Odisha Judiciary — Prelims 2017
Indian Constitution is;
- aUnitary
- bFederal
- cQuasi-federal
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The Indian Constitution is described as quasi-federal (federal in form, unitary in spirit) per the Supreme Court in State of West Bengal v. Union of India and the classic K.C. Wheare characterisation.
The words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular were added in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the ___ Constitutional Amendment.
- a42nd
- b32nd
- c25th
- d9th
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The words 'Socialist' and 'Secular' were inserted into the Preamble by the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976.
“Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment” is provided under Article:
- a14
- b15
- c16
- d17
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.
The President can make laws, when the Parliament is not in session by issuing:
- aOrders
- bBills
- cOrdinance
- dNotification
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Article 123, the President promulgates Ordinances having the force of law when Parliament is not in session.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that the Union Government cannot dismiss a duly elected State Government on the sole ground that the ruling party in the state suffered an overwhelming defeat in the election of the Lok Sabha?
- aS. R. Bommai v. Union of India
- bKarunanidhi v. Union of India
- cJayalalitha v. State
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) held a State Government cannot be dismissed merely because the ruling party lost the Lok Sabha election; Article 356 is subject to judicial review.
The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States falls under its:
- aAdvisory jurisdiction
- bAppellate jurisdiction
- cOriginal jurisdiction
- dConstitutional jurisdiction
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Centre-State and inter-State disputes are decided under the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction under Article 131.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court used its power of Judicial review ?
- aGolaknath Case
- bBank Nationalization Case
- cMinetva Mills Case .
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Golak Nath, Bank Nationalization (R.C. Cooper) and Minerva Mills all involved the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, so 'All of the above' is correct.
The Supreme Court considered the scope of Freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a)for the first time in:
- aCross Roads Case
- bK. A. Abbas Case
- cBandit Queen Case
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, popularly the 'Cross Roads' case (1950), was the first to consider the scope of Article 19(1)(a) freedom of speech.
In which of the following Cases, Supreme Court held that right to legal aid is a Fundamental Right ?
- aSunil Batra Case
- bM. H. Hoskot Case
- cPrem Shanker Shukla Case
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978) held that the right to free legal aid is a fundamental right under Article 21.
Reservation of seats for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in every Panchayat is provided under Article_____ of Constitution of India.
- a243D
- b274D
- c275D
- d272D
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Article 243D provides reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in every Panchayat.
In which of the following provisions 1mesne profit has been defined in the Code of Civil Procedure ?
- aSection 2(4)
- bSection 2(8)
- cSection 2(12)
- dSection 2(14)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
'Mesne profits' is defined in Section 2(12) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Pecuniary jurisdiction of the court is contained in_____ of Code of Civil Procedure.
- aSection 6
- bSection 7
- cSection 8
- dSection 9
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 7 of the CPC deals with pecuniary jurisdiction (Provincial Small Cause Courts); it is the recognised provision addressing pecuniary jurisdiction among the listed options.
Principle of res judicata applies to
- aSuits only
- bExecution proceedings only
- cArbitration proceedings only
- dSuits as well as execution proceedings
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
The principle of res judicata under Section 11 CPC applies to suits as well as execution proceedings (Explanation VII to Section 11).
Which of the following Section of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with stay of suits?
- aSection 9
- bSection 10
- cSection 11
- dSection 12
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 10 of the CPC deals with stay of suits (res sub judice).
A suit for the partition of immovable property, shall be instituted in the court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the____
- aProperty is situated
- bPlaintiff resided
- cDefendant resided
- dAny of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 16 CPC, a suit for partition of immovable property must be instituted where the property is situated.
Which of the following provisions under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with rejection of plaint ?
- aOrder 7, Rule 7
- bOrder 7, Rule 8
- cOrder 7, Rule 10
- dOrder 7. Rule 11
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC deals with rejection of plaint.
Which of the following order deals with issue and service of summons ?
- aOrder V
- bOrder VI
- cOrder VII
- dOrder IV
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Order V of the CPC deals with issue and service of summons.
