Kerala Judiciary — Prelims 2022
Under Section 146 of the Contract Act, the co-sureties are liable to contribute........................................
- aEqually
- bUnequally
- cAccording to capacity
- dNeither (A), (B) or (C)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 146 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that co-sureties are liable to contribute equally to the debt or part unpaid by the principal debtor.
Under the Specific Relief Act, a suit for recovery can be filed
- aOnly in respect of movable property
- bIn respect of both movable and immovable property
- cOnly in respect of immovable property
- dNeither the movable or immovable property
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under the Specific Relief Act (Sections 5 and 7), a suit for recovery of possession lies in respect of both immovable property (s.5) and movable/specific movable property (s.7-8).
Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act deals with
- aDoctrine of election
- bSpecific performance
- cPart performance of contract
- dFraudulent transfer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 embodies the doctrine of part performance of a contract.
A cheque is a .....................drawn upon a specified banker and payable on demand.
- aBill of exchange
- bHundi
- cPromissory note
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker and payable on demand.
Section 25 of the Limitation Act deals with
- aAcquisition of easement by prescription
- bSpecial exception
- cEffect of acknowledgment in writing
- dContinuing breaches and torts
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 25 of the Limitation Act, 1963 deals with acquisition of easements (right to light, air, way, water etc.) by prescription on 20 years' uninterrupted enjoyment.
Which Section of the Kerala (Buildings Lease and Rent Control) Act, interdicts the tenant from contesting the application or preferring an appeal under Section 18?
- aSection 11(2)
- bSection 5
- cSection 12(1)
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 12(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 bars a tenant from contesting an eviction application or preferring an appeal under Section 18 unless he pays/deposits the admitted arrears of rent.
Section 14 of the Limitation Act deals with
- aEffect of fraud or mistake
- bExtension of prescribed time in certain cases
- cExclusion of time taken for proceeding bona fide before a court without jurisdiction
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides for exclusion of time spent prosecuting in good faith a civil proceeding before a court that, from defect of jurisdiction or like cause, was unable to entertain it.
‘Pari passu' distribution mean?
- aEqual distribution
- bRateable distribution
- cPartition by metes and bounds
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Pari passu' means proportionate/rateable distribution among creditors on an equal footing; in the execution context (s.73 CPC) it denotes rateable distribution of assets.
Which is not correct about the promissory note ?
- aIt contains a conditional undertaking
- bIt contains the amount mentioned on it
- cIt is an instrument in writing
- dIt is signed by the maker
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A promissory note (s.4 NI Act) contains an UNconditional undertaking to pay; a conditional undertaking is therefore not correct of a promissory note.
As per Order 13 Rule 9, the person entitled to receive back a document produced in a suit is
- aOnly a party to the suit
- bPlaintiff
- cDefendant
- dPerson who produced the document, whether a party or not.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Order 13 Rule 9 CPC entitles the person who produced a document to receive it back, whether or not he is a party to the suit.
Which among the following acts can be done by an outgoing partner conducting business, competing with the firm?
- aUse of firm’s name
- bAdvertise such business
- cRepresent himself as carrying on the business of the firm
- dSolicit business from customers who were dealing with the firm before he ceased to be a partner
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 36 of the Partnership Act, 1932, an outgoing partner may carry on a competing business and advertise it, but may not use the firm's name, represent himself as carrying on the firm's business, or solicit the firm's old customers.
Under Section 6(2)(a) of the Specific Relief Act, no suit shall be brought after the expiry of a period from the date of dispossession.
- a6 months
- b1 year
- c2 years
- d3 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 6(2)(a) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 bars a suit for possession based on prior possession if brought after six months from the date of dispossession.
A suit posted for hearing can be adjourned by the court only a maximum of at the instance of a party.
- aOnce
- bTwo times
- cThree times
- dHearing cannot be adjourned
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under the proviso to Order 17 Rule 1 CPC, no adjournment shall be granted more than three times to a party during the hearing of the suit.
What is the remedy provided against an order passed at the execution stage in a rent control petition?
- aAppeal
- bRevision
- cWrit petition
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Orders passed at the execution stage of a rent control petition are challengeable by revision (under Section 20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act / civil revision), not by appeal.
A suit for possession under Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act can be filed within
- aThree years
- bTwelve years
- cFive years
- dNine years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A suit for possession of immovable property based on title under Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act follows the ordinary 12-year limitation period (Articles 64/65, Limitation Act).
A and B are partners in a stationery business. Z orders on the firm's letterhead to supply two bags of wheat at his residence. What will be the liability of the firm under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932?
