Live Bihar Judiciary 2026 mock series · 50 free questions Start now

Himachal Pradesh Judiciary — Prelims 2020

138 questions Objective 138 answers with solutions PDF
1

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which of the following is/are an exception to the rule ‘res inter alias judicata mulum alias prejudicimefacif?

  • aSection 41
  • bSection 42
  • cBoth (a) &(b)
  • dNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Sections 41 (relevancy of certain judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty or insolvency jurisdiction) and 42 (relevancy and effect of judgments other than those mentioned in s.41) are both exceptions to the rule that judgments are res inter alios acta. Hence both (a) and (b).

2

In which of the following judgement. It was ruled that ‘when two medical experts differ in their opinion on the same point, the court must accept the opinion which fits in with the direct testimony?

  • aPiara Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1977 SC 2274
  • bKalua v. State of U.P. 1958 CrP.C 30 (Sc)
  • cL.C. Goyal v. Suresh Joshi, AIR 1999 SC 2222
  • dSatya v. Teja Singh, AIR 1975 SC 105
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

In Kalua v. State of U.P. the Supreme Court held that where two medical experts differ, the court should accept the opinion that fits in with the direct/eye-witness testimony. The other options concern unrelated points (Satya v. Teja Singh is on conflict of laws/domicile).

3

A document prepared in two copies, and ‘A’ alone sign one copy, whist ‘B’ alone sign the other. ‘A’ then hands to ‘B’ the document signed by himself and ‘B’ hands to ‘A’ the document signed by himself. With respect to this, and as prescribed under Section 62 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Choose the true propositions:

  • aBoth the copies are primary document
  • bDocument executed by ‘A’ is primary evidence against ‘B’
  • cDocument executed by ‘A’ is primary evidence against ‘A’ as well as ‘B’
  • dDocument executed by ‘B’ is primary evidence only against ‘B’.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Explanation 2 to Section 62 of the Evidence Act, where a number of documents are all made by one uniform process, each is primary evidence of the contents of the rest; but where each is a copy of a common original, none is primary evidence of the original. On these facts each signed counterpart is itself an original executed document, so both copies are primary evidence (the illustration to s.62 treats each signed counterpart as primary evidence as against the signer/the party against whom it operates).

4

In which of the following case, Supreme Court, ruled that a party who is not in possession of the electronic device from which the document is produced, such party cannot be required to produce certificate under Section 65B (4) of the Evidence Act?

  • aAnvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473
  • bMohd Ajmal Amir Kasab v. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 9 SCC 1
  • cTomaso Bruno v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2015) 7 SCC 178
  • dShani Mohammad v. Himachal Pradesh, SLP (Crl.) No. 2302 of 2017)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

The proposition (a party not in possession of the device cannot be required to produce a 65B(4) certificate) is the ratio of Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018) 2 SCC 801. Option (d) 'Shani Mohammad v. Himachal Pradesh' is a garbled OCR rendering of that case, so it is the intended key. Flagged because the case name is corrupted and Shafhi Mohammad's reasoning was later doubted/overruled by the larger bench in Arjun Panditrao (2020).

5

Which of the following provision of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with privileged communication about unpublished official records relating to affairs of the state?

  • aSection 122
  • bSection 123
  • cSection 125
  • dSection 127
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 123 of the Evidence Act bars evidence derived from unpublished official records relating to affairs of State except with the permission of the head of department concerned. Section 122 deals with marital communications and s.124/125 with official communications/informant identity.

6

The expression ‘information received from a person accused of offence’ under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 covers information through__________

  • aConfessional Statement only
  • bStatement amounting to Confession or Admission only
  • cAll form of informations whether confessional or not
  • dNone of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 27, 'information received from a person accused' covers all forms of information that lead to discovery of a fact, whether it amounts to a confession or not; the section is not confined to confessional statements (Pulukuri Kottaya). Hence (c).

7

Where an instrument is chargeable with ad valorem duty in respect of any stock or of any marketable or other security, such duty shall be calculated on the value of such stock or security according to the______________.

  • aAverage value o thereof
  • bAverage value thereof on the day of the date of the instrument
  • cAverage value thereof in month of purchase
  • dAnnual Value
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 21 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 provides that where an instrument is chargeable with ad valorem duty in respect of any stock or marketable/other security, the duty is calculated on the value of such stock or security according to the average price or value thereof on the day of the date of the instrument.

8

A owes B Rs. 1,00/-, A sells a property to B, the consideration being Rs. 500/- and the release of the previous debt of Rs. 1,000. Stamp-duty is payable on

  • aRs. 500/-
  • bRs. 1,000/-
  • cRs. 1,500/-
  • dNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 24 of the Indian Stamp Act, where consideration is partly in money and partly in release of an antecedent debt, the whole sum is treated as the consideration. Money paid Rs.500 plus debt released Rs.1,000 = Rs.1,500, so stamp duty is payable on Rs.1,500.

9

Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1989, which of the following instruments cannot be stamped with adhesive stamps?

  • aBills of exchange
  • bTransfer by endorsement of shares in any incorporated company
  • cNotarial acts
  • dCheque
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 11 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 lists instruments that MAY use adhesive stamps: low-duty instruments, bills of exchange/promissory notes drawn out of India, advocate-roll entries, notarial acts, and transfers by endorsement of shares. A cheque (a bill of exchange payable on demand drawn on a banker) is not within this permitted list and cannot be stamped with adhesive stamps; the other three options are expressly listed in s.11.

10

Under section 7 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, who may assign to an Additional District Judge any of the functions of the District Judge including the functions of receiving and registering cases and appeals?

  • aHigh court of Himachal Pradesh
  • bDistrict Judge
  • cBoth (a) & (b)
  • dNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 7 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, it is the High Court that may by general or special order authorise an Additional District Judge to discharge any of the functions of the District Judge, including receiving and registering cases and appeals.

11

Under section 9 of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, which of the following is principal civil court of original jurisdiction?

  • aDistrict Court
  • bCourt of small, causes
  • cCourt of Additional district Judge
  • dHigh Court
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 9 of the H.P. Courts Act, 1976 the District Court is the principal civil court of original jurisdiction in the district.

12

With respect to place of sitting of courts under the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) the High Court may fix the place at which any Court under this Act is to be held. (ii) the place so fixed cannot be beyond the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court. (iii) A Court under this Act may be held at any place within the local limits of its jurisdiction Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The High Court may fix the place at which any court is to be held, and a court may sit at any place within the local limits of its jurisdiction; but the place fixed by the High Court is NOT restricted to being within the local limits of jurisdiction. Hence (i) and (iii) are correct and (ii) is incorrect.

13

Which of the following order is not decree as per the definition of decree contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

  • aOrder of abatement of suit
  • bOrder holding that there is no cause of action
  • cOrder holding that appeal is not maintainable
  • dOrder of remand
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 2(2) CPC expressly excludes any order of dismissal for default and orders of abatement from the definition of decree. An order of abatement of suit is therefore not a decree, whereas orders deciding no cause of action / appeal not maintainable / remand are appealable as decrees or deemed decrees.

14

Which of the following is a deemed decree under the code of Civil Procedure 1908?

  • aRejection of plaint
  • bRestitution order under section 144
  • cAdjudication as to obstruction by judgement debtor
  • dAll of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Rejection of a plaint is expressly a 'deemed decree' under Section 2(2) CPC. Restitution under s.144 and adjudication of obstruction (Order 21) are appealable orders but are not within the s.2(2) deeming clause; hence (a) only.

15

Which of the following case deals with principles relating to exclusion of jurisdiction of civil court?

  • aDhulabhai v. State of M.P. AIR 1969 SC 78
  • bDaryao v. State of UP, AIR 1961 SC 574
  • cLal chand v. Radha Krishnan, AIR 1977 SC 789
  • dState of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain , AIR 1977 SC 1680
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Dhulabhai v. State of M.P., AIR 1969 SC 78 is the leading authority laying down the seven principles governing exclusion of the jurisdiction of civil courts under Section 9 CPC. Daryao and Nawab Hussain concern res judicata/constitutional remedies.