Defendant failed to file a written statement even after the stipulated time. The court pronounced the judgement. It is:
- aLegal
- bIllegal
- cJustifiable
- dIrregular
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC, where a defendant fails to file a written statement within the permitted time, the court may pronounce judgment; doing so is legal.
An application to set aside an ex parte decree shall be filed before_____
- aThe High Court
- bThe court which passed the decree
- cThe court to which an appeal lies from the decree
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, an application to set aside an ex parte decree is filed before the court which passed the decree.
In a suit by A against B, C and Ds ex parte decree was passed, C and D were not served with summonses while B was served. In such a situation:
- aDecree against all of them can be set aside
- bDecree against B cannot be set aside
- cDecree against all of them cannot be set aside
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under the proviso to Order IX Rule 13 CPC, where the decree is of such a nature that it cannot be set aside against the non-served defendants (C and D) without affecting B, the decree against all may be set aside.
An accused arrested can be kept in custody without producing him before the magistrate, after his arrest for a period of______
- a12 hours
- b24 hours
- c48 hours
- d90 days
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 57 CrPC (and Article 22(2) of the Constitution), an arrested person cannot be detained beyond 24 hours without being produced before a magistrate (excluding journey time).
Section 41 A, 41B, 41C and 41D were incorporated in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by:
- aThe Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005
- bThe Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2006
- cThe Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Sections 41A, 41B, 41C and 41D were inserted into the CrPC by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008 (Act 5 of 2009).
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that ‘no arrest can be made because it is lawful for the police officer to do so. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing and the justification for the exercise of it is quite another. The police officer must be able to justify the arrest apart from his power to do so’?
- aState of Gujarat v. Lai Singh
- bJoginder Kumar v. State of UP
- cNandini Satpathy v. P. L Dahi
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. (1994) held that no arrest should be made merely because it is lawful; the existence of the power to arrest is distinct from the justification for its exercise.
When a police officer files a report under Section 195(1)(a) of CrPC, it is known as a:
- aComplaint
- bRefer Report
- cPolice Report
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under the Explanation/proviso to Section 2(d) CrPC, a report by a police officer in a case disclosing a non-cognizable offence (the situation under Section 195(1)(a)) is deemed to be a complaint, and the officer the complainant.
Offence for which, a police officer, has no authority to arrest without warrant is called a:
- aBailable offence
- bNon-cognizable offence
- cNon-compoundable offence
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A non-cognizable offence is one in which a police officer has no authority to arrest without a warrant (Section 2(l) CrPC).
The accused filed an application before the magistrate to allow him to appear through his power of attorney holder. The magistrate allowed the petition. The order is:
- aLegal
- bIllegal
- cImproper
- dIrregular
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 205/273 CrPC a magistrate may dispense with personal attendance and permit appearance through a pleader/power of attorney holder; the order is legal.
Executive Magistrates are appointed under_____ of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
- aSection 20
- bSection 18
- cSection 14
- dSection 15
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 20 CrPC empowers the State Government to appoint Executive Magistrates in every district and metropolitan area.
Which of the following Sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with conditional order for removal of nuisance ?
- aSection 133
- bSection 134
- cSection 135
- dSection .136
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 133 CrPC provides for a conditional order for removal of nuisance by a District/Sub-Divisional/Executive Magistrate.
Chapter XI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with:
- aMaintenance to wives, children and parents
- bMaintenance of public order and tranquillity
- cPreventive action of police
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Chapter XI CrPC (Sections 129-148) deals with maintenance of public order and tranquillity (unlawful assemblies, public nuisances, disputes as to immovable property).
A new proviso was added to Section 157(1) of the Code of(Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008 in relation to an offence of:
- aMurder
- bRape
- cTerrorist Acts
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
The proviso to Section 157(1) added by the CrPC (Amendment) Act 2008 (Act 5 of 2009) concerns the offence of rape, requiring the victim's statement be recorded at her residence/place of choice, as far as practicable by a woman officer.
Which of the following Sections of the Indian Evidence Act deals with the relevancy of admissions and confessions ?
