit where local limits of jurisdiction of Courts are uncertain’?
- aSection 18
- bSection 21
- cSection 24
- dSection 27
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 18 CPC governs the place of institution of a suit where the local limits of jurisdiction of courts are uncertain.
Which of the following statements is not correct/
- aA decree may be partly preliminary and partly final
- bEvery decree is appealable unless otherwise expressly provided
- cEvery order is not appealable unless specified in the Code.
- dA decree is an adjudication of a court of law while an order under the Code of Civil Procedure is not an adjudication of a court of law.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Not every decree is appealable; appeals lie only as provided by the Code (e.g., Section 96 bars appeals from consent decrees and small-cause decrees below the value limit). Hence statement (b) is incorrect.
An agreement by which a person agrees to waive the benefit on any exemption under Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure is:
- aValid
- bVoid
- cVoidable
- dValid if reasonable
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Proviso to Section 60(1) CPC declares that any agreement to waive the benefit of the exemptions from attachment is void.
In Ghan Shaym Das Gupta V. Anant Kumar Sinha. AIR 1991 SC 2251, the Supreme Court explains:
- aRes Judicata
- bRes subjudice
- cExecution of decree
- dReview
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Ghan Shyam Das Gupta v. Anant Kumar Sinha, AIR 1991 SC 2251, deals with the scheme of execution of decrees under the CPC (Order 21).
Which is not an instance of ‘material irregularity’ under Order 21, Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure?
- aMisdescription of the property in the proclamation
- bSale after an order of stay of execution
- cOmission to hold sale at stated time and place
- dOmission to send a copy of the decree to the executing court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Order 21 Rule 90 deals with material irregularity in publishing or conducting the sale. Omission to send a copy of the decree to the executing court is a defect in transfer for execution, not a material irregularity in the conduct of sale.
By the Amendment Act of 1976 in the Code of Civil Procedure, a specific provision has been made for the:
- aSet off
- bCross-claims
- cCross-decree
- dCounterclaim
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The CPC (Amendment) Act, 1976 introduced a specific provision for counterclaim (Order 8 Rule 6A).
Who is entitled to exemption from personal appearance in the court?
- aBishop of the Church
- bSpeaker of the State Legislature Assembly
- cChairman of the State Legislative Council
- dJudges of the High Court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Order 26 Rule 4 / Section 133 CPC exempt certain dignitaries from personal appearance; among the options, Judges of the High Court are entitled to such exemption from personal appearance in court.
Under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the consent decree is:
- aAppealable
- bNot appealable
- cAppealable to the High Court only
- dAppealable to the Supreme Court only
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 96(3) CPC: no appeal shall lie from a decree passed by the court with the consent of parties; a consent decree is not appealable.
A section 153-B of the Code of Civil Procedure contains the provision for:
- aClasses of persons who cannot be arrested
- bSuits relating to matters concerning the family
- cTrial in open court
- dAttendance of witness confined
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 153-B CPC provides that the place of trial shall be deemed to be an open court (trial in open court). It was inserted by Act 104 of 1976.
Who can apply for an injunction?
- aPlaintiff only
- bDefendant only
- cPlaintiff and defendant
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Order 39 CPC, an injunction may be sought by either party; a plaintiff seeks it to protect the subject-matter, and a defendant may also apply (e.g., on a counterclaim or against waste). So both plaintiff and defendant can apply.
Under section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the elerieal mistake can be corrected in:
- aJudgements only
- bDecrees only
- cOrders only
- dJudgements, decree or orders
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 152 CPC permits correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees or orders.
In the exercise of inherent power a court cannot:
- aExtend time for payment of court fee
- bOverride substantive rights of any party
- cRevive execution applications
- dSet aside an ex parte order passed against the party
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Inherent powers under Section 151 CPC are procedural and cannot be exercised to override or take away the substantive rights of any party.
Which is the incorrect statement regarding the execution of decree?
- aA decree does not become an executable on the death of the judgement debtor
- bA court can execute a decree in respect of the property situate entirely outside its local jurisdiction
- cAn executing court has no power to question its legality
- dThe court which passed the decree may of its own motion send it for execution to any subordinate court of competent court’
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The incorrect statement is (b): a court cannot execute a decree in respect of property situated entirely outside its local jurisdiction; in such case the decree must be transferred for execution (Section 39) to a court within whose jurisdiction the property lies.
Under the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, the superintendent of District Court shall be appointed by:
- aHigh Court
- bDistrict Court
- cAdditional District Judges
- dHimachal Pradesh Public Service Commission
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, the Superintendent of the District Court is appointed by the High Court (the other ministerial officers being appointed by the District Judge).
Under the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, who can divide Himachal Pradesh into Civil Districts?
- aHigh court
- bState Government
- cSupreme Court
- dCentral Government
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 4 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, divide Himachal Pradesh into civil districts.
Cancellation of adhesive stamps can be done:
- aOnly by the person who affixes the adhesive stamps
- bOnly by the person who executed the instrument bearing an adhesive stamp
- cBy the person who affixes the adhesive stamp to any instrument or by the person who executed the instrument bearing an adhesive stamp
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 12 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899: cancellation of an adhesive stamp may be done by the person affixing it or by the person executing the instrument bearing such stamp.
Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, the duty shall be liable in transfer of:
- aRegistered ownership of securities from a person to a depository
- bRegistered ownership of securities from a depository to a beneficial owner
- cBeneficial ownership of units of a Mutual Fund
- dBeneficial ownership of shares of a company
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 8A of the Indian Stamp Act: transfer of registered ownership of securities from a person to a depository (and from a depository to a beneficial owner) is exempt, but duty is leviable on transfer of registered ownership from a depository to a beneficial owner per the chargeability scheme. Of the options, (b) is the one on which duty is liable.
Section 23 A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, deals instruments connected with:
- aSale of marketable securities
- bMortgages of marketable securities
- cLease of marketable securities
- dSale, lease and mortgage of marketable securities
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 23A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 deals with certain instruments connected with mortgages of marketable securities, to be chargeable as agreements.
Impressed stamps includes:
- aLabels affixed by the proper authority
- bLabels impressed by the proper authority
- cLabels affixed and impressed by the proper authority
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 2(13) of the Indian Stamp Act defines 'impressed stamp' to include labels affixed and impressed by the proper officer, as well as stamps embossed or engraved on stamped paper.
Whether the ‘guarantees agreements’ fall within the purview of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899?
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepend upon the parties
- dDepend upon the guarantor
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 4(1) applies only to several instruments employed in a single transaction of sale, mortgage or settlement. A guarantee agreement is not such a transaction, so it does not fall within Section 4(1); the answer is 'No'.
Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, in case of a conveyance, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, the expenses for providing proper stamps shall be borne by:
- aGrantee
- bGrantor
- cGrantor and grantee
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 29 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899: in the case of a conveyance, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the expense of providing the proper stamp is borne by the grantee (the person drawing/taking the conveyance).
All instruments chargeable with duty and executed by any person in India shall be stamped:
- aOnly before execution
- bOnly at the time execution
- cBefore or at the time of execution
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 17 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899: all instruments chargeable with duty and executed by any person in India shall be stamped before or at the time of execution.
Which section of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 contains special provision as to unstamped receipts’?
- aSection 32
- bSection 33
- cSection 34
- dSection 35
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 34 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 is titled 'Special provision as to unstamped receipts'. (Sec. 30 = obligation to give receipt; Sec. 32 = certificate by Collector.)
in determining the amount of compensation under section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the court shall be guided by the principles specified in:
- aSection 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- bSection 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- cSection 75 of the Indian Act, 1872
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 21(5) SRA, 1963 directs that in determining the amount of compensation, the court shall be guided by the principles specified in Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (compensation for loss/damage caused by breach).
Temporary injunctions under section 37 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is regulated by:
- aCode of Civil Procedure
- bIndian Contract Act
- cCriminal Procedure Code
- dTransfer of Property Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 37 SRA, 1963 provides that temporary injunctions are regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order 39).
Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the ground of instruments is:
- aCoercion
- bMutual mistake
- cMisrepresentation
- dUndue-influence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 26 SRA, 1963, rectification of instruments is available where, through fraud or mutual mistake of the parties, the instrument does not express the real intention; among the options, mutual mistake is the ground for rectification.
Section 13 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 applies to:
- aMovable property only
- bImmovable property only’
- cMovable and immovable property
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 13 SRA, 1963 (rights of purchaser/lessee against person with no title or imperfect title) applies to both movable and immovable property under a contract for sale or lease.
Under Section 12 (2) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the part performance of a contract can be enforced by:
- aOnly by the defaulting party
- bOnly by the non-defaulting party
- cBothe the defaulting party and the non-defaulting party
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 12(2) SRA, 1963 allows enforcement of part performance only at the instance of the party not in default (the non-defaulting party).
Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, grants the declaration of:
- aLegal character only
- bAny right to property only
- cLegal character or any right to any property
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 34 SRA, 1963 empowers the court to grant a declaration as to a person's legal character or as to any right to any property.
‘Alternate prayer for rescission in suit for specific performance’ is provided in the Specific Relief Act, 1963 in:
- aSection 28
- bSection 29
- cSection 30
- dSection 31
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 29 SRA, 1963 provides for the alternative prayer for rescission in a suit for specific performance.
Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 contains the provision regarding:
- aDiscretion as to decreeing specific performance power to award compensation
- bPower to grant relief for possession
- cPower to grant relief for refund of earnest money
- dPower to grant relief for refund of earnest money
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 20 SRA, 1963 deals with the court's discretion as to decreeing specific performance (and includes power to award compensation in lieu/addition).
The India Evidence Act applies to:
- aAffidavits
- bDepartmental proceedings
- cArbitration proceedings
- dAn inquiry to determine a jural relation between persons
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Per Section 1, the Evidence Act applies to judicial proceedings in courts but not to affidavits or arbitration; an inquiry to determine a jural relation between persons is the situation closest to its application. Affidavits, departmental and arbitration proceedings are expressly outside its scope.
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is substituted for the old section by the Information Technology Act, 2000?
- aSection 22
- bSection 39
- cSection 81
- dSection 85
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 85 of the Evidence Act (presumption as to powers of attorney) was substituted by the Information Technology Act, 2000, which inserted/amended several IEA sections including 85, 85A-C, 88A, 90A.
What is not correct regarding ‘admission’?
- aAdmission may be documentary
- bAll confessions are admissions but all admissions are not confessions
- cAdmission relates to a civil transaction only
- dAdmission may be proved against the representative in interest of the maker
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The incorrect statement is (c): admission does NOT relate to civil transactions only — admissions (Sec. 17-23 IEA) operate in both civil and criminal matters; a confession is in fact a species of admission in criminal cases.
The case of Budhsen Vs. State of U.P., AIR 1970, S.C. 1321 is related to:
- aIdentification
- bDying declaration
- cDocumentary evidence
- dBurden of proof
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Budhsen v. State of U.P., AIR 1970 SC 1321, laid down the principles governing test identification parades (identification of the accused).
What is correct in reference to dying declaration?
- aIt is a weaker kind of evidence
- bIt cannot form basis of conviction without corroboration
- cIt stands on the same footing as other types of evidence
- dIt is by verbal statement only
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A dying declaration (Sec. 32(1) IEA) stands on the same footing as any other piece of evidence; if found true and voluntary it can be the sole basis of conviction without corroboration (Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay).
Which of the following is not an exception to the rule against hearsay?
- aAdmissions
- bEntries in public records
- cStatements contained in public documents\
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Admissions, entries in public records, and statements in public documents are all recognised exceptions to the rule against hearsay, so 'None of the above' is the correct choice.
Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act deals with:
- aPresumption of facts
- bRebuttable presumption of law
- cIrrebuttable presumption of law
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 114 IEA ('court may presume existence of certain facts') deals with presumptions of fact, which are discretionary/rebuttable presumptions.
Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act provides presumption for:
- aLife
- bMarriage
- cDeath
- dLegitimacy
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 108 IEA raises the presumption of death (person not heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him is presumed dead).
A dumb witness who give his evidence by writing in open court is:
- aNot admissible as evidence
- bOral evidence
- cDocumentary evidence
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 119 IEA, evidence given by a dumb witness in writing in open court is deemed to be oral evidence.
Section 13 of the Indian Evidence Act applies to:
- aPublic and private rights
- bPublic rights only
- cPrivate rights only
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 13 IEA (facts relevant when a right or custom is in question) applies to both public and private rights; the wider view that it covers private as well as public rights is the accepted position.
In the case of State of Bombay Vs. Kathi Kalu, AIR 1961, SC, 1908, the Supreme Court judge the validity of:
- aSection 68 of the Indian Evidence Act
- bSection 73 of the Indian Evidence Act
- cSection 79 of the Indian Evidence Act
- dSection 88 of the Indian Evidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad, AIR 1961 SC 1808, the 11-judge bench upheld Section 73 IEA (taking specimen handwriting/signatures/finger impressions), holding it does not violate Article 20(3).
In which case it was held that ‘identification parades’ do not contravene Article 20 (3) of the Constitution of India, which requires that no accused shall be compelled to be a witness against himself?
- aPyare Lal Vs. The State, AIR 1961, Cal. 531
- bChandmal Vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1976, S.C. 917
- cLakhanpal Vs. State of M.P., AIR 1979, S.C. 1620
- dRam Avtar Vs. State (Delhi Administration), AIR 1985, S.C. 1692
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Pyare Lal (Peare Lal Show) v. The State, AIR 1961 Cal 531, held that test identification parades do not contravene Article 20(3), as mere exhibition of the body is not a volitional testimonial act.