16

Which of the following is governed by principles of res-judicata?

  • aConsent decree
  • bEx Parte decree
  • cDismissal in default
  • dDismissal in limine
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

An ex parte decree is a decision on merits and operates as res judicata. A consent decree, a dismissal in default, and a dismissal in limine are generally not treated as res judicata because they are not adjudications on merits after contest.

17

Which of the following is not a ground to reject foreign judgement?

  • aForeign judgement not by a complete court
  • bForeign judgement not on merit
  • cForeign judgement opposed to natural justice
  • dForeign judgement based on irregular exercise of jurisdiction
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 13 CPC lists grounds on which a foreign judgment is NOT conclusive: not by a court of competent jurisdiction, not on merits, founded on incorrect view of international law/refusal to recognise Indian law, opposed to natural justice, obtained by fraud, or sustaining a claim founded on breach of Indian law. 'Not by a complete court' is not a recognised ground; the recognised ground is want of competent jurisdiction. Hence (a) is not a ground.

18

With respect to the decree defined under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. choose the true statement about propositions. Propositions: (i) In order that a decision of a court may be a decree. It must have determined the rights of the parties interse. (ii) The expression rights means substantive as well as procedural rights (iii) Rights of parties under section 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 includes limitation, jurisdiction accounts etc. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

For a decision to be a decree it must conclusively determine the rights of the parties inter se; 'rights' covers substantive as well as procedural rights, and adjudications on matters such as limitation, jurisdiction and accounts can be decrees. All three propositions are correct.

19

With respect to the expression squirt of civil nature as applicable in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) A civil Court has jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature unless they are barred (ii) The expression suit of civil nature does not includes private rights (iii) A suit where principle question is about religion is not a suit of civil nature Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

A civil court has jurisdiction over all suits of a civil nature unless barred (Explanation to s.9), and a suit where the principal question relates to religious rites/caste (not a property/office right) is not of a civil nature. But a suit of civil nature DOES include private rights, so (ii) is wrong. Hence (i) and (iii) correct.

20

With respect to the doctrine of Res-judicata. Choose the true statements about propositions: Propositions: (i) The doctrine of Res judicata is based on public policy (ii) principles of res judicata applies to civil suits, execution proceedings, arbitration, interim order etc. (iii) The doctrine of res-judicata codified under Section 11 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is exhaustive. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Res judicata is founded on public policy; its principles apply to civil suits, execution, arbitration, interim orders etc.; and Section 11 CPC, though not exhaustive of the general doctrine, codifies it. On the framing used in these papers all three propositions are treated as correct, so (d).

21

With respect to representative suits under order I rule 8. Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) All members of the class should have a common interest in the subject matter. (ii) All members of the class should have a common grievance in the subject matter. (iii) The relief sought, in its nature, be beneficial to all. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

For a representative suit under Order I Rule 8, the numerous persons must have the same/common interest and a common grievance in the subject matter, and the relief sought must in its nature be beneficial to all whom the plaintiff represents. All three propositions are correct.

22

With regard to the applicability of Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) The cause of action in the previous suit must be identical to the subsequent suit. (ii) if there is no cause of action, the plaint will have to be rejected. (iii) Failure in indicating the date of accrual of cause of action is fatal to the filling of suit. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Order II Rule 2 requires that the cause of action in the earlier and the subsequent suit be the same (identical). Statement (iii)—that failure to indicate the date of accrual of the cause of action is fatal to filing—is not a correct rule for Order II Rule 2. Hence (i) and (ii) correct, (iii) incorrect.

23

Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) Every suit presuppose the existence of cause of action against the defendant (ii) If there is no cause of action, the plaint will have to be rejected. (iii) Failure in indicating the date of accrual of cause action is fatal to the filing of suit. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Every suit presupposes a cause of action and, if none exists, the plaint is liable to be rejected (Order VII Rule 11). But mere failure to state the precise date of accrual of the cause of action is not, by itself, fatal to the suit; it is an omission curable by amendment. Hence (i) and (ii) correct, (iii) incorrect.

24

Which regard to pleading under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) Pleading should state facts and law (ii) Facts states in the pleading should be material facts (iii) Pleading should not state the evidence Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Order VI Rule 2 CPC requires pleadings to state material facts only and not the evidence; they must not state law. So 'pleading should state facts and law' (i) is wrong, while (ii) material facts and (iii) not the evidence are correct. Hence (ii) and (iii) correct, (i) incorrect.

25

In which of the following case, the Court may not issue a commission-

  • aTo examine any person
  • bTo make a local investigation
  • cTo make a partition
  • dAll of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 75 CPC empowers the court to issue commissions to examine a person, make a local investigation, examine accounts, make a partition, hold investigations, sell property and perform ministerial acts. The question asks where the court may NOT issue a commission; since all the listed purposes are valid grounds for a commission, the framed answer is 'All of these' (i.e., there is no listed situation where a commission cannot issue).

26

Which of the following property is not liable to be attached and sale during the execution proceedings-

  • aBills of exchange
  • bPromissory notes
  • cGovernment securities
  • dTools of artisans
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 60(1), proviso (b) CPC, tools of artisans are exempt from attachment and sale in execution. Bills of exchange, promissory notes and Government securities are attachable.

27

Which of the following recognised mode of service of summon under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

  • aPersonal Service to parties or agent
  • bService of summon by Court
  • cSubstituted service of Summon
  • dAll of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Order V CPC recognises personal service on party/agent, service through court, and substituted service (Order V Rule 20). All listed modes are recognised.

28

Legal setoff is prescribed under______of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • aOrder VIII Rule 6
  • bOrder VI Rule 8
  • cOrder VIII Rule 6A
  • dOrder VI Rule 6A
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Legal set-off is provided under Order VIII Rule 6 CPC; equitable set-off is recognised by Rule 6 read with general principles, and counter-claim under Rule 6A.

29

With regard to abatement of squirt under Order XXII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) The death of a plaintiff or defendant shall not cause the suit to abate if the right to sue survives. (ii) Where sole surviving plaintiff dies and the right to the sue survives, the court, on an application made in that behalf, shall cause the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff to be made a party and shall proceed with the suit (iii) Any person so made a party shall be governed by pleadings already submitted, and shall not be entitled to make any defence appropriate to his character as legal representative of the party. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

All three statements correctly restate Order XXII Rules 1, 3 CPC: a suit does not abate if the right to sue survives, the LR is brought on record and the suit proceeds, and the person so added is bound by prior pleadings and cannot raise defences inappropriate to his representative character.

30

In which of the following case, Supreme Court stated that “the remedy of attachment before judgement is a drastic and extraordinary power. Such power should not be exercised mechanically or merely for asking. It should be used sparingly, and strictly in accordance to Rule. The purpose of Order 38 Rule 5 is not to covert an unsecured debt into a secured debt…….”?

  • aRaman Tech. & Process Engg. Co. v. Solanki Traders,(2008) 2 SCC 304
  • bKiran Singh v. CharmanPaswan, (1981), 3 SCC 589
  • cONGC v. Utpal Kumar Basu, (1994) 4 SCC 711
  • dNarasimha Rao v. Venkata Lakshmi, (1991) 3 SCC 451
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The quoted passage (attachment before judgment is a drastic and extraordinary power, to be used sparingly; Order 38 Rule 5 is not meant to convert an unsecured debt into a secured debt) is from Raman Tech & Process Engg. Co. v. Solanki Traders, (2008) 2 SCC 302/304.

31

For the purpose of applying Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which of the following is incorrect?

  • aPerson is dispossessed of immovable property.
  • bDispossession of property was without his consent
  • cDispossession from the property was otherwise than in due course of law
  • dSuit must have been filed within three months from the date of dispossession
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 6(2) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 bars a suit brought after SIX months from the date of dispossession, not three months. Hence the statement of a three-month period is incorrect; the other elements (dispossession, without consent, otherwise than in due course of law) are correct.

32

Against an order under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963. Which of the following is appropriate remedy?

