Q1 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 The proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, places a restriction on amendment of pleadings by providing that no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial has commenced unless the Court concludes that :-
A in spite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial B the opposite party has consented to the amendment C the suit value exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court D the amendment relates only to a clerical error
Q2 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 On the application of any party and to the satisfaction of the Court, the power to transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending before it to any subordinate court competent to try the same, or to withdraw such proceeding and transfer it, is conferred on the District Court (and the High Court) under :-
A Section 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure B Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure C Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure D Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Q3 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 All questions arising between the parties to the suit in which the decree was passed, or their representatives, and relating to the execution, discharge or satisfaction of the decree, shall be determined by the executing court and not by a separate suit. This bar is contained in :-
A Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure B Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure C Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure D Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Q4 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Where a decree is varied or reversed in any appeal, revision or other proceeding, the court of first instance, on the application of any party entitled to a benefit, shall cause such restitution as will, so far as may be, place the parties in the position they would have occupied but for the decree. This power is exercised under :-
A Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure B Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure C Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure D Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Q5 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 An order granting or refusing to grant a temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is :-
A revisable only and not appealable B a final decree not subject to any challenge C open to review alone under Section 114 D an appealable order under Order XLIII Rule 1
Q6 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 The court may, at any stage of the proceedings, order that the name of any party improperly joined be struck out, or that the name of a person who ought to have been joined be added, so that all questions in the suit may be effectually and completely adjudicated upon. This power is conferred by :-
A Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure B Order I Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure C Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure D Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure
Q7 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 A second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, lies to the High Court only where the case involves :-
A a substantial question of law B a mixed question of law and fact C a question of fact wrongly decided by the first appellate court D any error apparent on the face of the record
Q8 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Before instituting a suit against the Government in respect of an act purporting to be done by a public officer in his official capacity, a notice in writing under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure must be given, and the suit cannot be instituted until the expiry of :-
A six months from the notice B two months from the notice C one month from the notice D three months from the notice
Q9 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 The doctrine of res sub judice, under which no court shall proceed with the trial of a suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, is contained in :-
A Section 12 CPC B Section 11 CPC C Section 10 CPC D Section 9 CPC
Q10 Constitution of India In Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010), the Supreme Court held that the involuntary administration of narco-analysis, polygraph and brain-mapping (BEAP) tests violates:
A Only the right to privacy under Article 21 B The right to equality under Article 14 C The right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) read with the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 D Only the right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3)