By which ‘Amendment’ section 113-A was inserted in the Indian Evidence Act?
- aDowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
- bThe information Technology Act, 2000
- cCriminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1986
- dCriminal Law (Amendment) Act1 1983
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 113-A IEA (presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman) was inserted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983.
Under section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, the opinion of expert cannot be on the question of:
- aForeign Law
- bScience
- cIndian Law
- dArt
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 45 IEA permits expert opinion on foreign law, science, art, handwriting, etc.; it does not extend to Indian law, which the court is presumed to know.
Under section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, evidence of judgement, order or decree can be challenged on the ground of:
- aFraud only
- bCollusion only
- cIncompetence of the court only
- dFraud or collusion or incompetence of the court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 44 IEA allows a party to show that a judgment, order or decree (otherwise relevant) was delivered by a court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that even the wife of a void marriage is entitled to maintenance ?
- aAmarjit Kaur Vs. Harbhajan Singh (2003)10 SCC 228
- bNirmala Devi Vs. Ram Das (2001)2 SCC 4
- cChand Dhawan Vs. Jawahar Lal Dhawan (1993)3 SCC 406
- dRamesh Chandra Vs. Veena Kausal AIR 1976 SC 1807
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Flagged: the classic holding that a wife of a void marriage is entitled to maintenance does not map cleanly to any listed case (the leading authority Yamunabai Adhav is not an option). Best guess Amarjit Kaur v. Harbhajan Singh (2003) 10 SCC 228, which concerns a wife's maintenance entitlement under the Hindu Marriage Act where the marital status was disputed.
Find correct answer using codes given below : Assertion (A) : “Option of puberty” is an easy process to repudiate the marriage under Hindu Law. Reason (R) : “Option of puberty” is not an easy process to repudiate the marriage under Muslim Law. Codes :
- a‘A’ is correct but ‘R’ is incorrect
- b‘A’ and ‘R’ both are correct
- c‘R’ is correct but ‘A’ is not correct
- da. and b. Both are not correct
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
'Option of puberty' (khyar-ul-bulugh) is a Muslim-law concept used to repudiate a minor's marriage; it is not a Hindu-law process, so Assertion (A) is wrong, and under Muslim law it IS the recognised (relatively easy) mode of repudiation, so Reason (R) is also wrong. Both A and R are incorrect.
Find correct answer using codes given below : Assertion (A) ; Srutis and Smritis form the greatest treasure house of hindustan Reason (R) : Srutis and Smritis are considered immemorial timeless and eternal Codes:
- aBoth ‘A’ and ‘R’ are true but ‘R’ is not the correct explanation of ‘A’
- bBoth ‘A’ and ‘R’ are true but is correct explanation of ‘A’
- c‘A’ is true, but ‘R’ is false
- d‘A’ is false but ‘R’ is true
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Srutis (Vedas) and Smritis are the primary sources of Hindu law and are regarded as immemorial, timeless and eternal; thus both A and R are true and R correctly explains why they form the treasure-house. (Option (b) is the 'R is correct explanation' choice.)
The junior widow has adopted a child without the consent of senior widow before HA & M Act 1956. Decide the adoption :
- aValid
- bVoid
- cVoidable
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under the old (pre-1956) Hindu law a junior widow could not validly adopt without the consent of the senior widow; such an adoption was void.
In which states, where a widow may adopt a child without an express authority from her husband, before HA and M Act, 1956 ?
- aOrissa and Andhra Pradesh
- bMadras and Bombay
- cBihar and Madhya Pradesh
- dU.P. and Himachal Pradesh
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Before the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, a widow could adopt without express authority from her husband in the Bombay and Madras schools, whereas in Bengal/Banaras schools express authority was required.
Daughter has become a coparcenary by virtue of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 under :
- aSection 5 of HS (Amendment) Act, 2005
- bSection 6 of HS (Amendment) Act, 2005
- cSection 6(1) of HS (Amendment) Act, 2005
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 substituted Section 6 of the principal Act, making a daughter a coparcener by birth on the same footing as a son.
Partition can be reopened, under what circumstances ?
- aRemoval of disability
- bFraud
- cAfter son born
- dAll of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A partition may be reopened on grounds such as fraud, removal of disability of a disqualified coparcener, and birth/after-born son (son in womb); hence all of these are correct.
Mitakshara commentary was written by whom ?
- aJimuthvahna
- bVijnanshawra (Vijnavalkya)
- cChitamony
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The Mitakshara is a commentary on the Yajnavalkya Smriti written by Vijnaneshwara; Jimutavahana wrote the Dayabhaga.
‘A’ marries ‘B’ the widow of his elder brother under Hindu Law. The marriage is :
- aValid
- bVoid
- cVoidable
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Brother's wife (widow of elder brother) is a 'degree of prohibited relationship' under Sec. 3(g) HMA; a marriage in contravention is void under Sec. 11 HMA, absent a valid custom permitting it.
In ancient ‘Hindu Marriage’, which one is approved form of marriage ?
- aBrahma
- bDavia
- cPrajapatya
- dAsura
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Of the eight ancient forms, Brahma is the most approved (highest) form of Hindu marriage; Asura is a disapproved (unapproved) form.
‘A’ contract may be vitiated by : (i) Fraud (ii) Mistake (iii) Frustration (iv) Undue influence
- aFind correct answer using codes :
- bOnly (i) is correct
- cOnly (i) and (ii) are correct
- dOnly (i), (ii) and (iii) are correct
- eAll are correct
Answer & solution
Correct answer: E
A contract may be vitiated by fraud, mistake, frustration and undue influence; all four are recognised vitiating factors, so all are correct.
Essentials of valid contract is :
- aMeeting of mind
- bMeeting of Parties
- cMeeting of discuss consideration
- dMeeting to discuss proposal and acceptance
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An essential of a valid contract is consensus ad idem, i.e., a true meeting of minds of the parties on the same thing in the same sense (Sec. 13, Indian Contract Act).
Tender is :
- aAn offer
- bAn invitation to offer
- cA counteroffer
- dA promise
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A tender (in the sense of a bid submitted in response to an invitation to tender) is an offer/proposal which, on acceptance, results in a contract.
An agreement not enforceable by law is stated to be void, under :
- aSection 2(d) of Contract Act
- bSection 2(e) of Contract Act
- cSection 2(f) of Contract Act
- dSection 2(g) of Contract Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 2(g) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines an agreement not enforceable by law as 'void'. (2(d) consideration, 2(e) agreement, 2(f) reciprocal promises.)
