Kerala Judiciary — Prelims 2020
Which among the following is not an ingredient of Res Judicata?
- aBoth the suits are between same parties
- bFirst suit is tried and finally decided by the court.
- cFormer suit is decided by a court competent to try the subsequent suit
- dThe matter in issue in the previous suit directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Res judicata under S.11 CPC requires the same parties OR parties litigating under the same title; option (a) merely says 'between same parties', which omits the 'same title' element, while (b) finally-decided, (c) competence to try the subsequent suit, and (d) matter directly and substantially in issue are all proper ingredients. Close call: (a) is the least complete statement of an ingredient.
Which among the following transfers under the Transfer of Property Act is an exception to “nemo dat quod non habet”.?
- aTransfer by a co-owner (8.44).
- bTransfer by an ostensible owner (8.41)
- cTransfer for benefit of unborn person (8.13).
- dTransfer of property pending suit (8.52)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Transfer by an ostensible owner under S.41 TPA is the classic exception to nemo dat quod non habet, protecting a bona fide transferee for value who took reasonable care. The other transfers do not embody that exception.
A suit for specific performance in relation to purchase of a residential house was filed in 2019, before the Munsiff Court. Defendant appeared and contended that the suit is liable to be tried by a special court under Section 20B of amended Specific Relief Act. Is that contention sustainable ?
- aYes. Since the amendment came into force prior to 2019.
- bNo. Since the amendment has no retrospective operation.
- cYes. Subject matter in the suit is one covered by S.20B of the Act.
- dNo. Since subject matter in the suit is not one covered by S.20B of the Act.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
S.20B (inserted by the 2018 Amendment) provides for Special Courts only for suits relating to contracts for INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS, not for purchase of a residential house; hence the contention fails because the subject matter is not covered by S.20B.
Which among the following is true? In a civil proceeding defendant is entitled to set up:
- aInconsistent defences till the end of trial.
- bMutually contradictory defences.
- cMutually destructive defences.
- dAlternative defences.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A defendant may plead alternative defences; pleadings may be inconsistent but not mutually destructive. Permissible pleading is alternative defences (Order 8). 'Inconsistent', 'contradictory' and 'destructive' defences are impermissible.
Which among the following statements is true in relation to the term 'Legal representative' as defined under the Code of Civil Procedure ?
- aTerm legal representative is wider than the legal heir.
- bAll legal heirs include legal representatives.
- cLegal heirs and legal representatives constitute a distinct and separate group of persons.
- dBoth terms are synonymous and denote a common group of persons.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under S.2(11) CPC 'legal representative' is wider than 'legal heir'; it includes any person who in law represents the estate of a deceased, even an intermeddler, not merely heirs.
Pending proceedings in a representative suit, the dispute is settled between plaintiff and defendants. They jointly filed an application to record settlement which was allowed. Suit was decreed in terms of the settlement. Is there any procedural irregularity?
- aNo
- bYes. Court ought to have conducted an inquiry about the genuineness of settlement.
- cYes. Court should have granted leave to settle, being a representative suit.
- dYes. Court cannot grant permission,being a representative suit.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC, no part of the claim may be abandoned/compromised without leave of court and notice to interested persons (Order 23 Rule 3B). The irregularity is that leave to settle was not granted.
The right available to a mortgagee in a usufructuary mortgage for recovery of mortgage money is ....?
- a, a suit for redemption
- ba suit for foreclosure
- ca suit for accounts
- dby retaining possession
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In a usufructuary mortgage (S.58(d) TPA) the mortgagee is put in possession and recovers the mortgage money by retaining possession and appropriating rents/profits; he has no right to sue for foreclosure or sale.
Doctrine of Election under 8.35 of the Transfer of Property Act is based on which among the following principles?.
- aPrinciple of nemo dat quod non habet
- bOne cannot approbate and reprobate
- cPrinciple of estoppel
- dPrinciple of equity
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The doctrine of election under S.35 TPA rests on the maxim that one cannot approbate and reprobate — a person taking a benefit under an instrument must accept the whole of it.
Which among the following is not correct in relation to substituted performance of a contract under 8.20 of the Specific Relief Act?.
- aA person who suffers due to non-performance of a contract is entitled to invoke the above provision
- bIt cannot be invoked unless 30 days notice in writing is given to the opposite party
- cA person who exercises the option of substituted performance is entitled to seek specific performance of contract
- dExercise of substituted service will not prevent such person from seeking compensation from the party in breach
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.20 of the Specific Relief Act (substituted performance), once a party opts for substituted performance he is NOT entitled to claim specific performance; he may only recover the costs from the party in breach. Hence option c is the incorrect statement.
A suit for mandatory injunction under 8.39 of the Specific Relief Act, is dismissed holding that the plaintiff is not entitled for the discretion. Can the plaintiff sue for damages?.
- aNo. In the light of 8.40(3) of above Act.
- bYes. In the light of 8.39(2) of the Act.
- cNo. In the light of 8.41 of the Act.
- dYes. In the light of 8.39(1) of the Act.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
S.39 of the Specific Relief Act deals with mandatory injunctions; the power to award damages in addition to or in substitution for an injunction flows from S.39(2)/S.40. The plaintiff may sue for damages in the light of S.39(2)/40, so option b (s.39(2)) is correct.
'A' took a building on rent from 'B', terminable by giving one month's notice from either side. 'C, an unauthorised person gives notice of termination to A'. 'B' ratifies the act of 'C. Is the ratification valid under the contract Act. If so, why?