- aThe firm is not liable to pay the debt
- bThe firm is liable to pay the debt
- cThe firm is liable only for half of the debt
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Supplying wheat is wholly outside the ordinary course of a stationery business, so the act does not bind the firm under Sections 19/22 of the Partnership Act; the firm is not liable.
An inchoate instrument is
- aAn incomplete instrument
- bAn instrument presented beyond time
- cAn illegible instrument
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
An inchoate (incomplete) stamped instrument is one delivered incomplete, dealt with under Section 20 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
The period of limitation for filing a suit based on promissory note is from the date of execution.
- aOne year
- bTwo years
- cThree years
- d12 Years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Article 35 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the limitation for a suit on a promissory note payable on demand is three years from the date of execution.
The rule against perpetuity is contained in
- aSection 32 of the Partnership Act
- bSection 62 of the Contract Act
- cSection 14 of the Transfer of Property Act
- dSection 6 of the Specific Relief Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The rule against perpetuity is contained in Section 14 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure pertain to the filing of
- aAppeal
- bRevision
- cReview
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC deal with the filing of a review.
Which of the following tests are to be applied in cases where the plea of bar of suit under Order 2 Rule 2 is raised?
- aWhether the cause of action in the previous suit and that in the subsequent suit are identical
- bWhether the relief claimed in the subsequent suit could have been given in the previous suit, on the basis of the pleading filed in that suit
- cWhether the plaintiff omitted to sue for a particular relief on the cause of action disclosed in the previous suit
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
All three tests (identity of cause of action, whether relief could have been claimed in the earlier suit, and omission to sue for a relief on the same cause of action) apply to a bar under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC.
Where a promissory note is payable by instalments and two or more instalments have become due and the holder of the note sues only for one of the instalments and omits to sue for the other instalment?
- aHe can sue for the other instalments later
- bHe cannot sue for the other instalments
- cEitherA or B
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC, a plaintiff who omits to sue for an instalment already due cannot afterwards sue for that omitted portion of the claim.
Which provision in the Code of Civil Procedure deals with the transfer of a decree?
- aSection 52
- bSection 39
- cSection 41
- dSection 151
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 39 of the Code of Civil Procedure deals with the transfer of a decree to another court for execution.
To calculate the maturity drawing date of a negotiable instrument, th4e drawing date be..............
- aIncluded
- bConsidered
- cExcluded
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In computing maturity under Section 24 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the date of drawing/presentment is excluded and three days of grace are added.
According to the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, the easements........................
- aCan be transferred
- bCannot be transferred
- cCannot be transferred apart from the dominant heritage
- dnone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 6(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, an easement cannot be transferred apart from the dominant heritage to which it is attached.
The Doctrine of Lis pendens is applicable to
- aMovable and immovable properties
- bPartial and absolute transfers
- cSpecified and unspecified properties
- dAll of these
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Lis pendens (Section 52, Transfer of Property Act) applies to immovable property only; among the options, 'movable and immovable properties' is the closest intended answer recognising it covers transfers of immovable property pending suit. Note: strictly TPA s.52 is confined to immovable property, but the keyed option here is (a).
Novation means
- aSubstitution of one agreement with another
- bCancellation of an agreement
- cWithdrawal from an agreement
- dExpiry of an agreement
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Novation under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act means substitution of a new contract for an existing one, discharging the old contract.
The limitation prescribed for filing application to implead the legal representatives of a deceased defendant or respondent is
- a30 days from the death of the defendant/respondent
- b45 days from the death of the defendant/respondent
- c60 days from the death of the defendant/respondent
- d90 days from the death of the defendant/respondent
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the period to apply to bring the legal representatives of a deceased defendant/respondent on record is 90 days from the date of death.
Under Section 89 of CPC the court shall formulate the terms of settlement and give them to the parties for their observation and after receiving the observation of the parties the court may reformulate the terms of probable settlement and send them for
- aArbitration
- bMediation
- cSettlement before Lok Adalat
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 89 CPC lists arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement including Lok Adalat, and mediation as modes of alternative dispute resolution the court may refer the dispute to; hence all of the above.
Babu entered into a sale agreement with Thomas, for purchase of 5 cents of land belonging to Thomas, situated in Ernakulam District. The agreement was executed and the advance sale consideration paid at Thiruvananthapuram, where Babu is residing. Thomas having failed to execute the sale deed, in spite of Baby being ready and willing to pay the balance sale consideration, Babu can institute a suit for specific performance of the agreement at
- aThiruvananthapuram
- bErnakulam
- cWhere Thomas is residing
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A suit for specific performance can be filed where the immovable property is situate (Ernakulam), where the cause of action wholly or partly arose / where the agreement was executed and money paid (Thiruvananthapuram), or where the defendant resides (Section 16 read with Sections 19/20 CPC); hence all of the above.
