Jharkhand Judiciary — Prelims 2015
Which of the underlined parts of the given sentence contains an error ? "One of my sister / lives / near the India Gate / in New Delhi"
- aOne of my sister
- blives
- cnear the India Gate
- din New Delhi
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'One of my' takes a plural noun, so it should be 'One of my sisters'. The error is in part (a).
Fill in the blank with a suitable form of the verb in the following: My friend has been living in Mumbai since 2014.
- ais
- bhas been
- cis being
- dwas being
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Since 2014' with a continuing action requires the present perfect continuous, so 'has been (living)' is correct.
Fill in the blank with an appropriate preposition. They belong to the same party, but I don't agree with everything.
- ain
- bat
- con
- dwith
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The idiom is 'agree with' (a person/everything they say); thus 'I don't agree with everything.'
The word 'Millenium' refers to a period of
- aone hundred years
- bone million years
- cone thousand years
- dten thousand years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A millennium is a period of one thousand years (Latin mille = thousand, annus = year).
Fill in the blank with the suitable choice. Delhi is better than Shimla in May.
- ahot
- bhotter
- cmore hot
- dmore hotter
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Comparison of two places with 'than' requires the comparative form 'hotter'.
Which of the following is similar in meaning of “that which cannot be read” ?
- aIllegitimate
- bIllegal
- cIllegible
- dIllogical
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
'Illegible' means that which cannot be read or deciphered.
Select the appropriate choice to fill in the blank in the sentence. Tigers are ferocious.
- aA
- bThe
- cAn
- dNo article is required.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A plural noun used in a general sense ('Tigers are ferocious') takes no article.
Identify the type of sentence given below: Can you lend me your pen, please ?
- aDeclarative
- bOperative
- cImperative
- dInterrogative
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A sentence asking a question ('Can you lend me your pen, please?') is interrogative.
An ophthalmologist treats the disorders of
- askin
- bheart
- ceye
- dbrain
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
An ophthalmologist is a medical doctor specialising in disorders of the eye.
The word “terrestrial” means connected with
- awater
- bland
- cspace
- dair
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Terrestrial' (Latin terra = earth/land) means connected with land/the earth.
Who appoints the Judges of High Courts ofIndia ?
- aPrime Minister
- bChiefJustice ofIndia
- cPresident ofIndia
- dLaw Minister ofIndia
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Article 217 of the Constitution, Judges of High Courts are appointed by the President of India.
The year of Quit India Movement is
- a1930
- b1940
- c1942
- d1947
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The Quit India Movement was launched by Gandhi/Congress in 1942.
Deficiency of which of the following Vitamins cause ‘Night-blindness’ ?
- aVitamin B
- bVitamin A
- cVitamin C
- dVitamin D
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Deficiency of Vitamin A causes night-blindness (nyctalopia).
One of the following gases is the cause of ‘Greenhouse effect’ (warming of the earth surface)
- aNitrogen oxide
- bNitrous oxide
- cCarbon dioxide
- dCarbon monoxide
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Carbon dioxide is the principal greenhouse gas responsible for warming of the earth's surface.
The UNO was formed on
- a24th October, 1945
- b23ri October, 1945
- c24th October, 1944
- d22nd October, 1944
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The UN was formally established on 24 October 1945, when the Charter came into force.
The American Journal ‘Time’ has chosen one of the following as ‘the person of the year 2015’ :
- aAngela Markel
- bBarack Obama
- cNarendra Modi
- dMargaret Thatcher
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Time magazine named German Chancellor Angela Merkel ('Markel' is a misspelling) as Person of the Year 2015.
Amaravati is being made the new capital of which of the following states ?
- aGoa
- bAndhra Pradesh
- cMizoram
- dChhattisgarh
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Amaravati was developed as the new capital of Andhra Pradesh after bifurcation.
Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai has been sworn in as the first woman judge of High Court of which of the following states ?
- aSikkim
- bKerala
- cTamil Nadu
- dDelhi
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai was sworn in as the first woman judge of the Sikkim High Court.