- aNo. unauthorised act which may injure 3rd party cannot be ratified.
- bYes. Principal is entitled to ratify any act of any person.
- cYes. By subsequent ratification, the act becomes authorised.
- dYes. Act was done by C for the benefit of B, on assumed agency.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under S.200 of the Contract Act, an act that would injure the rights of a third person cannot be ratified. C's unauthorised notice of termination, if ratified, would prejudice A; hence ratification is invalid.
Which among the following is not a mandate for applying 8.92 of C.P.C.?
- aSuit must relate to a trust created for public purpose
- bThere must be allegations of breach of trust.
- cSuit must be filed by any statutory authority.
- dRelief claims must be one or other mentioned in Section 92.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
S.92 CPC permits a suit by the Advocate-General or by two or more persons with leave of court; it does NOT require the suit to be filed by a statutory authority. Hence option c is not a mandate.
A suit with leave of court is instituted at a place where one among the three defendants reside. Other defendants after appearance raise objections that they do not reside,work or carry on business within the jurisdiction of that Court. Is the objection sustainable?
- aNo, in the light of S.20(b) CPC
- bYes. In the light of S.21 (1) CPC
- cNo. In the light of S. 15 of CPC
- dYes. In the light of S.22 (1) of CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under S.20(b) CPC, where there are several defendants, the suit may be instituted where any one of them resides provided leave of court is obtained; the objection of the other defendants is therefore not sustainable.
A Judgement debtor is brought under arrest in execution of a decree for payment of money. Which among the following is the duty cast on the execution Court?
- aEnquire from the Judgement debtor whether he has the means to pay the decree debt.
- bInform the Judgement debtor that he is entitled to apply to be declared as insolvent.
- cEnquire whether he can offer immovable property as security for release.
- dEnquire whether he has solvent sureties, so that he can be released on bail.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Before committing a judgment-debtor to civil prison in execution of a money decree, the court must hold an inquiry into his means to pay (S.51 proviso and Order 21 Rule 40 CPC) — i.e. enquire whether he has the means to pay.
An advocate commissioner appointed by court at the request of The plaintiff conducted a local inspection with notice to the defendant. Defendant filed objections to the report. In the trial, the advocate commissioner was not examined. After trial, on request of the plaintiff, the report was marked by the Court as Ext.C1.ls the procedure correct. ?
- aNo. Commissioner has to be examined.
- bYes. Commissioner being an officer of court need not be examined.
- cNo. Plaintiff has to examine the commissioner.
- dYes. Since the report forms part of the record, it is the duty of the party who files an objection to establish his objection.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A commissioner's report forms part of the record (Order 26 CPC); the commissioner need not invariably be examined, and the burden lies on the party objecting to the report to substantiate his objections.
A Landlord obtains an order of eviction under S.11(4)(iv) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Landlord fails to reconstruct within the time fixed. Which among the following is the relief that cannot be granted to the tenant on his application.
- aTo direct the landlord to pay the rent which tenant had to pay for another building he is occupying consequent to eviction.
- bIn appropriate cases to put the tenant back to possession.
- cPay fine not exceeding Rs.500/-.
- dIssue direction for reconstruction.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.11(4)(iv) read with the proviso of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, on the landlord's failure to reconstruct, the tenant may be restored to possession, the landlord directed to reconstruct, and to pay differential rent; the Act does not provide for a fine of Rs.500, which therefore cannot be granted.
In which among the following circumstances a memorandum of title deed in a mortgage by deposit of title deed is liable to be registered ?
- aWhen the memorandum evidences the details of property mortgaged.
- bWhen a mortgage is created by the memorandum of deposit of title deed.
- cWhen a mortgagee undertakes to retain a portion of mortgage money to be repaid later.
- dWhen a mortgage by deposit of title deed is created in an area outside the notified town.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A mortgage by deposit of title deeds requires no registration, but where the mortgage is actually CREATED by (constituted in) the memorandum itself rather than the deeds, the memorandum becomes a document creating an interest in immovable property and is compulsorily registrable.
Under the CPC, in one situation the contract of engagement of a lawyer by the party to suit will be deemed to continue even after the death of that party. Which is that situation ?
- aTill the pleader informs the court about the death of the party.
- bTill the legal heirs engage a new lawyer.
- cTill an application for impleadment of legal heirs is filed.
- dTill the legal heirs are brought on record.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Order 22 Rule 10A / the proviso to the pleader's vakalath, the engagement of a pleader is deemed to continue until the legal heirs of the deceased party are brought on record.
Which among the following is the consequence of recession of a voidable contract ?
- aParty rescinding the contract, if he has received any benefit thereunder, should restore such benefit.
- bParty rescinding will be under an obligation to continue to perform his part.
- cThe party rescinding will be entitled to ask the opposite party to perform his part.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
On rescission of a voidable contract (S.64 Contract Act / S.30 Specific Relief Act), the party rescinding must restore any benefit he has received under the contract to the person from whom it was received.
In a proceeding under 8.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the trial court ordered interim compensation under S.143A of the Act. The drawer of the cheque was acquitted after trial. What should be the consequential order relating to interim compensation. ?
- aThe court shall direct that interim compensation shall be repaid by the complainant within 30 days.
- bThe amount paid will be repaid only after the appeal period is over.