Rajan had let out his shop room to Venu on rent. Venu clandestinely sublet a portion of the room to Gopi. On coming to know about this, Rajan caused a lawyer notice to Venu under Section 11(4) of the Building Lease and Rent Control Act, but omitted to mention Gopi’s name. Will will the omission be fatal when Rajan files a rent control petition for evicting Venu alleging sub-lease?
- aFatal
- bNot fatal
- cCurable
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Omission to name the sub-tenant (Gopi) in the Section 11(4) notice is not fatal to a rent control petition for eviction on the ground of subletting, since the statutory requirement is notice to the tenant; the sub-tenant need not be separately noticed.
Constructive res judicata is contained in
- aExplanation III to Section 11
- bExplanation IV to Section 11
- cExplanation VI to Section 11
- dExplanation VII to Section 11
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Constructive res judicata is embodied in Explanation IV to Section 11 CPC — matters which might and ought to have been made a ground of attack or defence in the former suit are deemed to have been directly and substantially in issue.
Which among the following is not essential in relation to transfer of property to an infirm person, under the Transfer of Property Act ?
- aA life interest in favour of one or more living people.
- bThe unborn person should come into existence before the expiry of prior life interest.
- cThe remaining right after creation of life interest should be transferred to unborn persons.
- dThe unborn person should be a descendant of the original transferor
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 13 TPA (transfer for benefit of unborn person), the requirements are a prior life interest, the whole remaining interest vested in the unborn, and existence before the prior estate ends; there is no requirement that the unborn be a descendant of the transferor. Hence (d) is not essential.
Which among the following is not a new provision introduced in the Specific Relief Act by 2018 amendment?
- aTime limit for disposal of cases under the Act.
- bSpecial Court for trial of suits under the Specific Relief Act.
- cProvision for substituted performance
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 introduced substituted performance (s.20), special courts for infrastructure contracts (s.20B), and a 12-month time limit for disposal (s.20C). Since all three listed are genuinely new provisions, the correct answer is 'None of the above'.
In which among the following mortgages, a personal undertaking by the mortgagor is essential ?
- aUsufructuary mortgage
- bEnglish mortgage
- cMortgage by conditional sale
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In an English mortgage (Section 58(e) TPA), the mortgagor binds himself to repay the mortgage money on a certain date — a personal undertaking to pay is an essential feature, unlike a usufructuary mortgage where there is no personal liability.
Which among the following is the procedure for transfer of an Actionable claim?
- aDelivery of possession
- bBy a formal declaration
- cBy an instrument in writing signed by the transferor or agent
- dBy an instrument in writing signed by both the transferor and the transferee and attested by two witnesses
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 130 TPA, transfer of an actionable claim is effected only by an instrument in writing signed by the transferor or his duly authorised agent.
Agreement in restraint of trade is
- aVoidable
- bVoid
- cIllegal
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, an agreement in restraint of trade is void (to that extent).
How is the gift of immovable property affected?
- aBy delivery of possession
- bBy a registered instrument, if value is more than Rs. 100 and otherwise by transfer of possession
- cBy a registered document attested by two witnesses
- dBy an oral transfer
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 123 TPA, a gift of immovable property must be effected by a registered instrument signed by the donor and attested by at least two witnesses.
Feeding the Grant by Transfer of Property Act. Estoppel is incorporated in .... .... of the
- aSection 43
- bSection 41
- cSection 35
- dSection 21
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The doctrine of feeding the grant by estoppel is contained in Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act (transfer by unauthorised person who subsequently acquires interest in the property).
Which among the following sections of the Transfer of Property Act govern the transfer of property to an unborn person ?
- aSections 12 and 13
- bSection 13
- cSections 13 and 14
- dSection 9. 10, 13
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Transfer of property for the benefit of an unborn person is governed by Section 13 TPA, read with Section 14 (rule against perpetuity); hence Sections 13 and 14.
Where a Magistrate has imposed a substantive sentence on the accused, the sentence of imprisonment in default of fine shall not exceed the term of sentence, which Magistrate is competent to impose as punishment ?
- aOne half
- bOne third
- cOne fourth
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 30 Cr.P.C., imprisonment in default of fine shall not exceed one-fourth of the term of imprisonment which the Magistrate is competent to inflict as punishment for the offence otherwise than as imprisonment in default.
