Himachal Pradesh Judiciary · Prelims Mock Test 9

Himachal Pradesh Judiciary Mock Test 9 — Questions & Solutions

Every question from this prelims mock with the correct answer and a detailed, source-backed solution. Free to read. Want the real exam feel — a timer, instant scoring, and a subject-wise weakness report? Take it as a test.

150
Questions
19
Subjects
+ solutions
Every question

Take this as a timed mock test — instant score + subject-wise analytics. First mock free, then ₹999/year for unlimited.

Start timed test →
Q1Code of Civil Procedure

Under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the courts have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature:

aOnly where the cause of action arises within their territorial limits
bOnly where the suit is expressly authorised by a statute
cExcept suits of which cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred
dExcept suits relating to caste and religious rites or ceremonies
Answer: C
Section 9 confers jurisdiction on civil courts to try all suits of a civil nature excepting those whose cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred; the Explanation clarifies that a suit involving questions of caste or religious rites is still of a civil nature where a right to property or office is in question.
Q2Code of Civil Procedure

The principle that no person shall be vexed twice for the same cause is embodied in the doctrine of res judicata under Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. "Constructive res judicata" is contained in which Explanation to Section 11?

aExplanation I
bExplanation VI
cExplanation IV
dExplanation V
Answer: C
Explanation IV to Section 11 embodies constructive res judicata: any matter which might and ought to have been made a ground of defence or attack in the former suit is deemed to have been a matter directly and substantially in issue.
Q3Code of Civil Procedure

Under the proviso to Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a court trying a suit or proceeding transferred to it:

aMay, subject to any special directions in the order of transfer, either retry it or proceed from the point at which it was transferred
bMust always proceed from the point at which the proceeding was transferred
cMust in every case retry the suit from the stage of issues
dCannot transfer the suit back to the court from which it was withdrawn
Answer: A
Under Section 24, the court to which a suit or proceeding is transferred may, subject to any special directions in the case of an order of transfer, either retry it or proceed from the point at which it was transferred.
Q4Code of Civil Procedure

Where a defendant resides, carries on business or personally works for gain outside the local limits of a court's jurisdiction but the cause of action arises wholly or in part within such limits, the suit, under Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:

aCannot be instituted in that court in any circumstance
bMay be instituted only with the leave of the court where the defendant resides
cMay be instituted in the court within whose limits the cause of action wholly or in part arises
dMust be instituted only at the place where the defendant resides
Answer: C
Section 20(c) permits a suit to be instituted in a court within whose local limits the cause of action arises wholly or in part, irrespective of where the defendant resides or carries on business.
Q5Code of Civil Procedure

Under Section 96(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, no appeal shall lie from a decree passed by a court of Small Causes where the value of the subject-matter of the original suit does not exceed:

aFive thousand rupees
bThree thousand rupees
cTen thousand rupees
dTwenty thousand rupees
Answer: C
Section 96(4) bars an appeal, except on a question of law, from a decree in a suit of the nature cognizable by Courts of Small Causes when the value of the subject-matter of the original suit does not exceed ten thousand rupees.
Q6Code of Civil Procedure

A second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as amended by the Amendment Act of 1976, lies to the High Court only:

aWhere the value of the suit exceeds twenty-five thousand rupees
bWith the prior certificate of the first appellate court
cIf the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law
dOn any question of fact arising in the case
Answer: C
After the 1976 amendment, Section 100 permits a second appeal only where the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law, which must be formulated under Section 100(4).
Q7Code of Civil Procedure

Under the proviso to Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (as amended in 1999), the High Court shall not vary or reverse any order made in the course of a suit or other proceeding except where the order, if it had been made in favour of the party applying for revision:

aWould have affected the merits of the case
bWould have finally disposed of the suit or other proceeding
cWould have raised a substantial question of law
dWould have caused irreparable injury to that party
Answer: B
The proviso to Section 115(1), as substituted by the 1999 amendment, restricts revisional interference with interlocutory orders to cases where the order, if made in favour of the applicant, would have finally disposed of the suit or other proceeding.
Q8Code of Civil Procedure