Who of the following is the writer of the book: ‘Wings of Fire’ ?
- aSarojini Naidu
- bA.P.J. Abdul Kalam
- cJagannath Pillai
- dAmrita Pritam
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Wings of Fire' is the autobiography of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam (with Arun Tiwari).
Cristiano Ronaldo has recently been voted as a number one footballer. He hails from which of the following countries ?
- aPortugal
- bArgentina
- cBrazil
- dGermany
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Cristiano Ronaldo hails from Portugal.
A Magistrate has the power to direct the police to investigate into an offence in CrPC under
- aSection 156 (3) Cr.PC
- bSection 156 (2) Cr.PC
- cSection 156 (1) Cr.PC
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 156(3) CrPC empowers a Magistrate competent under s.190 to order police investigation into a cognizable offence.
Under the scheme of Criminal Procedure Code non-cognizable offences are
- aPrivate wrongs
- bPublic wrongs
- cBoth public and private wrongs
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Non-cognizable offences (relatively minor, requiring complaint/warrant) are regarded as private wrongs under the scheme of the CrPC.
Under Section 159 of Cr PC, the Magistrate has the power to
- aDepute any Magistrate subordinate to him to hold a preliminary inquiry
- bDirect-investigation by the police
- cEither (A) or (B)
- dOnly (B) and not (A)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 159 CrPC empowers the Magistrate, on receiving a police report under s.157, to depute a subordinate Magistrate to hold a preliminary inquiry, or to inquire himself.
Under Section 167 of Cr. PC the nature of custody can be altered from judicial custody to police custody and vice- versa, this alteration can be done
- aDuring the period of first seven days
- bDuring the period of first fifteen days
- cDuring the period of first fourteen days
- dDuring the period of first ten days
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 167 CrPC, custody can be altered between police and judicial custody only during the first fifteen days of remand.
Cognizance of offence of defamation under Chapter XXI ofIPC can be taken
- aOn a complaint made by an aggrieved person
- bOn a police report
- cSuo mow
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 199 CrPC, no court takes cognizance of defamation (Ch. XXI IPC) except on a complaint by the person aggrieved.
Joint trial of several persons is permissible
- aUnder Section 219 ofCr.PC
- bUnder Section 221 ofCr PC
- cUnder Section 222 ofCr.PC
- dUnder Section 223 ofCr.PC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 223 CrPC, 1973 enumerates the categories of persons who may be charged and tried jointly (joint trial of several persons). Sections 219-222 deal with joining of charges against the same person.
Rule antre for’s acquit or antre for’s commit is contained in
- aUnder Section 298 ofCr PC
- bUnder Section 300 ofCr PC
- cUnder Section 320 OfCr.PC
- dUnder Section 321 ofCr PC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The rule against double jeopardy, autrefois acquit and autrefois convict, is contained in Section 300 CrPC, 1973 (person once convicted or acquitted not to be tried for the same offence).
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot directly entertain bail application of POTA accused without its refusal by special court ?
- aState ofGujarat v, Santosh Kumar
- bState of Gujarat v. Salimbhai Abdul Gaffar Shaikh
- cState of Uttar Pradesh v. S.N. Srivastava
- dState of Maharashtra v. S.K. Dhinde
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In State of Gujarat v. Salimbhai Abdulgaffar Shaikh (2003) 8 SCC 50, the Supreme Court held that under the POTA scheme, an accused must first move the Special Court for bail and can approach the High Court only by way of appeal under Section 34(4) POTA after refusal; the High Court cannot directly entertain a bail application under Section 439 CrPC.
‘A Legal Remembrances cannot be made ex-officio public prosecutor.’ This was held in
- aState of Kerala v. K Veettil Krishnan
- bV. Ramchandra v. M.C. Jagadodharana
- cVijay v. State ofMaharashtra
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The printed option 'V. Ramchandra v. M.C. Jagadodharana' is the conventionally keyed authority for the proposition that a Legal Remembrancer cannot be made ex-officio Public Prosecutor; case name is OCR-garbled and could not be independently confirmed against the exact citation, so flagged. Best guess (b).
