Rajasthan Judiciary — Prelims 2017
Under provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 probate cannot be granted to:
- aA married daughter
- bA minor son
- cIllegitimate child
- dHalf brother
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (s.234 and related provisions), probate/letters of administration follow legitimate kindred; an illegitimate child is not recognised as kindred for grant of probate. A married daughter, minor son or half-brother can otherwise take a grant.
Under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 who among the following cannot be adopted:
- aA Hindu
- bAlready adopted child
- cA minor
- dAn unmarried child
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 10 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 lists who may be adopted: the person must be a Hindu, not already adopted, not married (unless custom permits) and below 15 years. A child already adopted cannot be adopted again.
Which of the following is not a 'Public Utility Service' for the purpose of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987:
- aTransport Service
- bPostal, Telegraph or Telephone Service
- cInsurance Service
- dBanking Services
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 22A of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 defines 'public utility service' to include transport, postal/telegraph/telephone, power/water, hospital and insurance services. Banking is not in the central statutory definition, so it is not a public utility service.
In a case where a party is added or substituted owing to assignment or devolution of any interest during the pendency of a suit, the suit shall as regards him, be deemed to have been instituted:
- aOn the date the suit was instituted.
- bWhen he had a party.
- cOn the date when the application for addition or substitution is made.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Order XXII Rule 10 (read with the proviso to s.21/limitation principles) CPC, where a party is added or substituted on assignment or devolution of interest during a suit, the suit as regards him is deemed instituted on the date the suit was originally instituted (the relation-back principle).
As per Schedule for compensation for third party fatal accidents under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 the amount of compensation arrived at, in consideration of the expenses, which a victim would have incurred, towards maintaining himself, had he been alive, shall be reduced
- a1/2
- b1/3
- c1/4
- d1/8
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under the Second Schedule to s.163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, one-third (1/3) of the income is deducted towards the amount the deceased would have spent on maintaining himself had he been alive.
For an instrument of gift of immovable property, under the Registration Act, 1908:
- aRegistration is compulsory
- bRegistration is optional
- cRegistration is exempted
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under s.17 of the Registration Act, 1908 (read with s.123 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882), a gift of immovable property must be effected by a registered instrument; registration is compulsory.
Where the time limit of a lease is of a year or number of years, which is expressed to be determinable before its expiration, and the lease omits to mention at whose option it is so terminable, who shall have such option:
- aLessee
- bLessor
- cTransferor
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 108(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 provides that where a lease for a year/years is determinable before expiry and the lease omits to mention at whose option, such option lies with the lessee.
The maxim 'Actus curiae neminem gravabit means
- aAn act of the Court shall prejudice no man
- bThe act of God does wrong to no one.
- cAn act in law shall prejudice no man.
- dAn act does not constitute guilt unless done with a guilty intention.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'Actus curiae neminem gravabit' means an act of the Court shall prejudice no man — no party should suffer for a mistake or delay attributable to the Court.
Which of the following is not an internal aid to the construction or interpretation of statute:
- aLong Title of an Act.
- bIllustrations
- cMarginal Notes appended to a section.
- dPreamble of a statute
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Long title, marginal notes and preamble are internal aids to construction (parts of the statute). Illustrations, being explanatory of the section, are sometimes treated as internal aids too, but among the given options 'Illustrations' is the answer the paper treats as not an internal aid; the long title, marginal notes and preamble are the classic internal aids.
Iddat period, in case of a divorced woman, if she is subject to menstruation, means:
- aThree menstrual courses after the date of divorce
- bSix months period after the date of divorce
- cNine menstrual courses after the date of divorce.
- dNine months after the date of divorce.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Muslim law (and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986), iddat for a divorced woman subject to menstruation is three menstrual courses after the date of divorce.
For the purpose of Rajasthan Relief of Agricultural indebtedness Act, 1957, the term 'agriculture' does not include:
- aHorticulture
- bBreeding of cattle, camels, sheep or goats
- cBee farming and collecting honey
- dReserving land for fodder grazing or thatching grass.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The definition of 'agriculture' in the Rajasthan Relief of Agricultural Indebtedness Act, 1957 includes horticulture, breeding of cattle/camels/sheep/goats and reserving land for fodder/grazing/thatching grass, but does NOT include bee farming and collecting honey.
Any person aggrieved by an order made by the Collector (Stamps) can apply for a revision under Section 65 of the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998, before:
- aRajasthan High Court
- bChief Controlling Revenue Authority
- cInspector General of Stamps
- dState Government
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 65 of the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 provides for revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority; a person aggrieved by an order of the Collector (Stamps) applies to that authority.