Under Order I, Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the power of the court to strike out or add parties may be exercised:

aOnly on the application of the plaintiff
bOnly before the settlement of issues
cOnly with the consent of all existing parties to the suit
dEither upon or without the application of either party, at any stage of the proceedings
Answer: D
Order I, Rule 10(2) empowers the court, at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, to strike out or add any party whose presence is necessary to effectually adjudicate the questions involved.
Q9Code of Civil Procedure

Under Order VIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the defendant shall present a written statement of his defence within thirty days from the date of service of summons; however, this period may be extended by the court for reasons to be recorded, but shall not be later than:

aSixty days from the date of service of summons
bForty-five days from the date of service of summons
cNinety days from the date of service of summons
dOne hundred and twenty days from the date of service of summons
Answer: C
The proviso to Order VIII, Rule 1 permits the court to extend the time for filing the written statement on recorded reasons, but in no case beyond ninety days from the date of service of summons.
Q10Code of Civil Procedure

A suit by an indigent person is governed by which Order of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

aOrder XXXII
bOrder XXXIII
cOrder XXXV
dOrder XXX
Answer: B
Order XXXIII of the Code deals with suits by indigent persons, prescribing the procedure for filing such suits without paying court-fees subject to the conditions therein.
Q11Code of Civil Procedure

Under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a temporary injunction may be granted where it is proved that:

aThe plaintiff has an arguable case only on a question of law
bAny property in dispute is in danger of being wasted, damaged or alienated, or wrongfully sold in execution of a decree
cThe defendant resides outside the jurisdiction of the court
dThe suit involves a substantial question relating to the construction of a document
Answer: B
Order XXXIX, Rule 1(a) permits a temporary injunction where property in dispute is in danger of being wasted, damaged or alienated by any party, or wrongfully sold in execution of a decree.
Q12Code of Civil Procedure

In Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu v. Union of India (II), AIR 2005 SC 3353, the Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of which provision introduced by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Acts of 1999 and 2002?

aSection 100A relating to letters patent appeals
bSection 89 relating to settlement of disputes outside the court
cSection 115 relating to revision
dSection 80 relating to notice to Government
Answer: B
In Salem Advocate Bar Association (II), the Supreme Court upheld the amendments and, in particular, considered Section 89 dealing with reference of disputes to arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement or mediation, laying down the modalities for its working.
Q13Code of Civil Procedure

Under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, an application for restitution lies where a decree or order is varied or reversed. Such an application is to be made to:

aThe High Court in its revisional jurisdiction
bThe District Judge having territorial jurisdiction over the parties
cThe court which passed the decree or order which has been varied or reversed
dThe appellate court which varied or reversed the decree
Answer: C
Section 144(1) provides that the application for restitution shall be made to the court which passed the decree or order that was subsequently varied or reversed in appeal, revision or otherwise.
Q14Code of Civil Procedure

Under Section 2(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which of the following is correct regarding a 'decree'?

aIt includes only a final adjudication and never a preliminary adjudication
bIt includes the dismissal of a suit for default of appearance
cIt includes any order of dismissal for default
dIt is the formal expression of an adjudication conclusively determining the rights of the parties, and may be preliminary or final, but does not include dismissal for default
Answer: D
Section 2(2) defines 'decree' as the formal expression of an adjudication conclusively determining the rights of the parties; it may be preliminary or final but expressly excludes any adjudication from which an appeal lies as an appeal from an order and any order of dismissal for default.
Q15Code of Civil Procedure

A decision in a former suit operates as res judicata against persons litigating bona fide in respect of a public or private right claimed in common for themselves and others. This rule is contained in which Explanation to Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?

aExplanation VI
bExplanation V
cExplanation IV
dExplanation VIII
Answer: A
Explanation VI to Section 11 provides that where persons litigate bona fide in respect of a public right or a private right claimed in common for themselves and others, all persons interested in such right shall be deemed to claim under the persons so litigating.
Q16Code of Civil Procedure