- aSections 6-16
- bSections 17-31
- cSections 32 – 33
- dSections 34-39
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Sections 17-31 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deal with the relevancy of admissions (17-23) and confessions (24-31).
Motive is insignificant when_____
- aDirect evidence is available
- bDirect evidence is not available
- cOnly circumstantial evidence is available
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Motive becomes insignificant/loses importance where there is direct (eye-witness) evidence; it assumes importance only in cases resting on circumstantial evidence.
An admission may be____ in nature.
- aOral
- bDocumentary
- cOral and Documentary
- dOral or documentary or contained in electronic form
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Per Section 17 (as amended) an admission may be oral or documentary or contained in electronic form.
In order to make the confession admissible, the person_____
- aMay not be an accused at the time of making confession
- bMust be an accused at the time of making the confession
- cMust be a suspect at the time of making the confession
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A confession under Sections 24-30 of the Evidence Act must be made by a person who is an accused; the statement is a confession only when made by the accused.
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court held that a retracted confession can be used against the accused and it is not against Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India?
- aMubarak Ali v. State
- bPalwinder Kaur v. State of Punjab
- cKalawati and another v. State of HP
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
In Kalawati v. State of H.P. (AIR 1953 SC 131) the Supreme Court held a retracted confession can be used against the accused and does not violate Article 20(3).
A and B are jointly tried for the murder of C. It is proved that A said, ‘Band I murdered C’. The court may consider the effect of this confession as against______
- aA only
- bB only
- cBoth A and B
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 30 of the Evidence Act, when persons are jointly tried for the same offence and one confesses implicating himself and a co-accused, the court may take it into consideration against both A and B.
Section 114A was introduced by the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1983, following the widespread protest against the judgement in the_____
- aMathura Case
- bVishakha Case
- cNarlavati Case
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 114A (presumption of absence of consent in custodial rape) was inserted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1983 following protests over the Mathura rape case (Tukaram v. State of Maharashtra).
The examination of a witness by the party who calls him shall be called_____
- aRe-examination
- bCross examination
- cExamination-in-chief
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 137 of the Evidence Act: examination of a witness by the party who calls him is the examination-in-chief.
Previous judgments are relevant to support the plea of______ in civil cases.
- aRes judicata
- bRes-subjudice
- cLimitation
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 40-43 (esp. Section 40) of the Evidence Act: a previous judgment is relevant to support the plea of res judicata, barring a second suit.
The contents of a document can be proved by______
- aPrimary evidence only
- bDirect evidence only
- cPrimary or secondary evidence
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 61 of the Evidence Act: contents of documents may be proved either by primary or by secondary evidence.
A, who knows swimming, failed to save the life of a drowning child and the child died as a result of A’s omission.
- aA is liable for not saving the drowning child
- bA is not liable for not saving the drowning child
- cAct is protected by general exceptions of the Indian Penal Code
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
There being no legal duty to act, mere omission to save a stranger drowning child is not an offence; A incurs no criminal liability under the IPC.
A person who consents, suffer no injury is known as:
- aDe minimis non curat iex
- bActus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea
- cVoienti non fit injuria
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
The maxim is volenti non fit injuria — to one who consents no injury is done; reflected in Sections 87-90 IPC (consent).
Which of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code deals with right of private defence of the body and of the property?
- aSection 98
- bSection 96
- cSection 97
- dSection 99
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 97 IPC confers the right of private defence of the body and of property.
A instigates B to murder D. B in pursuance of the instigation stabs D. D recovers from the wound:
- aA is guilty of instigating B to commit murder
- bA is guilty of attempt to murder
- cA is not guilty since intended act did not happen
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 109/115 IPC, A who instigated B and the act (stabbing) was committed in pursuance is guilty of abetment of murder; D's recovery does not absolve A of the instigation that was acted upon.
Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions is an offence punishable under_____ of the Indian Penal Code.
- aSection 186
- bSection 187
- cSection 188
- dSection 189
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 186 IPC punishes voluntarily obstructing a public servant in the discharge of his public functions.