Get correct answer using codes given below : Assertion (A) : A proposal, when accepted, results in an agreement. Reason (R) : it is only after the acceptance of the proposal that a contract between the two parties can arise. Codes :
- aBoth ‘A’ and ‘R’ are true and ‘R’ is correct explanation of ‘A’
- bBoth ‘A’ and ‘R’ are true and ‘R’ is not correct explanation of ‘A’
- c‘A’ is true, but ‘R’ is false
- d‘A’ is false but ‘R’ is true
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An accepted proposal becomes an agreement (Sec. 2(b), 2(e)), and it is precisely the acceptance that gives rise to the contractual nexus; both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists : List I List II
- aChandra Das Mushib Vs.Ganga Prasad Das Mushib (i) Fraud
- bMithu Lal Nayak Vs. LIC of India (ii) Undue influence
- cSatyabrata Ghose Vs. Mugneeram Bangur (iii) Waiver
- dJagad Bandhu Chatterjee Vs. Nilma Rani (iv) Frustration of Contract
- eCodes :
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Correct pairings: Chandra Das Mushib v. Ganga Prasad = undue influence (ii); Mithoolal Nayak v. LIC = fraud (i); Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur = frustration of contract (iv); Jagad Bandhu Chatterjee v. Nilima Rani = waiver (iii). FLAGGED: the numbered answer-code combinations are not reproduced in the OCR'd options, so the exact lettered key cannot be fixed; best guess (b).
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists : List I List II
- aAgreement in restraint of legal proceeding (i) Section 28
- bAgreement in restraint of Marriage (ii) Section 31
- cWagering Contract (iii) Section 26
- dContingent Contract (iv) Section 30
- eCodes :
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Correct pairings: Restraint of legal proceeding = Sec. 28 (i); Restraint of marriage = Sec. 26 (iii); Wagering contract = Sec. 30 (iv); Contingent contract = Sec. 31 (ii). FLAGGED: the numbered code combinations are missing from the OCR'd options, so the precise lettered key cannot be determined; best guess (a).
Arrange the following concepts in sequence in which they occur, using codes given below : (i) Offer (ii) Acceptance (iii) Damage (iv) Damages Codes :
- a(iv) (iii) (ii) (i)
- b(i) (ii) (iv) (iii)
- c(i) (iv) (ii) (iii)
- d(i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Logical sequence: Offer (i) -> Acceptance (ii) -> Damage/breach causing loss (iii) -> Damages awarded (iv), i.e., (i)(ii)(iii)(iv).
An agreement not pursue legal remedies but to refer the dispute to the arbitrator under Section 28 of Contract Act is :
- aValid
- bVoid
- cVoidable
- dUnenforceable
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Exception 1 to Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act saves an agreement to refer present or future disputes to arbitration; such an agreement is valid and not void.
Goods displayed in a shop with a price tag is a/an :
- aOffer
- bInvitation to offer
- cCounter offer
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Goods displayed in a shop window/shelf with a price tag is only an invitation to offer (invitation to treat), not an offer (Pharmaceutical Society v. Boots; Fisher v. Bell).
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists : List I List II
- aSubrogation (i) Section 94
- bRights of Mesne Mortgagee (ii) Section 126
- cUniversal donee (iii) Section 92
- dRevocation of gift (iv) Section 128
- eCodes :
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Correct pairings: Subrogation = Sec. 92 (iii); Rights of mesne mortgagee = Sec. 94 (i); Universal donee = Sec. 128 (iv); Revocation of gift = Sec. 126 (ii). FLAGGED: the final numbered code combinations are missing from the OCR'd options, so the lettered key cannot be pinned down; best guess (c).
Universal donee is defined under :
- aSection 127 TPA
- bSection 126 TPA
- cSection 125 TPA
- dSection 128 TPA
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A 'universal donee' (one who takes the whole of the donor's property) is defined in Section 128 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and is personally liable for the donor's debts to the extent of the property received.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court had held that ‘there is no ban on the transfer of interest in flavour of an unborn person. Section 20 permits an interest being created for the benefit of an unborn person who acquires interest upon his birth.”
- aF.M Devaru Ganapathi Bhai Vs. P. Ganpathi Bhai AIR 2004 SC 2665
- bRajes Kanta Roy Vs. Santi AIR 1957 SC 255
- cRUKHMABAI Vs. Shivaram AIR 1981 SC 881
- dKokilambal Vs. N. Raman AIR 2005 SC 2468
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In F.M. Devaru Ganapati Bhat v. Prabhakar Ganapati Bhat, AIR 2004 SC 2665, the Supreme Court held there is no ban on transfer of interest in favour of an unborn person; Section 20 TPA permits an interest to be created for an unborn who acquires it on birth.
‘A’ transfer property to ‘B’ in trust for ‘C’ and directs ‘B’ to gives possession of the property to ‘C’ when he attains the age of 25. ‘C’ is entitled to possession at the age of 18 years, under Section :
- aS. 25 TP Act
- bS. 21 TP Act
- cS. 19 TP Act
- dS. 18 TP Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Per the illustration to Section 19 TPA (vested interest): postponement of enjoyment to age 25 does not prevent immediate vesting, so C has a vested interest and is entitled to possession on attaining majority (18).
‘A’ settled property in flavour of ‘B’ authorising him to collect rect of his house. A created in flavour of ‘B’ is :
- aVested interest
- bNo vested interest
- cContingent interest
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A settlement authorising B to collect rent of the house gives B a present, unconditional right to enjoy the income; it is a vested interest under Section 19 TPA (no condition precedent attaches).
Match the List I with List II and select the answer with the help of codes given below : List I (Name of the case) List II (Sections TPA)
- aKokilambal Vs. N. Raman AIR 2005 S.C. 2468 (i) Section 14
- bJohn Vallamattom Vs. Union of India AIR 2003 S.C. 2902 (ii) Section 13
- cKempraj Vs. Barton Son & Co. Air 1970 S.C. 1872 (iii) Section 19
- dGavaru Ganapati Bhai Vs. P.Ganapathi Bhai AIR 2004 (iv) Section 18
- eS.C. 2665
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Correct pairings: Kokilambal v. N. Raman = Sec. 19 vested interest (iii); John Vallamattom v. UOI = rule against perpetuity, Sec. 14 (i); Kempraj v. Barton = Sec. 18 (iv); Devaru Ganapati Bhat = transfer for benefit of unborn, Sec. 13 (ii). FLAGGED: the numbered code combinations are not reproduced in the OCR'd options, so the exact lettered key cannot be fixed; best guess (b).
A gift was made by a Hindu to his Grandson ‘K’ who was in existence at the date of the gift, and ‘S’ grandson who might be born after the date of the gift; and ‘P’ is born in fact after the date of the gift ? who will have the capacity to take the gift ?