- cThe court shall direct the complainant to repay the amount of compensation with interest at Bank rate within 60 days
- dThe interim compensation will stand forfeited.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.143A(4) NI Act, if the accused is acquitted the court shall direct the complainant to repay the interim compensation with interest at the bank rate published by RBI at the beginning of the relevant financial year, within 60 days (extendable by 30 days).
Which among the following is not contemplated under 8.89 CPC?
- aMediation
- bJudicial settlement
- cConciliation.
- dNegotiation.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
S.89 CPC contemplates arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement (including Lok Adalat) and mediation. 'Negotiation' is not one of the statutory modes.
What is the legal status of a finder of lost goods?
- aTrustee
- bBailor
- cBailee
- dPawnee
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.71 of the Contract Act, a finder of lost goods is in the position of a bailee, with the duties and rights attached to a bailee.
Under the Contract Act, what is an advertisement inviting tender?
- aAn invitation to offer
- bA standing offer
- cAn offer.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An advertisement inviting tenders is merely an invitation to offer (invitation to treat); the tenders submitted in response are the offers.
In what type of commercial instrument under the Negotiable Instrument Act the drawer is both debtor to one and creditor to another.
- aHundi
- bPromissory Note
- cBill of Exchange
- dCheque with endorsement
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In a bill of exchange the drawer is creditor of the drawee (who owes him) and debtor of the payee — i.e. debtor to one and creditor to another.
What is the legal status of a contract prohibited by law?
- aVoid contract
- bVoidable contract
- cIllegal contract
- dRatifiable contract.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
An agreement whose object or consideration is forbidden by law / unlawful (S.23 Contract Act) is an illegal contract; it is void and also taints collateral transactions.
Under 8.34 of the Specific Relief Act ,what is the prerequisite for filing a suit for declaration of status or right?
- aHe must be entitled to any legal character or to any right to property.
- bHe must be entitled to any legal or a statutory right.
- cHe must be a person whose legal status is offended.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under S.34 Specific Relief Act, the plaintiff must be a person entitled to any legal character, or to any right as to any property, to sue for a declaration.
In which among the following instances the property of a receiver appointed under Order 40 CPC can be attached and sold in execution?
- aWhen he commits delay in payment of dues.
- bWhen he fails to hand over the charge.
- cWhen he occasions loss to property due to his wilful default or gross negligence.
- dWhen the subject matter is alienated by the receiver.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Order 40 Rule 4 CPC, where a receiver fails to discharge his duties and causes loss to the property by his wilful default or gross negligence, the court may attach and sell his property to recover the loss.
Parties interested in the decision on a question of fact or law enter into an agreement to refer such matter to court and to comply with the decision of court. What is the name given to such proceedings?
- aAn interpleader suit.
- bSpecial case under OXXXVI
- cSupplemental proceedings
- dReference.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Where parties agree in writing to state a question of fact or law in the form of a case for the opinion of the court and to be bound by the decision, it is a 'special case' under Order XXXVI CPC.
Under Section 11 (11) of Rent Control Act, a tenant engaged in any notified essential service is exempted from eviction under the Act. What is the statutory exception to that ?
- aWhere the landlord has no other building of his own.
- bWhere the landlord himself is employed in such notified employment.
- cWhere landlords bona fide require the building for his own use.
- dWhere the landlord himself is engaged in such notified employment and he requires the building for his own occupation.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under S.11(11) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, a tenant in notified essential service is exempt from eviction, except where the landlord himself is engaged in such notified employment and requires the building for his own occupation.
Under the Contract Act, a guarantee which extends to a series of transactions is known as
- aPerpetual guarantee
- bUnlimited guarantee
- cContinuing guarantee
- dLimited guarantee
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.129 of the Indian Contract Act, a guarantee which extends to a series of transactions is called a 'continuing guarantee'.
“Might and Ought” Principle ?
- a8.11 CPC.
- bS.10 CPC
- c8.47 CPC
- d8.151 CPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The 'might and ought' principle (constructive res judicata) is embodied in Explanation IV to S.11 CPC: a matter which might and ought to have been made a ground of defence or attack is deemed to have been directly and substantially in issue.
A has a cause of action against B to sue for malicious prosecution. Can it be assigned to another for consideration. ?
- aYes. There is no legal embargo
- bNo . It amounts to a contract of Champerty
- cNo. It is hit by Section 6 (e) of Transfer of Property Act.
- dYes. It is a voidable contract.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A mere right to sue (such as a cause of action for malicious prosecution, a personal tort) cannot be transferred; it is hit by S.6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act.
Company as referred to in 8.141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act does not include......?
- aA firm
- bAny body corporate
- cAn association of individuals
- dJoint Hindu Family.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under the Explanation to S.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 'company' means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; a Joint Hindu Family is not included.
In relation to invasion into the enjoyment of property, which among the following is a ground for refusing perpetual injunction under the Specific ReliefAct?
- aWhere the defendant is the Trustee of the property.
- bWhere it is necessary to prevent multiplicity of proceedings.
- cWhere compensation in terms of money would afford adequate relief
- dWhere there is no standard for ascertaining actual damage caused
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.38(2)/41(h) and the principles governing perpetual injunction, an injunction is refused where compensation in money would afford adequate relief; the other options are grounds for granting it (e.g., no standard to ascertain damage, to prevent multiplicity, against a trustee).
Any order under 8.47 CPC can be reversed or modified only if
- aThere is any error.