Urgent cases of Nuisance or apprehended danger falls under
- aSection 146 ofCr.PC
- bSection 144 ofCr.PC
- cSection 142 ofCr.PC
- dSection 140 ofCr.PC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 144 CrPC, 1973 empowers a Magistrate to issue orders in urgent cases of nuisance or apprehended danger. Section 146 deals with attachment of disputed property.
When Warrant also cannot be executed the court may proceed under
- aSection 83 and 84 ofCr.PC
- bSection 82 and 83 ofCi.PC
- cSection 81 and 82 of Cr.PC
- dSection 80 and 81 ofCr.PC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
When a warrant cannot be executed, the court may issue a proclamation under Section 82 and order attachment of the absconder's property under Section 83 CrPC, 1973.
“Plea Bargaining” a new chapter was added in Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 by the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2005 (2 of 2006) is contained in
- aSection 265 A to 265 N
- bSection 265 A to 265 M
- cSection 265 A to 265 L
- dSection 265 A to 265 E
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Chapter XXIA on Plea Bargaining, inserted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 (effective 2006), comprises Sections 265A to 265L of CrPC, 1973.
A Magistrate may under Section 252 or Section 255 of Crpc convict the accused of any offence triable under
- aChapter XIX ofCr.PC
- bChapter XX of Cr.PC
- cChapter XXI ofCr.PC
- dChapter XV ofCr.PC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Sections 252 and 255 fall in the trial of summons-cases; under them a Magistrate may convict the accused of any offence triable under Chapter XX (Trial of Summons-Cases by Magistrates) of CrPC, 1973.
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that FIR was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker ?
- aAnil Kumar v. 8.8. Neelakanta, AIR 2010 SC 2715
- bViveta Gazra v. State, AIR 2010 SC 2712
- cUnion of India v. A. Kumar, AIR 2010 SC 2735
- dC. Magesh v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 2768
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In C. Magesh v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 2768 / (2010) 5 SCC 645, the Supreme Court reiterated that the FIR is not substantive evidence and can only be used to corroborate (or contradict) its maker under Sections 157/145 of the Evidence Act.
In summons-cases and inquiries, memorandum is the only
- aRecord of witness
- bRecord of accused statement
- cRecord of evidence
- dRecord of all statements
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In summons-cases and inquiries the Magistrate records a memorandum of the substance of the evidence (Section 274 CrPC); this memorandum is the only record of evidence in such proceedings.
If the accused is not acquitted under Section 232 of Cr. PC then the court calls upon him to enter on
- aHis defence
- bHis counsel
- cHis version
- dHis statement
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In a sessions trial, if the accused is not acquitted under Section 232 CrPC, the court calls upon him to enter on his defence under Section 233 CrPC, 1973.
In case of anticipatory breach of contract, an aggrieved party
- aHas the right to claim performance at any time
- bCannot claim any remedy as performance is still executory
- cMay wait till the date of performance
- dDoes not have the right to terminate the contract
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
On anticipatory breach (Section 39, Indian Contract Act), the aggrieved party may either rescind immediately and sue, or keep the contract alive and wait till the date of performance. Hence he 'may wait till the date of performance'.
Which of the following statements is not correct ?
- aAcceptance must be communicated.
- bAcceptance must be in writing.
- cOral acceptance is a valid acceptance.
- dAcceptance must be in the prescribed manner.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Acceptance need not be in writing; oral acceptance is valid. The statement 'Acceptance must be in writing' is not correct.
The principle “Restitution stops where repayment begins’ can be applied against
- aAn alien enemy only
- bAny incapable person
- cLunatics and idiots only
- dMinors only
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The doctrine of restitution against a person who has obtained benefit under a void agreement does not lie against a minor; 'restitution stops where repayment begins' (Leslie v. Sheill). It applies against minors only in the limited sense and the maxim restrains restitution from amounting to enforcement of a void contract.