- a‘S’ will take the gift
- b‘K’ will take the gift
- c‘P’ will take the gift
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under the rule against transfer to unborn persons (TPA s.13 / classical Hindu law of gifts), only a person in existence at the date of the gift can take. K, who existed at the date of the gift, takes; S and P (unborn then) cannot take a direct gift.
In Section 6 clause (dd) was added :
- aBy the Amending Act, 1900
- bBy the Amending Act, 1929
- cBy the Amending Act, 2002
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Clause (dd) of Section 6 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (a right to future maintenance cannot be transferred) was inserted by the Amending Act of 1929.
Where the property of a deceased Mohammedan was inherited by A,B,C grandsons and W, and ‘X’ daughters. The grandsons took possession of the whole property, entered it in their own names in the ‘Khatoni’ Register, two years later Mortgaged it. The daughters first heard of the Mortgage when the Mortgagee bought the property to sale and although it does not appear that they had husbands to protect their interest, their was held :
- aCovered under Section 41 TP Act
- bCovered under Section 43 TP Act
- cBarred by Section 43 TP Act
- dBarred by Section 41 TP Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Classic fact-pattern on ostensible ownership/transfer by ostensible owner — held covered by Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act (transfer by ostensible owner), protecting the bona fide mortgagee. Flagged: heavily OCR-garbled question; among options 'covered under Section 41' best fits the ostensible-owner doctrine.
The amendments made the Amending Act of 1929, both under the TP Act as well as the Registration Act, 1908, to even unregistered documents for the purpose of Section 53-A has now withdrawn by the amendments made by the Registration and other related laws (Amendments) Act, 2001, which has came into force with effect from :
- a1st September, 2001
- b23rd September, 2001
- c26th September, 2001
- d24th September, 2001
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Registration and Other Related Laws (Amendment) Act, 2001 (which withdrew the s.53-A benefit for unregistered documents) is generally cited as coming into force on 24th September 2001. Flagged: exact commencement date not confirmable from two independent authoritative sources.
The Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1969 came with effect from the date :
- a25th March, 1969
- b23rd March, 1969
- c26th March, 1969
- d24th March, 1969
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1969 (Act 10 of 1969) is commonly cited as effective 24th March 1969. Flagged: precise commencement date not verifiable from two independent reputable sources.
The Limitation Act, 1963 extend to Sikkim and came into force on :
- a1st January, 1984
- b1st September, 1984
- c24th August, 1984
- d23rd August, 1984
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The Limitation Act, 1963 was extended to Sikkim by notification, generally cited as 1st September 1984. Flagged: exact date not confirmable from two independent reputable sources.
On the third Law Commission recommendations the Limitation Bill was Introduced in the Lok Sabha on 23rd December, 1960. But it lapsed on account of dissolution of the Lok Sabha. It was introduced in the year :
- a1961
- b1968
- c1963
- d1962
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The Limitation Bill, after lapsing on dissolution of the Lok Sabha, was reintroduced and the Limitation Act was enacted as Act 36 of 1963. Best guess 1963. Flagged: reintroduction year of the lapsed Bill not independently verifiable.
Match List I and List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists : List I List II
- aEffect acknowledgment in writing (i) Section 24
- bContinuing wrong (ii) Section 25
- cAcquisition of easement by prescription (iii) Section 18
- dComputation of time (iv) Section 22
- eCodes :
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Limitation Act, 1963: Effect of acknowledgment in writing = s.18; Continuing wrong = s.22; Acquisition of easement by prescription = s.25; Computation of time/legal-proceedings exclusion = s.24. Matching A-(iii)18, B-(iv)22, C-(ii)25, D-(i)24 corresponds to code option d.
Match the List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists : List I List II
- aSection 5 of limitation Act (i) When the court closed period expired
- bSection 3 of limitation Act (ii) Disability of one of several persons
- cSection 4 of limitation Act (iii) Condonation of Delay
- dSection 7 of limitation Act (iv) Bar of limitation
- eCodes :
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Limitation Act, 1963: s.5 = Condonation of delay (iii); s.3 = Bar of limitation (iv); s.4 = when court closed/period expired (i); s.7 = disability of one of several persons (ii). The A-(iii),B-(iv),C-(i),D-(ii) matching corresponds to option c.
The limitation period from the date of the ex-parte-decree is :
- a60 days
- b90 days
- c120 days
- d30 days
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 123 (Schedule): application to set aside an ex parte decree is 30 days from the date of the decree.
Match the List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists : List I List II
- a(Name of the case) (Sections)
- bKrishna Murthy S. Setlur (i) Exclusion of time in legal
- cVs. O.V. Narsimha Setty (2007)3 SCC.569 Proceedings
- dTilak Ram Vs. Nathu (1967)S.C. 935 (ii) Suit for Possession
- eState of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Maharaja Narain (iii) Acknowledgment
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
OCR-broken matching question (case names/sections fragmented across option lines). Krishna Murthy Setlur relates to acknowledgment; Tilak Ram v. Nathu to easement/acknowledgment; State of U.P. v. Maharaja Narain to exclusion of time. Flagged: options are incomplete/garbled; first-listed code is best guess.
In which of the following, the supreme Court held that “The expression ‘sufficient cause’ should be considered with pragmatism in justice oriented approach rather than the technical detection of sufficient cause for explaining every day’s delay.”
- aDarshan Singh Vs. Gurdeep Singh AIR 1995 S.C.75
- bStater (NCT of delhi) Vs. Ahmad Jaan (2008)10 JT179
- cUdayan Chinubhai Vs. R.C. Bali AIR 1977 S.C. 2319
- dAnandilal Vs. Ram Narain AIR S.C. 1383
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The 'sufficient cause should be considered with pragmatism in a justice-oriented approach' observation on s.5 condonation of delay is from State (NCT of Delhi) v. Ahmed Jaan, (2008) 14 SCC 582.
Where the judgement debtor has, by fraud, prevented the execution of a decree or order within the period of limitation on the application of the Judgement debtor made after the expiry of the said period, the court for execution of decree provided such application is made within one year from the data of the discovery of fraud under Section:
- a1 Section 17(2) of the TP Act
- bSection 18(2) of the TP Act
- cSection 15(3) of the TP Act
- dSection 15(5) of the TP Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Fraud preventing execution within limitation is dealt with by Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (effect of fraud), application within one year of discovery. Option (a) references 'Section 17(2)' (mislabelled 'TP Act' by OCR) which best matches. Flagged: options misattribute the section to the TP Act.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that ‘a suit for damages for wrongful detention of goods is based on different footing vis-a-vis continuing wrong. The period of limitation would run from time when property is wrongfully taken.’
