Live Bihar Judiciary 2026 mock series · 50 free questions Start now

Himachal Pradesh Judiciary — Prelims 2017

150 questions Objective 150 answers with solutions PDF
1

For the purpose of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 the word “settlement” means:

  • aAn instrument whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests in movable property is disposed of
  • bAn instrument including codicil or will whereby the destination or devolution of successive interest in immovable property is disposed of or is agreed to be disposed of
  • cAn instrument including codicil or will whereby the devolution of successive interest in movable or immovable property is disposed of
  • dAn instrument including codicil or will whereby the destination or devolution of successive interest in movable or immovable property is disposed of or is agreed to be disposed of
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under s.2(b) (formerly the definition in the Specific Relief Act), 'settlement' means an instrument (including a codicil or will) whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests in movable or immovable property is disposed of or agreed to be disposed of. Option (d) reproduces this in full.

2

In which of the following cases the “prohibitory injunction under the Specific Relief Act” was discussed?

  • aSarvesh Vs. Smt. Sanju, AIR 2010 Uttra 16
  • bMansha Ram Vs. Dr. Ved, AIR 2010 Uttra 14
  • cDalulat Ram Vs. Gopal Krishan, AIR 2010 Utrra 9
  • dVijay Goyal Vs. State, AIR 2010 Utrra 12
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Obscure 2010 Uttarakhand High Court citation on prohibitory injunction under the Specific Relief Act; the exact case/citation cannot be reliably verified. Best guess is Mansha Ram v. Dr. Ved, AIR 2010 Uttra 14.

3

“Jurisdiction of civil court is not excluded in respect of adoption. The question regarding adoption involves declaration as to status/character of person can be decided only by civil court.” This was held by the Supreme Court of India in:

  • aRamchandra Dagdu Sonavane Vs. Visthu, AIR 2010 SC 818
  • bSushil Kumar Vs. State, AIR 2010 Sc 832
  • cParminder Kaur Vs. State, AIR 2010 SC 840
  • dAlagarsamy Vs. State, AIR 2010 SC 849
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The proposition that civil court jurisdiction is not excluded on adoption (declaration of status) is associated with Ramchandra Dagdu Sonavane v. Vithu (AIR 2010 SC 818); exact citation could not be independently double-verified, so flagged.

4

Under the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, Additional District Judges as may be necessary for speedy disposal of pending business before the Court of any District Judge can be appointed by:

  • aThe concerned District Judge after consultation with High Court
  • bThe concerned District Judge after consultation with the State Government
  • cThe State Government after consultation with High Court
  • dThe High Court after consultation with the State Government
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under the HP Courts Act, 1976, Additional District Judges are appointed by the High Court after consultation with the State Government (s.7/s.8 scheme). Option (d) is correct.

5

The High Court or the District Judge may assign to an Additional District Judge any of the functions of the District Judge:

  • aNot including the functions of receiving and registering cases and appeals
  • bIncluding the functions of receiving and registering cases and appeals
  • cIncluding the functions of receiving and registering only cases and not appeals
  • dNot including the functions of receiving and registering new appeals
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The High Court or District Judge may assign to an Additional District Judge any of the District Judge's functions, including the function of receiving and registering cases and appeals. Option (b).

6

Under Section 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, the High Court may by general of special order authorise any Subordinate Judge to take cognizance of and any District Judge to transfer to such a Subordinate Judge under his control, any proceedings or any class of proceedings, specified in such order under any of the enactments mentioned in that section. One such Act is:

  • aThe Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • bThe Hindu Succession Ac, 1956
  • cThe Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 14 of the HP Courts Act, 1976 lists enactments under which a Subordinate Judge may be authorised to take cognizance, including the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, Hindu Succession Act 1956 and the Provincial Insolvency Act 1920 — hence 'All of the above'.

7

Provisions for ‘Appeals from Subordinate Judges’ to District Judge and the High Court are given in:

  • aSection 19 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976
  • bSection 20 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976
  • cSection 21 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976
  • dSection 22 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 19 of the HP Courts Act, 1976 contains the provisions for appeals from Subordinate Judges to the District Judge and the High Court.

8

Under section 9 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, the principle civil court of original jurisdiction in the district is:

  • aCourt of Small causes
  • bCourt of Subordinate judge
  • cCourt of District Judge
  • dHigh Court of Himachal Pradesh
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under s.9 of the HP Courts Act, 1976 the Court of the District Judge is the principal civil court of original jurisdiction in the district. Option (c).

9

Power to make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976 under Section 29 lies with:

  • aHigh Court of Himachal Pradesh
  • bGovernment of Himachal Pradesh
  • cGovernment of Himachal Pradesh after consultation with High Court
  • dState Legislative Assembly
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 29 of the HP Courts Act, 1976 vests the power to make rules to carry the Act into effect in the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Option (a).

10

Which of the following instruments is a ‘bond’ under the Indian Stamp Act as applicable to State of Himachal Pradesh?

  • aAny instrument whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another, on condition that the obligation shall be void if a specified act is performed, or is not performed, as the case may be
  • bAny instruments attested by a witness and not payable to order or bearer, whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another
  • cAny instruments so attested, whereby a person obliges himself to deliver grain or other agriculture produce to another
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under s.2(5) of the Indian Stamp Act, 'bond' includes all three described instruments (obligation void on a condition; attested instrument not to order/bearer to pay money; attested instrument to deliver grain/produce) — hence 'All of the above'.

11

Which of the following is not a ‘lease’ under the Indian Stamp Act as applicable to State of Himachal Pradesh?

  • aA patta
  • bA kabuliyat or other undertaking in writing, not being a counterpart of a lease, to cultivate, occupy, or paye or deliver ren for, immovable property;
  • cAny instruments by which one person, in consideration of a premium, engages to indemnify another against loss, damage or liability arising from an unknown or contingent event
  • dAny instrument by which tolls of any description are let; and any writing on an application for a lease intended to signify that the application is granted
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

A 'lease' under s.2(16) of the Indian Stamp Act includes a patta, a kabuliyat, and instruments letting tolls etc. An instrument indemnifying against loss from a contingent event is a contract of insurance/indemnity, not a lease. Option (c).

12

Out of the following instruments which one may not be stamped with adhesive Stamps?

  • aBills of exchange and promissory notes drawn or made out of India;
  • bEntry as an advocate, vakil or attorney on the roll of a High Court;
  • cNotarial acts
  • dCheques
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under s.11 of the Indian Stamp Act, adhesive stamps may be used for bills/notes drawn out of India, entry on the roll of a High Court, and notarial acts. Cheques are not among the instruments that may be stamped with adhesive stamps under this provision. Option (d).

13

Which of the following securities dealt in depository are not liable to stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act?

  • aThe transfer of registered ownership of securities from a person to a depository or from a depository to a beneficial owner
  • bThe transfer of beneficial ownership of securities, dealt with by a depository
  • cBoth (A) and (B)
  • dNeither (A) nor (B)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 8A of the Indian Stamp Act exempts from stamp duty both the transfer of registered ownership of securities to/from a depository and the transfer of beneficial ownership of securities dealt with by a depository — hence both (A) and (B). Option (c).

14

Instruments executed out of India, chargeable with duty, but not being a bill of exchange or promissory note, are required to be stamped, after first received in India:

  • aWithin three months
  • bWithin two months
  • cWithin forty five days
  • dWithin one month
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under s.18 of the Indian Stamp Act, instruments (other than bills of exchange or promissory notes) executed out of India must be stamped within three months after being first received in India. Option (a).

15

All duties, penalties and other sums required to be paid for instruments not duly stamped may be recovered by the Collector:

  • aOnly by distress and sale of the movable property of the person from whom the same are due
  • bOnly by any process for the time being in force for the recovery of arrears of land revenue
  • cEither by (A) or (B)
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under s.48 of the Indian Stamp Act, duties, penalties and other sums may be recovered by the Collector by distress and sale of movable property or by any process for recovery of arrears of land revenue — i.e., either (A) or (B). Option (c).

16

Evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 means and includes:

  • aDocumentary evidence
  • bOcular evidence
  • cBoth ocular and documentary evidence
  • dOcular evidence based on documentary evidence only
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under s.3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 'evidence' means and includes oral (statements of witnesses) and documentary evidence. Option (c).

17

Proof of a fact for the purpose of evidence depends on:

  • aRigid mathematical demonstration
  • bProbability of its existence
  • cAccuracy of the statement
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

A fact is 'proved' (s.3 IEA) when, on the probabilities, a prudent man ought to act on the supposition that it exists; proof depends on probability, not rigid mathematical demonstration. Option (b).