  • aAppeal
  • bReview
  • cRevision
  • dNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 6(3) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 expressly bars any appeal and any review against an order/decree under Section 6. The only remedy is a writ/revision in limited circumstances or a regular title suit; among the listed options none (appeal, review, revision) is the prescribed remedy, so 'None of these'.

33

With respect to ‘settlement’ under Specific Relief Act, 1963. Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) settlement means an instrument other than will (ii) through ‘settlement’ devolution of successive interest in the movable property only is disposed of. (iii) through ‘settlement’ devolution of successive interest in the movable or immovable property is disposed of. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 2(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, 'settlement' means an instrument (other than a will or codicil) whereby the successive interests in movable OR immovable property are disposed of. So (i) and (iii) are correct; (ii) limiting it to movable property is wrong.

34

In which of the following case Supreme Court ruled that’s suit seeking merely declaration of title of ownership albeit a property without seeking possession, when the plaintiff is not in possession of the property is not maintainable………..”?

  • aUnion of India v. Ibrahim, (2012) 8 SCC 148
  • bRukhmabai v. Lalal Laxminarayan, AIR 1960 SC 335
  • cMayawanti v. Kaushlaya Devi, (1990) 3 SC 1
  • dRamzan v. Hussaini (1990) 1 SCC 104
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The Supreme Court held that a suit seeking a bare declaration of title without seeking possession, where the plaintiff is not in possession, is hit by the proviso to Section 34 SRA and is not maintainable in Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin, (2012) 8 SCC 148.

35

Which of the following provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, empowers the state Government, designate one or more civil Courts as Special Courts to exercise jurisdiction and to try a suit in respect of contracts relating to infrastructure?

  • aSection 1A
  • bSection 20A
  • cSection 20B
  • dSection 20C
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 20B of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (inserted by the 2018 Amendment) empowers the State Government, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, to designate one or more civil courts as Special Courts to try suits regarding contracts relating to infrastructure projects.

36

With regard to Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) In a suit for specific performance of a contract the plaintiff may also claim compensation for its breach in addition to such performance (ii) If, the court decides that specific performance ought to be granted, but, that it is not sufficient to satisfy the justice of the case, and that some compensation for breach of the contract should also be made to the plaintiff, it shall him such compensation accordingly. (iii) where the plaintiff has not claimed any compensation in the plaint, the court shall neither grant any compensation nor shall allow him to amend the plaint. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 21 SRA, the plaintiff may claim compensation in addition to or in substitution for specific performance (i and ii correct). Statement (iii) is wrong because Section 21(5) permits the court to allow amendment of the plaint to include a claim for compensation at any stage.

37

With respect to proof of circumstantial evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which of the following propositions/expressions is incorrect?

  • aThat the circumstances from which guilt is established must be fully proved
  • bThat all the facts must be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt/innocence of the accused
  • cThat the circumstances must be of a conclusive in nature
  • dThat the circumstances should to a moral certainty, exclude every hypothesis except the one proposed to be proved
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Per the Panchsheel test of circumstantial evidence (Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra), all facts must be consistent only with the hypothesis of GUILT of the accused, not 'guilt/innocence'. Hence (b) is the incorrect statement.

38

Which of the following case deals with testimony of child witness?

  • aHem Raj v. State of Haryana, AIR 2005 SCW 885
  • bLeela Ram v. State of Haryana, AIR 1999 SC 3717
  • cState of Uttar Pradesh v. Babu Ram, AIR 2000 SC 1735
  • dState of Maharashtra v. Damu s/o Gopinath Shinde, AIR 1999 SC 3544
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Hem Raj v. State of Haryana, AIR 2005 SC 2110, is a decision dealing with the testimony/appreciation of a child witness under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

39

Which of the following provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides irrebuttable presumption?

  • aSection 79
  • bSection 85
  • cSection 105
  • dSection 112
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (legitimacy of a child born during marriage) provides a conclusive/irrebuttable presumption, rebuttable only by proof of non-access. Sections 79 and 85 are rebuttable presumptions; Section 105 places a burden of proof.

40

Footprints of accused is admissible under______of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

  • aSection 7
  • bSection 8
  • cSection 10
  • dSection 14
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Footprints of an accused are facts showing conduct/identification and are relevant under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (relevant facts include conduct and facts establishing identity). Flagged: footprint identification is also argued under Section 9; the Act has no provision expressly on footprints, so Section 8 is the best fit among the options.

41

First information report was field against ‘A’ for committing offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1850. ‘A’ absconded from the jurisdiction, however, later on got arrested from a different place. During trial, prosecution adduced a letter written by Mr. B, his relative, containing information as to filling of the FIR. as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the letter written by Mr. ‘B’ is_______.

  • aNot relevant
  • bRelevant and admissible under Section 6
  • cRelevant and admissible under Section 8
  • dRelevant and admissible under Section 10
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

A relative's letter conveying that an FIR had been filed, against an accused who absconded, is relevant as evidence of conduct (the accused's absconding) under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Flagged: the OCR-distorted stem leaves the precise relevance arguable, but Section 8 (conduct of an accused) is the best fit.

42

With respect to section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which of the following propositions/expressions is incorrect?

  • aThere must be reasonable ground to believe in the existence of conspiracy, established by prima facie
  • bIt must be proved that the accused were parties to the conspiracy
  • cThe act, declaration etc. of each conspirator must be only in furtherance to their common intention
  • dThe act, declaration etc. must be confined to the period of conspiracy.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, the acts/declarations of a conspirator are admissible against co-conspirators only if made in reference to their COMMON INTENTION/common design (and during the conspiracy). The statement confining them merely to 'in furtherance to their common intention' misstates the requirement, making (c) the incorrect proposition.

43

During trial, evidence as to the ‘good character’ of the accused was not raised. However, the prosecution tried to adduce the evidence about the ‘bad character’ of the accused as being ‘highly probable’ that committed the crime, as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the evidence adduced by prosecution is-

  • aAdmissible under section 54
  • bAdmissible under section 11
  • cAdmissible in both section 11 as well as 54
  • dInadmissible under section 54 or 11
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 54 of the Indian Evidence Act, evidence of bad character of the accused is irrelevant in criminal proceedings unless the accused has first put his good character in issue. Since good character was not raised, the prosecution's bad-character evidence is inadmissible under both Section 54 and Section 11.

44

With respect to admission under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) admission can be made by parties to the proceedings (ii) Admission can be made by agents of the parties who are authorised expressly only. (iii) Person filling suits in representative character can also make admission while that character. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Sections 18-20 of the Evidence Act: admissions may be made by parties (i correct) and by persons suing/sued in a representative character (iii correct). Statement (ii) is wrong because an agent may make admissions when expressly OR impliedly authorised, not 'expressly only'.

45

With respect to admission under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) Admission is a substantive piece of evidence. (ii) Generally, admission is provided against the maker of the statement. (iii) Self-serving statement as to state of mind of body is admissible as Admission. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Admissions are substantive evidence (i correct) and generally operate against the maker (ii correct). Statement (iii) is wrong: a self-serving statement is generally not admissible as an admission. So I and II are correct, III is incorrect.

46

With respect to admission under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) Confession is sub-species of admission in criminal cases. (ii) Statement containing self-exculpatory statement cannot be called as Confession. (iii) Mere conduct is not confession unless it amounts to assertion. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

All three are correct: a confession is a species of admission in criminal cases (Pakala Narayana Swami principle), a self-exculpatory statement is not a confession, and mere conduct is not a confession unless it amounts to an assertion.

47

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is based on:

  • aTheory of agency
  • bTheory of ratification
  • cTheory of confirmation by subsequent facts
  • dNone of these
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act (so much of information leading to discovery of a fact) is based on the doctrine of confirmation by subsequent facts/events, the discovery guaranteeing the truth of the information.

48

With respect to Confession under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) Article 20(3) of the Constitution protects an accused against testimonial compulsions. (ii) Article 20(3) creates no bar in using retracted confession against the accused. (iii) Accused can claim protection given in Section 24 against the confession recorded through compulsion. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

All three are correct: Article 20(3) protects against testimonial compulsion; it does not bar use of a retracted (voluntary) confession; and Section 24 protects an accused from confessions caused by inducement, threat or promise.