- aSankar Dostidar Vs. Banjula Dostidar
- bTilak Ram Vs. Nathu AIR 1967 SC 935
- cBondar Singh Vs. Nihal Singh (2003)4 SCC 161
- dAsian Resorts Ltd. Vs. Usha Bre Co. Ltd. AIR 2002 SC 55
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In Sankar Dastidar v. Banjula Dastidar, (2007) 12 SCC 538, the Supreme Court held a suit for damages for wrongful detention of goods runs from when the property is wrongfully taken, distinct from continuing wrong.
Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, which Court has the power to transfer proceedings :
- aSupreme Court
- bHigh Court
- cDistrict Court
- dAll of these Courts
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 28 of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, the High Court has the power to transfer proceedings pending before a Controller/appellate authority.
Under which of the following sections the residential building converted into a non-residential building ?
- aSection 13, HPURC Act
- bSection 14, HPURC Act
- cSection 12, HPURC Act
- dSection 11, HPURC Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 12 of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act bars conversion of a residential building into a non-residential building without written permission of the Controller.
“Every Landlord shall be bound to keep the building or rented land in which good and tenantable repairs” ; under which section of H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1971 ?
- aSection 13(3) of the Act
- bSection 13(1) of the Act
- cSection 10(2) of the Act
- dSection 11(3) of the Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 13(1) of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act provides that every landlord shall be bound to keep the building or rented land in good and tenantable repairs.
How many Schedules are there in H.P. Urban Rent Control Act ?
- a1(one)
- b2(two)
- c3(three)
- d4(four)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The H.P. Urban Rent Control Act has two Schedules (Schedule I and Schedule II).
“The Landlord shall not claim or receive any premium or other like sum in addition to fair rent or any rent in excess of such fair rent, but the landlord may stipulate for and receive in advance not exceeding one month rent”, provided under :
- aSection 8(3) of the Act
- bSection 5(1)(a) of the Act
- cSection 5(4)(c) of the Act
- dSection 7(1)(a) of the Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 7(1)(a) of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act bars premium and allows the landlord to stipulate for and receive in advance an amount not exceeding one month's rent.
In which of the following cases are related to H.P. Urban Rent Control Act ?
- aRam Murthi Vs. Bhole Nath
- bSantosh Mehta Vs. Om Prakash & others
- cBoth a. and b.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Both Ram Murti v. Bhole Nath and Santosh Mehta v. Om Prakash are commonly cited as H.P./rent-control-related decisions; the intended answer is 'Both a and b.' Flagged: case-specific attribution to this particular Act not independently re-verified.
On which date HP Urban Rent Control Act came into force ?
- a17th November, 1971
- b29th January, 1971
- c17th November, 1987
- d26th January, 1987
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 is deemed to have come into force on 17th November 1971 (the date the predecessor 1971 Act commenced), with retrospective effect.
Match the List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists : List I List II
- a“Tenant” (i) Section 23
- b‘Scheduled building’ (ii) Section 16
- cLeases of vacant buildings (iii) Section 2(i)
- dExecution of orders (iv) Section 2(h)
- eCodes :
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Matching: 'Tenant' = s.2(j); leases of vacant buildings = s.23; execution of orders = s.16. OCR pairings here are 'Tenant'-(iii)s.2(i), 'scheduled building'-(iv)s.2(h), leases of vacant buildings-(i)s.23, execution of orders-(ii)s.16, giving code option d. Flagged: definition sub-clause labels garbled by OCR.
Which of the following Sections of the H.P.Urban Rent Control Act, 1971 prescribes penalties for the contravention of the provisions of Section 10,11,12 or 24 of the Act,1971 ?
- aSection 30
- bSection 31
- cSection 25
- dSection 28
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 30 of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act prescribes penalties for contravention of Sections 10, 11, 12 or 24.
Under which Sections of the H.p.Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, power to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses ?
- aSection 26
- bSection 28
- cSection 25
- dSection 27
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 25 of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 confers the power to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses.
Which one of the following Sections of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 deals with the power of Central Government to declare areas as sanctuaries or National Park ?
- aSection 35
- bSection 36A
- cSection 38A
- dSection 38B
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Power to declare sanctuaries/National Parks by the Central Government falls under Chapter IVA / s.38 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; 's.38' is not an option, so 38A (the Chapter IVA range) is the best available choice. Flagged: option set omits the precise section 38, making the item defective.
The licence for the possession of arm with which an offence was committed against the Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 may be cancelled by the court on conviction of such person and he shall not be eligible for a period of :
- aOne year from the date of conviction
- bTwo years from the date of conviction
- cThree years from the date of conviction
- dFive years from the date of conviction
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 50(4) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, on conviction the court may cancel the arms licence and the person is not eligible for a licence for five years from the date of conviction.
Experts or professionals appointed under Clause (d) of Sub-section (2) of Section 38 L of the Wildlife (Protection) Act shall hold office not exceeding :
- aFive years
- bThree years
- cTwo years
- dOne year
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 38M(1) read with Section 38L(2)(d) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act provides that experts/professionals nominated shall hold office for a period not exceeding three years.
Meat under the Wildlife (Protection) Act does not include :
- aBlood
- bBones
- cVermin
- dFlesh
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 2(18A) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 'meat' includes blood, bones, sinew, eggs, shell or carapace, fat and flesh whether raw or cooked of any captive or wild animal, but the definition's listed exception/exclusion places 'blood' as not within the ordinary meat sense; meat excludes vermin-related items, but among the options blood is the answer keyed.
Which one of the following Sections of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 deals with the protection of sanctuary ?
- aSection 18
- bSection 18A
- cSection 18B
- dSection 24
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 18A of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (inserted by the 2002 amendment) deals with protection of a sanctuary pending the settlement/declaration proceedings.
Which one of the following Sections of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 deals with the formation of village Forest ?
- aSection 28
- bSection 30
- cSection 31
- dSection 32
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 28 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 empowers the State Government to assign forest land to a village community, i.e., the formation of 'village forests'.
A person who commits an offence under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to……..
- aSixth months
- bOne year
- cTwo years
- dThree years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 prescribes punishment for acts prohibited in protected forests; the imprisonment may extend to six months (with or without fine).
whenever , it is decided to constitute any land as a reserved forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, theState Government shall issue notification in the Official Gazette under :
- aSection 3
- bSection 4
- cSection 5
- dSection 7
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 requires the State Government to issue a notification in the Official Gazette declaring the intention to constitute land as a reserved forest.
Which of the following Sections of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 provides powers of Forest Settlement Officers :
- aSection 8
- bSection 11
- cSection 12
- dSection 14
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 14 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 confers powers on the Forest Settlement Officer to inquire into and record claims (powers like those of a civil court).
A duty may be imposed on timber and other forest-produce under Section 39 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 by :
- aCollector
- bForest officer
- cState Government
- dCentral Government
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 39 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 empowers the State Government to impose a duty on timber and other forest-produce.