Promissory estoppels is sometimes spoken of as a substitute for
- aQuasi contract
- bConsideration
- cCoercion
- dNovation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Promissory estoppel is often described as a substitute for consideration, allowing enforcement of a promise that would otherwise lack consideration.
A change of nature of obligation of a contract known as
- aAlteration
- bRepudiation
- cRescission
- dNovation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A change in the nature of the obligation by substituting a new contract for the old is novation under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
A notice in die newspapers inviting tenders is
- aAn invitation for negotiation
- bA promise
- cAn invitation to proposal
- dA proposal
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A newspaper notice inviting tenders is not an offer but an invitation to offer (invitation to proposal); tenders submitted in response are the offers.
Examine the following statements : 1. Every contract is an agreement. 2. Every agreement is a contract. 3. Every lawful civil obligation is a contract. 4. Every contract has a legally enforceable civil obligation. Which of these statements are correct ?
- a1 and 4
- bland 2
- c2 and 3
- d3 and 4
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Every contract is an agreement (1, true) and every contract has a legally enforceable obligation (4, true). Not every agreement is a contract (2 false) and not every lawful civil obligation is a contract (3 false). Hence 1 and 4.
Union of India v. Maddala Thathiah is an illustration, where the tender was in the form of
- aPublic offer
- bStanding offer
- cSpecific offer
- dGeneral offer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In Union of India v. Maddala Thathiah, AIR 1966 SC 1724, the tender to supply jaggery as and when required was held to be a standing offer, acceptance of which occurred each time a definite order (requisition) was placed.
The rule laid down in Adam v. Lindsell was approved by the House ofLords in
- aDunlop v. Higgins
- bEliason v. Henshaw
- cPowell v. Lee
- dHyde v. Wrench
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The postal rule of Adams v. Lindsell (1818) was approved by the House of Lords in Dunlop v. Higgins (1848) 1 HL Cas 381, affirming that acceptance is complete on posting.
Which one of the following agreements is held to be opposed to public policy ?
- aThe arbitration clause for the application of foreign law
- bPayment in foreign currency
- cAgreement of payment of lea salary
- dArbitrators residing in the foreign country
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Per the contract-textbook MCQ key, an arbitration clause for application of foreign law is treated as opposed to public policy; however modern Indian authority (party autonomy) increasingly upholds such clauses, so the answer is contested. Best guess (a).
The facts of Griffith v. Brymer would attract Section 20 and facts of Kreil v. Henry attract
- aSection 20 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- bSection 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- cSection 12 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- dSection 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Krell v. Henry (1903) is the coronation frustration case; its facts attract Section 56 (frustration/impossibility of performance) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, whereas Griffith v. Brymer (common mistake) attracts Section 20.
The obligation to restore advantage in a void agreement is provided by
- aSection 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- bSection 60 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- cSection 63 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
- dSection 68 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 obliges a person who received any advantage under an agreement later discovered to be void (or a contract that becomes void) to restore it or compensate the person from whom he received it.
A continuing guarantee under Section 130 is
- aIrrevocable absolutely
- bRevocable as regards future transaction
- cRevocable absolutely
- dEither (A) or (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a continuing guarantee may at any time be revoked by the surety as to future transactions, by notice to the creditor.
For the purpose of pledge, delivery of possession of goods
- aMay be symbolic
- bEither actual or constructive
- cMay be constructive
- dHas to be actual
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
For a valid pledge (Section 172 ICA) delivery of possession of goods may be either actual or constructive (e.g., symbolic delivery of documents of title), not necessarily physical/actual delivery.
A valid lease can be determined by
- aForce majeure
- bFrustration
- cEfflux of time
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a lease of immovable property determines, inter alia, by efflux of the time limited thereby. Force majeure/frustration are not statutory modes of determining a lease.
There can also be estoppels.
- aSale
- bOwnership
- cFraud
- dPossession
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Stem is OCR-truncated; it refers to estoppel of ownership (estoppel by title). Under estoppel a person may be precluded from denying ownership/title, so the closest fit is ownership.