The Supreme Court of India in the exercise of its jurisdiction may make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any case, such power is conferred by:
- aArticle 141 of the Constitution of India.
- bArticle 142 of the Constitution of India.
- cArticle 32 of the Constitution of India.
- dArticle 124 of the Constitution of India.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Article 142 of the Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to pass such decree or order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it.
In which Judgement, Hon'ble Supreme Court has held Right to Privacy to be a Fundamental Right:
- aSubramanium Swamy vs. Union of India & Ors.
- bLok Prahari vs. Union of India & Ors.
- cJustice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation vs. Union of India & Ors.
- dJustice K.S.Puttaswamy & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1, a nine-judge bench held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21.
Which of the following is a valid defence against an action in tort:
- aMistake of fact
- bAct of God
- cMinority
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Act of God (vis major) is a recognised general defence in tort. Mistake of fact and minority are generally not valid defences in the law of torts.
When a marriage has been dissolved by a decree of divorce under Hindu Marriage Act,1955 and there is a right of appeal, the divorced persons may marry again:
- aAfter expiry of 1 month from the decree of divorce.
- bImmediately after passing of the decree of divorce.
- cAfter expiry of 2 months from the decree of divorce.
- dAfter expiry of the time for appealing, without any appeal having been presented.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 provides that divorced persons may marry again after the time for appealing has expired without any appeal having been presented (or after dismissal of an appeal).
Promissory estoppel is the extension of principle contained in which provision of the Evidence Act:
- aSection 65
- bSection 110
- cSection 115
- dSection 150
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Promissory estoppel is an extension of the principle of estoppel contained in Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Prior to the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 coming into force, who amongst the following was not Class I heir of male Hindu dying intestate:
- aMother
- bWidow
- cDaughter
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Mother, widow and daughter were all Class I heirs of a male Hindu dying intestate even prior to the 2005 amendment (Schedule, s.8 HSA, 1956). Hence none of them was excluded — 'None of the above'.
Under which provision of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, a person without lawful authority occupying land, which is at the disposal of local authority, can be evicted:
- aSection 91 of the Act
- bSection 90-A of the Act
- cSection 90-B of the Act
- dSection 92 of the Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 provides for summary eviction of a person occupying, without lawful authority, land which is at the disposal of the State or a local authority.
'Decree', as defined by Section 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 does not include:
- aA preliminary decree.
- bRejection of a plaint.
- cDetermination of any question within Section 144 CPC.
- dAny order of dismissal for default
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 2(2) CPC: 'decree' includes rejection of a plaint and determination of any question within s.144, and a preliminary decree, but expressly excludes any order of dismissal for default.
Against a decree passed in a suit after recording a compromise, an appeal on the ground that the compromise should not have been recorded, can be filed under:
- aSection 151 CPC.
- bOrder XXIII CPC.
- cOrder XLIII Rule 1-ACPC.
- dNone of the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
By the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 3 and Rule 3A CPC, no separate suit/appeal lies challenging a recorded compromise; the only remedy is before the same court that recorded it. No appeal under the listed provisions lies, so 'None of the above'. (Order XLIII Rule 1A only allows raising the validity of the compromise within the appeal against the decree itself, not as an independent appeal.)
Chapter II and III of Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 applies to:
- aAny premises let out to a citizen of a foreign country.
- bAny premises belonging to or vested in a University established by any law for the time being in force.
- cAny premises belonging to a Government Company as defined under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956.
- dAny premises situated in the municipal area of Jaipur City, let out for residential purposes, for a monthly rent of Rs. 8,000/-.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 3 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 exempts (excludes from Chapters II & III) premises let to foreign citizens, premises of a University/Government Company, etc. The Jaipur residential premises is the intended 'applies' answer (d). Flagged: per the bare Act, residential premises in Jaipur with rent of Rs.7,000 or more are also exempt, so Rs.8,000/month would arguably be exempt too — option appears internally inconsistent, but (d) is the official-key answer.
A suit against a municipality or its officers can be instituted otherwise than for the recovery of immovable property or for a declaration of title thereto:
- aAfter six months of the accrual of cause of action
- bAfter eight months of the accrual of cause of action.
- cWithin six months next after the accrual of cause of action.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Suits against a municipality/its officers (other than for recovery of immovable property or declaration of title) must be instituted within six months next after the accrual of the cause of action (standard municipal-law limitation/notice provision).
The grant of and transfer of licences is governed by:
- aThe Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
- bThe Specific Relief Act, 1963.
- cThe Indian Contract Act, 1932.
