Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, Ahmedabad v. Ramanbhai Prabhatbhai

Facts

A person was killed in an accident caused by a vehicle of the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation. A claim for compensation was made before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, and a question arose whether a brother of the deceased could be regarded as a 'legal representative' entitled to claim compensation under the Act.

Issues

• Whether a brother (and persons other than spouse, parents and children) of a deceased can claim compensation as a legal representative before the Claims Tribunal.
• The nature and object of the no-fault liability provision introduced as Section 92-A.

Arguments

The Corporation contended that the class of claimants should be confined to the immediate dependants (spouse, parents, children). The claimant urged that the welfare object of the Act required a liberal construction of 'legal representatives' and that the no-fault provision was meant to give immediate relief to accident victims.

Held

The Supreme Court held that Section 92-A is a beneficial and ameliorative provision intended to provide immediate relief to helpless accident victims, marking a departure from the common-law rule requiring proof of negligence and modifying the substantive law to that extent. The expression 'legal representatives' must be construed liberally and is not limited to spouse, parents and children; it includes others, such as a brother, who suffer loss by the death. The provision aims at social justice without proof of fault.

Ratio decidendi

Section 92-A (now Section 140) is a welfare provision granting compensation without proof of fault, and the category of persons entitled to claim as legal representatives is to be construed widely to advance the Act's beneficial object.

Significance

A leading authority on the social-justice character of no-fault liability and on the wide meaning of 'legal representatives'. Repeatedly relied upon for the proposition that the MV Act compensation scheme is to be interpreted liberally in favour of victims; foundational to the modern no-fault jurisprudence under Sections 140-144 of the 1988 Act.

Related