Sevoke Properties Ltd v West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co Ltd
Once a lease is determined by efflux of time under section 111(a), the lessee becomes a tenant at sufferance and no notice to quit under section 106 is required to evict him.
Facts
The premises had been let to the respondent under a lease for a fixed term. The lease expired by efflux of time. The lessee continued in occupation after expiry, and the lessor sought to recover possession. A question arose whether, after determination of the lease by efflux of time, the lessor was required to serve a notice to quit under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act before evicting the occupant.
Issues
- Whether, on determination of a lease by efflux of time under section 111(a), a separate notice to quit under section 106 is necessary to terminate the tenancy.
- What is the status of a lessee who continues in possession after the lease expires by efflux of time.
Arguments
The lessee argued that even after expiry of the fixed-term lease, the tenancy continued and could be terminated only by a valid notice to quit under section 106, in the absence of which eviction was bad. The lessor argued that on expiry of the lease by efflux of time the tenancy stood determined automatically under section 111(a), reducing the occupant to a tenant at sufferance who was not entitled to any notice.
Held
The Court held that when a lease is determined by efflux of time under section 111(a), the lease comes to an end of its own force and no notice under section 106 is required. On such determination the occupant who remains in possession becomes a tenant at sufferance, whose possession, lawful in inception, becomes wrongful in continuance. Such a tenant is not entitled to a notice to quit and may be proceeded against for recovery of possession; he is liable for mesne profits or compensation for use and occupation.
Ratio decidendi
A lease determined by efflux of time under section 111(a) terminates automatically without any notice under section 106; the occupant thereafter holds as a tenant at sufferance, not entitled to a notice to quit.
Significance
A leading recent statement of the settled rule that section 106 notice is needed only to determine tenancies that do not end automatically; it consolidates the law on tenancy at sufferance and the consequences of expiry by efflux of time, and is frequently cited for the proposition that no notice is required after determination under section 111(a).
Related
Test yourself on Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Application-level MCQs with instant scoring.
Take a subject test →Source: /Users/tiwari/Documents/All Law Books/raw/tpa/CHAPTER 5 Of Leases of Immovable Property.md