Live Bihar Judiciary 2026 mock series · 50 free questions Start now
Law of Contract & Allied · Sec. 27, 30 Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Sec. 178 Indian Contract Act, 1872 (pledge by transfer of documents of title)

Morvi Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. Union of India

An owner of goods can make a valid pledge of them by endorsing and transferring the railway receipts representing those goods.

Citation
AIR 1965 SC 1954
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
1965-03-03
Bench
K. Subba Rao, Raghubar Dayal, J.R. Mudholkar, JJ.

Facts

A firm consigned boxes of menthol crystals from Bombay to Delhi 'to self' and endorsed the railway receipts in favour of Morvi Mercantile Bank as security for an advance of Rs. 20,000. The consignment never reached Delhi and the railway failed to deliver the goods. The Bank, as endorsee of the railway receipts for valuable consideration, sued for Rs. 35,500, the value of the goods, as damages.

Issues

  • Whether the owner of goods can make a valid pledge of them by transferring the railway receipts representing the goods.
  • Whether the Bank as pledgee/endorsee of the railway receipts could maintain a suit for the full value of the consignment.

Arguments

The Bank argued that endorsement of the railway receipts for consideration effected a valid pledge of the underlying goods, entitling it to recover their full value. The Union of India contended that transfer of a document of title could not confer on a full owner a right to pledge greater than that available to owners with defective title or mercantile agents.

Held

The Court held that an owner of goods can make a valid pledge of them by transferring the railway receipts representing the goods. It reasoned that the exceptions grafted onto the nemo dat quod non habet maxim to facilitate mercantile transactions allow bona fide pledges by transfer of documents of title by owners with defective title and by mercantile agents; it would be incongruous to deny the same facility to a full owner. The right was therefore extended by construction to full owners, and the Bank as pledgee was allowed a decree for Rs. 35,500 as damages.

Ratio decidendi

A railway receipt is a document of title to goods, and a valid pledge of the goods can be effected by endorsement and transfer of the railway receipt; the pledgee can maintain a suit for the full value of the goods on non-delivery.

Significance

A landmark on documents of title and pledge under the Sale of Goods Act and Contract Act; it secured the position of banks financing trade against documents of title and remains the leading authority that a railway receipt represents the goods for purposes of pledge.

Related

nemo dat quod non habet (Sec. 27 Sale of Goods Act)Documents of title to goods (Sec. 2(4) Sale of Goods Act)Pledge (Sec. 172, 178 Indian Contract Act)Stoppage in transit

Test yourself on Law of Contract & Allied. Application-level MCQs with instant scoring.

Take a subject test →

Source: /Users/tiwari/Documents/All Law Books/raw/Sales of goods Act/EFFECTS OF CONTRACT _ TRANSFER OF TITLE.docx.mdhttps://indiankanoon.org/doc/292369/

Law Mock is an independent preparation resource and is not affiliated with any High Court, Public Service Commission, or government body. All exam information is sourced from official notifications and is updated periodically.