- bThere is any defect
- cThere is any irregularity in proceedings
- dIf any of the above has prejudicially affected the decision of the case.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under S.99 CPC (the principle applied to S.47 orders), no order shall be reversed or modified for any error, defect or irregularity not affecting the merits, unless it has prejudicially affected the decision of the case.
Puisne mortgage is ...?
- aMultiple mortgages by mortgagee
- b2nd mortgage of the same mortgaged property by the mortgagor
- c2nd mortgage of the same mortgaged property by the mortgagee
- dMortgage of multiple properties by the mortgagor.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A puisne (later/subsequent) mortgage is a second or subsequent mortgage of the same property created by the mortgagor, ranking after the prior mortgage.
Which among the following is not true in relation to Vested Rights?
- aVested rights are not subject to any condition and if at all there is a condition, it is a specified certain event.
- bVested rights are heritable and alienable
- cVested rights are revocable after transfer.
- dVested rights are not defeated by the death of a transferee before acquiring it.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A vested interest (S.19 TPA) is not revocable, is heritable and transferable, is not affected by the death of the transferee before vesting, and is not made contingent on an uncertain event. 'Revocable after transfer' is therefore not true.
Among the following, in which case a person detained in civil prison in execution of decree, cannot be prematurely released ?
- aThe decree passed against such a person is fully satisfied
- bOn the request of the family members of the judgement debtor
- cOn the deposit of the amount mentioned in the warrant with the officer in charge of civil prison
- dOn failure of decree holder to remit subsistence allowance
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under S.58 CPC, a judgment-debtor in civil prison is released on full satisfaction of the decree, on deposit of the warrant amount, or on the decree-holder's failure to pay subsistence allowance. A mere request by family members is not a ground for premature release.
Summons ordered from a Court are returned with an endorsement of the serving officer on the ground that the defendant refused to accept the summons. The court is bound to examine the serving officer under Order5 Rule 19 CPC, if.... ?
- aThe Court has doubt regarding the endorsement
- bThe serving officer has not verified it by an affidavit.
- cThe Court is informed that the address of the defendant is wrong.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Order 5 Rule 19 CPC, where summons is returned with an endorsement of refusal, the court, if it has reason to be dissatisfied / has doubt about the truth of the endorsement, shall examine the serving officer on oath.
A for natural love and affection, promises to give his son B, a sum of Rs.1 Lakh. A reduced that into writing and registered it. Is it a valid enforceable contract? Which is the relevant section?
- aValid contract. S.25 Contract Act
- bVoidable Contract. 8.24 Contract Act.
- cVoid Contract. S.26 Contract Act.
- dIllegal Contract. S.27 Contract Act.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A written and registered promise made on account of natural love and affection between parties standing in a near relation is a valid contract under S.25(1) of the Contract Act, despite want of consideration.
Estoppel is a....... ?
- aRule of Procedure.
- bRule of evidence.
- cRule of substantive law.
- dRule of convenience.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Estoppel (S.115 Indian Evidence Act) is a rule of evidence; it operates to prevent a party from denying what he has earlier represented and is contained in the Evidence Act.
Which among the following is the essential ingredient of 8.300 fourthly of IPC?
- aIntention to cause death.
- bKnowledge that the act is imminently dangerous that in all probability it will cause death.
- cIntention to cause bodily injury which is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death.
- dIntention to cause such bodily injury as the offender knows is likely to cause death.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
S.300 'Fourthly' IPC applies where the person committing the act knows it to be so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, and does it without excuse for incurring such risk.
Which among the following is incorrect in relation to issue estoppel ?.
- aIt applies only if both proceedings are criminal proceedings.
- bWhere an issue of fact is tried by a competent court on a former occasion, and finding is rendered, it would constitute issue estoppel.
- cThe estoppel is against reception of evidence to disturb an earlier finding of fact.
- dIssue estoppel will act as a bar against trial and conviction of the same accused even for a different and distinct offence than the first one.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Issue estoppel bars re-litigation of an issue of fact already decided, but it does NOT bar trial and conviction for a different and distinct offence; hence option (d) is the incorrect statement.
One person enticed 'A' from his home to be offered in sacrifice to a Goddess. Which among the following is the offence committed by that person?
- a8.365 IPC
- b8.364 IPC
- c8.359 IPC
- d8.363 IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Kidnapping or abducting a person in order that he may be put in danger of being murdered (e.g., offered as a human sacrifice) is punishable under S.364 IPC.
In the course of interrogation of an accused in police custody he confesses “the murder was committed by me using a sharp knife. After that, I washed the knife in the pond near the temple. I have hid the knife beneath the culvert. If I am taken there, I will show it to you”. The knife is recovered from the spot as shown by the accused. To what extent of the extracted portion the confession is admissible in a criminal trial?
- aThe entire extracted portion.
- b“After that, show it to you”.
- c“I have hid....show it to you”.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.27 Indian Evidence Act, only so much of the information as distinctly relates to the fact discovered is admissible, i.e., 'I have hid the knife beneath the culvert... I will show it'; the confession to murder is inadmissible.
In a trial for committing murder of A by B, PW2 gave evidence that a few days prior to the incident, he saw A and B consuming liquor in a bar and thereafter they went together. PW2 did not see A thereafter. What is the most logical deduction the Court can arrive at?
- aThe “last seen theory” can be applied
- bB might have murdered A
- cB, in all probability might have murdered A
- dA and B were friends
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Where the deceased was last seen alive in the company of the accused and not seen thereafter, the 'last seen theory' is the logical deduction; mere proof of being last seen does not by itself prove murder.