A suit for the determination of any right to or interest in immovable property situate within the jurisdiction of one court only is to be instituted in the court within whose local limits the property is situate. This is provided under:

aSection 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
bSection 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
cSection 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
dSection 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Answer: D
Section 16 requires suits for recovery, partition, foreclosure, sale or redemption of, or for the determination of any right or interest in, immovable property to be instituted where the property is situate, subject to the proviso permitting personal-obedience relief under Section 16.
Q17Code of Civil Procedure

The power to transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any High Court or other civil court in one State to a High Court or other civil court in any other State is conferred upon:

aThe High Court of the State where the suit is pending, under Section 24
bThe Supreme Court, under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
cThe District Court, under Section 24
dThe Central Government, under Section 25
Answer: B
Section 25 of the CPC empowers the Supreme Court, on the application of a party and after notice, to transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding from a High Court or civil court in one State to a High Court or civil court in another State where it is expedient for the ends of justice.
Q18Code of Civil Procedure

No appeal shall lie, except on a question of law, from a decree in any suit of the nature cognizable by Courts of Small Causes when the amount or value of the subject-matter of the original suit does not exceed:

aThree thousand rupees
bFive thousand rupees
cTwenty thousand rupees
dTen thousand rupees
Answer: D
Section 96(4) of the CPC bars an appeal (except on a question of law) from a decree in a suit of a nature cognizable by Courts of Small Causes where the subject-matter does not exceed ten thousand rupees.
Q19Code of Civil Procedure

A second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to the High Court lies only:

aIf the case involves a substantial question of law
bWhere the value of the subject-matter exceeds one lakh rupees
cOn any question of fact or law arising in the case
dOn a reappraisal of the entire evidence on record
Answer: A
Under Section 100, a second appeal lies to the High Court from an appellate decree only if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law, which must be formulated by the Court.
Q20Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the punishment for the offence of defamation is:

aFine only
bSimple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, or community service
cRigorous imprisonment up to three years and fine
dImprisonment up to five years and fine
Answer: B
Section 356 of the BNS, 2023 defines defamation and prescribes simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, or community service — community service being a newly added mode of punishment.
Q21Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, 'organised crime' — a new offence covering continuing unlawful activity by an organised crime syndicate — is dealt with under:

aSection 109
bSection 115
cSection 113
dSection 111
Answer: D
Section 111 of the BNS, 2023 is a new provision penalising organised crime committed by or on behalf of an organised crime syndicate; Section 113 separately deals with terrorist acts.
Q22Indian Penal Code

Under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where culpable homicide not amounting to murder is committed with the intention of causing death, the imprisonment for a fixed term shall not be less than:

aThree years
bSeven years
cTen years
dFive years
Answer: D
Section 105 of the BNS, 2023 provides that for culpable homicide not amounting to murder done with intention to cause death, the term imprisonment shall be not less than five years extending up to ten years (or imprisonment for life), in addition to fine — a minimum not present in the old Section 304 IPC.
Q23Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the punishment for murder is provided in:

aSection 103
bSection 105
cSection 101
dSection 100
Answer: A
Section 100 defines culpable homicide and Section 101 defines murder, but the punishment for murder (death or imprisonment for life and fine) is laid down in Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023.
Q24Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where a group of five or more persons acting in concert commits murder on the ground of race, caste, community, sex, place of birth, language or personal belief (mob lynching), the relevant penal provision is:

aSection 117(2)
bSection 103(1)
cSection 104
dSection 103(2)
Answer: D
Section 103(2) of the BNS, 2023 specifically penalises murder by a group of five or more persons on grounds such as race, caste, community, sex, place of birth, language or personal belief, prescribing death or imprisonment for life or a term not less than seven years.
Q25Indian Penal Code

A, intending to kill B by poisoning, places poisoned food which is eaten by C, whose death was not intended, and C dies. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, A's liability for culpable homicide of C is governed by:

aSection 105
bSection 100
cSection 101
dSection 102
Answer: D
Section 102 of the BNS, 2023 deals with culpable homicide by causing the death of a person other than the person whose death was intended (the doctrine of transferred malice).
Q26Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, abetment of suicide (where the deceased is neither a child nor a person of unsound mind) is punishable under:

aSection 109
bSection 106
cSection 108
dSection 107
Answer: C
Section 108 of the BNS, 2023 punishes abetment of suicide generally, while Section 107 deals with abetment of suicide of a child or a person of unsound mind.
Q27Indian Penal Code