A, knowing that B has murdered Z, assists B to hide the body with the intention of screening B from punishment. Under which of the following Sections of the Indian Pena! Code can A be punished ?
- aSection 200
- bSection 201
- cSection 202
- dSection 203
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 201 IPC: causing disappearance of evidence of an offence or screening the offender from punishment.
A doctor registered as a medical practitioner and entitled to practice in Homoeopathy only, prescribed an allopathic medicine to the patient. The patient died. The doctor is guilty of:
- aDeath by rash and negligent act
- bMurder
- cCulpable homicide not amounting to murder
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
On facts of Juggankhan and Poonam Verma type cases, a homoeopath prescribing allopathic medicine causing death is liable for death by a rash/negligent act (Section 304A IPC), not murder or culpable homicide.
Criminal Breach of Trust is defined under_____ of the Indian Penal Code.
- aSection 403
- bSection 404
- cSection 405
- dSection 406
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Criminal breach of trust is defined in Section 405 IPC; Section 406 prescribes punishment.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that legal and valid marriage is not a necessary ingredient to attract Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code ?
- aReema Agarwal v. Anupam and others
- bSushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India and others
- cArun Vyas v. Anita Vyas
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In Reema Aggarwal v. Anupam (2004) 3 SCC 199 the Supreme Court held a legal/valid marriage is not a necessary ingredient to attract Section 498A IPC.
A makes an attempt to pick the pocket of Z by thrusting his hand into Z’s pocket. A fails in the attempt in consequence of Z’s having nothing in his pocket.
- aA is guilty under Section 511 of , the Indian Penal Code
- bA is not guilty under Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code
- cA is guilty of no offence
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Per Illustration (b) to Section 511 IPC, A thrusting his hand into an empty pocket is guilty of attempt under Section 511 even though completion was impossible (factual impossibility).
Which of the following Sections of the Limitation Act, 1963 deals with expiry of prescribed period when court is closed ?
- a2
- b3
- c4
- d5
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that where the prescribed period expires on a day when the court is closed, the suit/appeal/application may be instituted on the day the court reopens.
An order made on an application filed beyond the period of limitation is:
- aIllegal
- bWithout jurisdiction
- cIrregular
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
An order on a time-barred application is not per se 'illegal' or 'without jurisdiction' (the court has jurisdiction to decide limitation under Sec.3); the best fit among these flawed options is 'None of the above'. Flagged as the intended key is debatable.
In a suit for recovery of possession of a house from a deemed trustee of wakf property:
- aNo limitation applies
- bLimitation is applicable
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A suit for recovery of possession from a deemed trustee of wakf property is governed by the ordinary Limitation Act; limitation is applicable (trusteeship of wakf does not give perpetual immunity from limitation).
The period of limitation for filing an application for the execution of any decree (other than a decree granting a mandatory injunction) or order of any civil court is:
- a1 year
- b2 years
- c3 years
- d12 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Article 136 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes 12 years for execution of any decree (other than a mandatory injunction) or order of a civil court, from when the decree becomes enforceable.
Exclusion of time under Section 14 is :
- aMandatory
- bDiscretionary
- cDirectory
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Once the conditions of Section 14 (bona fide prosecution in a court lacking jurisdiction etc.) are satisfied, exclusion of that time is mandatory — the court must exclude it; it is not discretionary.
Which of the following Sections of the Limitation Act, 1963 deals with the ‘Effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant’?
- a21
- b22
- c23
- d24
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 21 of the Limitation Act, 1963 deals with the effect of substituting or adding a new plaintiff or defendant; the suit is deemed instituted against him when he is so made a party.
In case of a suit for compensation for an act which does not give rise to a cause of action unless some specific injury actually results there from, the period of limitation shall be computed from the time:
- aWhen the injury results
- bWhen the act occurred
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Article 24/72 scheme of the Limitation Act, for an act not actionable without special damage, time runs from when the injury (special damage) actually results, not from the date of the act.
