Live Bihar Judiciary 2026 mock series · 50 free questions Start now
Consumer Protection · Section 2(1)(d) and Explanation, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (now Section 2(7), 2019 Act)

Laxmi Engineering Works v. P.S.G. Industrial Institute

A buyer of goods for 'commercial purpose' is not a consumer, except where goods are bought and used exclusively to earn a livelihood by self-employment.

Citation
(1995) 3 SCC 583 : AIR 1995 SC 1428
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
1995-04-04
Bench
Kuldip Singh and B.P. Jeevan Reddy, JJ.

Facts

Laxmi Engineering Works, a proprietary concern, purchased machinery (a universal turning machine) financed by the State Finance Corporation for manufacturing auto parts. Alleging the machine was defective, it filed a complaint before the State Commission, which dismissed it on the ground that the goods were bought for a commercial purpose. The matter reached the Supreme Court on the question whether the buyer was a 'consumer'.

Issues

  • What is the meaning and scope of the expression 'commercial purpose' in Section 2(1)(d)?
  • Does the Explanation (self-employment for earning livelihood) save the buyer from exclusion, and how is the test to be applied?

Arguments

The appellant argued that the machinery was bought to earn a livelihood through self-employment and was therefore not for a 'commercial purpose', so it remained a consumer. The respondent contended that goods purchased to run a manufacturing business for profit fall squarely within 'commercial purpose' and are excluded from the Act.

Held

The Court held that whether a purchase is for a 'commercial purpose' is a question of fact in each case. Goods bought and used for carrying on an activity on a large scale for profit are for a commercial purpose, but the 1993 Explanation carves out an exception: goods bought and used by a person exclusively for earning a livelihood by means of self-employment are not for a commercial purpose. The Court clarified that the size of the activity and use of hired help do not automatically defeat the exception, the dominant intention and the self-employment-for-livelihood test being decisive. As the Explanation operated retrospectively (clarificatory), the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.

Ratio decidendi

A person who buys goods and uses them exclusively to earn his livelihood by self-employment is a 'consumer'; but goods bought to run a commercial enterprise for profit are for a 'commercial purpose' and the buyer is not a consumer. 'Commercial purpose' is a question of fact decided on the facts of each case.

Significance

The leading authority interpreting 'commercial purpose' and the self-employment/livelihood exception under the Consumer Protection Act; consistently followed and its test was carried into the Explanation to Section 2(7) of the 2019 Act.

Related

Section 2(7), Consumer Protection Act, 2019Self-employment / earning livelihood exceptionCheema Engineering Services v. Rajan Singh

Test yourself on Consumer Protection. Application-level MCQs with instant scoring.

Source: /Users/tiwari/Documents/All Law Books/raw/consumer protection act commentary/CHAPTER-01-Preliminary-and-Definitions.md

Law Mock is an independent preparation resource and is not affiliated with any High Court, Public Service Commission, or government body. All exam information is sourced from official notifications and is updated periodically.