- dThe Indian Easements Act, 1882.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Licences are dealt with under the Indian Easements Act, 1882 (ss.52-64); the grant and transfer of licences is governed by that Act.
Under Rajasthan Court fees and Suits. Valuation Act, 1961, all questions arising on a plea that the subject matter of the suit has not been properly valued or that the fee paid is not sufficient, are required to be heard and decided:
- aAt the final hearing of the suit.
- bAt the discretion of the trial court.
- cBefore the hearing of the suit as contemplated by Order XVIII CPC.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under the Rajasthan Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961, all questions on under-valuation or insufficiency of court-fee are to be heard and decided before the hearing of the suit (as contemplated by Order XVIII CPC).
Which of the contract is not specifically enforceable:
- aA contract for the non performance of which compensation in money is not an adequate relief.
- bA contract which is in its nature determinable.
- cA contract, the performance of which does not involve the performance of a continuous duty, which the Court can supervise.
- dA contract which is not dependent on the personal qualification or volition of the parties.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 14(1) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, a contract which is in its nature determinable cannot be specifically enforced. Options (a), (c) and (d) describe contracts that ARE specifically enforceable; (b) is the exception.
The power of review on the Board of Revenue and other revenue courts is conferred by which provision of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955:
- aSection 207
- bSection 224
- cSection 229
- dSection 230
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 229 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 confers the power of review on the Board of Revenue and other revenue courts (Sections 229-231 deal with review, revision and reference).
Which of the following is not a negotiable instrument:
- aPromissory note
- bFixed Deposit Receipt
- cBill of Exchange.
- dA cheque
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 recognises only promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques as negotiable instruments. A Fixed Deposit Receipt is not a negotiable instrument.
Under the General Rules (Civil), 1986 all pleadings, applications and petitions filed in the course of civil judicial proceedings, shall be written in:
- aHindi
- bEnglish
- cAny language specified in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under the Rajasthan General Rules (Civil), 1986, pleadings, applications and petitions in civil judicial proceedings are required to be written in Hindi (the language of the courts in Rajasthan).
Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in the case of international commercial arbitration 'Court' means
- aThe principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction.
- bSmall Causes Court
- cThe High Court
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 2(1)(e)(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in the case of international commercial arbitration 'Court' means the High Court in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction (or having jurisdiction to decide the questions forming the subject-matter).
An order refusing to refer the parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is appealable under:
- aSection 34 of the Act
- bArticle 227 of the Constitution of India
- cSection 37 of the Act
- dSection 11 of the Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 37(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 makes an order refusing to refer the parties to arbitration under Section 8 appealable. (Post the 2015 amendment Section 37 expressly covers refusal under Section 8.)
The provisions for removal and suspension of any member or Chairperson of a Panchayati Raj Institution under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 are contained in:
- aSection 119 of the Act
- bSection 38 of the Act
- cSection 117-A of the Act
- dSection 39 of the Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 38 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 contains the provisions for removal and suspension of any member, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson of a Panchayati Raj Institution.
Under section 10 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 every partner is under a duty:
- aTo render true accounts and full information.
- bTo indemnify the firm for any loss caused to it by his fraud in the conduct of the business of the firm.
- cNot to carry on any business other than that of the firm.
- dTo be just and faithful to each other.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 10 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 ('Duty to indemnify for loss caused by fraud') casts on every partner the duty to indemnify the firm for any loss caused to it by his fraud in the conduct of the business of the firm. The other duties fall under Sections 9, 11 and 16.
Under Sale of Goods Act, 1930, movable goods does not include:
- aStock and shares
- bGrass
- cMoney
- dGrowing crops
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, 'goods' means every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money, but includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to land agreed to be severed. Money is expressly excluded.
In a suit against a Corporation, the summons may be served on:
- aAny employee of the corporation
- bRelative of the director of the corporation.
- cPrincipal officer of the corporation.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Order XXIX Rule 2 CPC, in a suit against a corporation the summons may be served on the secretary, or on any director or other principal officer of the corporation.
The offences under Sections 66B, 66C, 66D and 66E of Information and Technology Act, 2000, are
- aCognizable
- bSessions Triable
- cNon-bailable
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
By virtue of Section 77B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, offences punishable with imprisonment of three years and above (which includes Sections 66B, 66C, 66D, 66E) are cognizable; these are bailable and not sessions-triable.
A complainant, of a Magistrate triable case instituted upon a complaint, can challenge the judgement of acquittal passed by the competent court, by filing:
- aRevision in the Sessions Court.
- bRevision in the High Court.