Intoxicant under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, shall be imported, exported or transported in compliance with such conditions as imposed by :
- aThe State Government
- bFinancial Commissioner
- cCollector
- dExcise officer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 16 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, no intoxicant shall be imported, exported or transported except under and in compliance with the conditions prescribed by the State Government.
No Tari producing tree under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 shall be tapped except under the authority and subject to terms and conditions of a licence granted by the:
- aState Government
- bExcise Commissioner
- cCollector
- dExcise Officer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 24 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, no tari-producing tree shall be tapped except under the authority and subject to the terms of a licence granted by the Collector.
Who has the power to prohibit the transport of any intoxicant under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914?
- aFinancial Commissioner
- bCollector
- cState Government
- dExcise officer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 17 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 empowers the Financial Commissioner to prohibit the import, export or transport of any intoxicant.
Under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, the power to make rules regulating the manufacture, supply, storage or sale of any intoxicant may be made by:
- aState government
- bFinancial Commissioner
- cExcise Officer
- dCollector
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 59 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 empowers the Financial Commissioner to make rules regulating the manufacture, supply, storage or sale of any intoxicant.
The collector may, by notification, under the Punjab Excise Act, make rules regulating:
- aThe bottling of liquor for purpose of sale
- bThe transport of intoxicant
- cThe manufacture of intoxicant
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 60 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, the Collector may by notification make rules regulating matters such as the bottling of liquor for the purpose of sale.
If the offence is committed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments, Act, 1881, the drawer of the cheque shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to:
- a60 days
- bThree months
- cOne year
- dTwo year
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
By the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002, the punishment under Section 138 was enhanced from one year to imprisonment which may extend to two years.
The court shall take cognizance of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 if the payee, after receipt of the information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid, makes a demand for the payment of the amount of money by giving notice in writing to the drawer of the cheque and the drawer fails to make payment within:
- aOne month
- bFifteen days
- cSeven days
- dTwenty one days
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under proviso (c) to Section 138 (post-2002 amendment), the drawer must fail to pay within fifteen days of receipt of the demand notice for the offence to be complete.
The court shall not take cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, if the payee after receipt of the information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid, makes a demand by giving notice in writing to the drawer after the expiry of:
- aFifteen days
- bTwo weeks
- cOne month
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under proviso (b) to Section 138 (as amended in 2002), the payee must make the demand by notice within thirty days (one month) of receipt of information of dishonour; failing which cognizance is barred.
In which of the following Sections of the Negotiable Instruments act, 1881, the power of court to try cases summarily has been provided.
- aSection 139
- bSection 140
- cSection 141
- dSection 143
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (inserted in 2002) empowers the court to try cases under Section 138 summarily.
Amendment in Sections 138,141,142 and 143 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 was made by the the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act in:
- a2001
- b2002
- c2004
- d2005
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The amendments to Sections 138, 141, 142 and 143 were made by the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002.
A child of the following age is presumed to be doli incapax:
- aA child under 7 years of age
- bA child above 7 years of age and under 12 years
- cA child above 8 years of age and under 14 years
- dA child above 7 years of age and under 10 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 82 IPC nothing is an offence done by a child under seven years of age; such a child is conclusively presumed doli incapax (incapable of crime).
The right of private defence of property does not extend to causing death in:
- aMischief by fire on any tent used for human dwelling
- bHouse breaking by night
- cHouse trespass
- dRobbery
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 103 IPC lists the offences (robbery, house-breaking by night, mischief by fire on a dwelling, theft/mischief/house-trespass causing apprehension of death or grievous hurt) where private defence of property extends to causing death; simple house-trespass is not included.
The right of private defence of body extends to causing death:
- aIn case of wrongful restraint
- bIn case of apprehension of hurt
- cIn case of assault with intention of abduction
- dIn case of wrongful confinement
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 100 IPC, the right of private defence of the body extends to causing death where the assault is with the intention of abducting (or of kidnapping); mere wrongful restraint, confinement or apprehension of hurt does not suffice.
A instigates B to give false evidence, B does not give false evidence, in this case:
- aA is not liable of any offence
- bA is liable for abetment by instigation
- cA is liable for abetment by conspiring
- dAll the above answers are correct
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Abetment by instigation (Section 107, First clause IPC) is complete on instigation itself; abetment is an offence even though the act abetted is not committed (Section 108, Explanation), so A is liable for abetment by instigation.
A with the guilty intention abets a child of 6 years to commit theft. The act is not committed. Here:
- aBoth A and the child can be tried
- bA has not committed any offence
- cA has not abetted theft
- dA is liable for abetting theft
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Explanation 3 to Section 108 IPC, abetment of an offence is an offence even though the person abetted is incapable (by infancy) of committing it; the abettor A is liable for abetting theft (the child being doli incapax).
A administers a poisonous drug to a woman B to cause miscarriage. It is found that B was not pregnant. Here:
- aA is not guilty of attempt
- bA is guilty of attempt
- cA is guilty of attempt
- dA is guilty of no offence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Even though B was not in fact pregnant, A who administered the drug with intent to cause miscarriage is guilty of an attempt (Section 511 read with Section 312 IPC), the impossibility not absolving him. Options b and c are duplicated; the correct keyed answer is 'guilty of attempt'.
Which one of the following is normally an essential element of crime?
- aVolition
- bActress Reus
- cMotive
- dWill
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Actus reus (the guilty act) together with mens rea is an essential element of crime; 'Actress Reus' is the garbled OCR of actus reus. Volition, motive and will are not invariably essential.
For the application of Section 34 of IPC, it is necessary that Criminal Act is done by:
- aTwo persons only
- bFive persons
- cMore than two but less than five persons
- dMore than one person
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 34 IPC speaks of a criminal act done 'by several persons' in furtherance of common intention, which requires participation of more than one person; there is no minimum of two-only or five.
McNaghten case relates to the defence on the ground of:
- aIntoxication
- bNecessity
- cConsent
- dUnsoundness of mind
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The M'Naghten case (1843) laid down the rules on the defence of insanity (unsoundness of mind), reflected in Section 84 IPC.
Right of private define of the body extends to causing death has been dealt with under:
- aSection 100 of IPC
- bSection 101 of IPC
- cSection 102 of IPC
- dSection 103 of IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 100 IPC enumerates the circumstances in which the right of private defence of the body extends to causing death.
For abetment:
- aIt is necessary that the person abetted should be capable of committing an offence under the law
- bIt is necessary that the person abetted should have the same guilty intention
- cIt is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable of committing an offence under the law or should have the same guilty intention
- dBoth (A) and (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Per Explanation 3 to Section 108 IPC, it is not necessary that the person abetted be capable of committing the offence or have the same guilty intention as the abettor.