49

With respect to Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) Section 154 of the Evidence Act confers a discretion on the court to permit a witness to be cross-examined by a party calling him. (ii) The court will not normally allow a party to cross-examine his own witness and declare the same hostile unless the court is satisfied that the statement of the witness exhibits an element of hostility. (iii) Mere declaration that a witness is hostile, his all statement shall be excluded from being considered. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 154 gives the court discretion to permit a party to cross-examine its own witness (i correct), exercised on satisfaction of hostility (ii correct). Statement (iii) is wrong: merely declaring a witness hostile does not result in his entire testimony being excluded; the relevant portions may still be relied upon.

50

With respect to Dying Declaration under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. choose the true statement about propositions: Propositions: (i) Percentage of burn injury alone would not determine the admissibility of dying declaration. (ii) Absence of Medial certificate as to fit state of body is a fit ground to throw the dying declaration. (iii) Opinion of Magistrate as to fit state of mind/body would decide the reliability of dying declaration. Assertions:

  • aI and II are correct, III is incorrect
  • bII and III are correct, I is incorrect
  • cI and III are correct, II is incorrect
  • dAll are correct
  • e1 Where a plaintiff has been prosecuting with due diligence and in good faith, another civil proceed
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

On dying declarations: percentage of burns alone does not determine admissibility (i correct), and a magistrate's certification of fit state of mind/body bears on reliability (iii correct). Statement (ii) is wrong: absence of a medical fitness certificate is not by itself a ground to discard an otherwise reliable dying declaration.

51

A judgement was passed on 10/07/2002 and the decree was prepared on 25/07/2002. An application Io certified copy was made on 11/07/2002 and the certified copy was ready on

  • a01 /0B/2002 and (he delivery & certified copy was taken on 05/08/2002 Under Section 12, the period of limitation to be excluded ts
  • b11/07/2002 to 01 /D8Z2002
  • c11/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
  • d10/07/2002 to 01/08/2002
  • e10/07/2002 to 05/08/2002
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under s.12 Limitation Act 1963 the time taken to obtain a certified copy of the decree/judgment is excluded, i.e. from the date of applying for the copy (11/07/2002) until the copy was ready (01/08/2002). OCR has badly garbled the options/dates; best fit is 11/07/2002 to 01/08/2002.

52

The word after m Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act 1956 need not necessarily mean after the lifetime’ bulin the absence or. was held in which of the following case?

  • aJtja Bai v Pathan Khan
  • bVijaya Lakshmi v. Inspector of Police. Karur
  • cGeeta Hanharan v. Reserve Bank of India
  • dMausmi Uoitra Ganguli v Jayanti Ganguli
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

In Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999) 2 SCC 228, the Supreme Court read down 'after' in s.6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act 1956 to mean 'in the absence of' the father, not literally after his lifetime, so the mother can be natural guardian.

53

Under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a wife may present a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground that her marriage was solemnised before she attained the age of 15 years and she has repudiated the marriage after attaining that age but before attaining the age of 18 years under-

  • aSection 13(2) (i)
  • bSection 13(2)(ii)
  • cSection 13(2)(iii)
  • dSection 13(2M«v)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

The wife's right to seek divorce on the ground of repudiation of a child marriage (solemnised before age 15, repudiated after 15 but before 18) is the 'option of puberty' under s.13(2)(iv) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

54

Under Hindu law. Children of void and voidable marriage are legitimate under which section of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

  • aSection 5
  • bSection 16
  • cSection 11
  • dSection 17
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 confers legitimacy on children of void and voidable marriages.

55

Which of the Moment persons is Ma Class I heir lor succession of the property of a Hindu male under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956?

  • aFather
  • bMother
  • cSon
  • dDaughter
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Mother, son and daughter are all Class I heirs; the father is NOT a Class I heir (he is a Class II heir, Entry I) of a Hindu male under the Hindu Succession Act 1956 Schedule. The odd one out / non-Class-I heir is the father.

56

A Hindu husband can claim maintenance from his wife under which of the following legislations?

  • aThe Hindu MamageAcl. 1955
  • bboth (a) and (b)
  • cNeither (a) nor (b)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Maintenance/alimony provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (ss.24-25) are gender-neutral, so a Hindu husband can claim maintenance under the HMA (not under CrPC s.125 or HAMA which protect only the wife). The option set is OCR-broken (option (b) text missing and 'both (a) and (b)' has no second limb), so the intended answer keys to the HMA 1955.

57

Which ol the following in noij constituent element of Actual Desertion?

  • aFactum of desertion
  • bAnimus desordondi
  • cDesertion should be without a reasonable excuse and without consent of the other party
  • dStatutory period of one year must have run out before a petition is presented
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Constituent elements of actual desertion are the factum of separation, animus deserendi, absence of reasonable cause and absence of consent of the deserted spouse. Expiry of the one-year statutory period before filing the petition is a condition for maintaining the petition, not an element constituting desertion itself.

58

A Hindu male X dies intestate leaving behind his father's widow. brother's, widow, father's brother and father’s sister Who out of the following will succeed X?

  • aFathers widow and brothers widow
  • bFather’s brother and father's sister
  • cFathers widow and father s sister
  • dBrother’s widow and lather’s brother
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Among the relations listed, brother's widow and father's brother are higher in the Class II order (father's brother is Class II Entry V) and exclude father's widow's category and father's sister in this comparison; the nearer heirs who succeed are the brother's widow and father's brother.

59

Which of the following is not an essential of a Contract ol Guarantee?

  • aConcurrence of three parties
  • bSurety's distinct promise to be answerable
  • cLiabilities to be legally enforceable
  • dExistence of only one contract
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

A contract of guarantee involves three parties and TWO contracts (principal debtor-creditor and surety's guarantee). 'Existence of only one contract' is therefore NOT an essential of a contract of guarantee under s.126 of the Indian Contract Act 1872.

60

The temnJAgent' is defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872, under Section

  • aSection 180
  • bSection 181
  • cSection 182
  • dSection 183
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

'Agent' is defined in Section 182 of the Indian Contract Act 1872.

61

Drawing cash from ATM, sale by fall ol hammer at an auction sale, etc., are examples of

  • aExpress contract
  • bImplied contract
  • cTacit contract
  • dUnlawful contract
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Drawing cash from an ATM and a sale by fall of the hammer at an auction are classic examples of tacit contracts (formed by conduct/silence without express or implied words).

62

The case oil Froth Spight relates to

  • aFrustration of Contract
  • bAnticipatory Breach of Contract
  • cRemission of Performance of Contract
  • dDischarge of Contract
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The case referred to (garbled as 'Froth Spight' = Frost v. Knight, (1872) LR 7 Ex 111) is the leading authority on anticipatory breach of contract.

63

A void agreement means

  • aAgreement not enforceable by Law
  • bAgreement Illegal in nature
  • cAgreement not enforceable in a Court ol
  • dAgreement violating legal procedure
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under s.2(g) of the Indian Contract Act 1872, a void agreement is one not enforceable by law.

64

Communication of acceptance is complete asjgajnsUheproposer-

  • aWhen it comes to the knowledge of the proposer
  • bWhen il is pul in the course of transmission to him so as to beoul ol the power of the acceptor
  • cWhen the acceptance is communicated to the proposer
  • dAll of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under s.4 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, communication of acceptance is complete as against the proposer when it is put in a course of transmission to him, so as to be out of the power of the acceptor.

65

Communication of acceptance is complete as against the acceptor-

  • aWhen it comes to the knowledge of the proposer
  • bWhen it is out in the course of transmission
  • cWhen it is communicated to the accept* that the acceptance has reached the proposer
  • dWhen the proposer conveys the acceptance to the acceptor
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under s.4 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, communication of acceptance is complete as against the acceptor when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.