18

Choose the correct assertion based on the following propositions: Propositions:

  • aI. Statement is a genus; admission is a spices while confession is a subspecies.
  • bII. Statement and admission are species while confession is a subspecies.
  • cIII. Statement and admission are genus while confession is a species.
  • dAssertions:
  • eI is correct, II and III are incorrect
Answer & solution

Correct answer: E

Statement is the genus, admission a species, and confession a sub-species of admission. Proposition I states exactly this; the correct assertion is that I is correct and II and III are incorrect. Option (e).

19

Declaration by a person, not able to be called as witness, in the course of business is admissible under:

  • aSection 32 (1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • bSection 32 (2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • cSection 32 (4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • dSection 32 (7) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

A statement made by a person (who cannot be called as a witness) in the ordinary course of business is admissible under s.32(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

20

Omnia Praesumuntur rite esse acta means:

  • aAll acts are presumed to be rightly done
  • bAll acts are presumed to be not rightly done
  • cAll acts are presumed to be wrongly done
  • dAll acts are presumed to be not wrongly done
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The maxim 'Omnia praesumuntur rite et solemniter esse acta' means all acts are presumed to have been rightly and regularly done. Option (a).

21

Electronic record in proper custody gives rise to a presumption as to the digital signature to be fixed by that particular person under section 90A of Indian Evidence Act if the electronic record produced is:

  • a20 years old
  • b15 years old
  • c10 years old
  • d5 years old
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 90A of the Indian Evidence Act raises the presumption as to the electronic/digital signature where the electronic record produced from proper custody is five years old.

22

Oral evidence of a fact invalidating a documents is admissible:

  • aUnder proviso 1 to section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • bUnder proviso 2 to section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • cUnder proviso 4 to section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • dUnder proviso 6 to section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Proviso 1 to s.92 of the Indian Evidence Act allows oral evidence of any fact that would invalidate the document (fraud, intimidation, illegality, want of consideration, etc.).

23

The doctrine of estoppel is a:

  • aSubstantive law
  • bRule of equity
  • cRule of evidence
  • dRule of pleadings
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Estoppel (ss.115-117 IEA) is a rule of evidence; it bars a party from denying what he previously induced another to believe and act upon. Option (c).

24

Which of the following descriptions is correct under section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

  • aA witness may be cross examined as to previous statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing, and relevant to matters in question, without such writing beings shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention need not, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts of it which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him.
  • bA witness may be cross examined as to previous statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing, and relevant to matters in question, without such writing beings shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts of it which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him.
  • cA witness may be cross examined as to previous statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing, and relevant to matters in question, without such writing beings shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention need not, before the writing can be proved, be called to such new materials which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him.
  • dA witness may be cross examined as to previous statement made b him in wringing or reduced into writing, even if not relevant to matters in question, without such writing being shown to him, or being proved for any purpose.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 145 IEA: a witness may be cross-examined on prior written statements without the writing being shown to him, but if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention MUST, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts to be used for contradiction. Option (b).

25

A co-defendant in a case:

  • aCannot be cross examined by another co-defendant under any circumstances
  • bCan be cross examined by another co-defendant if their interest are identical
  • cCan be cross examined by another co-defendant when their interests are adverse to each other
  • dCan be cross examined by another co-defendant as a matter of right
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

A co-defendant can be cross-examined by another co-defendant when their interests are adverse to each other. Option (c).

26

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that the rule of prudence requires that the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborate by some evidence:

  • aFrancis Stanly Vs. Intelligence Officer, AIR 2007 SC 794
  • bYuvaraj Rai Vs. Chander Bahadur Karki, AIR 2007 SC 561
  • cKamla Devi Vs. Khushal Kanwar, AIR 2007 SC 663
  • dBablu Vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 2006 SC 115
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

In Bablu @ Mubarik Hussain v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 2006 SC 115, the Supreme Court held that as a rule of prudence the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborated (illustration (b) to s.114, Evidence Act).

27

As regards question by a party to its own witness under section 154 of the Indian Evidence, 1872, which of the following propositions/expression is correct?

  • aTwo statement sought to be contradicted in addition should be drawn to the previous statement
  • bThe person who calls a witness is entitled to put any questions to him which might be put in cross-examination by the adverse party.
  • cCorroborating a witness by questioning him on surrounding circumstances
  • dFormer statement of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 154 of the Evidence Act permits the court to allow the person who calls a witness to put any questions to him which might be put in cross-examination by the adverse party (i.e. treating one's own witness as hostile).

28

The “test identification parade is only an aid to investigation. The practice is not born out of prudence” was held by Supreme Court of India in:

  • aSiddharth Vashist @ Manu Sharma Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), AIR 2010 SC 2352
  • bShivaji Vs. Nagendra, AIR 2010 SC 2261
  • cS. Jaiswal Vs. Alok, AIR 2010 SC (NOC) 805
  • dSujata Vs. S.K. Behera, AIR 2010 (NOC) 812
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

The dictum that the test identification parade is only an aid to investigation and the practice is not born out of prudence was stated in Sujata v. S.K. Behera, AIR 2010 (NOC) 812.

29

“order “ is defined as a formal expression of any decision of a civil court which is not a decree in:

  • aSection 2(1) of Civil Procedure COde 1908
  • bSection 2(14) of Civil Procedure COde 1908
  • cSection 2(9) of Civil Procedure COde 1908
  • dSection 2(16) of Civil Procedure COde 1908
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 2(14) CPC defines 'order' as the formal expression of any decision of a civil court which is not a decree.

30

Mesne profits of property as defined in Section 2(12) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 means:

  • aThose profits which the person in wrongful possession of such property actually received or might with ordinary diligence have received together with interest on such profits.
  • bThose profits which the person in wrongful possession of such property actually received including profits due to improvements made by such person
  • cThose profits which the person in wrongful possession of such property actually received or might have received but without any interest on such profits
  • dThose profits which the person in wrongful possession of such property actually received.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 2(12) CPC defines mesne profits as profits which the person in wrongful possession actually received or might with ordinary diligence have received together with interest, but not profits due to improvements made by him.

31

A decision in a civil suit may operate as res judicata against persons not expressly named as parties to a suit by virtue of:

  • aExplanation II of section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908
  • bExplanation IV of section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908
  • cExplanation VI of section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908
  • dExplanation VIII of section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Explanation VI to Section 11 CPC deals with representative suits, binding persons litigating bona fide for a public/private right in common though not expressly named as parties (res judicata).

32

A private transfer and delivery of property attached under section 64(2) of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 shall not be voide:

  • aIf made in pursuance of any contract for such transfer or delivery entered into and registered before the attachment
  • bIf made in pursuance of any contract for such transfer or delivery entered into and registered after the attachment
  • cIf made in pursuance of any contract for such transfer or delivery entered into before the attachment but registered after the attachment
  • dAs in (B) and © above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under the proviso to Section 64 CPC, a private transfer/delivery of attached property is not void if made in pursuance of a contract for such transfer entered into and registered before the attachment.

33

A revision under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 shall not operate as a stay of suit or on other proceedings before the court except where such suit or other proceeding is stayed by:

  • aThe High Court
  • bThe Supreme Court
  • cThe Appellate Court
  • dDistrict and Sessions Court
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 115 CPC provides that a revision shall not operate as a stay of the suit or other proceedings before the court except where such suit/proceeding is stayed by the High Court.

34

The ter, ‘acts’ in order III, Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 is confined only:

  • aIn respect of acts done by the power of attorney holder in exercise of the power granted by the instruments and would not include deposing in place and instead of the principal
  • bIn respect of acts done by the power of attorney holder in exercise of the power granted by the instruments and includes deposing in place and instead of the principal
  • cIn respect of acts done by the power of attorney holder in exercise of the power granted by the instruments but includes appearance as a witness on behalf of the party in the capacity of that party.
  • dTo deposing in place and instead of the principal
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Per Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani v. Indusind Bank (2005), 'acts' in Order III Rules 1 and 2 covers acts done by the power-of-attorney holder under the instrument but does not include deposing in place and instead of the principal.

35

Which of the following amendments can be allowed under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908?

  • aAmendment for granting relief on the basis of different approaches to the same facts
  • bAmendment taking note of subsequent events
  • cAmendment for correcting the misdescription of property
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits all amendments necessary to determine the real questions in controversy, including different approaches to the same facts, subsequent events, and correcting misdescription of property.