Which among the following sections incorporates the principle of vicarious liability in criminal jurisprudence?
- aS.120B IPC
- bS.120A IPC
- cS.149 IPC
- dS.34 IPC
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 149 IPC (unlawful assembly — every member vicariously liable for an offence committed in prosecution of the common object) is the classic provision incorporating constructive/vicarious criminal liability.
In the trial of a criminal case, a question touching the relevant matter in issue is put to the witness, he refuses to answer, contending that the answer will incriminate him. He was compelled to give evidence. If so, under which provision of Law?
- aSec. 129 of the Indian Evidence Act.
- bSec.132 read with S.147 of the Indian Evidence Act.
- cS.142 of the Indian Evidence Act.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A witness may be compelled to answer an incriminating question under Section 132 of the Indian Evidence Act (with the proviso protecting the answer from being used against him), read with Section 147.
After the trial was over, charge was altered invoking 8.216 Cr.P.C, from one under 8.306 to 8.302 I PC. Thereafter, on request of the prosecutor, a surgeon who was not examined earlier, was permitted by the court, to be summoned. Is the court legally competent to do so?
- aYes, under S.218(1) Cr.P.C
- bNo, under 8.217 (a) Cr.P.C
- cYes, Under 8.217 (b) Cr.P.C
- dNo, under 3.218 (2) Cr.P.C
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
On alteration of charge under Section 216 Cr.P.C., the prosecutor and accused may be permitted under Section 217(b) Cr.P.C. to recall or re-summon and examine any witness with reference to the alteration. Hence yes, under 217(b).
A bond is executed by the accused for the appearance in court. The accused failed to appear, in spite of specific directions. What should be the next step taken by the court under 3.446 Cr.P.C?
- aIssue show cause as to why bail bond shall not be forfeited
- bRecord satisfaction regarding forfeiture and call upon the person to pay a penalty or to show cause why it shall not be paid.
- cCancel the bail bond, impose penalty on the sureties for such amount not exceeding the bond amount.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
On breach of a bond (failure to appear), the court under Section 446 Cr.P.C. records the grounds of proof of forfeiture and calls upon the person bound (or surety) to pay the penalty or show cause why it should not be paid.
In which among the following, oral admission as to the contents of documents is relevant?
- aIf the party proposing is able to show that he is entitled to give secondary evidence under the rules.
- bIf the genuineness of the document in question is admitted.
- cIf the document in question is an electronic document.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, oral admissions as to the contents of a document are relevant when the party is shown to be entitled to give secondary evidence of its contents under the rules.
Which among the following is not correct under 8.34 IPC?
- aPrior meeting of mind is essential.
- bCommission of a Criminal act by one or more persons among the group in furtherance of criminal intention of all.
- cEach of the persons need not commit any individual overt act.
- dEach of the above persons accused of common intention should be present at the time of commission of offence.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 34 IPC, physical presence at the scene is not always essential (participation in furtherance of common intention suffices); requiring each accused to be present at the time of commission is therefore not a correct/necessary proposition.
In which among the following instances, sanction under 8.197 Cr.P.C is essential?
- aWhere the accused is a public servant and the offence was done by him, while he was a public servant.
- bWhere the accused is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from office, save without sanction of Government, is alleged to have committed offence, while acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duty
- cWhere the accused is or was a public servant and is alleged to have committed an offence while in service.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 197 Cr.P.C. sanction is required where a Judge, Magistrate or public servant not removable from office save by/with sanction of Government is accused of an offence alleged to have been committed while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of official duty — option (b).
If a written complaint is submitted to a Magistrate who is not competent to take cognizance of that offence, he shall
- aDirect the complainant to the proper court
- bReturn it for presentation to the proper court with an endorsement.
- cForward the complaint to the proper court, through the concerned SHO and direct the complainant to that court.
- dReturn it for presentation before the proper court and to refer the party to the proper court.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 201 Cr.P.C., if a written complaint is made to a Magistrate not competent to take cognizance, he shall return it for presentation to the proper court with an endorsement to that effect.
To attract the principle of estoppel, which among the following conditions must be fulfilled?
- aRepresentation by a person to another
- bThe other shall have acted upon the said representation.
- cThe act should have been detrimental to the interest of the person who has acted.
- dAll the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Estoppel under Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act requires a representation by one person to another, the other acting upon it, and that act being to his detriment/alteration of position; hence all the above.
Dying declaration to be admissible
- aMust be made before a Magistrate
- bMust be made before the Police Officer or a doctor
- cMay be made before any private person.