The jurisdiction to great exemption under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 is given exclusively to:
- aCivil Court
- bHigh Court
- cSupreme Court
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 14 confers no exclusive jurisdiction on any particular court; the exclusion is available before any court computing limitation, so 'None of the above' is correct.
The period of limitation for a suit for compensation for infringing copyright or any other exclusive privilege is :
- a1 year
- b2 years
- c3 years
- d12 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Article 88 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes 3 years for a suit for compensation for infringing copyright or any other exclusive privilege, from the date of infringement.
The period of limitation for filing an application to set aside a decree passed ex parte to rehear an appeal heard ex parte, is:
- a10 days
- b30 days
- c90 days
- d1 year
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Article 123 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes 30 days to set aside an ex parte decree or to rehear an appeal heard ex parte, from the date of the decree.
A vested interest created in favour of an unborn person comes under:
- aSection 20
- bSection 24
- cSection 19
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 20 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 deals with when an unborn person acquires a vested interest on a transfer for his benefit.
Actionable claim means claim to any:
- aDebt or beneficial interest
- bDebt alone
- cBeneficial interest, other than debt
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Per Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, an 'actionable claim' means a claim to any debt (other than one secured by mortgage/pledge) or to any beneficial interest in movable property not in possession of the claimant.
Doctrine of Election in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is provided under:
- aSection 35
- bSection 38
- cSection 34
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The doctrine of election is contained in Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
The term Transfer of Property’ is defined in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in :
- aSection 3
- bSection 5
- cSection 2(a)
- dNot defined in the Act
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
'Transfer of property' is defined in Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 as an act by which a living person conveys property to one or more other living persons, or to himself.
The registration of mortgage is not required where the mortgage is:
- aSimple mortgage
- bAnomalous mortgage
- cEnglish mortgage
- dMortgage by deposit of title deeds
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
A mortgage by deposit of title deeds (equitable/English 'memorandum' mortgage) under Section 58(f) does not require registration, unlike simple, English, etc. mortgages which need a registered instrument.
Any provisions made as a clog on redemption is:
- aVoid
- bVoidable
- cValid
- dEnforceable
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
A clog on the equity of redemption is void; the right to redeem under Section 60 cannot be fettered (once a mortgage always a mortgage).
The lease of immovable property is terminable by either party by a notice of:
- a15 days
- b3 months
- c1 month
- d6 months
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, a lease of immovable property (other than for agricultural/manufacturing purposes, i.e. month-to-month) is terminable by 15 days' notice.
Puisne mortgagee is the:
- aAssignee of the equity of redemption
- bCo-mortgagee
- cSubsequent mortgagee
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A puisne mortgagee is a subsequent (later-in-time) mortgagee of the same property, ranking after the prior mortgagee.
In a lease of immovable property what is transferred, is the: t
- aInterest in the property
- bRight to enjoy the property
- cMesne profit
- dPossession alone
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, a lease transfers a right to enjoy the immovable property for a term in consideration of rent/premium; it is not a transfer of ownership interest.
Transfer of immovable property made with intent to defeat or delay the creditors of the transferor is known as:
- aFeeding the grant
- bTransfer lis pendens
- cFraudulent transfer
- dTransfer by ostensible owner
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act deals with fraudulent transfer — a transfer made with intent to defeat or delay creditors is voidable at their option.
The rule in Pinnel’s Case relates to:
- aPart performance
- bMinor’s contract
- cFraud .
- dUndue influence
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
The rule in Pinnel's Case (1602) holds that payment of a lesser sum is not satisfaction of a larger debt — it concerns part-payment/part performance of an obligation (accord and satisfaction / consideration).
When an offer is addressed to the public at large, the offer is called:
- aAdvertisement
- bSpecific offer
- cGeneral offer
- dAuction
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
An offer addressed to the public at large is a general offer (e.g. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.); it can be accepted by anyone fulfilling its terms.
X makes a proposal to Y, which Y accepts. But before the acceptance comes to the knowledge of X, Y revokes his acceptance by telegram. When is the revocation complete ?