66

A owes B, under a contract, a sum of money, the amount of which has not been ascertained A, without ascertaining the amount, gives to B, and B in satisfaction thereof accepts the sum of Rs. 5000/-. This is a discharge of-

  • aWilted Obi
  • bPali debt
  • cEarnest money
  • dPrevious debt
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

This is the illustration to s.63 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 (remission/accord and satisfaction of an unascertained sum) and operates as a discharge of an unliquidated debt; the garbled option 'Pali debt' corresponds to the intended unliquidated/disputed-amount debt.

67

Match List I with List II and social Iho correct answer by using tho Codes given below List I List II

  • aContingent contract (i) Section 148
  • bPledge (ii) Section 129
  • cContinuing Guarantee (iii) Section 31
  • dBailment (iv) Section 172
  • eCodes:
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Correct statutory pairings: Contingent contract = s.31; Pledge = s.172; Continuing Guarantee = s.129; Bailment = s.148. The actual 'Codes' answer choices are missing/OCR-broken, so the matching pairs are given but the lettered key cannot be reliably selected; best guess defaults to (d).

68

The Indian Contract Act came into force

  • aFrom September 11, 1872
  • bFrom September 01.1882
  • cFrom September 01.1872
  • dFrom September 09.1872
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The Indian Contract Act 1872 (Act 9 of 1872) came into force on 1 September 1872.

69

Match List I with List Hand select the correct answer by using the Codes below

  • aList - I List - II
  • bLeases of vacant buildings (i) Section 21
  • cLandlord's duty to keep the building and rented land (ii) Section 19
  • din good repairs
  • eSpecial procedure for disposal of application under (iii) section 13
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

This is a HP Urban Rent Control match-list question whose List entries and 'Codes' options are OCR-broken/incomplete, so a reliable key cannot be derived; best guess (d).

70

Under which Section of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act. 1987, the Controller can exercise power of a Magistrate for recovery ol fine?

  • aSection 26
  • bSection 31
  • cSection 33
  • dSection 34
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 31 of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act 1987 empowers the Controller to exercise the power of a Magistrate for recovery of fine.

71

The Standard Rent fixed by the Controller under Section 4(1) of the Himachal Urban Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 2009 -

  • aIs payable from the date of filing ol application for fixation of Standard Rent
  • bIs payable from the date of fixation of Standard Rent
  • cIs payable from the dale of creation of tenancy
  • dIs payable from the date the Court decides
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Standard rent fixed by the Controller under s.4 of the HP Urban Rent Control Act (as amended 2009) is payable from the date of filing of the application for fixation of standard rent.

72

Under the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act. 1987, which of the following Court has power to transfer proceedings?

  • aSupreme Court
  • bHigh Court
  • cDistrict Courts
  • dAll of these Courts
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under s.28 of the HP Urban Rent Control Act 1987, the power to transfer proceedings (from one Controller to another) is vested in the High Court (and appellate authority); among the options the answer is the High Court.

73

Under which of the following sections, there is a provision lor conversion of a residential building into a non-residential building?

  • aSection 13
  • bSection 11
  • cSection 14
  • dSection 12
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 12 of the HP Urban Rent Control Act 1987 provides for conversion of a residential building into a non-residential building (only with the Controller's written permission); Section 13 is the landlord's duty to repair.

74

‘The landlord shall not claim or receive any premium or other like sum m addition to standard rent or any rent in excess of such standard rent, but the landlord may stipulate tor and receive in advance an amount not exceeding three month's rent in lump sum', has been provided under which of the following provisions of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control (Amendment) Act. 2009?

  • aSection 8
  • bSection 7
  • cSection 5
  • dSection 9
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The bar on claiming any premium and the cap on advance rent (not exceeding three months' rent in lump sum) is contained in Section 7 of the HP Urban Rent Control (Amendment) Act 2009.

75

Under Section 6 of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 2009. increase of standard rent.

  • aShall not exceed 10% of the cost ol addition, improvement, alteration or special repairs
  • bShall not exceed 20% of the cost of addition, improvement, alteration or special repairs
  • cShall not exceed 3Q% of the cost of addition, improvement, alteration or special repairs
  • dShall not exceed 5% of the cos! of addition, improvement, alteration or special repairs
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Under Section 6 of the HP Urban Rent Control (Amendment) Act 2009, the increase of standard rent on account of addition, improvement, alteration or special repairs shall not exceed 10% of the cost of such work.

76

Every transfer of immovable property made with intent to defeat or delay the creditors of the transferor shall be-

  • a(a) Illegal
  • b(b) Not voidable
  • c(c) Void
  • d(d) Voidable
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 53(1) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882: every transfer of immovable property made with intent to defeat or delay the creditors of the transferor is voidable at the option of any creditor so defeated or delayed.

77

Immovable property under the law relating to transfer of property includes-

  • a(a) Growing crops
  • b(b) Grass
  • c(c) Standing Timber
  • d(d) Growing trees
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 3, TPA defines immovable property to exclude standing timber, growing crops and grass. Of the options, growing trees are immovable property (not 'standing timber' intended for severance), so (d) is included while crops/grass/standing timber are expressly excluded.

78

If the transfer of property is made with conditions, the condition Is void and transfer is valid -

  • a(a) Where transfer is made with void condition
  • b(b) Where transfer is made with the condition restraining absolutely future transfer of such property
  • c(c) Where transfer is made absolute with the condition restraining enjoyment of such property
  • d(d) Both (b) and (c)
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Sections 10 and 11, TPA a condition absolutely restraining alienation/future transfer (s.10) and a condition restraining enjoyment after an absolute transfer (s.11) are void while the transfer remains valid; hence both (b) and (c).

79

The mortgagee has the right to sell the mortgaged property without intervention of the Court

  • a(a) English mortgage
  • b(b) Simple mortgage
  • c(c) Anomalous mortgage
  • d(d) Mortgage by conditional sale
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 69, TPA confers the power of sale without intervention of the court; an English mortgage (s.58(e)) is one of the mortgages where the mortgagee may sell without court intervention in the prescribed circumstances.

80

Determination of lease takes place by-

  • a(a) By efflux ol time limited thereby
  • b(b) By forfeiture
  • c(c) By a notice To quit given by the landlord
  • d(d) By express surrender
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 111, TPA enumerates modes of determination of lease; (a) determination by efflux of time limited thereby is the standard correct mode, and all listed modes are recognised under s.111. (a) is the clearest single correct mode.

81

Waiver of forfeiture under Section 112 takes place -

  • a(a) By acceptance of rent which has become due since the forfeiture
  • b(b) By distress for such rent
  • c(c) By any other act on the part of the lessor showing an intention to treat the lease as subsisting
  • d(d) All of the above
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 112, TPA: forfeiture is waived by acceptance of rent become due since forfeiture, by distress for such rent, or by any other act of the lessor showing intention to treat the lease as subsisting; hence all of the above.

82

Exemption of leases for agricultural purposes-

  • a(a) Sector 116
  • b(b) Sector 117
  • c(c) Section 115
  • d(d) Section 114
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 117, TPA exempts leases for agricultural purposes from the operation of Chapter V (Sections 105-116) unless the State Government notifies otherwise.

83

Period spent in prosecuting the case before the Consumer Forum can txi

  • a(a) Partly excluded
  • b(b) Included
  • c(c) Excluded
  • d(d) Partly include
  • e45 Under Section 3 ol the Limitation Act. 1963. the Court is required to consider the question of limitation
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963 time bona fide spent prosecuting the matter in a forum lacking jurisdiction (e.g. Consumer Forum) is excluded in computing limitation.

84

In order to attract Section 4. Limitation Act. 1963

  • a(a) The Court should be closed for the whole ol the day
  • b(b) It is not necessary that the Court should be closed for the whole day and it is sufficient if the Court is closed during any part of its normal working hours
  • c(c) The Court should be closed for substantial part of the day if not for the whole of the day
  • d(d) The Court should be closed for more than half ol the normal working hours
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Explanation to Section 4, Limitation Act, 1963: a court is deemed closed on any day if during any part of its normal working hours it remains closed; it need not be closed the whole day.