- dAll of above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, a dying declaration may be made to any person (Magistrate, police officer, doctor or any private individual); there is no rule requiring a particular recorder. Hence 'All of above.'
Which among the following is not an essential ingredient of criminal conspiracy under 8.120 B of IPC?
- aAn object to be accomplished
- bA plan or scheme embodying means to accomplish that object.
- cAn agreement or understanding between two or more persons to cooperate for accomplishment of the object.
- dcommission of an overt act.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Criminal conspiracy under S.120A/120B IPC is complete on the mere agreement to do an illegal act; commission of an overt act is NOT essential (except for conspiracies to commit acts not amounting to an offence). Thus 'commission of an overt act' is not an essential ingredient.
Which among the following conditions is to be satisfied to enable a court to order appointment of commission to examine a witness?
- aWhenever the court feels so
- bWhenever the presence of a witness cannot be easily procured, without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience.
- cWhenever the court feels that the summoning of the witness may cause delay.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under S.284 CrPC, a commission to examine a witness may be issued when attendance of the witness cannot be procured without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience which would be unreasonable in the circumstances.
In which among the following, the court can order costs to be paid by the accused of the complainant?
- aUnder 8.359 Cr.P.C, when a person is convicted on a complaint of a non-cognizable offence, filed by the complainant.
- bUnder 8.358 Cr.P.C, when a person is groundlessly arrested
- cWhen compensation is ordered under 8.357 Cr.P.C
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
S.359 CrPC empowers the court, on conviction of a non-cognizable offence on a complaint, to order the convicted accused to pay the complainant's costs. (S.358 deals with compensation to a groundlessly arrested person, not costs by the accused.)
In which among the following circumstances, can the court permit indecent and scandalous questions to be put to witnesses?
- aIf it relates to the character of the witnesses
- bIf it relates to fact in issue.
- cIf it relates to previous conduct of the witnesses.
- dCourt cannot permit indecent and scandalous questions.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under S.151 of the Indian Evidence Act, the court may forbid indecent or scandalous questions, but it shall permit them when they relate to facts in issue, or to matters necessary to be known in order to determine whether facts in issue existed.
Which among the following cannot be a method of impeaching the credit of witnesses?
- aThrough the oral evidence of any other witness
- bThrough the evidence of persons who know that the witness is not credit worthy
- cBy proof that the witness has been bribed.
- dBy producing previous contradicting statements of witnesses.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
S.155 of the Evidence Act lists the modes of impeaching credit: evidence of persons who testify the witness is unworthy of credit, proof of bribery/corrupt inducement, and proof of former inconsistent statements. 'Evidence of persons who know the witness is not creditworthy' is not a recognised statutory mode (the witness must testify to his unworthiness from personal knowledge).
8.34 IPC is?
- aa rule of evidence
- ba substantive offence
- can inchoate offence
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 34 IPC creates no substantive offence; it only lays down a rule of evidence/constructive joint liability where a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.
Under Indian Penal Code “illegal" signifies?
- aeverything which is an offence
- beverything prohibited by law
- cEverything which furnishes ground for civil action.
- dAll the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 43 IPC defines 'illegal' as everything which is an offence, or which is prohibited by law, or which furnishes ground for a civil action. Hence all of the above.
Which among the following is true for dying declaration?
- adying declaration cannot be used as the sole basis of conviction.
- bdying declaration, unless corroborated, cannot be read as sole basis for conviction.
- cdying declaration which is cryptic must be discarded
- dwhen witnesses affirm that deceased was not in a fit state to make declaration, medical opinion cannot prevail
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A true and voluntary dying declaration can be the sole basis of conviction without corroboration (so (a) and (b) are wrong), but a cryptic dying declaration, being unreliable, is to be discarded. Hence (c) is the correct statement.
If an offender is sentenced to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, solitary confinement shall not exceed.......?
- a15 days
- bone month
- ctwo months
- d45 days.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under S.73 IPC, where the imprisonment imposed does not exceed six months, the period of solitary confinement shall not exceed one month.
Section 76 and Section 79 of IPC provide the general exception of....... ?
- amistake of law
- bmistake of fact
- cboth mistake of fact and law
- deither mistake of law or of fact
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Sections 76 and 79 IPC embody the maxim ignorantia facti excusat - they provide the general exception of mistake of fact (a person bound, or believing in good faith by reason of a mistake of fact that he is bound/justified by law, to do an act).
In a criminal trial relating to causing injury on the body of the victim, sole eye witness deposed in accordance with the prosecution case that accused inflicted a puncture wound, with a sharp weapon. Post mortem surgeon gave evidence that the wound on the body was caused by a gunshot. On the basis of this evidence, which among the following will be the most probable outcome?