Rioting means use of force or violence by an unlawful assembly, or by a member thereof, in prosecution of common object of such assembly, as per:
- aSection 144 of IPC
- bSection 145 of IPC
- cSection 146 of IPC
- dSection 148 of IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 146 IPC defines rioting as the use of force or violence by an unlawful assembly, or a member thereof, in prosecution of the common object of such assembly.
During the scuffle between A and B, A gave a blow on the face of ‘B’ and consequently two teeth of ‘B’ were broken. In case circumstances ‘A’ has committed an offence of causing:
- aSimple injury
- bAttempt to cause culpable homicide not amounting to murder
- cGrievous hurt
- dNo offence at all
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Fracture or dislocation of a tooth / 'destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint' is grievous hurt under Section 320 IPC (knocking out teeth is a settled instance of grievous hurt).
Wrongful restraint has been defined under:
- aSection 339 of IPC
- bSection 340 of IPC
- cSection 341 of IPC
- dSection 342 of IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Wrongful restraint is defined in Section 339 IPC; Section 341 prescribes its punishment. (Wrongful confinement is defined in s.340, punished by s.342.)
Assault can be caused by:
- aGesture
- bMere words
- cPreparation
- dNeither (A) nor (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 351 IPC assault is made by a gesture or preparation intended to cause apprehension of criminal force; the Explanation states that mere words do not amount to assault. Of the options, a gesture causes assault.
Warrant case has been defined under Section 2(x) of Cr.P.C. as a case relating to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term:
- aExceeding three years
- bExceeding two years
- cExceeding one years
- dExceeding one year but less than two years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 2(x) CrPC defines a warrant-case as one relating to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for a term exceeding two years.
It is mandatory to produce the person arrested before the Magistrate, with 24 hours of his arrest, under:
- aSection 56 of Cr.P.C.
- bSection 57 of Cr.P.C.
- cSection 58 of Cr.P.C.
- dSection 59 of Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 57 CrPC requires that an arrested person not be detained beyond 24 hours without a Magistrate's order; production before the Magistrate within 24 hours is mandated (read with Art. 22(2) and s.167).
It is mandatory for a police officer to inform the person arrested, the grounds of arrest and right of bail if the offence is not no-bailable, under:
- aSection 49 of Cr.P.C
- bSection 50 of Cr.P.C
- cSection 51 of Cr.P.C
- dSection 54 of Cr.P.C
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 50 CrPC obliges the arresting officer to communicate the grounds of arrest and, where the offence is bailable, the right to be released on bail.
A proclamation under section 82(1) requiring a person to appear must be published giving:
- aNot less than 30 years time to the person concerned
- bNot less than 10 years time to the person concerned
- cNot less than 20 years time to the person concerned
- dNot less than 15 years time to the person concerned
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 82(1) CrPC requires the proclamation to fix a date not less than 30 days from its publication for the person's appearance. (The OCR reads 'years' but the statute says days.)
Section 92 of Cr.P.C. lays down the procedure for:
- aProduction of documents(s) in the custody of postal or telegraph authority
- bProduction of documents(s) in the custody of any person other than the accused
- cProduction of documents(s) in the custody of an accused person
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 92 CrPC lays down the special procedure for production of documents/parcels in the custody of a postal or telegraph authority. (General production by others is under s.91.)
A declaration of forfeiture under Section 95 of Cr.P.C. can be set aside by:
- aMagistrate issuing the search warrant
- bChief Judicial Magistrate/Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
- cCourt of Sessions
- dHigh Court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 96 CrPC, any person interested may apply to the High Court to set aside a declaration of forfeiture made under Section 95; a Special Bench of the High Court decides it.
When the police register a case regarding commission of cognizable offence. The registration of the case is under:
- aSection 154 of Cr.P.C.
- bSection 155 of Cr.P.C.
- cSection 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.
- dSection 190 of Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An FIR registering a cognizable offence is recorded under Section 154 CrPC.
The investing police officer in a case has power to require attendance of a person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case under:
- aSection 158 of Cr.P.C.
- bSection 159 of Cr.P.C.
- cSection 160 of Cr.P.C.
- dSection 161 of Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 160 CrPC empowers the investigating police officer to require, by written order, the attendance of any person acquainted with the facts of the case.
The investing officer under Section 160 of Cr.P.C. cannot require the attendance of a male, at a place other than the place of his residence, who is:
- aUnder the age of 15 years
- bUnder the age of 16 years
- cUnder the age of 18 years
- dUnder the age of 21 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
As applicable to this 2014 paper, the proviso to Section 160(1) CrPC barred requiring attendance, at a place other than his residence, of any male person under the age of 15 years (and of any woman).
A Magistrate records the confession of an accused or a statement of a witness during investigation, under:
- aSection 164 of Cr.P.C.
- bSection 281 of Cr.P.C.
- cSection 162 of Cr.P.C.
- dChapter XXIII of Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 164 CrPC empowers a Magistrate to record confessions and statements made in the course of investigation.
Statement recorded during investigation under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. can be used during trial:
- aFor corroborating the witness
- bFor contradicting the witness
- cCannot be used for any purpose
- dNeither (A) nor (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
By the proviso to Section 162 CrPC, a statement recorded under s.161 may be used only to contradict the witness (in the manner of s.145 Evidence Act), not to corroborate.
Section 164 of Cr.P.C. provides a special procedure for recording of:
- aConfession
- bStatements made during the course of investigation
- cConfession as well as statements made during the course of investigation
- dEither (A) or (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 164 CrPC provides the special procedure for recording both confessions and statements made during the course of investigation.
Under Section 167 of Cr.P.C. for offences other than those punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a period not less than 10 years, the detention during investigation, can be authorised for a total period of:
- a30 days
- b45 days
- c60 days
- d75 days
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under proviso (a) to Section 167(2) CrPC, for offences other than those punishable with death/life/imprisonment of not less than 10 years, detention during investigation cannot exceed a total of 60 days.
An order for maintenance or interim allowance can be cancelled under the circumstances stated under:
- aSection 125(5) of Cr.P.C.
- bSection 127(2) of Cr.P.C.
- cSection 127(3) of Cr.P.C.
- dNone of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 127(2) CrPC empowers the Magistrate to cancel or vary an order of maintenance/interim allowance in consequence of a competent court's decision.
A case can be committed to the Court of Sessions, by a Magistrate under:
- aSection 209 of Cr.P.C.
- bSection 323 of Cr.P.C.
- cSection 324 of Cr.P.C.
- dBoth (A) and (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A Magistrate commits a case (triable exclusively by the Court of Session) to the Court of Session under Section 209 CrPC. (Sections 323/324 deal with commitment after commencement of inquiry/trial in other situations, but the standard committal answer is s.209.)
Practise Himachal Pradesh Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Himachal Pradesh Judiciary preparation guide.