Causing of the death of child in the mother’s womb is not homicide as provided under
- aexplanation V to Section 300
- bexplanation I to Section 299
- cexplanation H to Section 299
- dexplanation III to Section 299
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Explanation 3 to Section 299 IPC states that causing the death of a child in the mother's womb is not homicide, but it may amount to culpable homicide if any part of the child has been brought forth.
Section 511 does not apply in case of
- aattempt of riot
- battempt of theft
- cattempt of affray
- dattempt of murder
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 511 IPC (attempt to commit offences punishable with imprisonment) does not apply to attempt to murder, which is specifically and separately punishable under Section 307 IPC.
Assault cannot be caused by
- amere gestures
- bmere words
- cmere preparation
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 351 IPC, assault is made by gesture or preparation; mere words do not amount to assault (though words may give a gesture/preparation the meaning of an assault). Hence assault cannot be caused by mere words alone.
Personating a public servant is an offence
- aUnder Section 186 ofIPC
- bUnder Section 171 ofIPC
- cUnder Section 170 ofIPC
- dUnder Section 169 ofIPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 170 IPC penalises personating a public servant. (Section 171 punishes wearing garb or carrying token used by a public servant with fraudulent intent.)
The Supreme Court of India has observed a clear distinction between dishonestly and fraudulently in the case of
- aNathu Lal v. State ofM. P.
- bCentral Bank ofIndia v. Narain
- cMubarik Ali v. State ofBombay
- dVinalaDevi v. Delhi Administration
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration (AIR 1963 SC 1572), the Supreme Court drew a clear distinction between 'dishonestly' (s.24) and 'fraudulently' (s.25) IPC, holding fraudulently requires deceit plus advantage/injury. Option (d) 'Vimla Devi v. Delhi Administration' refers to this case.
The minimum duration of imprisonment provided for an offence under the Indian Penal Code is imprisonment for
- aTwenty four hours under Section 511
- bTwenty four hours under Section 510
- cSentence of 20 hours under Section 510
- dSentence of imprisonment till rising of the court under Section 511
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The shortest term of imprisonment under the IPC is imprisonment till the rising of the court, prescribed as a punishment under Section 510 IPC (misconduct in public by a drunken person). The minimum imprisonment is thus 'till rising of the court'.
The principle underlying in Section 95 of IPC is
- ade minimis non curat lex
- bVolenti non fit injuria
- cNon compos mentis
- dActus me invito factus non est mens actus
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 95 IPC (act causing slight harm) embodies the maxim 'de minimis non curat lex' — the law does not take account of trifles.
Section 97 of IPC expressly states that the right of private defence is subject to the restrictions contained in
- aSection 99 ofIPC
- bSection 100 ofIPC
- cSection 98 ofIPC
- dSection 102 ofIPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 97 IPC expressly makes the right of private defence subject to the restrictions contained in Section 99 IPC.
The language of Part third of Section 105 is similar to that of
- aSection 39 ofIPC
- bSection 37 ofIPC
- cSection 38 of IPC
- dSection 40 ofIPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The third part of Section 105 of the Evidence Act (presumption of absence of circumstances bringing the case within a General Exception) is similar in language to Section 38 IPC. (Note: stem references 'Section 105'; the answer pairing in the key is Section 38 IPC.)
Which of the following Sections of IPC has incorporated the English law known as principal in the Second degree ?
- aSection 114
- bSection 112
- cSection 110
- dSection 109
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 114 IPC (abettor present when offence is committed) incorporates the English law concept of a 'principal in the second degree'.
The definition of criminal conspiracy in Section 120-A, IPC has been taken from that given in
- aMulchay v. Queen
- bQuinn v. Leatham
- cAbdul Rehman v. Emperor
- dR v. Vincent
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The definition of criminal conspiracy in Section 120-A IPC is taken from Lord Brampton's (Hawkins, J.) dicta in Mulcahy v. Queen (1868) LR 3 HL 306 — an agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act or a lawful act by unlawful means.
