Live Bihar Judiciary 2026 mock series · 50 free questions Start now
Family Law · Section 2(ii), 2(vii) and 2(ix), Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939

A. Yousuf Rawther v. Sowramma

A Muslim wife can obtain dissolution under Section 2(ii) on the husband's failure to maintain her for two years even if she contributed to that failure; talaq is not an arbitrary unilateral male privilege.

Citation
AIR 1971 Ker. 261; AIR 1971 Ker. 266
Court
High Court of Kerala
Decided
1970-08-13
Bench
V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.

Facts

Sowramma, a Hanafi girl of about 15, married Yousuf Rawther, nearly twice her age. After about a month at the matrimonial home she returned to her parents and lived apart for over two years, during which the husband did not maintain her. The wife sued for dissolution under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act; the trial court dismissed the suit but the appellate court granted a decree, and the husband appealed.

Issues

  • Whether a wife who herself stayed away can claim dissolution under Section 2(ii) for the husband's failure to maintain her for two years.
  • The true scope of the wife's right to divorce and the nature of talaq under Islamic law as applied in India.

Arguments

The husband argued that he was willing to keep the wife, that her own wrongful refusal to return caused the non-maintenance, and that a wife at fault cannot claim dissolution for non-maintenance. The wife relied on the plain words of Section 2(ii) and the beneficent, contractual character of Muslim marriage permitting dissolution.

Held

Krishna Iyer J. dismissed the appeal and upheld dissolution. Adopting the Sind High Court view, he held that Section 2(ii) speaks only of the fact of non-maintenance for two years, not of the wife's enforceable right to maintenance, so the wife's own conduct is irrelevant — prolonged non-maintenance evidences an irretrievably broken marriage. In an influential exposition he held that Muslim marriage is a civil contract, that the Quran discourages divorce and forbids capricious repudiation, and that the notion of the husband's arbitrary, unbridled unilateral talaq misrepresents Islamic law, which contemplates reasonable cause and reconciliation.

Ratio decidendi

Under Section 2(ii) of the 1939 Act the mere fact that the husband has not maintained the wife for two years entitles her to dissolution irrespective of her own conduct; Muslim divorce law, properly understood, requires reasonable cause and does not sanction capricious unilateral talaq.

Significance

Seminal scholarly judgment that reoriented Indian understanding of Muslim divorce towards gender equality and Quranic restraint; its reasoning was expressly approved by the Supreme Court in Shamim Ara and shaped the modern law restricting arbitrary talaq.

Related

Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939Khula and option of pubertyTalaq — reasonable cause and reconciliation requirementShamim Ara v. State of U.P.Ghulam Sakina v. Falak Sher Allah Bakhsh

Test yourself on Family Law. Application-level MCQs with instant scoring.

Source: /Users/tiwari/Documents/All Law Books/raw/Hindu law/CHAPTER-33-A-Yousuf-Rawther-v-Sowramma.md

Law Mock is an independent preparation resource and is not affiliated with any High Court, Public Service Commission, or government body. All exam information is sourced from official notifications and is updated periodically.