A woman Revenue Officer tries to enter property of X, to effect attachment in execution of Revenue Recovery Proceedings. When this is disclosed, X pulls the officer by hand. Which among the following offences is committed by X?
- a8.354 IPC
- b8.353 IPC
- c8.355 IPC
- d8.352 IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Pulling a public servant (Revenue Officer) by hand to deter/prevent her from discharging her duty of attachment is assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from discharge of duty, punishable under S.353 IPC.
The object of examining the accused under 8.313 Cr.P.C. is to ....?
- aExplain personally his defence.
- bExplain the allegations brought out against him in evidence.
- cAnswer the charges framed against him.
- dTo personally explain the circumstances appearing in the evidence against him.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The object of examining the accused under S.313 Cr.P.C. is to enable him personally to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against him.
Who among the following is entitled to invoke the power under 8.321 of Cr.P.C.?
- aAny public prosecutor.
- bAny Assistant Public Prosecutor.
- cPublic prosecutor or assistant public prosecutor in charge of that case.
- dDistrict Government Pleader.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.321 Cr.P.C., only the Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of the case may, with the consent of the court, withdraw from the prosecution.
The presumption under 8.112 of Evidence Act can be displaced by husband by establishing which among the following facts?.
- aParties had no access during the relevant period.
- bHusband was abroad for a long period.
- cHusband was temporarily disabled for a long period.
- dWife was abroad continuously for a long period.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The presumption of legitimacy under S.112 Indian Evidence Act can be rebutted only by proving non-access between the parties during the relevant period of conception.
In the course of trial of an offence under S. 324 IPC, the doctor who had examined the injured and issued a wound certificate deposed that the injury was sufficient to cause death. What is the option available to the Magistrate?
- aAddress the Chief Judicial Magistrate for necessary action.
- bStop the trial and order further investigation.
- cCommit the case to Sessions Court for trial.
- dRequest the Sessions Judge to exercise power of Suo moto revision.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
If during trial of a warrant-triable offence (S.324) evidence shows the offence is in fact exclusively triable by Sessions (e.g. attempt to murder/grievous nature sufficient to cause death), the Magistrate must commit the case to the Court of Session under S.323 CrPC.
Is the protection applicable to a judge under S.77 of IPC under General Exception, applicable to a Magistrate ? If so, under which provision?
- aNo.
- bYes. In view of S.19 IPC.
- cNo. In the light of S.22 IPC.
- dYes. In the light of explanation under S.77 IPC.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Explanation to S.77 IPC extends the protection given to a Judge to a Magistrate, providing the same immunity for acts done in a judicial capacity in good faith believed to be within his power.
Mandatory death sentence for committing murder by a person serving life sentence under S.303 IPC was struck down by the Supreme Court in which case?
- aR.C.Cooper v. Union of India
- bBachan Singh v. State
- cAruna Shanbag v . Union of India
- dMittu v . State of Punjab
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In Mithu v. State of Punjab (1983), a Constitution Bench struck down S.303 IPC (mandatory death for a life convict committing murder) as violative of Articles 14 and 21.
Under Section 132 of Indian Evidence Act, answers given by a witness in cross examination can be used in one type of prosecution. Which among the following is that ?
- aProsecution for giving false evidence by such an answer.
- bFor Malicious prosecution.
- cIn a contempt of court procedure
- dIn a proceeding for defamation.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under the proviso to S.132 of the Evidence Act, a compelled answer cannot subject the witness to any other prosecution, except a prosecution for giving false evidence by that answer.
Oral evidence regarding contents of electronic evidence are not relevant under S.22A of Evidence Act,. It has an exception. Which among the following is it ?
- aIf electronic records are lost or not available.
- bIf electronic records are not produced from proper custody.
- cIf genuineness of electronic evidence produced is in question.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
S.22A makes oral admissions as to contents of electronic records irrelevant, except where the genuineness of the electronic record produced is in question.
Classic decision of the Privy Council in P. Kottayya and Other v. King Emperor (AIR 1947 PC 67) relates to which provision of Indian Law ?
- a8.300 IPC
- bS. 376 IPC
- cS.27 of Indian Evidence Act
- d8.120B of IPC.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor (AIR 1947 PC 67) is the classic Privy Council decision interpreting S.27 of the Indian Evidence Act, holding only so much of the information as relates distinctly to the fact discovered is admissible.
Does the prohibition against privileged communication between lawyer and client under 8.126 of Indian Evidence Act extend to his clerk also?
- aYes . Under 8.127 of Evidence Act.
- bNo. Under S. 126 of Evidence Act
- cYes. Under 8.123 of Evidence Act.
- dNo. Under S. 122 of Evidence Act.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
S.127 of the Evidence Act extends the privilege of professional communication under S.126 to the interpreters, clerks and servants of the legal adviser.
Which provision of law provides for declaring a witness as hostile?
- aSection 154 Cr.P.C.
- bS. 154 of Evidence Act.
- cS.150 of Cr.P.C.
- dS.150 Evidence Act.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
S.154 of the Evidence Act permits the court to allow the party calling a witness to put questions in the nature of cross-examination (treating the witness as hostile).
Can a District Magistrate grant an order of injunction ?
- aNo. It is in the domain of civil court.
- bYes. Under 8.142 Cr.P.C. while conducting enquiry under 8.133 Cr.P.C.