Homicide cannot be defined as killing of a person by a person in view of the nature of the definition of the word ‘person’ in
- aSection 13 of the Indian Penal Code
- bSection 11 of the Indian Penal Code
- cSection 9 of the Indian Penal Code
- dSection 7 of the Indian Penal Code
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 11 IPC defines 'person' to include any company, association or body of persons, so 'person' is not confined to a human being; hence homicide cannot be defined simply as killing of a person by a person.
The requirement of possession has been highlighted by illustrations
- a(a), (b), (c) and (d) in Section 373 ofIPC
- b(b), (c), (d) and (e) in Section 378 ofIPC
- c(c), (d), (e) and (f) in Section 378 ofIPC
- d(d), (e), (f) and (g) in Section 378 ofIPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Theft is defined in Section 378 IPC. The illustrations highlighting the requirement of possession are illustrations (d), (e), (f) and (g) to Section 378 IPC.
Theft under Indian Penal Code differ from larceny in English Law whack contemplated
- aPermanent gain and loss
- bLoss of property
- cMoving of property
- dDenying the owner of his property
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Larceny in English law required an intention to cause permanent gain/loss (lucri causa), whereas theft under Section 378 IPC requires only dishonest intention with moving of property; the distinction lies in 'permanent gain and loss' being contemplated by larceny.
‘A’ instigates ‘B’ to murder ‘C’ who refuses to do so. ‘A’ is guilty of
- aAbetment to commit murder
- bNo offence
- cCriminal conspiracy
- dCriminal instigation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Instigating another to commit an offence is abetment by instigation under Section 107 IPC, punishable even if the act abetted is not committed (Section 115/116). A who instigates B to murder C is guilty of abetment to commit murder.
Which one of the following brings out the distinction between Section 34 and 149 of the IPC ?
- aSection 149 creates a specific offence whereas Section 34 does not
- bSection 34 creates a specific offence whereas Section 149 does not
- cSection 34 as well as Section 149 create specific offences
- dSection 34 as well as Section 149 do not create specific offences
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 149 IPC (unlawful assembly/common object) creates a specific substantive offence, whereas Section 34 IPC (common intention) is only a rule of evidence/constructive liability and does not by itself create a distinct offence.
The Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 permits evidence in the form of
- aPetition
- bAffidavits
- cStatements
- dDocuments
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The CPC (Amendment) Act, 2002 amended Order XVIII Rule 4 to permit examination-in-chief of a witness to be given on affidavit. Hence evidence in the form of affidavits.
It has been held by the Supreme Court in R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra that a contemporaneous tape-record of a relevant conversation is a relevant fact. It is
- arelevant
- bres gestae
- cadmissible
- ddocuments
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra (1973) the Supreme Court held a contemporaneous tape-recording of a relevant conversation is a relevant fact and is admissible in evidence.
Section 11 of the Indian Evidence Art enables a person charged with a crime to take what is commonly called the plea of
- ares gestae
- blis pendens
- calibi
- dres-judicata
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 11 of the Indian Evidence Act (facts not otherwise relevant become relevant if inconsistent with a fact in issue) enables an accused to set up the plea of alibi.
A judicial admission operates as
- aan admission
- ba confession
- ca plea of ignorance
- da waiver of proof
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A judicial admission (Section 58 Evidence Act) dispenses with the need for proof of the admitted fact; it operates as a waiver of proof.
The burden of proof means the obligation to prove a fact. This is defined under
- aSection 201 of the Indian Evidence Act
- bSection 101 of the Indian Evidence Act
- cSection 200 of the Indian Evidence Act
- dSection 100 of the Indian Evidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act defines burden of proof — whoever desires a court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on facts which he asserts must prove those facts.
The principle stated in Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act is an application of the principle of
- ares gestae
- bres ipsa loquitur
- cres-judicata
- dres sic stantibus
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 106 of the Evidence Act (burden of proving fact especially within knowledge) is an application of the principle res ipsa loquitur — the matter speaks for itself / facts within the special knowledge of a party.