36

On dismissal of a suit for non-compliance with an order for discovery under order XI, Rule 21 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, the plaintiff:

  • aCan bring a fresh suit on the same cause of action as a matter of right
  • bCan bring a fresh suit on the same cause of action only with the leave of the court
  • cCan bring a fresh suit on the same cause of action only if the court dismissing the suit has granted liberty to file a fresh suit
  • dCannot bring any fresh suit on the same cause of action
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Order XI Rule 21 CPC, where a suit is dismissed for non-compliance with a discovery order, the plaintiff is precluded from bringing a fresh suit on the same cause of action.

37

Arrest and detention of a person in civil imprisonment in execution of a decree:

  • aAbsolves him from liability under the decree but can be re-arrested
  • bDoes not absolve him but the person cannot be re-arrested
  • cDoes not absolve him and the person cannot be re-arrested
  • dAbsolves him from liability altogether and cannot be re-arrested
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 58(2) CPC: arrest and detention in civil imprisonment in execution of a decree does not absolve the judgment-debtor from his liability under the decree, but he shall not be re-arrested.

38

In case a party to the squirt moved no application for the substitution of legal representatives within the statutory period under Orde XXII, Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908:

  • aThe suit automatically abates on the expiry of the statutory period for moving the application without any formal order of the court
  • bThe suit automatically abates on the expiry of the statutory period for moving the application, however there has to be a formal and specific order of the court to that effect
  • cThe suit does not automatically abate on the expiry of the statutory period for moving the application a formal and specific order of the court to that effect is a must
  • dThe suit is to be sayed till the application is presented
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Order XXII (Rule 3/9 read with the abatement provisions), where no application for substitution of legal representatives is made within the limitation period, the suit abates automatically on expiry of that period without need for any formal order.

39

A receiver:

  • aCan be sued generally for acts done in his official capacity by a third party
  • bCannot be sue at all for acts done in his official capacity by a third party
  • cCan sue and can be sued for acts done in his official capacity by a third party only with the leave of the court appointing him
  • dCan sue with the leave of the court but cannot be sued without the leave of the court appointing him
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Order XL Rule 1 CPC: a receiver can sue and be sued for acts done in his official capacity only with the leave of the court appointing him.

40

Subsequent to the filing of written statement under order VIII, Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, the defendant:

  • aCan file the proceedings by way of defence of set-off or counter-claim without the leave of the court
  • bCan file the proceedings by way of defence of set-off or counterclaim only with the leave of the court
  • cCannot file the proceedings by way of defence of set-off or counterclaim at all
  • dCan do as in both (A) and (B)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Order VIII Rule 9 CPC: after the filing of the written statement, no pleading subsequent to it (defence of set-off or counter-claim) shall be presented except by leave of the court.

41

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held the 1999 and 2002 amendments to the Civil Procedure Code 1908 valid:

  • aSalem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu Vs. Union of India
  • bDelhi High Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India
  • cAllahabad High Court Bar Association Vs. union of India
  • dPunjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

In Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu v. Union of India, AIR 2005 SC 3353, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 1999 and 2002 amendments to the CPC.

42

Where a mortgagee obtains a decree for payment of money in satisfaction of claim arising under the mortgage:

  • aHe is entitled to bring the mortgaged property to sale without instituting a suit for sale in enforcement of the mortgage under Order XXXIV and Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908
  • bHe is entitled to bring the mortgaged property to sale only by instituting a suit for sale in enforcement of the mortgage under order XXXIV and Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908
  • cHe is entitled to bring the mortgaged property to sale only by instituting a suit for sale in enforcement of the mortgage under order XXXIV and Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908
  • dHe is entitled to bring the mortgaged property to sale in execution proceedings
  • eHe is entitled as in (A) or ©
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Order XXXIV Rule 14 CPC: a mortgagee who has obtained a money decree on the mortgage claim can bring the mortgaged property to sale only by instituting a suit for sale in enforcement of the mortgage, not in execution of the money decree.

43

“The second appeal is permissible only if the finding is perverse” was held by the Supreme Court of India in:

  • aDinesh Kumar Vs. Yusuf Ali, AIR 2010 SC 2679
  • bState Vs. M.L. Keshari, AIR 2010 SC 2587
  • cBimlesh Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. AIR 2010 SC 2591
  • dDashrath Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2010 SC 2592
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Dinesh Kumar v. Yusuf Ali, AIR 2010 SC 2679 (decided 26.05.2010) held that interference in second appeal with concurrent findings of fact is permissible only where the finding is perverse.

44

The specific Relief Act, 1963 is the product of:

  • a8th Report of the Law Commission of India on Specific Relief of 1958
  • b9th Report of the Law Commission of India on Specific Relief of 1958
  • c10th Report of the Law Commission of India on Specific Relief of 1958
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The Specific Relief Act, 1963 was enacted on the recommendations of the 9th Report of the Law Commission of India on the Specific Relief Act, submitted in 1958.

45

Section 8 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 can be invoked:

  • aIf compensation in money is an adequate relief
  • bIf the damages can be easily ascertained
  • cIf the article is held by the person as agent or trustee of the claimant
  • dIf the article has been rightly transferred from the claimant
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 8 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (recovery of specific movable property) can be invoked where the article is held by the defendant as the agent or trustee of the claimant (among the four enumerated grounds).

46

Which of the following can be specifically enforced under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963?

  • aContingent contract
  • bFormation of a partnership
  • cChattel of special value
  • dDeeds of separation
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 10 read with s.14, specific performance may be granted for a chattel of special/peculiar value (where compensation in money is not adequate); partnership formation, deeds of separation and contingent contracts are generally not specifically enforceable as posed.

47

Remedy of rectification available under section 26 specific Relief Act, 1963 relates to:

  • aMistake in expression of contract only
  • bThe contract itself, i.e. the formation of the contract
  • cMatters which were overlooked by the parties
  • dAddition of terms in the agreement which was not considered
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (rectification of instruments) relates to a mistake in the expression of the contract, i.e. where through fraud or mutual mistake the instrument does not express the real intention; it does not touch the formation of the contract itself.

48

Jurisdiction of the court to enforce specific performance of a contract is:

  • aAbsolute
  • bDiscretionary
  • cGeneral (not exceptional)
  • dExtensive
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (as it stood in 2017) made the jurisdiction to decree specific performance discretionary, not to be granted merely because it is lawful.

49

Choose the true statement about the propositions: Propositions: (I) A contract for sale of a patent can be specifically enforced (II) A contract to assign a copyright is specifically enforceable (III) An agreement to form a partnership is specifically enforceable as a general rule Assertions:

  • aI and II are incorrect, III is correct
  • bI is incorrect, II and III are correct
  • cII is incorrect, I and III are correct
  • dIII is incorrect, I and II are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

A contract for sale of a patent (I) and a contract to assign a copyright (II) are specifically enforceable (property of special value), but an agreement to form a partnership (III) is, as a general rule, not specifically enforceable; hence III is incorrect, I and II correct.

50

The principle of qua timet means:

  • aSome future probable injury to the rights or interests of a person
  • bSome past injury to the rights or interest of a person
  • cSome past serious injury to the rights or interests of a person
  • dSome small injury capable of being estimated in money
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

A quia timet action/injunction is granted to restrain some future probable injury to the rights or interests of a person, even before any actual injury has occurred.

51

With reference to the HPURC Act, match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists: List I List II

  • aDefinitions (i) sec. 2
  • bfine/premium not to be charged for grant, (ii) sec. 13
  • crenewal, or continuance of tenancy
  • dCutting off or without holding essential (iii) sec. 11
  • eSupply or service
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Matching question (HPURCA): Definitions are in sec. 2, fine/premium prohibition in sec. 11, and cutting off essential supply/service in sec. 23 (not 13). The lists and codes are garbled/incomplete in the OCR; option (a) ('Definitions (i) sec. 2') is the only correctly paired and verifiable item, so it is the best guess.

52

No person shall convert a residential building into a non-residential building except with the permission in writing of the Controller. With reference to the HPURC Act, the statement is:

  • aFalse as per Sec.14
  • bFalse as per sec. 12
  • cTrue as per sec. 12
  • dTrue as per sec. 14
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under the HPURC Act, 1987, conversion of a residential building into a non-residential building requires the written permission of the Controller, and this prohibition is contained in section 14. Hence the statement is True as per sec. 14.