- cAppeal before a Sessions Court.
- dApplication for grant of leave to appeal in the High Court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 378(4) CrPC, in a complaint case where the order is one of acquittal, the complainant may present an appeal to the High Court only after obtaining special leave to appeal from the High Court.
An information, supplied by an accused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, shall be recorded:
- aIn presence of two independent Panch witnesses.
- bIn presence of a Gazetted Officer.
- cIn presence of two Police Officers.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 27 of the Evidence Act prescribes no particular mode/witnesses for recording the information leading to discovery; the law mandates no presence of panch witnesses, Gazetted Officer or police officers as a condition. Hence 'None of the above.'
While assessing age of a person under the Juvenile Justice (care and protection of children) Act, 2015, the Court/Board is required to consider the documents/evidence in the following order of preference:
- a(i) Birth Certificate issued by a Municipality. (ii) School Certificate. (iii) Ossification test report. (iv) Aadhar Card.
- b(i) Ossification test report. (ii) Birth Certificate issued by the Municipality. (iii) Aadhar Card.
- c(i) Birth Certificate issued from the school/matriculation certificate. (ii) Date of birth certificate issued by the Municipality. (iii) Ossification test report.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 94(2) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 prescribes the order of preference: (i) date of birth certificate from school / matriculation certificate; failing which (ii) birth certificate from a municipality/corporation; and only in absence of both, (iii) ossification/age determination test.
Which of the following orders may not be passed by the Juvenile Justice Board after conducting inquiry of a child in conflict with law:
- aDirect the child to attend a school.
- bDirect the child to attend a vocational training centre.
- cSentence the child to imprisonment till he attains 18 years of age.
- dDirect the child to perform community service.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 18 of the JJ Act, 2015, the Board can pass dispositional orders (attend school, vocational training, community service, etc.) but cannot sentence a child in conflict with law to imprisonment; Section 21 bars death penalty/life imprisonment, and the Board has no power to imprison.
A Children Court trying a child in conflict with law for a heinous offence, is not empowered to
- aHold trial of a child as an adult.
- bHold inquiry of the child as a Juvenile Justice Board.
- cSentence the child to imprisonment for a term of 10 years.
- dSend the child to a place of safety till he attains the age of 21 years.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 19 r/w Section 21 of the JJ Act, 2015, a Children's Court trying a child as an adult cannot sentence the child to imprisonment (death penalty/life imprisonment without release are barred and ordinary imprisonment is not the prescribed mode); a fixed-term sentence such as 10 years' imprisonment is impermissible.
Where, after inquiry under Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (care and protection of children) Act, 2015, the Juvenile Justice Board is satisfied that a child above 16 years of age, has committed a heinous offence and should be tried as an adult, it may:
- aCommit the case to the Sessions Court concerned for trial of the child as an adult.
- bTry the child as per the procedure provided in Cr.P.C
- cReturn the charge-sheet to the Investigating Officer for presentation in the Court concerned.
- dTransfer the case to the Children Court for trial of the child as an adult.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 15 r/w Section 18(3) of the JJ Act, 2015, where the Board finds the child should be tried as an adult, it transfers the case to the Children's Court having jurisdiction to try such offences.
A private vehicle proceeding on a Highway, suspected to be carrying psychotropic drugs, may be searched by:
- aA Head Constable posted in the Police Station concerned.
- bA Sub-Inspector posted in some other District.
- cThe Deputy Superintendent of Police or officer-in-charge of the police station of the area concerned.
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 42 of the NDPS Act, 1985 (search of a vehicle in transit/conveyance on a highway falls under Section 43 for public place; empowered officers under Section 42 are the Deputy Superintendent of Police or officer-in-charge of the police station/empowered gazetted officers of the area concerned).
Before searching a suspect carrying a bag containing narcotic drugs in his hand, the Officer concerned is required to apprise him of his right to be searched in the presence of:
- aA Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer.
- bTwo independent witnesses from the locality.
- cOfficer-in-charge of the Police Station of the area concerned.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, 1985, before a personal search the officer must apprise the suspect of his right to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate (as held in State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh).
A vehicle, container or a receptacles used for commission of an offence punishable under the NDPS Act, 1985, shall not be liable to be confiscated:
- aIf the person using the same is acquitted by the Court after trial.
- bIf the prosecution fails to lead evidence about its ownership.
- cIf the owner proves that the vehicle was used in commission of the offence without his knowledge or connivance.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under the proviso to Section 60(3) of the NDPS Act, 1985, a conveyance shall not be confiscated if the owner proves that it was used in the commission of the offence without his knowledge or connivance and that he had taken reasonable precautions.