- aWhen the telegram Is despatched
- bWhen the telegram is received by X
- cWhen the contents of the telegram come to the knowledge of X
- dWhen X accepts the revocation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Sections 4–5 of the Indian Contract Act, an acceptance may be revoked before the communication of acceptance is complete against the proposer, i.e. before its contents come to the knowledge of X; revocation here is complete when the telegram's contents reach X.
‘A’ threatened to commit suicide his wife and son if refused to execute a deed in his favour. They executed the deed. The deed is said to have been obtained by:
- aFraud
- bUndue influence
- cCoercion
- dMisrepresentation
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A threat to commit suicide is 'coercion' within Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act (Ammiraju v. Seshamma); the deed was obtained by coercion and is voidable.
Wagering agreements are void but collateral transactions will be:
- aVoid
- bVoidable
- cValid
- dValid, at the discretion of court
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act, wagering agreements are void, but collateral transactions remain valid (a wager being void, not illegal).
Owner of a cinema-hall contracts to exhibit a film in the month of October. In the month of September, the hall collapsed during an earthquake. The contract:
- aIs valid and binds the owner of the cinema-hall to exhibit the film
- bIs not frustrated
- cHas become impossible to perform
- dHas to be honoured and so the owner should reconstruct the hall to exhibit the film
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Destruction of the subject-matter (cinema hall) before performance makes the contract impossible to perform and void under Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act (doctrine of frustration / supervening impossibility).
If a person accepts a lesser sum of money than what was contracted for a discharge of the whole debt, it is known as:
- aRemission
- bAlteration
- cRescission
- dWaiver
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Acceptance of a lesser sum in full discharge of the whole debt is remission of performance under Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Under English law a contract of insurance other than life insurance is :
- aContract of agency
- bContingent contract
- cContract of guarantee
- dContract of indemnity
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under English law, every contract of insurance except life insurance is a contract of indemnity, since the insured is indemnified only to the extent of actual loss.
The leading case Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. relates to:
- aCapacity of parties
- bMinor’s agreement
- cGeneral offer
- dTender
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) is the leading authority on a general offer made to the public at large, which can be accepted by anyone fulfilling its conditions.
‘Consensus ad idem’ means:
- aConsent of the parties obtained illegally
- bParties identified the same thing in the same sense
- cContract between the same parties
- dContract without consent
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Consensus ad idem means the parties have agreed upon the same thing in the same sense; it is the essence of a valid agreement under Section 13 of the Indian Contract Act.
Distribution of property among heirs in Class II of the Schedule under Section 11 shall be divided between them:
- aOne share
- bEqually
- c1/3rd share
- d1/4th share
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 11 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the property is divided equally among the Class II heirs who take simultaneously in the same entry.
Who among the following is a Class-1 heir?
- aBrother’s son
- bSister’s son
- cBrother’s daughter
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
None of the listed relations (brother's son, sister's son, brother's daughter) is a Class I heir under the Schedule to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Coparcenary is_____
- aA creature of Hindu law
- bCreated by agreement between parties
- cCreated by act of parties
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Coparcenary is a creature of Hindu law; it cannot be created by agreement or act of parties, as held in numerous decisions (e.g. on Mitakshara coparcenary).
A person who dies without making testamentary disposition in respect of his property under Section 3(g) is______
- aCoparcener
- bIntestate
- cTestator
- dLegatee
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 3(g) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a person who dies without making a testamentary disposition is said to die intestate.
General rules of succession in the case of the succession of the female Hindus are dealt with under_______
- aSection 16
- bSection 20
- cSection 21
- dSection 15
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 lays down the general rules of succession in the case of female Hindus.
A widow inherits property of her husband on his death. Whether a subsequent re-marriage would divest her of property in view of Section 24 and Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 ?
- aYes
- bNo
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Section 24 (now omitted by the 2005 Amendment) and Section 14 make the widow a full owner; re-marriage does not divest property already vested in her, so the answer is No.
One who shares (equally) with others in inheritance in the estate of a common ancestor is called a_______
- aCognate
- bCoparcener
- cAgnate
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
A coparcener shares with others in the inheritance of the estate of a common ancestor under Mitakshara law.
