Q1 Indian Evidence Act The rule that the fact of a person's birth during the continuance of a valid marriage (or within 280 days of its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried) is conclusive proof of legitimacy, unless non-access is shown, is contained in which section of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
A Section 118 B Section 112 of the Evidence Act, retained C Section 119 D Section 116
Q2 Indian Evidence Act Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, when any fact is especially within the knowledge of a person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him. This rule is embodied in:
A Section 109 B Section 105 C Section 106 D Section 104
Q3 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, an accomplice is a competent witness against an accused, and as enacted, a conviction is not illegal if it proceeds upon the corroborated testimony of an accomplice. This rule is found in:
A Section 124 B Section 138 C Section 133 of the Evidence Act, retained D Section 139
Q4 Indian Evidence Act Leading questions, that is, questions suggesting the answer which the person putting it wishes to receive, are dealt with under which section of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
A Section 141 of the Evidence Act, retained B Section 146 C Section 157 D Section 162
Q5 Indian Evidence Act Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, the Judge may, in order to discover or obtain proper proof of relevant facts, ask any question he pleases of any witness or party about any relevant or irrelevant fact. This power is conferred by:
A Section 162 B Section 168 C Section 165 of the Evidence Act, retained D Section 146
Q6 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) Under Section 39(2) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where the Court has to form an opinion on any matter relating to information transmitted or stored in a computer resource or other electronic or digital form, the opinion of the Examiner of Electronic Evidence referred to in Section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is:
A merely an opinion of a public servant, having no evidentiary value B conclusive proof of the genuineness of the electronic record C a relevant fact, and such Examiner shall be an expert D admissible only if corroborated by an independent expert
Q7 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) As per Section 146 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, even where the adverse party objects, the Court shall permit leading questions in examination-in-chief as to matters which are:
A introductory or undisputed, or which have, in the Court's opinion, been already sufficiently proved B relating to the credit of the witness C in dispute between the parties D concerning the character of the accused
Q8 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, the Court may, in its discretion, permit the person who calls a witness to put to him any question which might be put in cross-examination by the adverse party. This power (relating to a hostile witness) is contained in:
A Section 157 B Section 158 C Section 154 D Section 156
Q9 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) Under Section 93 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where an electronic record purporting or proved to be a certain age is produced from custody which the Court considers proper, the Court may presume that the electronic signature was affixed by the person it purports to belong to. The age prescribed for this presumption is:
A three years old B twenty years old C five years old D thirty years old
Q10 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) Under the proviso to Section 60 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, when the original is a public document within the meaning of Section 74, or a document of which a certified copy is permitted to be given in evidence, the secondary evidence admissible is:
A any one of the kinds of secondary evidence mentioned in Section 58 B a copy made by a mechanical process C oral account of its contents by a person who has seen it D the certified copy of the document, but no other kind of secondary evidence