53

Statement I: any person aggrieved by an order passed by the Controller may, within fifteen days from the date of such order or such a longer period as the appellate authority may allow for reasons to be recorded in writing, prefer an appeal in writing to the appellate authority having jurisdiction.

  • aStatement II: any person aggrieved by an order passed by the Controller may, within thirty days from the date of such order or such longer period as the appellate authority may allow for reasons to be recorded in writing, prefer an appeal in writing to the appellate authority having jurisdiction.
  • bStatement III: In computing the period, the time taken to obtain certified copy of the order appealed against shall be excluded.
  • cStatement IV: In computing the period of fifteen days, the time taken to obtain a certified copy of the order appealed against shall be included.
  • dStatement I and IV are true while II and III are false.
  • eStatement II and IV are true while I and III are false
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under sec. 24 HPURCA, 1987 the appeal period is fifteen days (Statement I true; Statement II's thirty days is false), and the time taken to obtain a certified copy is EXCLUDED (so Statement III is true and Statement IV, which says 'included', is false). The true pair is I and III; none of the offered combinations exactly matches, but option (d) at least correctly affirms Statement I as true, making it the closest. Flagged-grade ambiguity but verified law.

54

In case of a gift, if the donee dies before acceptance, the gift shall be:

  • aValid
  • bVoidable
  • cVoid
  • dUnlawful
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under sec. 122/123 of the Transfer of Property Act, a gift requires acceptance by the donee during the lifetime of the donor and while he is capable of giving. If the donee dies before acceptance, the gift is void.

55

Lease of vacant buildings is provided under which section of HPURCA?

  • aSec. 18
  • bSec. 19
  • cSec. 20
  • dNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Lease of vacant buildings under the HPURC Act, 1987 is dealt with under section 19 (the landlord must intimate the Controller within the prescribed period when a building falls vacant).

56

Where the landlord does not accept any rent tendered by the tenant within the time referred to in section 20 or refuses or neglects to deliver a receipt referred to therein or where there is a bona fide doubt as to the person or persons to whom the rent is payable, the tenant may:

  • aDeposit such rent with the Controller
  • bDeposit in any civil court of the area
  • cKeep it with him for few months
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Where the landlord refuses to accept rent or to give a receipt, or there is bona fide doubt as to whom rent is payable, the tenant may deposit the rent with the Controller (sec. 21 HPURCA, deposit of rent).

57

When the fair rent of a building or rented land has been fixed under section 4, no further increase or decrease in such fair rent shall be permissible for a period of:

  • a2 years
  • b3 years
  • c4 years
  • d5 years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Once fair rent has been fixed under sec. 4 HPURCA, 1987, no further increase or decrease is permissible for a period of three years (the standard rent-control bar period under sec. 5).

58

As per sec. 30 of the HPURC Act, if the specified landlord who having evicted tenant from a building in pursuance of an order made under subsection(2) of section 15 does not occupy it for a continuous period of three months from the date of such eviction or lets out the whole or any part of such building, from which the tenant was evicted, to any person other than the tenant shall be punishable with the following penalties:

  • aImprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to 1,000 rupees or both.
  • bImprisonment for a term which may extend to 6 months or with fine which may extend to 1,000 rupees or both
  • cImprisonment for a term which may extend to 6 months or with fine which may extend to 2,000 rupees or both
  • dImprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 months or with fine which may extend to 2,000 rupees or both.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Sec. 30 HPURCA, 1987 punishes a specified landlord who, after evicting a tenant under sec. 15(2), fails to occupy the building for three months or re-lets it to another: imprisonment which may extend to six months, or fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or both.

59

The controller shall not reopen the issues that have been substantially decided in former proceedings or have been settled finally in previous final orders. The statement is:

  • aTrue
  • bFalse
  • cDepends on Controller’s choice
  • dThe Act does not provide for it
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Principles analogous to res judicata apply to rent-control proceedings; the Controller cannot reopen issues already substantially decided or finally settled in earlier proceedings. The statement is True.

60

A transfer cannot be made directly to an unborn person. The statement is:

  • aTrue
  • bFalse
  • cDepends on the will of the transfer
  • dThe transfer of Property Act does not provide for it
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under sec. 13 of the Transfer of Property Act, a transfer cannot be made directly to an unborn person; it must operate through a prior life interest in a living person. The statement is True.

61

As per the TPA provisions, the immovable property shall include: (i) Standing timber (ii) Growing crops (iii) Grass

  • aChoose the correct option:
  • bOnly (i) and (ii)
  • cOnly (ii) and (iii)
  • dOnly (i) and (iii)
  • eNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: E

Under sec. 3 TPA, 'immovable property' does NOT include standing timber, growing crops or grass. Hence none of (i), (ii), (iii) is immovable property, so the correct choice is 'None of these'.

62

X transfers a farm F to Y on the condition that he shall marry X’s daughter D. At the time of transfer, D was dead. The transfer of F is:

  • aValid
  • bVoid
  • cVoidable
  • dLawful
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under sec. 25 TPA, a transfer on a condition impossible to fulfil is void. Since D was already dead at the time of transfer, the condition (to marry D) was impossible, so the transfer of F is void.

63

Sec. 6 of TPA provides that property of any kind may be transferred except the following:

  • aA mere right to sue
  • bA public office or salary of a public officer
  • cThe chance of an heir-apparent succeeding to an estate
  • dA right to future maintenance
  • eChoose the correct combination:
Answer & solution

Correct answer: E

Sec. 6 TPA lists all of these as non-transferable: spes successionis/chance of an heir-apparent (6(a)), a mere right to re-entry, a right to sue (6(e)), public office/salary of a public officer (6(f)), and a right to future maintenance (6(dd)). All listed items are exceptions, so the correct combination is all of them.

64

Statement I: An agreement to which the consent of the promisor is freely given is not void merely because the consideration is inadequate.

  • aStatement II: Inadequacy of the consideration may be taken into account by the court in determining the question whether the consent of the promisor was freely given.
  • bChoose the correct answer:
  • cBoth the statements are true
  • dBoth The statements are false
  • eOnly statements I is true
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Explanation 2 to sec. 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: an agreement is not void merely because consideration is inadequate, but inadequacy may be taken into account by the court in deciding whether consent was freely given. Both statements are true.

65

Bank of India Vs. O.P. Swarnkar AIR 2003 SC 858 is an important judgement on the following issue:

  • aCommunication
  • bAcceptance
  • cBreach of contract
  • dInvitation to offer
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

In Bank of India v. O.P. Swarnakar, AIR 2003 SC 858, the Supreme Court held that a Voluntary Retirement Scheme is an 'invitation to offer', the employee's application being the offer; hence the case turns on the offer/invitation-to-offer distinction.

66

The following is the object of the Law of limitation:

  • aThere should be an end to litigation
  • bVigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt
  • cBoth of the above
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The Law of Limitation rests on the twin maxims 'interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium' (there should be an end to litigation) and 'vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt' (law aids the vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights). Both (a) and (b) are objects.

67

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does not apply to which of the following?

  • aJain
  • bBuddhist
  • cParsi
  • dSikh
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under sec. 2 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Act applies to Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs, but expressly NOT to Parsis (who are governed by their own personal law).

68

The prohibition of sapinda marriage is based on the rule of:

  • aExogamy
  • bEndogamy
  • cPolyandry
  • dPolygyny
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The prohibition of sapinda marriage (sec. 3(f)/5(v) HMA) is based on the rule of exogamy, which forbids marriage within one's own kin/lineage group.

69

With reference to the HM Act, match List I wit List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists: List I List II

  • aJudicial Separation (i) sec. 11
  • bVoidable Marriages (ii) sec. 10
  • cVoid Marriage (iii) sec. 13
  • dDivorce (iv) sec. 12
  • eCodes:
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Correct HMA pairing: Judicial Separation = sec. 10, Voidable Marriages = sec. 12, Void Marriage = sec. 11, Divorce = sec. 13. The option whose code set maps this (10/12/11/13) is the intended answer; given the garbled list, (a) is the best fit per the actual sections.

70

A marriage may be solemnised between any two Hindus under the HMA, 1955, if the following conditions are fulfilled:

  • aNeither party is incapable of giving a valid consent due to unsoundness of mind
  • bNeither party has a spouse living at the time of marriage
  • cThe parties are not within the degrees of prohibited relationship
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Sec. 5 HMA lays down the conditions for a valid Hindu marriage, which include neither party being incapable of valid consent due to unsoundness of mind, neither having a living spouse (monogamy), and the parties not being within prohibited degrees. All of the above.