- cYes. Under 8.143 Crpc while conducting enquiry under 8.144 Cr.P.C.
- dYes. Under section 144 while conducting enquiry under 8.133 Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under S.142 CrPC, pending an enquiry under S.133, the Magistrate may issue an injunction directing the person against whom the conditional order under S.133 was made. (The option text mis-numbers the sections but only choice (d) correctly pairs injunction power with a S.133 nuisance enquiry.)
Opinion on the relationship between two persons, expressed by conduct by a member of the family and who has special means of knowledge in that capacity is not a sufficient proof in which among the following proceeding?
- aIn a proceeding for defamation.
- bTo prove marriage in any proceeding under the Divorce Act.
- cIn a proceeding under the Indian Succession Act.
- dIn a proceeding for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
S.50 of the Evidence Act makes opinion of conduct of a family member relevant to prove relationship, but its proviso bars such opinion as sufficient proof of marriage in proceedings under the Divorce Act (and in prosecutions under S.494, 495, 497, 498 IPC).
Which among the following is not a privileged communication?
- aOfficial communication made to an officer in official confidence, if disclosure will affect public interest.
- bProfessional communication between a lawyer and his client in the course of engagement of lawyer, without client's consent.
- cAny evidence from unpublished official records relating to affairs of State, without permission of the Head of Department.
- dCommunication between husband and wife during marriage, in a proceeding under S.498A IPC.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The marital-communications privilege under S.122 of the Evidence Act does not apply in suits between the spouses or in prosecutions of one spouse for a crime against the other; hence in a S.498A IPC proceeding it is not privileged. Options (a)-(c) are privileged under S.123/124/126.
A surgeon, after checking the reports of his patient informs in good faith for the benefit of that person that he may not survive. Patient suffers a shock and dies. Has the surgeon committed any offence? Which is the provision of law applicable?
- aNo, in view of S.93 IPC.
- bYes, in view of S.95 IPC
- cYes, in view of S.92 IPC
- dNo, in view of S.88 IPC.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
S.88 IPC protects an act done in good faith for the benefit of a person with consent (express or implied) where not intended to cause death; a surgeon's bona fide communication of prognosis for the patient's benefit is protected and is not an offence.
Victim's right of appeal under proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. does not extend to which among the following ?
- aFor enhanced sentence
- bAcquitting the accused.
- cConvicting for lesser offence
- dImposing inadequate compensation.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The proviso to S.372 CrPC gives a victim the right to appeal against (i) acquittal, (ii) conviction for a lesser offence, or (iii) imposition of inadequate compensation; it does not provide for an appeal seeking enhanced sentence.
Concept of 'letter rogatory' is embedded in which among the following provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
- a166ACr.P.C.
- b156 Cr.P.C.
- c164 Cr.P.C.
- d167 Cr.P.C.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
S.166A CrPC provides for issuance of a letter of request (letter rogatory) to a competent authority in a foreign country for investigation.
Under what circumstances an unmarried illegitimate child, who has attained majority, entitled to maintenance under S. 125(1) Cr.P.C.?
- aIf she is unable to maintain herself for any reason whatsoever.
- bIf she is by reason of any physical disability unable to maintain herself.
- cIf she is by reason of any physical or mental abnormality unable to maintain herself.
- dIf she by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or injury is unable to maintain herself.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under the proviso to S.125(1) CrPC, a major (illegitimate) unmarried daughter is entitled to maintenance where, by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or injury, she is unable to maintain herself.
The Principle of vicarious liability is embedded in which among the following offences?
- a8.107 IPC.
- b8.153 IPC
- cS.120B IPC
- dS.34 IPC.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
S.34 IPC (acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) embodies the principle of joint/vicarious (constructive) criminal liability.
What is the evidentiary value of retracted confession of an accused ?
- aCannot form the basis of conviction.
- bCan form a basis for conviction, even if not corroborated on material aspects.
- cCan form the basis of conviction without corroboration, if found to be perfectly voluntary, true and trustworthy.
- dIs weaker than direct evidence.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A retracted confession can form the basis of conviction without corroboration if the court is satisfied it is voluntary, true and trustworthy, though as a rule of prudence corroboration is usually sought.
A confesses to B in a drunken condition that he has committed theft in the house of C. This was confirmed in evidence by B. Is this evidence relevant in trial?
- aNo. Since A was in a drunken condition.
- bYes. In view of S.29 of Evidence Act
- cNo. In view of S.26 of Evidence Act.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
S.29 of the Evidence Act provides that an otherwise relevant confession is not irrelevant merely because it was made under intoxication or other stated circumstances; the confession remains relevant and admissible.
The term “mutually satisfactory disposition” in Cr.P.C. relates to
- aPlea bargaining.
- bProceedings under S.125 Cr.P.C.
- cPleading guilty.
- dTrial of matrimonial offences.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The expression 'mutually satisfactory disposition' appears in Chapter XXIA CrPC dealing with plea bargaining (S.265A-265L).
In a prosecution under S.420 IPC, the complainant establishes that the accused offered to sell his car to the complainant and received one half of the price amount. The vehicle was not delivered within the agreed time and money was not repaid. This is established. Accused proved that on the previous day of agreed delivery,the vehicle met with an accident and it remained in the workshop till the date of lodging complaint. Accused in S.313 Cr.P.C. The questioning agreed that he can deliver the vehicle along with some compensation for damages caused. What is the next logical conclusion that the court can arrive at ?