Leading questions can always be asked
- ain second examination
- bin re-examination
- cin cross-examination
- din first examination
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 143 of the Indian Evidence Act, leading questions may always be asked in cross-examination.
Alibi is governed by
- aSection 8 ofEvidence Act
- bSection 6 ofEvidence Act
- cSection 11 ofEvidence Act
- dSection 12 of Evidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The plea of alibi is governed by Section 11 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (facts inconsistent with relevant facts / making existence of a fact highly improbable).
Admissions made by a party are evidence against
- aPrivies in estate
- bPrivies in law
- cPrivies in blood
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Sections 18-20 of the Evidence Act, admissions by a party are evidence against him and against persons claiming under him, i.e. privies in estate, in blood, and in law.
Communication made without prejudice’ are protected
- aUnder Section 21 of Evidence Act
- bUnder Section 24 ofEvidence Act
- cUnder Section 23 ofEvidence Act
- dUnder Section 22 ofEvidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Communications made 'without prejudice' (in settlement negotiations) are protected and inadmissible in civil cases under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
‘Necessity rule* as to the admissibility of evidence is contained in
- aSection 61 ofEvidence Act
- bSection 60 ofEvidence Act
- cSection 32 ofEvidence Act
- dSection 31 ofEvidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 32 of the Evidence Act is the 'necessity rule' - statements of persons who are dead or cannot be found etc. are admissible out of necessity as an exception to the rule against hearsay.
The res inter alia acta is receivable
- aUnder Section 48 ofEvidence Act
- bUnder Section 47 of Evidence Act
- cUnder Section 46 ofEvidence Act
- dUnder Section 45 ofEvidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The doctrine of res inter alios acta (similar facts / opinion as to relationship) relating to general reputation is received under Section 46 of the Evidence Act (facts bearing upon opinions of experts/relevant facts).
Section 92 ofEvidence Act applies to
- aBilateral documents
- bUnilateral documents
- cBoth (A) and (B)
- dEither (A) or (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 92 of the Evidence Act, which excludes oral evidence to contradict the terms of a written document, applies only to bilateral documents (contracts, grants, dispositions of property).
Estoppel
- aNeed not be specifically pleaded
- bShould be specifically pleaded
- cMay be specifically pleaded or may not be specifically pleaded
- dBoth (B)&(C) are correct
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Estoppel is a rule of evidence that must be specifically pleaded; it cannot be raised unless taken as a plea in the pleadings.
Zahira Sheikh was prime witness in
- aBest Bakery retrial case (2006)
- bBest Bakery case (2004)
- cSukh Ram disproportionate assets case (2005)
- dGujjar Killings case (2003)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Zahira Sheikh was the prime witness in the Best Bakery case (Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat); the original trial culminated in 2004 acquittals, after which the Supreme Court ordered retrial.
The presumption under Section 41 of Evidence Act is a
- aPresumption of fact
- bRebuttable presumption of law
- cPresumption of fact & law
- dRebuttable presumption of law
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 41 (final judgments in probate, matrimonial, admiralty, insolvency jurisdiction being judgments in rem) raises a rebuttable presumption of law as to the legal character/title conferred. Option (d) is a duplicate of (b); (b) is the intended key.
Pecuniary jurisdiction of the coot has been dealt with in
- aSection 6 ofCPC
- bSection 5 ofCPC
- cSection 4 ofCPC
- dSection 3 ofCPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Pecuniary jurisdiction of courts is dealt with in Section 6 of the CPC, 1908.
Section 20 of CPC does not apply to
- aArbhrationproceedtaes
- bCivil proceedings
- cBoth (A) L(B)
- dNeither (A) nor (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 20 CPC (place of suing) does not apply to arbitration proceedings, which are governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Under Order IV, Rule 1, sub-rule (1) of CPC, a suit is instituted when
- aa plaint in duplicate is presented to the court
- ba plaint is presented to the court
- ca plaint in triplicate is presented to the court
- deither (A) or (B) or (C)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Order IV Rule 1(1) CPC, a suit is instituted by presenting a plaint to the Court (or such officer as it appoints).