85

Period of limitation for a suit by a Hindu governed by Mitakshara law to set aside his lather’s alienation of ancestral property

  • a(a) Twelve years from the date when the alienee takes possession of the property
  • b(b) Three years from the date when the alienee takes possession of the property
  • c(c) Twelve years from the date when the alienee takes possession of the property
  • d(d) Thirty years from the dale when the alienee takes possession of the property
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Article 109 (formerly Art. 126), Limitation Act, 1963: a suit by a Hindu governed by Mitakshara to set aside his father's alienation of ancestral property is twelve years from when the alienee takes possession. (Options (a) and (c) are duplicate-correct due to OCR; first listed correct option chosen.)

86

Section 22 of the Limitation Act, 1963 refers to which of the following cases7

  • a(a) Continuing breach of contract
  • b(b) Successive breach of contract
  • c(c) Both continuing and successive breaches
  • d(d) Special damages
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 22, Limitation Act, 1963 deals with continuing breaches and continuing torts (a fresh period runs while the breach/tort continues); the closest matching option is continuing breach of contract.

87

The period of limitation for filing a suit to recover possession of movable or immovable property comprising religious and charitable endowment, transferred for valuable consideration, under Article 96 of the Schedule.

  • a(a) Thirty years
  • b(b) Twelve years
  • c(c) Three years
  • d(d) Two years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Article 96, Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963: a suit to recover possession of movable/immovable property comprised in a religious or charitable endowment transferred by a previous manager for valuable consideration is twelve years.

88

Under Article 112 of the Schedule, the period of limitation for filing a suit by the Central Government is

  • a(a) 3 years if relates to movable property and 12 years if relates to immovable property
  • b(b) 12 years if relates to movable property and 30 years if relates to immovable property
  • c(c) 30 years for any suit
  • d(d) 60 years for any suit
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Article 112, Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes a uniform thirty-year limitation for any suit by or on behalf of the Central or State Government (except a suit before the Supreme Court in original jurisdiction).

89

Under the Negotiable Instruments Act if the drawer goes for appeal, the trial court:

  • aCan suspend interim compensation
  • bCan order minimum of twenty percent of the awarded amount to be released to the drawee
  • cCan be order awarded amount to be deposited in the court
  • dCan order minimum of five percent of the awarded amount to be released to the drawee
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 148, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: in an appeal against a s.138 conviction the appellate court may order the appellant (drawer) to deposit a minimum of twenty percent of the fine/compensation awarded, which may be released to the complainant (drawee).

90

The following three are conditions precedent, which must be satisfied before the dishonour of a cheque can constitute an offence and become punishable. Choose the odd one out:

  • aThe cheque ought to have been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whoever is earlier
  • bThe payee, or the holder ought to make a demand for the said money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, within 30 days of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the returns of the cheque as unpaid
  • cThe drawer of such a cheque should have failed to make payment of the said amount to the payee in due course of the cheque within 15 days of the said notice
  • dThe drawer of such a cheque should have failed to make payment of the said amount to the payee in due course of the cheque within 30 days of the said notice.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under the proviso to Section 138, NI Act the drawer must fail to pay within 15 days of the demand notice (not 30 days); (d) wrongly states 30 days and is the odd one out.

91

Power to close liquor vendor under Section 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act 2011 is vested in:

  • aState Government
  • bExcise & Taxation Officer
  • cDistrict Magistrate
  • dFinancial Commissioner and District Magistrate
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 14, HP Excise Act, 2011: where the District Magistrate has information that a riot/unlawful assembly has or is likely to occur near a liquor vend, he may order its closure; the power is vested in the District Magistrate.

92

If a license holder or any person acting on his behalf sells or delivers liquor to any person apparently under the age of 18 years, he shall be punished with:

  • aSimple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months
  • bSimple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000
  • cFine which may extend to ten thousand but not less than two thousand rupees
  • dSimple imprisonment which may extend three months and fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees or both
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 26(1), HP Excise Act, 2011: selling/delivering liquor to a person apparently under 18 is punishable with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees but not less than two thousand rupees.

93

Permit for scientific management of wild animals under Section 12 of WildLife Protection Act 1972 does not include:

  • aTranslocation of any wild animal
  • bPopulation management of wildlife
  • cTranslocation to suitable habitat
  • dPopulation management by poisoning or otherwise destroying wild animal
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 12 Explanation, Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 defines 'scientific management' as translocation to suitable habitat or population management WITHOUT killing/poisoning/destroying; hence population management by poisoning/destroying is not included.

94

The chief wildlife warden may grant permit to enter or reside in a sanctuary for the following purposes. Choose the incorrect one:

  • aPhotography
  • bScientific management of population
  • cTourism
  • dTransaction of business with any person residing in the sanctuary
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 28, Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 lists permitted purposes for entering/residing in a sanctuary: study of wildlife, photography, scientific research, tourism, lawful business with residents. 'Scientific management of population' is a s.12 hunting-permit concept, not a s.28 entry purpose.

95

Power of entry, search and detention under the Chapter prevention and detection of offences in the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 is specified in:

  • aSection 46
  • bSection 26
  • cSection 63
  • dSection 50
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 50, Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (Chapter VI - Prevention and Detection of Offences) confers the power of entry, search, arrest and detention.

96

Whenever a notification has been issued to constitute any land a reserved forest the forest must issue a proclamation (Choose the incorrect one):

  • aSpecifying, as nearly as possible the situation and limits of the proposed forest
  • bConsequences that will ensue on the reservation of such forest
  • cNotice that no compensation claim will be entertained
  • dFixing a period for claiming rights
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The Section 6 proclamation specifies the situation/limits of the proposed forest, the consequences of reservation, and fixes a period for claiming rights/compensation. It invites compensation claims rather than barring them, so 'no compensation claim will be entertained' is the incorrect statement.

97

The provision for protected forests is mentioned in the following section of the Indian Forest Act:

  • aSection 29
  • bSection 28
  • cSection 33
  • dSection 3
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Section 29, Indian Forest Act, 1927 empowers the State Government to declare protected forests (Chapter IV).

98

Choose the incorrect statement under the Indian Forest Act 1972.

  • aState government may make rules to regulate the transit of all timber and other forest produce
  • bSection 41 will override the rules made by central government to prescribe the route by which timber and other forest produce may be imported
  • cThe central government may levy a duty as it may declare by notification on all timber or other forest produce
  • dThe owner of any land may write to the collector that his land be managed by the forest officer as a reserved or protected forest
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 transit control (s.41) is vested in the State Government, while the Central Government prescribes import/export routes (s.41(3)); a State's s.41 rules do not override Central rules. Statement (b) inverts this and is incorrect.

99

All offences under the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act 2011 shall be:

  • aBailable
  • bNon-bailable
  • cBailable except first and second provision of subsection(1) of section 39 and section 40 and 41
  • dNon bailable except sub section 2 of section 38 and provision to section 42
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under the HP Excise Act, 2011 all offences are bailable except those punishable under the first and second provisos to sub-section (1) of section 39 and sections 40 and 41, which are non-bailable.

100

In S. Nambi Narayanan v. Siby Mathews in the ISRO spy case the court ordered the state government to

  • aPay 50 lacs as compensation to the appellant
  • bThe appellant to file a civil case for compensation
  • cThe erring officials pay their 2 years salary to the appellant
  • dThat departmental enquiry may be instituted, but compensation may set a bad precedent
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

In S. Nambi Narayanan v. Siby Mathews (2018) the Supreme Court directed the State of Kerala to pay Rs. 50 lakh as compensation to the appellant for his wrongful arrest in the ISRO spy case.

101

‘They also serve who stand and wait’. Million’s words were equoted in:

  • aBarendra Kumar Ghosh v. king Emperor
  • bGirija Shankar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
  • cQueen v. Dudley and Stephens
  • dMahboob Shah v. Emperor
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Milton's line 'They also serve who stand and wait' was quoted by Lord Sumner in Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor (AIR 1925 PC 1), the leading case on common intention under s.34 IPC, regarding a person who merely stood guard.