Under Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, a person who causes death by rash and negligent driving of a vehicle (not amounting to culpable homicide) and escapes without reporting the incident soon after to a police officer or Magistrate may be punished with imprisonment which may extend to:

aFive years
bSeven years
cTen years
dTwo years
Answer: C
Section 106 of the BNS, 2023 provides that where the offender escapes after a fatal rash or negligent driving without reporting it soon after to a police officer or Magistrate, the imprisonment may extend to ten years.
Q28Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offence of 'grievous hurt' (the section defining what kinds of hurt are designated as grievous) is contained in:

aSection 116
bSection 114
cSection 115
dSection 117
Answer: A
In the BNS, 2023, Section 114 defines 'hurt', Section 115 deals with voluntarily causing hurt, Section 116 designates the kinds of hurt that are 'grievous hurt', and Section 117 punishes voluntarily causing grievous hurt.
Q29Indian Penal Code

Under Section 115 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, whoever voluntarily causes hurt (in the ordinary case) may be punished with imprisonment which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to:

aOne thousand rupees
bFive thousand rupees
cTen thousand rupees
dTwenty thousand rupees
Answer: C
Section 115(2) of the BNS, 2023 prescribes imprisonment up to one year, or fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, or both, for voluntarily causing hurt.
Q30Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offences of theft, robbery and dacoity are respectively defined in:

aSections 303, 309 and 310
bSections 303, 308 and 309
cSections 304, 309 and 311
dSections 378, 390 and 391
Answer: A
In the BNS, 2023, theft is defined in Section 303, robbery in Section 309 and dacoity in Section 310 (where five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt robbery).
Q31Indian Penal Code

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 introduced a distinct offence of 'snatching' as a special form of theft. This offence is dealt with under:

aSection 305
bSection 308
cSection 303
dSection 304
Answer: D
Section 304 of the BNS, 2023 is a new provision treating theft as 'snatching' where the offender suddenly, quickly or forcibly seizes or grabs movable property from a person or their possession.
Q32Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offences of criminal breach of trust and cheating are respectively defined in:

aSections 316 and 320
bSections 316 and 318
cSections 314 and 316
dSections 405 and 415
Answer: B
In the BNS, 2023, criminal breach of trust is dealt with under Section 316 and cheating under Section 318 (criminal misappropriation being separately covered under Section 314).
Q33Indian Penal Code

Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the offence of rape is defined and gang rape is dealt with respectively in:

aSections 375 and 376D
bSections 63 and 70
cSections 64 and 70
dSections 63 and 71
Answer: B
In the BNS, 2023, Section 63 defines rape, Section 64 prescribes punishment for rape, and Section 70 deals with gang rape.
Q34Indian Penal Code

Under Section 70(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where a woman below eighteen years of age is subjected to gang rape, each person of the group shall be punished with:

aImprisonment for a term not less than twenty years
bImprisonment for life (remainder of natural life) or with death
cImprisonment for life only
dImprisonment for a term not less than ten years
Answer: B
Section 70(2) of the BNS, 2023 provides that gang rape of a woman below eighteen years of age is punishable with imprisonment for life, which shall mean the remainder of that person's natural life, or with death.
Q35Indian Penal Code

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 replaced the offence of sedition with a new provision penalising acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. This provision is:

aSection 147
bSection 124A
cSection 152
dSection 150
Answer: C
Section 152 of the BNS, 2023 penalises acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India (such as exciting secession, armed rebellion or subversive activities), the IPC offence of sedition under Section 124A having been omitted.
Q36Criminal Procedure Code

Pre-arrest protection by way of anticipatory bail (direction for grant of bail to a person apprehending arrest for a non-bailable offence) is provided under which Section of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?