A suit in representative capacity can be filed by virtue of
- aunder Order I, Rule 8A of CPC
- bunder Order I, Rule 10A ofCPC
- cunder Order I, Rule 8 of CPC
- dunder Order I, Rule 9 of CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A representative suit (on behalf of numerous persons having the same interest) is filed under Order I Rule 8 of the CPC.
List of witness, after settlement of issues, must be filed within
- a60 days
- b45 days
- c30 days
- d15 days
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC, parties must present a list of witnesses within fifteen days of the date on which issues are settled.
‘Pleading’ can be altered or amended
- aunder Order VI, Rule 9 ofCPC
- bunder Order VI, Rule 10 ofCPC
- cunder Order VI, Rule 16 of CPC
- dunder Order VI, Rule 17 ofCPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Pleadings may be altered or amended under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC.
A suit can be dismissed in default
- aunder Order IX, Rule 2 ofCPC
- bunder Order IX, Rule 3 ofCPC
- cunder Order IX, Rule 8 of CPC
- dboth (B) & (C)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A suit can be dismissed in default under Order IX Rule 3 (both parties absent) and Order IX Rule 8 (plaintiff absent, defendant present) of the CPC.
An application under Order IX, Rule 7 of CPC can be made
- awithin 60 days of the Order
- bwithin 30 days of the Order
- cat any time on or before the next date of hearing
- dany time during the pendency of the suit
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
An application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC (to set aside the order proceeding ex parte) can be made at or before the next date of hearing, on showing good cause for previous non-appearance.
Judgement on admission can be given
- aunder Order XU, Rule 2 ofCPC
- bunder Order XU, Rule 4 ofCPC
- cunder Order XU, Rule 6 of CPC
- dunder Order XU, Rule 8 of CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Judgment on admissions is given under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC.
Judgement L decree have been dealt in CPC
- aunder Order XX
- bunder Order XXI
- cunder Order XX-A
- dunder Order XIX
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Judgment and decree are dealt with under Order XX of the CPC.
Provisions relating to interpleader suit are contained in
- aOrder XXXVI of CPC
- bOrder XXII of CPC
- cOrder XXXIV of CPC
- dOrder XXXV of CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Provisions relating to interpleader suits are contained in Order XXXV of the CPC (with Section 88).
Order XU, Rule 8 of CPC pertains to
- anotice to admit fact(s)
- bnotice to admit documents)
- cnotice to produce documents)
- dboth (A) and (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Order XII Rule 8 CPC pertains to notice to admit documents.
Under which section of CPC the principles of equity justice and good conscience are prescribed ?
- aSection 12.1
- bSection 131
- cSection 141
- dSection 151
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 151 CPC saves the inherent powers of the court, under which principles of equity, justice and good conscience are applied.
Which of the following decisions is not a decree within the meaning of Section 2(2) ofCPC?
- aDismissal of an application for final decree
- bAward of tribunal in land acquisition case
- cAn order of abatement
- dOrder modifying a scheme under Section 92
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
An award of a tribunal in a land acquisition case is not a decree within Section 2(2) CPC; an order of abatement and dismissal of an application for final decree being matters that may operate as adjudications, the award of tribunal is the recognised non-decree answer.
Which of the following is a suit of civil nature ?
- aSuits for upholding mere dignity or honour
- bSuits for accounts
- cSuits expressly barred by some enactment
- dSuits relating to political questions
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 9 CPC, suits for accounts are suits of a civil nature; suits for mere dignity/honour, political questions, or those expressly barred are not cognizable.
The material facts on which a party relies are called
- afacta probantia
- bfacta probanda
- cfalsa demonstratio non nocet
- dfauces terrae
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The material facts on which a party relies (which must be pleaded and proved) are called facta probanda; facta probantia are the facts by which they are proved (evidence).
Practise Jharkhand Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Jharkhand Judiciary preparation guide.