- aAccused had committed an offence of cheating.
- bAccused did not commit cheating .
- cAccused most probably committed cheating.
- dComplainant failed to establish that the accused had an intention to cheat.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Cheating under S.420 requires fraudulent/dishonest intention existing at the inception. As the non-delivery was due to a genuine accident and the accused offered to perform, the complainant failed to prove the dishonest intention to cheat at the outset.
A person is working on a machine with necessary safety precautions. A portion of the machinery breaks off and injures another employee. Which statutory protection is available to him?
- aS.77 IPC
- b8.76 IPC
- c8.80 IPC
- d8.81 IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
S.80 IPC exempts an accident occurring in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner with proper care and caution, without criminal intent or knowledge; an injury from a machine breaking despite safety precautions is such an accident.
An adult male peeps through the keyhole of the washroom, while a woman is bathing. Which offence is committed by him?
- aStalking
- bVoyeurism
- cOutraging the modesty of a woman
- dSocial harassment
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Watching/capturing the image of a woman engaging in a private act (such as bathing) where she expects privacy is voyeurism under S.354C IPC.
Which authority is competent to commute the death sentence under S.54 IPC?
- aState Government
- bUnion Government
- cGovernor of State
- dAppropriate Government
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
S.54 IPC empowers the 'appropriate Government' to commute a death sentence to any other punishment provided by the Code, without the offender's consent.
Which among the following is not an ingredient of S.304B IPC?
- aDeath caused by bodily injuries or burns.
- bOccurs within 8 years of marriage
- cDeceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment.
- dSuch cruelty must be in connection with demand for dowry
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
S.304B requires the death to occur within SEVEN years of marriage, not eight; hence 'within 8 years of marriage' is not an ingredient.
One person owns a ferocious dog. It is not properly chained. Consequently, it injures the neighbour. What is the offence committed?
- aS.289 IPC
- bS.324 IPC
- cS.326 IPC
- dS.323 IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Negligent conduct with respect to an animal (failing to guard/secure a ferocious dog) so as to endanger human life or cause injury is punishable under S.289 IPC.
Which among the following does not amount to personation at election?
- aVotes in the name of another person
- bVotes in a fictitious name
- cVotes once again after himself voting earlier
- dProxy voting under authorization.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Personation at election (S.171D IPC) covers voting in another's name, in a fictitious name, or voting again. Proxy voting under proper authorization is lawful and not personation.
In the course of extortion, the victim is put to fear of instant death. What is the offence?
- aRobbery
- bDacoity
- cTheft
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under S.390 IPC, extortion becomes robbery when the offender, at the time of committing it, puts the victim in fear of instant death, hurt or wrongful restraint.
Information regarding commission of a non-cognizable offence is disclosed to the SHO. What is his duty under S. 155(1) of Cr.P.C.
- aRegister the crime and investigate
- bSeek permission of Court to investigate
- cRegister the crime and seek permission for investigation
- dRecord the substance of information in a book and refer the informant to the Magistrate.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
S.155(1) Cr.P.C. requires the SHO to enter the substance of the information in the prescribed book and refer the informant to the Magistrate; he cannot investigate a non-cognizable offence without an order under S.155(2).
What is the ultimate duty of an Investigation Officer conducting investigation in a cognizable offence?
- aFile report regarding exclusion of any person from array of accused
- bFile a report under S. 173(2) Cr.P.C.
- cFile report under S. 172 Cr.P.C.
- dNone of above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The ultimate duty on completion of investigation of a cognizable offence is to file the final/police report (charge-sheet) to the Magistrate under S.173(2) Cr.P.C. S.172 is only the case diary.
Which one among the following is correct?
- aSessions Court can take cognizance of a case only when it is committed to.
- bSessions Court may at its option, take cognizance without committal.
- cUnless otherwise provided by Code or any other law, Sessions Court can take cognizance of cases only when it is committed to it.
- dAll the above are wrong.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
S.193 Cr.P.C.: except as otherwise expressly provided by the Code or any other law, no Court of Session shall take cognizance of any offence as a court of original jurisdiction unless the case has been committed to it.
Name the woman who was the Judge of the Supreme Court of India as well as the Governor of a State?
- aJustice Ruma Pal
- bJustice M.Fathima Beevi
- cJustice Leila Seth
- dJustice Anna Chandy
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Justice M. Fathima Beevi was the first woman judge of the Supreme Court of India (1989) and later served as Governor of Tamil Nadu (1997).
What is the meaning of the maxim “ubi jus ibi remedium.’’?
- aFor breach of justice there is a remedy
- bWhoever is just gets remedy
- cWhere there is right, there is remedy
- dJustice cannot exist without remedy
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
'Ubi jus ibi remedium' means 'where there is a right, there is a remedy'.
The concept of free legal aid takes its root from which article in the Indian Constitution?
- aArticle 30
- bArticle 39
- cArticle 38
- dArticle 39A
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Article 39A of the Constitution (a Directive Principle) provides for equal justice and free legal aid.
The only writ which is sustainable against a private individual is?
- aMandamus
- bCertiorari
- cHabeas Corpus
- dProhibition
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Habeas corpus is the only writ that lies against a private individual (to produce a person in unlawful detention); mandamus, certiorari and prohibition lie only against public authorities/bodies.
Chair has four legs. All animals have four legs. Hence, a chair is an animal. This reasoning is known as...?