- aThe Court can convict the accused based on direct evidence of an eye witness.
- bCourt should discard opinion evidence, and rely on direct evidence
- cCourt should rely only on evidence of expert surgeon
- dAccused should be acquitted, granting benefit of doubt, based on contradictory versions of prosecution witness.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Where the sole eyewitness says the wound was a puncture wound by a sharp weapon but the post-mortem surgeon says it was a gunshot, the direct evidence is fundamentally contradicted by medical evidence; such an irreconcilable conflict entitles the accused to the benefit of doubt and acquittal.
Accident as an exception has been dealt with in which among the following provisions of IPC ?
- a8.77
- bS.78
- c8.80
- d5.82
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Accident as a general exception is dealt with in Section 80 IPC (act done by accident or misfortune, without criminal intention or knowledge, in doing a lawful act by lawful means with proper care and caution).
Which among the following statements is true in relation to examination in chief of a witness?
- aLeading question can be asked
- bIt must only relate to relevant facts
- cIt must relate to facts in question
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Examination-in-chief (S.137 Evidence Act) must be confined to relevant facts; leading questions are generally not permitted (S.142), and it is not restricted only to facts in issue. Hence 'It must only relate to relevant facts.'
The presumption that all judicial and official acts have been regularly performed can be drawn from which provision of Indian Evidence Act?
- a8.123
- b8.114
- c8.121
- d8.112
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 114 of the Evidence Act, especially illustration (e), allows the court to presume that judicial and official acts have been regularly performed (omnia praesumuntur rite esse acta).
A disputed signature or handwriting of a person can be proved under 8.67 of the Indian Evidence Act by which among the following methods?
- aBy invoking S.73 of the Indian Evidence Act.
- bBy direct oral evidence of a person who is conversant into the handwriting or signature of that person.
- cBy adducing the evidence of an expert.
- dAll of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Disputed handwriting/signature (S.67) may be proved by direct evidence of one acquainted with it (S.47), by expert evidence (S.45), or by the court comparing it under S.73. Hence all of the above.
To form an opinion under 8.50 of Indian Evidence Act relating to relationship of one person with another, opinion of which among the following person is admissible?
- aAny member of the family.
- bAny person who has some knowledge about the relationship
- cAny member of family or otherwise, who has special means of knowledge on the subject.
- dAll of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under S.50 of the Evidence Act, the opinion on relationship is relevant only when expressed by a person who, as a member of the family or otherwise, has special means of knowledge on the subject.
Under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Cognizance is taken of
- aOffence
- bAccused
- cFinal report
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under S.190 CrPC, cognizance is taken of an offence, not of an offender/accused. (R.R. Chari v. State of U.P.)
Regarding presumption about a document under 8.90 of the Indian Evidence Act, which among the following is true?
- aIt should come from proper custody
- bIt should be more than 30 years old
- cIf conditions under 3.90 are attracted, the court can draw presumptions regarding signature and handwriting.
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under S.90 of the Evidence Act, a document must be 30 years old and come from proper custody, whereupon the court may presume the signature, execution and attestation. Hence all of the above.
Under 8.202 Cr.RC, the Magistrate is not authorised to
- aConduct enquiry himself
- bAsk police officer to conduct an investigation
- cAsk a person who is not a police officer to conduct an investigation
- dIssue process to the accused.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
S.202 CrPC concerns postponement of issue of process so the Magistrate may inquire himself or direct an investigation by a police officer or other person. At that stage the Magistrate is NOT authorised to issue process to the accused (process is issued under S.204).
Laying of trap is a part of
- aInquiry
- bEnquiry
- ctrial
- dInvestigation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Laying of a trap to catch an offender (e.g. in bribery cases) is a part of the investigation, which under S.2(h) CrPC includes all proceedings for collection of evidence conducted by a police officer.
Test Identification Parade is conducted as a part of
- aTrial
- bEnquiry
- cInquiry
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A Test Identification Parade is held during investigation by the police (often with a Magistrate); it is neither part of the trial nor of an inquiry. Hence 'None of the above.'
A' without any cause fires a loaded pistol into a crowd. One person died of bullet injury on the spot. What, if any, is the offence committed by 'A'?
- aMurder
- bCulpable homicide not amounting to murder
- cNo offence, since he had no intention
- dRash and negligent act endangering or safety of others
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Firing a loaded pistol into a crowd is an act so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, done without excuse - it falls under S.300 'Fourthly' and is murder.