A being the owner of a plot of land, sells the same to B through a registered sale deed in the year 2005. B however does not make full payment to A. A again sells the same land to C in the year 2010 without informing him of the earlier transaction of 2005. Who would be the person aggrieved in these circumstances:
- aB (the first purchaser).
- bA (the seller).
- cC (the subsequent purchaser)
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 27 r/w Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, the prior registered sale to B (whether or not fully paid) creates a transfer; C, who paid value without notice of the earlier transaction, is the person aggrieved/prejudiced by A's fraudulent second sale.
The bail application rejected by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in a case involving offences under the said Act, may be challenged in the High Court, by filing:
- aBail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
- bRevision under Section 397 Cr.P.C.
- cPetition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
- dAn appeal
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 provides an appeal to the High Court against an order granting or refusing bail by the Special Court; hence the rejection is challenged by way of an appeal (not Section 439/397/482 CrPC).
X knows that Y is a member of the Scheduled Caste community. During the course of a free fight, X inflicts a grievous injury to Y by a sharp weapon. X is guilty of offence punishable under Section(s):
- a326 IPC only
- b3(b)(V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
- c326 IPC and 3(b)(V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In a free fight, the grievous hurt by sharp weapon is punishable under Section 326 IPC; the SC/ST Act offence under Section 3 requires the act to be committed 'on the ground that' the victim is a member of a SC/ST. In a free fight that caste-based intent is absent, so only Section 326 IPC applies.
A woman aged 30 years and her son aged 14 years, are witnesses to a murder. Their statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C. may be recorded by the Police Officer concerned at:
- aThe scene of the occurrence.
- bThe Women Police Station.
- cAt the Police Station where FIR is registered.
- dThe place where, such woman and her son reside
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 161 CrPC permits the police officer to examine and record statements of witnesses, including a woman and a child, at the scene of occurrence (or wherever the witness is found); there is no statutory bar requiring a particular police station or residence, so the statement may be recorded at the scene of occurrence.
In which of the following cases, the Court is required to record evidence before framing of charge:
- aSummons trial cases.
- bSessions trial cases.
- cWarrant cases instituted upon a complain
- dWarrant cases instituted upon a Police report.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 244 CrPC, in a warrant case instituted upon a complaint the Magistrate must take all such evidence as may be produced in support of the prosecution before framing of charge (Section 246). In police-report warrant cases (Section 240) and Sessions trials, charge is framed on the record/documents without pre-charge evidence.
Noncompliance of, which of the following orders passed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is an offence:
- aMaintenance order
- bCustody order
- cResidence order
- dProtection order
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, breach of a 'protection order' (or interim protection order) is the only non-compliance made a punishable offence (up to 1 year/Rs.20,000).
A woman subjected to rape, gives a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. implicating the accused for the offence. She commits suicide sometime later but before her statement could be recorded at the trial. Such statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. would be:
- aAdmissible as a substantive piece of evidence
- bAdmissible under Section 32 of the Evidence Act.
- cAdmissible under Section 33 of the Evidence Act.
- dInadmissible in evidence.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Once the maker is dead, her Section 164 CrPC statement as to the cause/circumstances of her death (rape leading to suicide) becomes admissible as a dying declaration under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act; it is not 'substantive' evidence in the ordinary sense nor admissible under Section 33 (which needs prior cross-examination).
A Court after holding trial, convicts and grants benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to an accused. Which of the following orders is impermissible in law:
- aAdmonish the offender.
- bDirect under Section 12 of the Act that the conviction shall not have an adverse effect on his service.
- cDirect the offender to pay compensation and cost.
- dDirect the offender to furnish bail and bonds to keep peace and good behaviour for three years.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Close call. On grant of probation under Section 4 POA the offender executes a bond to appear and receive sentence and to keep peace/good behaviour up to 3 years, so a separate direction to furnish 'bail and bonds to keep peace and good behaviour for three years' (a CrPC Ch.VIII security measure) is the order that does not fit the POA scheme; admonition (s.3), removal of disqualification (s.12) and compensation/costs (s.5) are all permissible.
Two friends A and B were sleeping in a room which was bolted from inside. In the morning, A is found murdered. Under which provision of the Evidence Act, prosecution can claim shifting of burden on B to prove the manner in which the murder took place:
- aSection 114 of the Evidence Act.
- bSection 103 of the Evidence Act.
- cSection 106 of the Evidence Act.
- dSection 101 of the Evidence Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Where two persons are in a room bolted from inside and one is found murdered, the fact of how the death occurred is within the special knowledge of the survivor; burden to explain shifts to him under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.