aSection 484
bSection 438
cSection 480
dSection 482
Answer: D
Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 provides for anticipatory bail and replaces Section 438 of the CrPC, 1973.
Q37Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, a proclamation requiring a person against whom a warrant has been issued and who is absconding to appear must specify a time not less than ______ from the date of its publication.

aForty-five days
bFifteen days
cThirty days
dSixty days
Answer: C
Section 84 of the BNSS, 2023 requires the proclamation to fix a date at least thirty days from publication; for grave offences, non-appearance may lead to declaration as a proclaimed offender.
Q38Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 184 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the registered medical practitioner who examines a victim of rape is required to forward the medical examination report to the investigating officer within:

aTwenty-four hours
bSeven days
cThree days
dFifteen days
Answer: B
Section 184 of the BNSS, 2023 requires the medical report of a rape victim to be forwarded to the investigating officer within seven days; it corresponds to Section 164A of the CrPC, 1973.
Q39Criminal Procedure Code

The Victim Compensation Scheme, under which every State Government in coordination with the Central Government prepares a scheme to compensate victims who have suffered loss or injury and require rehabilitation, is contained in which Section of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?

aSection 398
bSection 357
cSection 395
dSection 396
Answer: D
Section 396 of the BNSS, 2023 provides for the Victim Compensation Scheme; it corresponds to Section 357A of the CrPC, 1973.
Q40Criminal Procedure Code

Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, a private person may arrest a person who, in his presence, commits:

aA non-bailable and cognizable offence, or who is a proclaimed offender
bAny cognizable and bailable offence
cAny non-cognizable offence, whether bailable or not
dAny bailable and non-cognizable offence
Answer: A
Section 40 BNSS permits a private person to arrest one who in his presence commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence, or who is a proclaimed offender, and the arrested person must be handed over to a police officer (or taken to the nearest police station) without unnecessary delay, within six hours.
Q41Criminal Procedure Code

Confessions and statements during investigation under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 may be recorded by:

aThe Superintendent of Police
bAny Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate, whether or not having jurisdiction in the case
cAny police officer not below the rank of Inspector
dOnly the Magistrate having territorial jurisdiction over the case
Answer: B
Section 183 BNSS (corresponding to old Section 164 CrPC) empowers a Metropolitan or Judicial Magistrate to record confessions and statements during investigation, whether or not he has jurisdiction in the case; police officers, even if vested with magisterial powers, cannot record confessions.
Q42Criminal Procedure Code

Section 173 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 gives statutory recognition to the "Zero FIR" by providing that information relating to a cognizable offence may be given:

aOnly to a Judicial Magistrate of the first class
bOnly in writing and signed at the time of giving it
cOrally or by electronic communication, irrespective of the area where the offence is committed
dOnly at the police station within whose jurisdiction the offence was committed
Answer: C
Section 173 BNSS allows information of a cognizable offence to be given orally or by electronic communication irrespective of the area where the offence is committed (Zero FIR); information given electronically must be signed by the informant within three days.
Q43Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 193 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, where the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term of less than ten years, the police report on completion of investigation must ordinarily be filed within:

a45 days from the date of the FIR
b90 days from the date of the FIR
c30 days from the date of the FIR
d60 days from the date of the FIR
Answer: D
The investigation/chargesheet timeline mirrors the custody scheme: where the offence is punishable with imprisonment of less than ten years the report is to be filed within 60 days, and where it is punishable with ten years or more (including life or death) within 90 days.
Q44Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 187 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the maximum period of 90 days for completion of investigation (failing which the accused becomes entitled to default bail) applies where the offence is punishable with:

aImprisonment for a term up to seven years
bDeath, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years
cImprisonment for a term up to three years
dFine only
Answer: B
Under Section 187(3) BNSS the 90-day period applies where the offence is punishable with death, imprisonment for life or a minimum imprisonment of ten years; in other cases the period is 60 days, after which the right to default bail accrues if no report under Section 193 is filed.
Q45Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, a Judicial Magistrate of the first class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or of fine not exceeding:

aFifty thousand rupees
bOne lakh rupees
cTwenty-five thousand rupees
dTen thousand rupees
Answer: A
Section 23 BNSS empowers a Judicial Magistrate of the first class to award imprisonment up to three years, or fine up to fifty thousand rupees, or both, or community service; a Magistrate of the second class may award up to one year or fine up to ten thousand rupees.
Q46Criminal Procedure Code