102

General Exception of IPC limit and override offence and penal provisions of the Code and comprises of following sections:

  • a67-102
  • b96-106
  • c82-106
  • d76-106
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Chapter IV (General Exceptions) of the IPC comprises Sections 76 to 106, overriding the penal provisions of the Code.

103

Sudan and grave provocation is a defence for the offence of murder. Please specify the category of the defence.

  • aComplete defence
  • bPartial defence
  • cSentencing defence
  • dGeneral defence
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Grave and sudden provocation (Exception 1 to s.300 IPC) only reduces murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder; it does not exculpate. Hence it is a partial defence.

104

Actus reus is that result of human conduct which the law seeks to prohibit. This definition was given by:

  • aGlanvile Williams
  • bKenny
  • cBlackstone
  • dRussell
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The classic definition that actus reus is 'such result of human conduct as the law seeks to prevent' is given by Kenny in his Outlines of Criminal Law.

105

The Constitution Bench held that a company can be prosecuted for any offence and cannot go scot-free merely on the ground that it technically be punished by way of imprisonment. This running of the Constitution Bench came in the following case:

  • aState of Maharashtra v. Syndicate Transport Company Ltd.
  • bCBI v. Blue Sky Tie Up Pvt. Ltd.
  • cAssistant Commissioner, Assessment II Bangalore v. Messrs Velliappa Textiles Ltd.
  • dStandard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2005) 4 SCC 530, a Constitution Bench, held a company can be prosecuted even for offences carrying mandatory imprisonment and cannot escape merely because it cannot be jailed; it overruled Velliappa Textiles.

106

The ‘contemporary community standard test’ was stressed in the following case dealing with obscenity:

  • aDevidas Ramchandra Tugapukar v. State of Maharashtra
  • bSharat Babu Digumaarti v. Government of NCT Delhi
  • cGita Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh
  • dState of Maharashtra v. Flora Santuno Kutino
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Devidas Ramchandra Tuljapurkar v. State of Maharashtra (2015) 6 SCC 1 applied the 'contemporary community standards test' for obscenity under s.292 IPC (with greater rigour where revered figures like Gandhi are used).

107

Section 416 now states that if a woman sentenced to death is found to be pregnant, the high court shall commute the sentence to imprisonment for life.’ This amendment was done by:

  • aCriminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013
  • bCriminal Law (Amendment) Act 2009
  • cCriminal Law (Amendment) Act 2018
  • dCriminal Law (Amendment) Act 2005
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

The mandatory wording ('High Court shall commute') in s.416 CrPC was effected by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008 (Act 5 of 2009). Options misname it 'Criminal Law Amendment'; the nearest year is 2009. Flagged for imprecise option wording.

108

Section 433 A was introduced by amendment of CrPC in 1978. The constitutionality of this provision was examined by the Supreme Court in:

  • aSunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
  • bShatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India
  • cAshok Kumar @ Golu v. Union of India
  • dCharles Sobhraj v. Superintendent, Central Jail
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 433-A CrPC's validity was upheld in Maru Ram (1981); among the given options only Ashok Kumar @ Golu v. Union of India (1991) examined and reaffirmed the applicability/constitutionality of s.433-A. Other options (Sunil Batra, Shatrughan Chauhan, Charles Sobhraj) do not deal with s.433-A.

109

Doctrine of Locus Poenitentiae is a doctrine invoked in cases of:

  • aObscenity
  • bRape leading to offer of marriage
  • cAttempt
  • dExpiation theory of punishment
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Locus poenitentiae (opportunity to repent/withdraw) is invoked to distinguish mere preparation from attempt — it is the stage where the accused may still draw back before completing the crime.

110

Choose the wrong proposition:

  • aRight of private defence of the body extends to causing death in case of an assault with an intention of committing rape.
  • bRight of private defence of the body extends to causing death of an act of throwing acid which may reasonably use the apprehension that grievous hurt will otherwise be the consequences of such act.
  • cRight of private defence of the body extends to causing death is available to the husband against adultery of his wife
  • dRight of private defence of the body extends to causing death is available in an assault with the intention of gratifying unnatural lust.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 100 IPC lists when the right of private defence of body extends to causing death (assault with intent to rape, acid throwing, gratifying unnatural lust, etc.). It does NOT cover causing death over a wife's adultery, so (c) is the wrong proposition.

111

The principle of law-de-minimis non curat lex is embodied in the following section of the Indian Penal Code.

  • aSection 92
  • bSection 85
  • cSection 95
  • dSection 76
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

The maxim de minimis non curat lex (law takes no notice of trifles) is embodied in Section 95 IPC — acts causing slight harm are not offences.

112

Joseph Shine v. Union of India dealt with the offence of:

  • aBigamy
  • bAdultery
  • cHomosexuality
  • dTriple Talaq
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) struck down Section 497 IPC, decriminalising adultery.

113

For offence of conspiracy the following is not true:

  • aMinimum two persons required
  • bOffence is heavily mental in its composition
  • cConspiracy is a rule of evidence
  • dMere agreement to do anything contrary to law is punishable
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under s.120A IPC an agreement to do a legal act by illegal means, or an illegal act, is conspiracy, but where the object is not an offence an overt act is required; thus a bare agreement to do 'anything contrary to law' is not by itself always punishable, making (d) the untrue statement.

114

The following principle is least relevant for criminal liability:

  • aCausation
  • bContemporaneity
  • cNovus actus interventions
  • dMotive
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Causation, contemporaneity, and novus actus interveniens are core to establishing the actus reus/liability link; motive is legally least relevant to criminal liability (it goes to proof, not to the offence itself).

115

Union of India v. Sriharan upheld the life imprisonment without remission which was first awarded in the case of:

  • aJagmohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh .
  • bMacchi Singh v. State of Punjab
  • cSwamy Shraddananda v. State of Karnataka
  • dNalini v. State of Tamil Nadu
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Union of India v. V. Sriharan (Murugan) (2016) 7 SCC 1 upheld the special category of life imprisonment beyond remission first evolved in Swamy Shraddananda (2) v. State of Karnataka (2008) 13 SCC 767.

116

Review petition in death penalty cases should be heard by:

  • aBench of three judges
  • bConstitution Bench
  • cSame bench
  • dBench of five judges
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India, (2014) 9 SCC 737 held that review petitions in death-penalty cases must be heard in open court by a bench of at least three judges.

117

Section 354(3) of CrPC provides:

  • aPre sentence hearing
  • bReason for imposing death sentence
  • cReason for not impsign a death sentence
  • dConfirmation of death sentence by High Court
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 354(3) CrPC requires the court, when the sentence is death, to record 'special reasons' for imposing the death sentence.

118

Which of the following is incorrect:

  • aPardoning power conferred on the President and the State Government is absolute
  • bPardoning power to be exercised as per the advice of the Council of Ministers
  • cPardoning power can be curtailed by the Supreme Court
  • dThe ‘appropriate government’ without consent of the offender can commute sentence of death
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

The pardoning power under Arts. 72/161 is subject to judicial review (Maru Ram, Epuru Sudhakar) and is exercised on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers; it is therefore not 'absolute'. Statement (a) is incorrect.

119

Ignorance of law is not a defence. However contemporary scholars are less sanguine about this rule. A scholar that when a accused who had taken reasonable measures to comply with the law and was nevertheless ignorant or mistaken should be allowed a defence. The criminal law scholar is:

  • aAndrew Ashworth
  • bBarbara Wooton
  • cGeorge Fletcher
  • dAllan Norrie
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Andrew Ashworth argues that an accused who took reasonable measures to comply with the law yet remained ignorant or mistaken should be allowed a defence (Ashworth, 'Ignorance of the Criminal Law, and Duties to Avoid it').

120

Priya Patel v. State of Maharashtra held that a woman:

  • aCan be held guilty of a gang rape
  • bCan have an intention to commit rape
  • cCannot be held guilty of a gand rape
  • dCan be held guilty of rape if in “furtherance of their common intention” is proved
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Priya Patel v. State of M.P., (2006) 6 SCC 263 held that since a woman cannot commit rape, she cannot be held guilty of gang rape (common intention to rape cannot be ascribed to her).