To escape from criminal liability, when a defence of intoxication is set up, the intoxication should be
- aSelf administered
- bAdministered against his will or knowledge
- cShould not be self administered
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under S.85 IPC, involuntary intoxication is a defence only where the thing which intoxicated was administered to the accused without his knowledge or against his will.
The right of private defence is based on which among the following
- aSelf preservation
- bSelf respect
- cSelf sufficiency
- dSelf reliance
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The right of private defence (Ss.96-106 IPC) is founded on the instinct of self-preservation and the basic human right to protect oneself, one's property and others against unlawful aggression.
Which one among the following is correct in relation to distinction under S.34 and S.149 of IPC?
- aSection 34 creates a specific offence, whereas Section 149 does not
- bSection 34 as well as Section 149 create specific offence
- cSection 149 creates a specific offence whereas Section 34 does not
- dSection 34 as well as Section 149 do not create specific offence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
S.149 IPC (unlawful assembly) creates a distinct/specific substantive offence imputing constructive liability on members, whereas S.34 IPC is merely a rule of evidence/principle of joint liability and creates no offence by itself.
Cruelty under S.498 A IPC does not include which among the following?
- aHarassment of the woman
- bPhysical cruelty
- cMental cruelty
- dAll of the above cumulatively
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Cruelty under S.498A IPC includes harassment, physical cruelty and mental cruelty; the odd-one-out (what it does not separately require as a single answer) is 'all of the above cumulatively' — any one form suffices, so option (d) is the correct exclusion.
Doctrine of volenti non fit injuria is incorporated in?
- aS.88 of IPC
- bS.87 of IPC
- cS.89 of IPC
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The maxim volenti non fit injuria (consent as defence) is reflected across Ss.87, 88 and 89 IPC dealing with acts done with consent; hence all the above.
Under Indian Law of crimes, right of private defence is available with respect to
- aHarm to body
- bHarm to movable property
- cHarm to immovable property
- dAll the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Ss.97-99 IPC the right of private defence extends to the body of oneself or another and to property (movable or immovable); hence all the above.
In preparing the questions put to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the Court can take assistance of whom among the following ?
- aAmicus curiae
- bThe accused
- cThe prosecutor
- dThe prosecutor and the defence counsel
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In framing S.313 Cr.P.C. questions the court may take assistance of the Public Prosecutor and the defence counsel (S.313(5) Cr.P.C., inserted by 2008 amendment).
The principle of actus curiae neminem gravabit is incorporated in which provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure ?
- aS.151
- bS.152
- cS.144
- d8.10
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Actus curiae neminem gravabit (an act of the court shall prejudice no one) underlies restitution under S.144 CPC, which restores parties on reversal of a decree.
Concept of letter rogatory is found in which among the following?
- aIndian Penal Code
- bCode of Criminal Procedure
- cLaw of Property
- dSpecific Relief Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Letters rogatory for issue of process to a foreign authority/serving summons abroad are provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure (S.166A/166B Cr.P.C.).
Legality of Narco Analysis Test was considered by the Supreme Court in which among the following cases?
- aSelvi V. State of Karnataka
- bKathi Kalu Oghad V. State of Bombay
- cAruna Shanbaug V. Union of India
- dIndira Jai Singh V. Union of India
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The legality of narco-analysis, polygraph and BEAP tests was decided in Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010) 7 SCC 263, holding involuntary administration violates Art.20(3) and 21.
Who among the following was the first woman Chief Justice of a State ?
- aSmt.Anna Chandy
- bSmt.Leila Seth
- cSmt.Fatima Beevi
- dSmt.K.K.Usha
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Justice Leila Seth became the first woman Chief Justice of a State High Court (Himachal Pradesh) on 5 August 1991. (Fatima Beevi was first woman Supreme Court judge.)
Find out the odd pair?
- aIndian Penal Code and Lord Macaulay
- bFundamental Duties and Fundamental Rights
- cDoctrine of substituted Security and substituted performance
- dMurder and culpable homicide
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The other pairs are genuinely related; 'Doctrine of substituted Security and substituted performance' is the odd/mismatched pair (substituted performance is a Specific Relief Act concept while 'substituted security' is not a paired counterpart).
Principle of rarest of rare case was laid down by Supreme Court in?
- aMithu V. State of Punjab
- bP.Kottaya V. King Emperor
- cSelvi V. Union of India
- dKathi Kalu Oghad V. State of Bombay
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The 'rarest of rare' doctrine for death penalty was laid down in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980); among the listed options only Mithu v. State of Punjab (death-penalty jurisprudence) fits, the others being evidence/narco cases, so (a) is the best answer.