An FIR in relation to the offence under Section 406 IPC is lodged on 1.1.2010. The Police conducts investigation and submits a negative Final Report in the Court concerned on 2.2.2012. The Court takes cognizance of the above offence on 3.3.2013. In these circumstances, which of the following is correct
- aThe proceedings are barred by limitation.
- bThe proceedings are not barred by limitation as the offence under Section 406 IPC is a continuing offence.
- cThe proceedings are not barred by limitation as the FIR was lodged promptly.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 406 IPC (criminal breach of trust) is treated as a continuing offence; limitation under Section 468 CrPC therefore does not bar the proceedings (and Section 470/473 also save them), so the prosecution is not time-barred.
C being the wife of B, has obtained a decree of separation from the competent Court but they are still living in the same premises. B subjects C to intercourse. Their neighbour A watches the act and files an FIR. Which preposition is correct in these circumstances:
- aB is guilty of the offence punishable under Section 376-B IPC.
- bB is not guilty of any offence because C continues to be his legally wedded wife.
- cA would be guilty of the offence punishable under Section 354-C IPC.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Where the wife is living separately under a decree of separation, sexual intercourse by the husband without her consent is an offence under Section 376-B IPC.
5 persons take illegal possession of a field. The owner (the complainant party) of the field collects his supporters and goes to the field for oust the trespassers therefrom. In the free fight, which ensues, the trespassers kill one person from the complainant's side. All The accused can be convicted :
- aWith the aid of section 34 of IPC.
- bWith the aid of section 149 of IPC.
- cFor the individual injuries caused to the members of the complainant party.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In a sudden 'free fight' there is neither common intention (s.34) nor common object (s.149); each combatant is liable only for the individual injuries he personally caused.
The Investigating Officer conducting investigation of a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 collects the call details of the mobile phones held by the accused from whom recovery of drug was effected and the conspirator, who supplied the drug. Such call details:
- aCan be used as substantive evidence to prove the charge of conspiracy
- bAre inadmissible in evidence
- cCan be considered relevant only if the conversation held between
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Call detail records (electronic records) are admissible and, proving contact/association between the recovered-from accused and the supplier-conspirator, can be used as substantive evidence to establish the charge of conspiracy.
In a case involving the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of IPC, the accused is arrested and the prosecution fails to comply with the requirements of Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. The accused, who is a habitual offender, becomes entitled to compulsive bail on:
- a61st day from the date of his arrest.
- b91st day from the date of his arrest.
- cThe accused is not entitled to be released on compulsive bail .
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 304 Part II IPC carries imprisonment up to 10 years (not 10 years or more), so the default-bail period under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC is 60 days; the accused becomes entitled to compulsive bail on the 61st day, and habitual-offender status is irrelevant to the statutory right.
A Patwari while preparing a revenue record, intentionally enters incorrect facts in the documents and signs & certifies the same with the intention of causing loss to the true owner of the land. The Patwari is guilty of:
- aOffence of creating false/ forged documents punishable under Sections 467 and 468 IPC.
- bOffence of using a forged document punishable under Section 471 IPC.
- cOffence of criminal breach of trust punishable under Section 406 IPC
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A public servant (Patwari) who knowingly makes a false entry in a public/revenue record and certifies it to cause loss commits forgery of a record under Sections 467 and 468 IPC (Section 466 dealing with public records), i.e. creating false/forged documents.
An accused aged 20 years, having no previous criminal conduct, charged for the offence under Section 304 IPC, is convicted by the trial court. In these circumstances:
- aThe trial court is under a mandate of law to release the accused on probation.
- bThe trial court may release the accused on probation.
- cThe accused is not entitled to the benefit of probation because the offence is punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 304 IPC is not punishable with death or life imprisonment mandatorily, so it is not outside Section 4 POA; the court 'may' (discretionary, not mandatory) release a 20-year-old first offender on probation.
In which judgement, Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down that the Police cannot refuse registration of an FIR on the ground of lack of jurisdiction:
- aManish Ratan Vs. State of M.P.; 2007(1) SCC 336
- bAmarendu Jyoti Vs. State of Chhattisgarh; 2014(6) Criminal 719
- cRasiklal Dalpatram Thakkar Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.; AIR 2010 SC 715
- dY.Abraham Ajith & Ors. Vs. Inspector of Police, Chennai & Ors.; AIR 2004 SC 4286
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In Rasiklal Dalpatram Thakkar v. State of Gujarat (AIR 2010 SC 715), the Supreme Court held that the investigating agency/police cannot refuse to register/investigate a complaint merely on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.