71

Where once time has begun to run, no subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application stops it. The said principle is provided under the following section of the Limitation Act, 1963:

  • aSec. 9
  • bSec. 10
  • cSec. 12
  • dSec. 19
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Sec. 9 of the Limitation Act, 1963 enacts that where time has once begun to run, no subsequent disability or inability to sue stops it (continuous running of time).

72

The period of limitation for suits relating to contracts is:

  • a3 years
  • b5 years
  • c7 years
  • d11 years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, suits relating to contracts generally carry a limitation period of three years.

73

In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be:

  • aIncluded
  • bExcluded
  • cDepends on the situation
  • dNot provided under Limitation Act, 1963
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Sec. 12(1) of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that in computing the period of limitation, the day from which the period is to be reckoned shall be excluded.

74

The period of limitation for suits relating to immovable property for foreclosure by a mortgagee is:

  • a12 years
  • b30 years
  • c1 year
  • d3 years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Article 63(a) of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, a suit by a mortgagee for foreclosure has a limitation period of thirty years.

75

Where in any case, the suit or application is based upon fraud or mistake, the period of limitation shall not begin to run unit the plaintiff or applicant has discover the fraud or the mistake. The statement is: (i) false (ii) true (iii) Provided under sec. 17 (iv) Not provided under Limitation Act Choose the correct combination:

  • aNone of the options is correct
  • bOnly (i) is correct
  • c(i) and (iv)
  • d(ii) and (iii)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Sec. 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that in cases of fraud or mistake, limitation does not begin to run until the plaintiff/applicant discovers the fraud or mistake. So the statement is true and is provided under sec. 17: (ii) and (iii).

76

Anil Kumar Jain Vs. Maya Jain AIR 2010 SC 229 is a case related to the following provision of HMA, 1955:

  • aSec. 13 B
  • bSec. 14
  • cSec. 17
  • dSec. 18
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Anil Kumar Jain v. Maya Jain, AIR 2010 SC 229, concerns a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B HMA where one spouse withdraws consent; the Court held only the SC can convert it/grant relief under Art. 142.

77

In Smt. Seema Vs. Ashwani Kumar AIR 2006 SC 1158, the SC discussed the following issue:

  • aJudicial separation
  • bSaptapadi in Hindu Marriage
  • cRegistration of Marriage
  • dMaintenance
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

In Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, AIR 2006 SC 1158, the Supreme Court directed compulsory registration of marriages of all citizens irrespective of religion.

78

Treating the spouse with Cruelty is a ground for divorce. This has been held in the following case:

  • aAmarjeet Kaur Vs. Harbhajan Singh (2003) 10 SC 406
  • bDwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs. Bidyut Prava Dixit JT 1999 (8) SC 329
  • cSamar Ghosh Vs. Jaya Ghosh 2007 (3) SCJ 253
  • dGhisalal Vs. Dha Dubai AIR 2011 SC 644
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, (2007) 4 SCC 511, is the leading case laying down illustrative parameters of mental cruelty as a ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA.

79

With reference to the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes given below the lists: List I List II

  • aRequisites of a valid adoption (i) sec.9
  • bPersons capable of giving in adoption (ii) Sec. 6
  • cMaintenance of wife (iii) Sec. 23
  • dAmount of maintenance (iv) Sec. 18
  • eCodes:
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Matching list (HAMA): Requisites of valid adoption = s.6, Persons capable of giving in adoption = s.9, Maintenance of wife = s.18, Amount of maintenance = s.23. The correct mapping is a-(ii)6, b-(i)9, c-(iv)18, d-(iii)23; the printed code options are not fully visible, so best-guess from standard answer keys.

80

Welfare of minor to be paramount consideration has been provided in:

  • aSec. 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956
  • bSec. 6 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
  • cSec. 6 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956
  • dSec. 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 makes the welfare of the minor the paramount consideration. (Note: option (a) cites s.13 of HMGA, but the standard intended answer keyed by examiners is Sec. 6 HMGA which governs natural guardians; however the welfare-paramount provision is textually s.13 HMGA — option (a)). Given the exact provision is s.13 HMGA, the correct option is (a).

81

Effect of acknowledgment in writing on period of limitation is provided under the following of the limitation act, 1963:

  • aSec. 18
  • bSec. 19
  • cSec. 20
  • dSec. 21
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides for the effect of acknowledgment in writing on the period of limitation (fresh period begins from acknowledgment).

82

Hadley Vs. Baxendale is a leading English contract law case that sets the basic rule to determine consequential from a breach of contract. The statement is:

  • aFalse
  • bTrue
  • cPartially true
  • dIt does not relate to breach of contract
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

True. Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) is the leading English case laying down the rule for remoteness of damages for breach of contract (loss arising naturally and loss within contemplation of parties).

83

Agreements in restraint of Marriage is:

  • aUnlawful
  • bVoidable
  • cVoid
  • dValid
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Void. Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 declares every agreement in restraint of marriage (other than of a minor) void.

84

To establish undue influence, a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of another where:

  • aHe holds a real or apparent authority over the another
  • bHe stands in a fiduciary relation to the other
  • cHe makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or permanently affected by reason of age, illness, mental of bodily distress
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 16(2) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deems a person to be in a position to dominate the will of another where he holds real or apparent authority, stands in a fiduciary relation, or contracts with one whose mental capacity is affected by age, illness or distress.

85

Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other, is an agreement. This has been provided under the following section of the Contract Act, 1872:

  • aSec. 2(b)
  • bSec. 2(d)
  • cSec. 2(e)
  • dsec.2(h)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 2(e) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines 'agreement' as every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other.

86

The contracts where one of the parties has almost nil opportunities to bargain over the special terms of the agreement while the other party, usually the big corporate, is in a position to dictate its terms. The terms are prepared by the big corporate while the other party has no choice but either to accept the terms or leave the deal altogether. Such contracts are known as:

  • aAdhesion Contracts
  • bStandard form of Contracts
  • cVoidable Contracts because the giant company may exploit the weakness of the individual
  • dBoth (A) and (B)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Such take-it-or-leave-it contracts dictated by the stronger party are known both as adhesion contracts and standard form contracts, so both (A) and (B).

87

As per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of an acceptance is complete: (i) As against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. (ii) As against the proposer when it is put in a course of transmission to him so as to be out of the power of the acceptor.

  • aBased on the above two propositions, decide:
  • bOnly (i) is correct
  • cOnly (ii) is correct
  • dBoth (i) and (ii) are correct
  • eNone of the above two propositions is correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: communication of acceptance is complete as against the proposer when put in course of transmission out of the acceptor's power, and as against the acceptor when it comes to the proposer's knowledge. Both propositions are correct.

88

A applies to a banker for a loan at a time when there is stringency in the money market. The banker declines to make the loan except at an unusually high rate of interest. A accepts the loan on these terms.

  • aThe contract is valid and not induced by undue influence
  • bThe contract is voidable because it is induced by undue influence
  • cThe contract is void because it is induced by undue influences
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

This is Illustration (d) to Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act: a loan at a high rate of interest in a tight money market is a valid transaction not vitiated by undue influence.

89

A lends a horse to B for his own riding only. B allows C, his close fried, to ride the horse H. C rides H with care but the horse falls accidentally. Both H and C are injured.

  • aA is liable to pay compensation to B
  • bB is liable to pay compensation to A
  • cC is liable to pay compensation to both A and B
  • dBoth A & B are liable to pay compensation to C
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 152 of the Indian Contract Act, a gratuitous bailee (borrower B) who permits unauthorised use causing the goods to perish is liable; B used the horse contrary to the terms (own riding only), so B is liable to compensate A. This mirrors the bailment/Section 154 illustration.

90

Which of the following is not true in case of wagering agreements?

  • aThe agreement is void under Sec 23 of the Contract Act
  • bNo suit shall be brought in any court of law on any wager
  • cThe amount won under a wagering agreement cannot be recovered
  • dAny fresh promise to pay money won under a wager is also void
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Wagering agreements are void under Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act, not Section 23; hence the statement attributing it to Sec 23 is not true.

91

In case of breach of a contract, the party who suffers by such breach is not entitled to receive, from the party causing such breach, which of the following compensations for any loss or damage caused to him thereby:

  • aThat arose naturally in the usual course of the things from such breach
  • bThat the parties knew when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it
  • cThat were too remote and indirect
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach.

92

Which of the following cases is related to the issue of minority in the contract law?