- aInduction reasoning
- bSyllogism
- cIllogical reasoning
- dAbsurd reasoning
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Reasoning by major premise, minor premise and conclusion is a syllogism; here the conclusion is a fallacious syllogism but the form is syllogistic.
Statute provides that a senior citizen is liable to be maintained by a close relative like son, daughter, grand child, brother, sister etc. The question that arose is whether the daughter in law is liable to maintain. Which rule of interpretation will apply?
- aNoscitur A Sociis
- bBeneficial interpretation.
- cEjusdem generis
- dGolden Rule of interpretation.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Where general words ('etc.') follow an enumeration of specific persons of the same class, ejusdem generis confines the general words to that genus, determining whether a daughter-in-law falls within the class of listed relatives.
Right to privacy was considered elaborately by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court. Which is that judgement ?
- aManeka Gandhi v. Union of India.
- bIndian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala.
- cOlga Tellis v. Union of India
- dK.S.Puttaswamy v. Union of India.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Right to privacy was elaborately considered by the nine-judge Constitution Bench in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), holding privacy a fundamental right under Article 21.
Voir Dire is commonly related to which among the following in a judicial proceeding ?
- aExamination of the accused.
- bRe-examination of witnesses.
- cExamination of Pardanashin lady witness.
- dExamination of child witnesses.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Voir dire is the preliminary examination conducted by the court to test the competency/understanding of a child witness before recording evidence.
In which case, Supreme Court laid down the guidelines against sexual harassment of women at workplace?.
- aAruna Shanbag v. union of India
- bNarayani v. District Judge.
- cR.C.Cooper v. Union of India.
- dVisaka v. State of Rajasthan
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) laid down the guidelines against sexual harassment of women at the workplace.
What is meant by parol evidence?
- aCollateral evidence
- bDirect evidence
- cDocumentary evidence
- dOral evidence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Parol evidence means oral evidence (the parol evidence rule excludes oral evidence to contradict the terms of a written document).
Which is the Law journal published in Kerala under the authority of the Government of Kerala ?
- aKerala Law Times.
- bKerala High Court cases.
- cIndian Law Reports (Kerala series)
- dKerala Law Journal.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Indian Law Reports (Kerala Series) is the law report published under the authority of the Government of Kerala; KLT, KHC and KLJ are private publications.
The legality of the Narco-analysis test was considered by the Supreme Court in which among the following decisions?
- aUmesh Kumar v. State ofAndhrapradesh
- bSafi Mohammed v. State of Rajasthan
- cSelvi v. State of Karnataka
- dShyam Lal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The legality of narco-analysis, polygraph and BEAP tests was decided in Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010), holding involuntary administration violates Article 20(3).
Which State Law, involved in Kesavanda Bharathi's case?
- aKerala Land Reforms Act
- bKerala Education Act
- cKerala Stamp Act
- dKerala Abkari Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) challenged the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (and constitutional amendments), giving rise to the basic structure doctrine.
PW3 deposed that in a trial under S.420 of IPO, he went to the shop of the accused, purchased an item, and hurriedly left. After reaching home, he found that the accused had not given the full balance. What is the logical deduction the Court can arrive at?
- aAccused is in the habit of cheating.
- bAccused did not give the full balance to PW3 either by mistake or purposefully.
- cAccused is not trustworthy.
- dAccused is a bad person.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Mere shortfall in balance, with the buyer leaving hurriedly, supports only the neutral inference that it was either a mistake or purposeful — not proof of the dishonest intention required for cheating under S.420 IPC.
Is the Writ Jurisdiction of the High Court wider than the Writ Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court? Examine the correct answer.
- aYes. Article 226 can be invoked to establish fundamental rights and any other right.
- bNo. Article 32 is wider.
- cBoth jurisdictions are identical.
- dNone of the above are true.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The High Court's writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is wider, as it can be invoked for enforcement of fundamental rights 'and for any other purpose', whereas Article 32 is limited to fundamental rights.
Subordinate Courts are dealt with in which chapter of Part VI of the Constitution of India ?
- aChapter III
- bChapter IV
- cChapter VI
- dChapter V
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Subordinate Courts are dealt with in Chapter VI of Part VI of the Constitution (Articles 233-237).
Lemon:Orange :: Potato :--------
- aCarrot
- bApple
- cCabbage
- dPineapple
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Lemon and orange are both fruits; the analogous pair for potato (a vegetable) is carrot, another vegetable.
Butter is connected to ghee. But it is not connected to-----
- aSugar
- bCurd
- cMilk
- dCheese
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Butter, ghee, curd, milk and cheese are all dairy products derived from/related to milk; sugar is unrelated.
Pick out the odd from the following
- aComptroller and Auditor General.
- bChief Justice of India.
- cAttorney General of India.
- dOmbudsman.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Comptroller and Auditor General, Chief Justice of India and Attorney General are constitutional offices; the Ombudsman (Lokpal) is not provided for in the Constitution, making it the odd one out.
The Supreme Court has no original jurisdiction in relation to which among the following?
- aDispute between two States
- bElection to the post of President of India.
- cAppointment of Governor
- dInter State Water Dispute
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction (Art.131) covers inter-State and Centre-State disputes; election disputes of President/Vice-President (Art.71) and inter-State water disputes are within it, but appointment of a Governor is an executive act with no original jurisdiction.
Practise Kerala Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Kerala Judiciary preparation guide.