In which judgement, under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that though compounding requires consent of both the parties, but even in absence of such consent, the Court can, in the interest of justice, on being satisfied that the complainant has been duly compensated, in its discretion, close the proceedings and discharge the accused:
- aMadhya Pradesh State Legal Service Authority Vs. Prateek Jain; 2015(1) SCC (Cri) 211
- bMetres and Instruments Private Limited Vs. Kanchan Mehta; AIR 2017 SC 4594
- cJIK Industries Ltd. Vs. Amarlal V. Jumani & Anr.; AIR 2012 SC 10
- dDamodar S.Prabhu Vs. Sayyed Bala Lal H.; AIR 2010 SC 1907
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In Meters and Instruments Pvt. Ltd. v. Kanchan Mehta (AIR 2017 SC 4594), the Supreme Court held that though compounding under the NI Act needs both parties' consent, the court may even without consent, on being satisfied the complainant is duly compensated, in its discretion close the proceedings and discharge the accused.
In which of the following judgments, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down that the competent Magistrate can direct the Police to conduct thorough and fair investigation into an FIR:
- aHasan Bhai Wali Bhai Qureshi Vs. State of Gujarat; AIR 2004 SC 2078
- bSakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P.; AIR 2008 SC 907
- cRashmi Behl Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.; AIR 2015 SC 776
- dAziza Begum Vs. Sate of Maharashtra; 2012 (b) SCC (Cri.) 61
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
In Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. (AIR 2008 SC 907), the Supreme Court held that a Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC has wide power to direct registration of an FIR and to order a thorough and fair investigation, and even monitor it.
In which judgement, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down that a party, who is desirous of proving electronic evidence but does not have access to the device from which, the document was produced, is not required to produce and prove the certificate under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act:
- aState of Delhi NCT VS. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru; AIR 2005 SC 3826
- bHarpal Singh @ Chhota Vs. State of Punjab; 2016(4) Crimes 154
- cAnvar P.V. Vs. P.K.Bashir; AIR 2015 SC 180
- dShafi Mohd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh; SLP (Cri) No.3202/2017, decided on 30.1.2018
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
In Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (SLP (Cri) No.2302/2017, dt. 30.01.2018), the Supreme Court held that a party not in possession/control of the device from which the electronic record was produced is not required to furnish the Section 65-B certificate.
In which judgement, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down that having taken cognizance of a case, the Magistrate cannot direct the Police to conduct further investigation:
- aState of Haryana Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal; AIR 1992 SC 604
- bM/s. Jayanti Vitamin Vs. Chaitanya Kumar; AIR 1992 SC 1930
- cAmrutbhai Shambhubhai Patel Vs. Sumanbhai Kantibhai Patel & Ors.; AIR 2017 SC774
- dHemant Dhasmana Vs. CBI; AIR 2001 SC 2721
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In Amrutbhai Shambhubhai Patel v. Sumanbhai Kantibhai Patel (AIR 2017 SC 774), the Supreme Court held that once cognizance is taken and the accused has appeared, the Magistrate cannot suo motu (or on the complainant's request) direct further investigation.
A competent Court, shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under The Electricity Act, 2003:
- aUpon a complaint in writing made by any general person.
- bUpon an oral complaint made by a Chief Electrical Inspector.
- cUpon a complaint in writing made by licencee or generating company
- dUpon none of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 151 of the Electricity Act, 2003, a court takes cognizance only upon a complaint in writing made by the appropriate Government/Commission or their authorised officer, a Chief/Electrical Inspector, or a licensee or generating company.
Under the provisions of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, can a report be published by the media, which discloses the identity of a sexually assaulted child:
- aCannot be published.
- bCan be published in public interest.
- cCan be published, if permitted by a competent Special Court.
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 23 of the POCSO Act, 2012 the media cannot disclose the identity of the child victim, but the Special Court competent to do so may, for reasons recorded in writing, permit such disclosure if it is in the child's interest.
Police Officer, in all cases where the arrest of a person is not required under section 41(1) of Cr.P.C., against whom, a reasonable complaint has been made that he has committed a cognizable offence, then:
- aPolice Officer may without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant, arrest such person
- bPolice Officer shall issue a notice directing that person to appear before him or at such other place, as may be specified in the notice.
- cA Police Officer, while recording his reasons in writing, can arrest such a person.
- dPolice officers can do all the above.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 41-A CrPC, in all cases where arrest is not required under Section 41(1), the police officer shall issue a notice directing the person to appear before him or at the specified place.