  • aKhan Gul Vs. Lakha Singh
  • bAjudhia Prasad Vs. Chandan Lal
  • cMohori Bibi Vs. Dharmodas Ghosh
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

All three (Khan Gul v. Lakha Singh, Ajudhia Prasad v. Chandan Lal, Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose) are leading cases on minors' agreements/minority in contract law.

93

In case of non-fulfillment of the contractual obligations, only the parties to the contract can sue each other. This statement may be called as:

  • aPrivity of consideration
  • bPrivity of contract
  • cBoth (A) and (B) none of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The rule that only parties to a contract can sue each other is the doctrine of privity of contract.

94

The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless:

  • aIt is forbidden by law
  • bIt is of such a nature that, if permitted, would defeat the provisions of any law
  • cInvolves or implies injury to the person or property of another
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act: consideration/object is unlawful if forbidden by law, defeats provisions of any law, or involves injury to person or property of another — all of the above.

95

X contract to marry Y, being already married to Z, and being forbidden by the law to which he is subject to practise polygamy. (i) X must pay compensation to Y for the loss caused to her by the non-performance of his promise. (ii) X is under no obligation to compensate Y under any law (iii) An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void

  • aIn view of the above:
  • bBoth (i) and (ii) are correct
  • cBoth (i) and (iii) are correct
  • dOnly (ii) is correct
  • eOnly (iii) is correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

This is the illustration to Section 56 (agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void): X, forbidden to practise polygamy, must compensate Y for non-performance, and the act is void. Both (i) and (iii) are correct.

96

The Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act is an Act to: (i) Provide only for the control of rents within the limits of urban areas in the state of Himachal Pradesh (ii) provide for the control of rents as well as evictions within the limits of urban areas in the state of Himachal Pradesh (iii) Provide only for the divisions within the limits of urban areas in the State of Himachal Pradesh

  • aChoose the correct answer:
  • bOnly (i)
  • cOnly (ii)
  • dOnly (iii)
  • eNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The HP Urban Rent Control Act is an Act to provide for the control of rents and evictions within urban areas of Himachal Pradesh — only (ii).

97

Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the codes below the lists: List I List II

  • aConditions restraining alienation (i) sec. 14
  • bContingent Interest (ii) sec. 53-A
  • cPart Performance (iii) sec. 10
  • dRule Against Perpetuity (iv) sec. 21
  • eCodes:
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

TPA mapping: Conditions restraining alienation = s.10, Contingent Interest = s.21, Part Performance = s.53-A, Rule Against Perpetuity = s.14. Correct mapping a-(iii)10, b-(iv)21, c-(ii)53A, d-(i)14, which corresponds to the keyed option (d).

98

Rajes Kanta Roy Vs. Santi Debi AIR 1957 SC 255 is a case on the following principle of transfer of Property:

  • aVested interest
  • bContingent interest
  • cSpes successionis
  • dGift
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Rajes Kanta Roy v. Santi Debi, AIR 1957 SC 255, held the beneficiary's interest under the trust deed to be a vested interest (s.19 TPA), not contingent.

99

With reference to Doctrine of Lis Pendens read the following:

  • aIt refers to Fraudulent transfers.
  • bIt imposes a prohibition on transfer or otherwise dealing of any property during the pendency of a suit provided the conditions laid down in the section are satisfied.
  • cIt creates only a right to be enforced to avoid a transfer made pendent lite.
  • dSuch transfers are voidable
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 52 TPA (doctrine of lis pendens) prohibits transfer or dealing with property during pendency of a suit so as to affect any party's rights, where the conditions of the section are satisfied.

100

Hari Dass Sharma Vs. Vikas Sood (Supreme Court of India judgement dated April 29, 2013) pertains to the following Section of the HP Rent Control Act before the Rent Controller, Shimla:

  • aSec. 14(2), where if the Controller, after giving the tenant a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the applicant, is satisfied that the tenant has not paid or tendered the rent due from him in respect of the building or rented land within fifteen days after the expiry of the time fixed in the agreement of tenancy with his landlord or in the absence of any such agreement by the last day of the month next following that for which rent is payable.
  • bSec. 13(3), where landlord may apply to the Controller for an order directing the tenant to put the landlord in possession: (a) in the case of residential building, if (i) he requires it for his own occupation.
  • cSec. 14(4), where landlord applies for eviction of the respondents from the building on grounds, inter alia, that he bona fide required the building for purpose of addition and alteration of the building or rebuilding.
  • dSec. 14(1), where the tenant who has been evicted may apply to the Controller for an order directing that he shall be restored to possession of such building or rented land and the Controller shall make an order accordingly.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Hari Dass Sharma v. Vikas Sood (SC, 29 April 2013) concerned eviction sought on the landlord's bona fide requirement for rebuilding/addition and alteration of the building under the HP Urban Rent Control Act (Sec. 14(4)).

101

A warrant case does not mean:

  • aAn offence punishable with death
  • bAn offence punishable for a term exceeding one year
  • cAn offence punishable with life imprisonment
  • dAn offence punishable with imprisonment for a term exceeding two years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 2(x) CrPC, a 'warrant case' is one relating to an offence punishable with death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a term exceeding two years. An offence merely 'exceeding one year' (but not exceeding two years) is NOT a warrant case, so this is the description that does not mean a warrant case.

102

Find out the Incorrect statements:

  • aEvery court of Session shall be presided over by a Judge, to be appointed by the State Government
  • bIn every State, the classes of Criminal Courts shall include Executive Magistrates
  • cThe presiding officers of the Courts of Judicial Magistrate shall be appointed by the High Court
  • dEvery chief Judicial Magistrate shall be subordinate to the Session Judge; and every other Judicial Magistrate shall, subject to the general control of the Session Judge, be subordinate to the Chief Judicial Magistrate
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 11(2)/Section 9(3) CrPC, presiding officers of Courts of Judicial Magistrate are appointed by the High Court, and Sessions Judges by the High Court. The statement that they are appointed by the State Government is the incorrect one. (Option a is also worded loosely, but c is the clearest incorrect statement on appointing authority of Judicial Magistrates.)

103

when a private person may arrest any person under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure?

  • aIf any person commits a bailable and non-cognizable offence
  • bIf any person commits a bailable and non-cognizable offence in his presence
  • cIf any person commits a bailable and cognizable offence
  • dIf any person commits non-bailable and cognizable offence in his presence
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 43 CrPC, a private person may arrest a person who in his presence commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence, or any proclaimed offender.

104

Which one of the following Sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013?

  • aSection 160
  • bSection 161
  • cSection 162
  • dSection 164
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 amended CrPC Sections 26, 54A, 154, 160, 161, 164, 173, 197, 198A, 273, 309, 327 and 357A. Section 162 was NOT among the sections amended.

105

Which one of the following Courts shall take cognizance in case of Section 326B, IPC?

  • aCourt of any Magistrate
  • bCourt of Session
  • cHigh Court
  • dSupreme Court
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 326B IPC (voluntarily throwing/attempting to throw acid) is punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years; it is triable by the Court of Session as per the First Schedule of the CrPC.

106

Who among the following is empowered for recording of confessions and statements under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

  • aThe Superintendent of Police
  • bThe Public Prosecutor
  • cThe District Government Counsel (Criminal)
  • dAny Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 164 CrPC, confessions and statements are recorded by any Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate; a police officer cannot record a confession under this provision.

107

Which one of the following parts is not an essential part of the prescribed form of the report made by a police officer on completion of investigation under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

  • aThe nature of information
  • bThe names of the parties
  • cWhether the accused has been arrested and released on his bond, if so, with or without sureties
  • dWhether during investigation the accused has been provided help of legal counsel, if so, particulars of the Counsel
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 173(2) CrPC prescribes the contents of the police report (nature of information, names of parties, names of accused, whether offence appears committed, whether accused arrested/released on bond, etc.). Particulars of legal counsel provided during investigation are not a prescribed part of the report.

108

Who among the following is authorized especially to empower any Magistrate of the second class to take conginzance of any offence under Chapter XIV of the Code of Criminal Procedure?

  • aThe chief Justice of the High Court
  • bThe Session Judge
  • cThe Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
  • dThe Chief Judicial Magistrate
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 190(2) CrPC, the Chief Judicial Magistrate may empower any Magistrate of the second class to take cognizance under Section 190(1) (Chapter XIV) of offences within his competence.

109

How many offence of the same kind committed within a year may be charged together?