As per Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 any property possessed by a female Hindu, whether acquired before or after the commencement of the Act shall be held by her as______
- aA full owner
- bA limited owner
- cJoint owner
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 converts a female Hindu's limited estate into absolute ownership; she holds property as a full owner, not a limited owner.
Which Section of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 defines codicil ?
- aSection 2(f)
- bSection 2(a)
- cSection 2(b) .
- dSection 2(h)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Codicil is defined in Section 2(b) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
A will or any part of a will, the making of which has been caused by fraud or coercion or by such importunity is:
- aValid
- bVoid
- cVoidable
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Under Section 61 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, a will or part of a will obtained by fraud, coercion or importunity is void.
The specific performance of any contract spacified in Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act may be enforced_____
- aAs of right
- bAs per discretion of court
- cMandatorily
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Specific performance under Section 10 (as it stood in 2017, pre-2018 amendment) is a discretionary remedy granted at the discretion of the court (Section 20).
What is the period of limitation fixed for filing a suit for specific performance of a contract ?
- a2 years
- b3 years
- c7 years
- d14 years
Answer & solution
Correct answer: B
Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes a 3-year limitation period for a suit for specific performance, from the date fixed for performance or when the plaintiff has notice of refusal.
Which of the following Sections of the Specific Relief Act deals with specific performance of part of contract ?
- aSection 12
- bSection 13
- cSection 14
- dSection 15
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 deals with specific performance of part of a contract.
In which of the following Cases has the Supreme Court held that when granting of damages is an adequate relief, the specific performance would be refused ?
- aPrakash Chandra v. Angadlal
- bMaria v. Bilkees
- cChand Rani v. Kamal Rani
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
In Prakash Chandra v. Angadlal (AIR 1979 SC 1241), the Supreme Court held that specific performance is the ordinary rule but should be refused where damages would constitute an adequate relief.
A party who has rescinded a contract_____
- aCan recover damages
- bCannot recover damages
- cDepends
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: A
Under Section 75 of the Indian Contract Act / Section 30 of the Specific Relief Act, a party rightfully rescinding a contract can recover compensation (damages) for any loss sustained through non-fulfilment.
In a suit for specific performance of a contract, the plaintiff may also claim compensation for its breach_______
- aIn addition to such performance
- bIn substitution of such performance
- cEither in addition to” or in substitution of such performance
- dNone of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, in a suit for specific performance the plaintiff may claim compensation for breach either in addition to or in substitution of such performance.
A declaration made under Section 34 is binding on______
- aThe parties of the suit
- bPersons claiming through them respectively
- cWhere any of the parties are trustees, on the persons for whom, if in existence at the date of the declaration, such parties would be trustees
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Section 35 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 makes a declaration binding on the parties, persons claiming through them, and (where parties are trustees) the persons for whom they would be trustees — all of the above.
Perpetual injunction is defined in Section_____ of the Specific Relief Act,
- aSection 36
- bSection 37
- cSection 38
- dSection 39
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
Perpetual injunction is defined in Section 37(2) and granted under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
A party can file a suit for rectification
- aAt any time when fraud is discovered
- bAt any time a mistake has come to light
- cWithin three years of execution of instrument
- dEither (A) or (B)
Answer & solution
Correct answer: C
A suit for rectification of an instrument is governed by Article 59 of the Limitation Act, 1963, prescribing three years from the date the facts entitling the plaintiff become known — i.e. within three years of execution/discovery.
Which of the following contracts cannot be specifically enforced ?
- aA contract for the non-performance of which compensation in money is an adequate relief
- bA contract which runs into such minute or numerous details
- cA contract which is in its nature determinable
- dAll of the above
Answer & solution
Correct answer: D
Under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (pre-2018), all of these — contracts where damages are adequate, those requiring minute/numerous details, and determinable contracts — cannot be specifically enforced.
Practise Odisha Judiciary the smart way.
Free mock tests modelled on this exact paper pattern, plus the full Odisha Judiciary preparation guide.