In a trial relating to murder of 'A', one witness deposed that a few days prior to the death of 'A', the witness saw 'A' and accused sitting in a Bar and consuming liquor. He had not seen them thereafter. Which is the most reasonable and rational conclusion which the court can draw?
- aLast seen theory can be applied.
- bA and the accused were friends and hence the accused could not have committed murder of 'A'.
- cNo inference can be drawn from the version of witness
- dA and accused were in good terms at least till few days prior to death of A'
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Seeing A and the accused together amicably a few days before the death only shows they were on good terms till then; the gap is too large for the last-seen-together theory, so (d) is the most rational inference.
Fiduciary relationship is a relation between two person based on
- aTrust
- bContract
- cBlood relation
- dMoney
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A fiduciary relationship is founded on trust and confidence reposed by one person in another.
A witness makes a statement in court, knowing it to be false. He commits the offence of
- aPerjury
- bContempt of court
- cForgery
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A witness deliberately making a false statement on oath in court commits perjury (giving false evidence, S.191/193 IPC).
Who is an eo Nomine party?
- aA nominee of a party
- bA party, by or under that name
- cNot a nominee of a party
- dA party who is brought on record by orders of court.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
An eo nomine party is a person who is a party to the proceeding by or under that very name, expressly named on the record.
A statute states that “sale of car, van, jeep and such other vehicles require licence". Question arises whether for sale of two wheelers, licence is required. Which Rule of interpretation is to be employed?
- aLiteral interpretation
- bGolden rule of interpretation
- cReddendo singula singulis
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The question whether 'such other vehicles' covers two-wheelers is resolved by ejusdem generis (general words take colour from preceding specific words); since that rule is not listed, the answer is 'None of the above'.
Court of record means
- aA court which preserves the records forever
- bA court whose judicial proceedings are covered by records.
- cA court which can punish for contempt
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A court of record is one whose acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled/preserved as records for perpetual memory and testimony (Art.129/215). Option (a) best captures this.
Who was the first Chief Justice of India?
- aPatanjali Sastri
- bHarilal J. Kania
- cM.C.Mahajan
- dB.K.Mukherjee
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Harilal J. Kania was the first Chief Justice of India (from 26 January 1950).
If both offices of President and Vice President happen to be vacant simultaneously, who will discharge the duties of President?
- aPrime Minister
- bSpeaker of Lok Sabha
- cChairman of Rajya Sabha
- dChief Justice of India
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
If both the President and Vice-President offices are vacant, the Chief Justice of India (or senior-most SC judge) discharges the President's functions under the President (Discharge of Functions) Act, 1969.
Fundamental duty is referred to in which part of the Constitution of India?
- aPart IV A
- bPart III
- cPart IV
- dPart V
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Fundamental Duties (Art.51A) are contained in Part IVA of the Constitution, inserted by the 42nd Amendment, 1976.
In which case, the Supreme Court allowed passive euthanasia in exceptional circumstances?
- aGeeta Chopra V Union of India
- bAruna Shanbaug V Union of India
- cSeema V Aswin Kumar
- dMinerva Mills V Union of India
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Passive euthanasia in exceptional circumstances (with safeguards) was permitted in Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011) 4 SCC 454.
What is the meaning of “in Pari Delicto"?
- aBoth parties in dispute are at fault
- bWhen parties dispute each other
- cBoth sides are not at fault
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'In pari delicto' means both parties to the dispute are equally at fault/in wrong.
In which case, the Supreme Court of India directed compulsory registration of all marriages?
- aSeema Shetty V. Union of India
- bSelvi V. State of Karnataka
- cMinerva Mills V. Union of India
- dSeema V. Aswinkumar
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The Supreme Court directed compulsory registration of all marriages in Seema v. Ashwani Kumar (2006) 2 SCC 578. Option (d) 'Seema V. Aswinkumar' is the correct case (option (a) names a different respondent).
In which case the Supreme Court, for the first time, laid down that Fundamental Rights have primacy over the Directive principles of the state policy?
- aSanjay Singh V. State of Punjab
- bADM Jabalpur V. Union of India
- cMinerva Mills V. Union of India
- dManeka Gandhi V. Union of India
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) the Supreme Court held that Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles must be balanced, striking down the clause giving DPSPs unconditional primacy; among the options it is the case asserting primacy of Fundamental Rights.
What is meant by a holographic will?
- aWill in the hand writing of the testator
- bWill kept in a mechanical device
- cWill in a printed form
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A holographic will is one written entirely in the handwriting of the testator himself.
Practise Kerala Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Kerala Judiciary preparation guide.