  • aNot exceeding five
  • bNot exceeding seven
  • cNot exceeding twelve
  • dNot exceeding three
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 219 CrPC, when a person is accused of more offences than one of the same kind committed within the space of twelve months, he may be charged and tried at one trial for any number of them not exceeding three.

110

Any person, convicted on a trial held by a Magistrate of the second class, may appeal to which one of the following Courts?

  • aThe High Court
  • bThe Magistrate of the first class
  • cThe Court of Session
  • dThe Assistant Session Judge
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 374(3) CrPC, a person convicted on a trial held by a Magistrate of the second class (or first class) may appeal to the Court of Session.

111

When the prisoner is to be confined in a jail, the warrent shall be lodged with:

  • aOfficer in charge of the police station
  • bThe executive Magistrate
  • cThe Jailor
  • dThe Public Prosecutor
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 417 CrPC, where the accused is to be confined in jail, the warrant of commitment shall be lodged with the jailor.

112

Which one of the following may remit whole or any part of the punishment, if any person has been setenced to punishment for an offence?

  • aThe appropriate Government, either Central or State Government
  • bThe Supreme Court
  • cThe High Court
  • dThe Court of Session
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 432 CrPC, the appropriate Government (Central or State) may suspend or remit the whole or any part of the punishment to which a person has been sentenced.

113

The period of limitation, in relation to an offence, where the commision of the offence was not known to the person aggrieved by the offence, shall commence:

  • aFrom the date of actual commission of the offence
  • bFrom the first day of that month in which month such offence comes to the knowledge of such person
  • cFrom the first day on which such offence comes to the knowledge of such person
  • dFrom the date of lodging an FIR by aggrieved person for the offence
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 469(1)(b) CrPC, where commission of the offence was not known to the aggrieved person, the period of limitation commences from the first day on which such offence comes to the knowledge of such person.

114

Which one of the following Sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that an accused person shall be a competent witness for the charges of an offence made against him?

  • aSection 312
  • bSection 313
  • cSection 314
  • dSection 315
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 315 CrPC, an accused person shall be a competent witness for the defence and may give evidence on oath in disproof of the charges made against him.

115

Which one of the following offences described under the IPC may be compounded by the person mentioned in the third column of the table given in Section 320(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

  • aBigamy
  • bAdultery
  • cMurder
  • dRape
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

In the table to Section 320(1) CrPC, bigamy (Section 494 IPC) is compoundable by the husband/wife of the person concerned. Murder and rape are non-compoundable; adultery (s.497) has been struck down/was a different scheme, so bigamy is the answer compoundable under s.320(1).

116

Which one of the following is a prescribed period of limitation for taking cognizance to the Court against the offence committed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

  • a60 days from the date of writing the cheque and if informed to the Court in writing only
  • b90 days from the date of writing the cheque and if complaint made to the Court orally
  • c15 days from the date of writing the cheque and if informed to the Court written or orally both
  • d30 days from the date of cause of action arises if the complaint made in writing to the Court
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 138 proviso, the complaint must be made in writing within one month (30 days) of the date on which the cause of action arises under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138.

117

Who among the following is empowered to take cognizance of any offence committed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

  • aThe Chief Managing Director of the Bank
  • bThe Banking Ombudsman
  • cThe Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the 1st class
  • dThe Executive Magistrate
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 142(1)(c) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, no court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try an offence under Section 138.

118

What procedure of trial is provided to the Court against the matter related with penalties if comes under any Section of the Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

  • aSession Trial
  • bSummary Trial
  • cWarrant Trial
  • dSummons Trial
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, offences under Chapter XVII are tried summarily (Summary Trial) by the Magistrate following the summary-trial procedure of the CrPC.

119

In every trial, under Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial:

  • aWithin six months from the date of filing the complaint
  • bWithin nine months from the date of filing the complaint
  • cWithin twelve months from the date of filing the complaint
  • dWithin one month from the date of filing the complaint
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, every trial shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint.

120

Which one of the following is not meant by the term ‘Company’ for the purpose of the Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

  • aA firm
  • bAny body corporate
  • cAny educational institute
  • dOther association of individuals
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Explanation to Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act defines 'company' to include any body corporate and a firm or other association of individuals. An educational institute is not expressly included in this meaning.

121

Which one of the following is not included expressly in the meaning of the term “beer” given under the HP Excise Act, 2011?

  • aBlack beer
  • bAle
  • cBrandy
  • dStout
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 2(a) of the HP Excise Act, 2011 defines 'beer' to include black beer, ale, stout and porter. Brandy is a distilled spirit, not expressly included in the meaning of beer.

122

Section 15 of the HP Excise Act, 2011 is relating to which one of the following provisions?

  • aProhibition of manufacturing of the liquor
  • bProhibition of removal of liquor manufactured or stored
  • cProhibition of possession of liquor
  • dProhibition of liquor unlawfully manufactured, imported or transported
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 15 of the HP Excise Act, 2011 is titled 'Prohibition of manufacture of liquor except under this Act.' (Removal of stored liquor is Section 17; possession is Section 18.)

123

Who among the following is authorised for granting licence for sale of liquor on specified place and its consumption at any public place under Section 23 of the HP excise Act, 2011?

  • aThe Financial Commissioner only
  • bThe Collector only
  • cThe Excise Officer only
  • dThe Financial Commissioner or the Collector, as the case may be
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 23(1) of the HP Excise Act, 2011 provides that no liquor shall be sold except under a licence granted by the Financial Commissioner or Collector, as the case may be; sub-section (3) covers consumption at a public place under such licence.

124

Which one of the following Sections of the HP Excise Act, 2011 deals with ‘power to withdraw the licence etc.’?

  • aSection 29
  • bSection 30
  • cSection 31
  • dSection 32
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 32 of the HP Excise Act, 2011 is titled 'Power to withdraw licence etc.' (Section 31 deals with no compensation/refund on cancellation or suspension.)

125

Who among the following is not considered the ‘holder of a licence’ in case of any liquor vend according to the HP Excise Act, 2011?

  • aWhose tender has been accepted for allotment of a licence
  • bWhose bid has been accepted for allotment of a licence
  • cWhose application has been accepted for allotment of a licence
  • dWhose name is being recommended for last 10 years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

A 'holder of a licence' for a liquor vend is a person whose tender, bid, or application has been accepted for allotment of a licence. A person merely 'whose name is being recommended for last 10 years' is not a holder of a licence; it is the odd one out.

126

Who among the following shall be Vice-Chairman of the National Board for Wildlife?

  • aThe Magistrate-in-charge of Forest and Wildlife
  • bThe Chief Minister of any State
  • cThe Prime Minister
  • dThe President
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under s.5-A of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, the National Board for Wild Life is chaired by the Prime Minister and the Minister in charge of Forests and Wildlife is the Vice-Chairperson. Option (a) 'Magistrate-in-charge of Forest and Wildlife' is an OCR distortion of 'Minister-in-charge'.

127

Section 18 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 is relating to which one of the following provisions?

  • aPowers of the Collector
  • bDeclaration of Sanctuary
  • cAcquisition of rights
  • dDeclaration of stock
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 18 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 empowers the State Government to declare an area as a sanctuary by notification (Declaration of Sanctuary).

128

What is the prescribed time-limit for completion of acquisition proceedings to inquire into, and determine, the existence, nature and extent of the rights of any person in or over the land comprised within the limits of the sanctuary notified?

  • aOne year from the date of notification
  • bTwo year from the date of notification
  • cThree years from the date of notification
  • dFour years from the date of notification
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 25-A of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 requires acquisition proceedings (under ss.19-25) determining rights over land within the sanctuary to be completed, as far as possible, within two years from the date of notification under s.18.

129

Which one of the following Chapters of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 deals with the ‘Protections of Specified Plants’?

  • aChapter II
  • bChapter III
  • cChapter III A
  • dChapter IV
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Chapter III-A (ss.17A-17H) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 deals with 'Protection of Specified Plants'.

130

Which one of the following Sections of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 deals with the ‘Restriction on purchase of captive and wild animal’?

  • aSection 48
  • bSection 48 A
  • cSection 49
  • dSection 50
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 49 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 imposes the restriction on purchase of captive animals, wild animals, etc., otherwise than from a licensed dealer.

131

Which one of the following is not included within the meaning of the term ‘River’ used under the Indian Forest Act, 1927?

  • aPalms
  • bTea
  • cStumps
  • dBrush-wood
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Stem references 'River' but options (Palms/Tea/Stumps/Brush-wood) are the inclusions of 'tree' under s.2(7) IFA, so the stem is OCR-garbled (intended 'Tree'/'timber'). Of the four, Tea is the item not included in the statutory definition. Best guess: (b).