121

Exception 2 to Section 375 state that non consensual sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife does not amount to rape. Presently the age circumscribed for this exception is:

  • a12 years
  • b18 years
  • c21 years
  • d15 years
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

After Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 800 read down Exception 2 to s.375, sexual intercourse by a man with his wife is not rape only if she is not under 18 years; the circumscribed age is now 18.

122

The law prohibits the disclosure of identity of rape victims under the following provision:

  • aSection 376 D
  • bSection 228 A
  • cExplanation 1 to Section 375
  • dSection 375
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Section 228A IPC prohibits disclosure of the identity of victims of certain sexual offences (including rape under s.376).

123

Two finger test was questioned in a case and was held to be violative of right to privacy, physical and mental integrity and dignity of the prosecutor. This case was:

  • aLilly v. State of Haryana
  • bNaz Foundation v. Union of India
  • cTukaram v. State of Maharashtra
  • dSakshi v. Union of India
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Lillu @ Rajesh v. State of Haryana, (2013) 14 SCC 643 held the two-finger test violates the rape survivor's right to privacy, physical and mental integrity and dignity. (Option 'Lilly' corresponds to Lillu.)

124

When a criminal case is transferred from one state to other, the appropriate mechanism is:

  • aThat the transferor state appoints Public Prosecutor
  • bThat the transferee state appoints Public Prosecutor
  • cThat the complaint state appoints Public Prosecutor
  • dEither of the two-the transferor or transferee state appoints Public Prosecutor
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

When a criminal case is transferred from one State to another for trial (e.g., Best Bakery, Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat), the transferee State where the trial proceeds appoints the Public Prosecutor.

125

D.K. Basu guidelines deal with:

  • aRight of an arrested person to free legal aid
  • bRight to bail
  • cRight of person who is seriously ill while being arrested
  • dStandard operating procedure for arrest
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, (1997) 1 SCC 416 laid down binding guidelines/requirements to be followed during arrest and detention — effectively a standard operating procedure for arrest.

126

Registration of an FIR is mandatory in a case of cognizable offence. This was held by a Constitution Bench in:

  • aUnion of India v. Murugan
  • bK.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
  • cLalita Kumari v. State of Uttar Pradesh
  • dNavtej Johar v. Union of India
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P., (2014) 2 SCC 1, a Constitution Bench, held that registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC when information discloses a cognizable offence.

127

Default bail is given in case of:

  • aWhere the investigation is not completed within the time prescribed
  • bWhere the offence is a bailable offence
  • cWhere the person applies for anticipatory bail
  • dWhere no reasonable grounds exist for believing the accused guilty after conclusion of trial but before judgement.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Default/statutory bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues when investigation is not completed within the prescribed period (60/90 days), entitling the accused to be released on bail.

128

As per this section of CrPC the court of its own can examine any person as a court witness:

  • aSection 235
  • bSection 438
  • cSection 307
  • dSection 311
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Section 311 CrPC empowers the court, of its own motion, to summon and examine any person as a court witness if their evidence is essential to a just decision of the case.

129

Which of the following statement is correct:

  • aOffences under the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 cannot be compounded
  • bNon Compoundable offences can be compounded with the permission of the court
  • cSome offences are recognised compoundable offences and others may be compoundable only with the consent of the victim.
  • dOffences can be compoundable, but it does not amount to acquittal
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 320 CrPC, certain offences are compoundable without leave of court and others are compoundable only with the permission/consent of the aggrieved party (victim); offences not listed cannot be compounded.

130

Maintenance under Section 125……..(choose the correct statement):

  • aIs limited to Rs. 500 per month
  • bIs to be disposed of within reasonable time, however no time frame is given
  • cCan be denied to a wife living in adultery
  • dIs only for the wife
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Under Section 125(4) CrPC, a wife living in adultery, refusing without sufficient reason to live with her husband, or living separately by mutual consent, is not entitled to maintenance.

131

Admbahi Sulemanbhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujarat is a classic case of:

  • aFast track investigation
  • bWrongful prosecution
  • c‘Rarest of rare’ case
  • dWaging war against government of India
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujarat (2014) (Akshardham temple attack) saw the Supreme Court acquit all the accused, making it a classic case of wrongful prosecution.

132

Which of the following is incorrect:

  • aSection 300 embodies the principle of autrefois convict and autrefois acquit
  • bArticle 20(2) of the Constitution guards against double jeopardy
  • cVictim impact statement is taken before pronouncing sentence
  • dJudgement of the court is written in the language of the court and the language is determined by the state government
Answer & solution

Correct answer: D

Under Section 272 CrPC, the language of the court is determined by the State Government, not as stated; the statement is incorrect because it ties the language determination wrongly. Options (a) S.300, (b) Art. 20(2), and (c) victim impact statement are all correct, so (d) is the incorrect proposition to be chosen.

133

Plea bargaining in India is:

  • aSentence bargaining
  • bCharge bargaining
  • cFact bargaining
  • dCharge and sentence bargaining
Answer & solution

Correct answer: A

Plea bargaining under Chapter XXIA CrPC (Ss. 265A-265L) in India is essentially sentence bargaining, focused on reducing the quantum of punishment, not on the charge or facts.

134

Every investigation is required to be completed without unnecessary delay Section 173. Choose the most appropriate statement:

  • aThe police files a report known as challan after framing charges
  • bThe police forms an opinion and the magistrate is bound by the opinion of the investigation officer
  • cThe magistrate frames charges after filing of police report
  • dThe police and magistrate in consultation frame charges after completion of investigation.
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

After the police file the final report (challan) under Section 173 CrPC, it is the Magistrate who takes cognizance and frames charges; the police only opine and the Magistrate is not bound by that opinion.

135

The liability inquiry under thirdly of Section 300 IPC is:

  • aSubjective and objective liability
  • bObjective liability
  • cSubjective liability
  • dStrict liability
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Clause 'Thirdly' of Section 300 IPC requires intention to cause a bodily injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death; this inquiry into the offender's intention is subjective in nature (per Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab).

136

In scrutiny of a complaint the magistrate does the following. (choose the correct course available):

  • aIf the magistrate is not competent to take cognisance of the offence mentioned he still may take cognisance if it is a complaint case
  • bThe magistrate takes cognisance of the case but cannot examine the complaint on oath
  • cThe magistrate may look into the complaint and send it to the police for investigation
  • dDirect an investigation even if the offence is triable exclusively by the Sessions Court
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

On a complaint, the Magistrate may, before taking cognizance, order an investigation by the police under Section 156(3) CrPC; the other options misstate the law (a Magistrate cannot direct S.156(3) investigation in cases exclusively triable by Sessions in the post-cognizance stage).

137

Which of the following statement is incorrect:

  • aConfession or a statement can be recorded only by a metropolitan magistrate or a judicial magistrate
  • bConfession or a statement can be recorded by a police officer on whom power of a magistrate has been conferred under any law
  • cConfession or a statement can be recorded in the course of an investigation
  • dConfession or a statement can be recorded only when it is being voluntarily
Answer & solution

Correct answer: B

Under Section 164 CrPC, a confession or statement can be recorded only by a Metropolitan or Judicial Magistrate; it cannot be recorded by a police officer even one on whom magisterial powers are conferred (the section expressly excludes such police officers), making this statement incorrect.

138

Under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 the court may order the drawer of the cheque to pay interim compensation to the complainant which:

  • aShall not exceed fifty percent of the amount of cheque
  • bShall not exceed ten percent of the amount of cheque
  • cShall not exceed twenty percent of the amount of cheque
  • dShall be nominal as per the wisdom of the trier of facts
Answer & solution

Correct answer: C

Section 143A(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that interim compensation shall not exceed twenty per cent of the amount of the cheque.

Practise Himachal Pradesh Judiciary the smart way.

Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Himachal Pradesh Judiciary preparation guide.

Open exam guide
Law Mock is an independent preparation resource and is not affiliated with any High Court, Public Service Commission, or government body. All exam information is sourced from official notifications and is updated periodically.