If a Magistrate of a Court, requiring to examine at his private residence, a record of a case in his Court, he:
- aMay take charge of such record without any permission.
- bMay take charge of such record with prior permission of concerned District & Sessions Judge.
- cMay take charge of such record with prior permission of concerned High Court.
- dCan not take charge of such record.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A Presiding Magistrate of the court to which the record belongs may take charge of the record of a case pending in his own court to examine it at his private residence without requiring any superior's permission under the General Rules (Civil).
Choose the correct alternative that expresses the 'Future Perfect' tense
- aShe will be completing her assignment
- bShe will complete her assignment
- cShe is completing her assignment.
- dShe will have completed her assignment by midnight.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
'She will have completed her assignment by midnight' is the future perfect tense (will have + past participle).
'He has just _______ out of the room in a rage.' Supply the correct form of verb from the given alternatives
- aFlinged
- bFlung
- cFlung
- dFlanged
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The past participle of 'fling' is 'flung' (He has just flung out of the room); options (b) and (c) are identical 'Flung', the intended correct form.
. _______ man is the only animal that uses fire.
- aX
- bThe
- cA
- dAn
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'Man is the only animal that uses fire' uses 'man' generically (whole class) and takes no article; option (a) 'X' denotes the zero/no article.
He has hardly _______ money for his survival.
- aFew
- bA few
- cSome
- dAny
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
With the adverb 'hardly' (a negative), the correct quantifier with an uncountable noun is 'any': 'He has hardly any money for his survival.'
As the enemy was closing in, we decided to stay away.' The phrase 'close in' means
- aShoot out
- bGo away
- cCome nearer
- dWin
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The phrasal verb 'close in' means to come nearer / approach (often menacingly).
When someone says, "I am out of the woods now", he means that
- aHe has come out of the forest.
- bHe has destroyed all the woods
- cHe is no longer in danger or difficulty.
- dHe does not want to live in forest
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The idiom 'out of the woods' means no longer in danger or difficulty.
Choose the correct passive voice of the following sentence. 'We must not look down on the poor.'
- aThe poor must not looked down upon by us.
- bThe poor must not be looked on by us
- cThe poor must not be looked down on by us.
- dThe poor must not be looked down on by us.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Passive of 'We must not look down on the poor' is 'The poor must not be looked down on by us.' Options (c) and (d) are printed identically; (c) chosen as first correct instance.
Identify the sentence which is not written in passive voice
- aUtmost care has to be taken
- bBeing a student, you must work hard.
- cHe was being chased.
- dThe case has been set aside by the court.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Being a student, you must work hard' is active voice; the other three are passive constructions.
Complete the following sentence with the correct coordinating conjunction. "I had studied a lot, _______ I did really well on the test.
- aSo
- bFor
- cBut
- dYet
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Cause-and-result requires 'so': 'I had studied a lot, so I did really well on the test.'
Complete the following sentence with correct subordinating conjunction: 'You can only play outside _______ your father gets home.’
- aWhereas
- bUntil
- cIn case
- dBecause
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Until' fits: 'You can only play outside until your father gets home' (time-based subordinating conjunction).
She said, “Merry Christmas!" Which of the following is the correct indirect speech of the above statement:
- aShe told me Merry Christmas.
- bShe said that Christmas was Merry.
- cShe wished me a Merry Christmas.
- dShe called me a Merry Christmas.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
An exclamation of greeting in reported speech uses 'wished': 'She wished me a Merry Christmas.'
Which of the following sentences uses the modal 'would' to express a wish or desire:
- aWould that I had made contact with him before his departure.
- bWould you mind opening the window?
- cShe would look at the stars for hours when she was a child.
- dShe would not follow my advice.
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'Would that I had made contact with him before his departure' uses 'would' to express a wish/desire.
Which of the following sentences expresses suggestion
- aWill I close the door?
- bShall I close the door?
- cMay I close the door?
- dCould I close the door?
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Shall I close the door?' offers/suggests an action; 'shall I' is used for suggestions and offers.
Pick the correct synonym for the word 'robust":
- aStrong
- bFrail
- cInfirm
- dNoxious
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
'Robust' means strong and sturdy; 'strong' is the synonym (frail/infirm are antonyms).
. Choose the word which is opposite in meaning to the word "Veracity"
- aTruthfulness
- bProbity
- cMendacity
- dIntegrity
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
'Veracity' means truthfulness; its opposite is 'mendacity' (lying/falsehood). Truthfulness, probity, integrity are synonyms.
Practise Rajasthan Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Rajasthan Judiciary preparation guide.