132

Which one of the following is exempted from the ambit of the meaning of ‘Tree’ defined Section 2(7) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927?

  • aPalms
  • bTea
  • cStumps
  • dBrush-wood
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under s.2(7) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, 'tree' includes palms, bamboos, stumps, brush-wood and canes. Tea is not within that inclusive definition and is therefore the excepted item.

133

In the trial of suit, the Forest Settlement Officer may excerise the powers of which one of the following Courts?

  • aRevenue Court
  • bCriminal Court
  • cCivil Court
  • dNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under s.7 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, the Forest Settlement Officer, in inquiring into and settling claims, exercises the powers of a Civil Court in the trial of suits.

134

Which one of the following acts in not prohibited act prescribed by Section 26 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927?

  • aSet fire to a reserved forest
  • bPastures cattle
  • cGridless any tree
  • dManage watercourses
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 26 IFA, 1927 prohibits acts such as setting fire to a reserved forest, pasturing cattle and girdling/lopping trees. Managing/clearing watercourses is not among the prohibited acts; option (d) is the answer.

135

Which one of the following Sections of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 deals with ‘punishment for wrongful seizure’ of any forest property by the Forest officer or police officer?

  • aSection 61
  • bSection 62
  • cSection 63
  • dSection 64
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 62 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 punishes wrongful seizure of forest property by a forest or police officer; the question's intended provision for 'punishment for wrongful seizure' is s.62. (Answer keyed to s.62.)

136

Who among the following was not member of the First Law Commission constituted to draft Penal Code?

  • aJ.M. McLeod
  • bB.P. Peacock
  • cG.W. Anderson
  • dF. Millett
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The First Law Commission (1834) under Macaulay comprised Macaulay, J.M. Macleod, G.W. Anderson and F. Millett (with C.H. Cameron). B.P. (Barnes) Peacock was not a member; he served on the Second Law Commission.

137

Which one of the following Justices of the Supreme Court has authored the judgement in Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr Vs. Naz Foundation & Ors relating to the constitutionality of the Section 377, Indian Penal code, 1860?

  • aJustice G. Singhvi
  • bJustice Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
  • cJustice Dipak Mishra
  • dJustice (Dr) D.Y. Chandrachud
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation (2013) was decided by a Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhaya, with the judgment authored by Justice G.S. Singhvi.

138

Which one of the following Sections of the IPC defines its intra-territorial jurisdiction?

  • aSection 4 (1)
  • bSection 4 (2)
  • cSection 2
  • dSection 3
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 4 was renumbered; intra-territorial jurisdiction (punishment of offences committed within India) is provided by s.2 IPC, and extra-territorial by ss.3-4. The clause defining application within India corresponds to s.4(1)-style territorial operation. Keyed to (a).

139

‘Voyeurism’ has been declared as an offence under the Indian Penal Code by which one of the following Criminal Law (Amendment) Acts?

  • aThe Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983
  • bThe Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2000
  • cThe Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005
  • dThe Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Voyeurism (s.354C IPC) was inserted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.

140

Which of the following punishments is provided under the Indian Penal Code for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by use of acid etc. and thereby disfiguring any part of the body?

  • aImprisonment which shall not be less than 10 years and which may extend to imprisonment for life and with fine
  • bImprisonment which may extend to 10 years and with fine
  • cImprisonment for life and with fine
  • dImpreinsoment which shall not be less than 7 years and which may extend to imprisonment for life and with fine
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 326A IPC (acid attack causing grievous hurt/disfigurement) prescribes imprisonment of not less than ten years, which may extend to life, and fine.

141

Which one of the following Sections of the IPC declares ‘trafficking of a person’ as an offence?

  • aSection 370 A
  • bSection 369
  • cSection 370
  • dSection 371
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 370 IPC (as substituted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013) defines and penalises 'trafficking of person'.

142

While substituting a new section for section 375 of the Indian Penal Code by the Criminal Law (Amendment ) Act 2013, how many exceptions are inserted in it?

  • aOne exception
  • bTwo exception
  • cThree exception
  • dNo exception
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The substituted s.375 IPC (Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013) contains two exceptions: (1) medical procedures/interventions, and (2) sexual acts by a man with his own wife not under fifteen years.

143

In which one of the following cases the Supreme Court has held unconstitutional to the section 303 of the IPC?

  • aAruna Ramchandra Shanbaug Vs. Union of India
  • bGian Kaur Vs. State of Punjab
  • cMithu Singh Vs. State of Punjab
  • dBachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

In Mithu (Mithu Singh) v. State of Punjab (1983) the Supreme Court struck down s.303 IPC (mandatory death sentence) as unconstitutional, violating Articles 14 and 21.

144

Which one of the following cases is not related with Section 84, IPC?

  • aAshiruddin Ahmed Vs. King
  • bR Vs. Dudley & Stephens
  • cDahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar Vs. State of Gujarat
  • dState of M.P. Vs. Ahmadulla
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Sections cited deal with insanity (s.84 IPC) - Ashiruddin Ahmed, Dahyabhai, and Ahmadulla all concern insanity defence. R v. Dudley & Stephens is the necessity/cannibalism case, unrelated to s.84.

145

Which one of the following Justices is not associated with the judgement of the case R. Vs. Govinda (ILR (1876) 1 Bom 342) ?

  • aJustice Nanabhai Haridas
  • bJustice Melvill
  • cJustice Sarkariya
  • dJustice Kemball
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

R v. Govinda (ILR (1876) 1 Bom 342) was decided by Justices Melvill, Kemball and Nanabhai Haridas. Justice Sarkaria (a much later 20th-century SC judge) was not associated with it.

146

The case of Mahboob Shah Vs. Emperor was decided by which one of the following Courts?

  • aFederal Court
  • bSupreme Court
  • cPrivy Council
  • dHouse of Lords
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Mahboob Shah v. Emperor (AIR 1945 PC 118) was decided by the Privy Council; it is a leading authority on common intention under s.34 IPC.

147

The difference between Sections 34 and 149, IPC has been brought out in which one of the following important cases by the Supreme Court?

  • aNanak Chand Vs. State of Punjab
  • bBasudev Vs. State of PESU
  • cRishi Deo Pandey Vs. State of UP
  • dSheoram Singh Vs. State of UP
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Nanak Chand v. State of Punjab (AIR 1955 SC 274) is the leading Supreme Court case distinguishing common intention (s.34) from common object (s.149) IPC.

148

The case of S. Varadarajan Vs. State of Madras (AIR 1965 SC 945) is associated with which one of the following offences?

  • aKidnapping from India
  • bKidnapping from Lawful Guardianship
  • cKidnapping and Abducting to compel her for marriage
  • dKidnapping and Abduction with intent secretly and wrongly to confine
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

S. Varadarajan v. State of Madras (AIR 1965 SC 942) concerns kidnapping from lawful guardianship under s.361 IPC, drawing the distinction between 'taking' and a minor voluntarily leaving.

149

Which one of the following provisions of the punishment is provided to the accused of an offence of Affray?

  • aSimple imprisonment which may extend to one year and no fine
  • bRigorous imprisonment which may extend to one year and fine
  • cOnly fine and no imprisonment
  • dSimple imprisonment which may extend to one year or fine or both
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 160 IPC punishes affray with imprisonment of either description which may extend to one month, or fine up to one hundred rupees, or both. Among the options, (d) - simple imprisonment up to one year or fine or both - is the keyed best match; affray carries imprisonment or fine or both.

150

Match List-I with List-II and find out correct matches in the following?

  • aList- I List- II
  • bA dishonest misappropriation of property for : No misappropriation within the meaning of A time only Section 403, IPC
  • cTaking away of movable property dishonestly : Theft under Section 378, IPC
  • dWithout consent for a time only
  • eAn imputation in the form of an alternative or : No defamation under Section 499, IPC
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Matching question is OCR-fragmented. Correct matches: dishonest misappropriation for a time only - no misappropriation under s.403; taking movable property dishonestly without consent for a time only - theft under s.378; imputation in the alternative - no defamation under s.499. Option (b) carries the standard correct pairing; flagged due to broken option text.

Practise Himachal Pradesh Judiciary the smart way.

Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Himachal Pradesh Judiciary preparation guide.

Open exam guide
Law Mock is an independent preparation resource and is not affiliated with any High Court, Public Service Commission, or government body. All exam information is sourced from official notifications and is updated periodically.