Which of the following novel forms of punishment can a Magistrate impose under the sentencing provisions (Section 23) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which had no counterpart in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

aSolitary confinement
bCommunity service
cWhipping
dForfeiture of property
Answer: B
Section 23 BNSS, read with the BNS, introduces community service as a form of punishment that a Magistrate may impose; it was not available under the CrPC/IPC scheme.
Q47Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in respect of a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, a police officer:

aMay arrest only with the prior sanction of the Court of Session
bNeed not arrest where arrest is not required, and may instead issue a notice directing the person to appear
cCannot investigate the offence at all without a Magistrate's order
dMust in every case arrest the accused before investigation
Answer: B
Section 35(3) BNSS makes notice the rule and arrest the exception for offences punishable up to seven years; where arrest is not necessary the officer may issue a notice to the accused to appear, and arrest is justified only on recorded reasons.
Q48Criminal Procedure Code

Under the proviso to Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, where an offence is punishable with imprisonment of less than three years and the person to be arrested is infirm or is above sixty years of age, the arrest may be made only:

aWith the prior permission of an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police
bWith the prior order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate
cWith the written consent of the person to be arrested
dAfter obtaining sanction of the State Government
Answer: A
The proviso to Section 35 BNSS requires prior permission of an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police before arresting a person who is infirm or above sixty years of age where the offence is punishable with imprisonment of less than three years.
Q49Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 290 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, an application for plea bargaining must be filed by the accused:

aOnly after recording of prosecution evidence
bWithin thirty days from the date of framing of charge
cAt any time before the judgment is pronounced
dWithin fifteen days from the date of the first hearing
Answer: B
Section 290 BNSS makes plea bargaining time-bound by requiring the accused to apply within thirty days from the date of framing of charge, a limitation that did not exist under the CrPC.
Q50Criminal Procedure Code

Under Section 351 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, when the Court examines the accused to enable him to explain circumstances appearing in evidence against him:

aNo oath shall be administered, and the accused is not liable to punishment for refusing to answer or giving false answers
bThe examination may be conducted only by the Public Prosecutor
cThe accused is bound to answer every question truthfully on pain of perjury
dAn oath shall be administered to the accused before examination
Answer: A
Section 351 BNSS (old Section 313 CrPC) provides that no oath is administered when the accused is examined, and he does not render himself liable to punishment by refusing to answer or by giving false answers.
Q51Criminal Procedure Code

Which provision of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 declares that any person accused of an offence shall be a competent witness for the defence and may give evidence on oath in disproof of the charges?

aSection 359
bSection 313
cSection 353
dSection 351
Answer: C
Section 353 BNSS provides that an accused is a competent witness for the defence and may give evidence on oath in disproof of the charges; he can be examined as a witness only on his own written request, and his silence draws no adverse inference.
Q52Indian Evidence Act

Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, the party who calls a witness may, with the permission of the court, put questions to him which might be put in cross-examination by the adverse party (declaring the witness hostile). This power is conferred by:

aSection 146
bSection 148
cSection 154 (unchanged)
dSection 157
Answer: D
Section 157 of the BSA replaces old Section 154 of the Evidence Act and permits a party, with the court's leave, to cross-examine and thereby treat its own witness as hostile.
Q53Indian Evidence Act

Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, a leading question, if objected to by the adverse party, must not be asked in examination-in-chief or re-examination except with the permission of the court. The provision dealing with leading questions is:

aSection 146
bSection 141
cSection 143
dSection 145
Answer: A
Section 146 of the BSA defines a leading question and restricts its use in examination-in-chief and re-examination, corresponding to old Sections 141-142 of the Evidence Act.
Q54Indian Evidence Act

Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, electronic records produced in evidence must, in addition to the conditions of admissibility, be accompanied by a certificate. The certificate requirement for electronic records is contained in:

aSection 61
bSection 65B (unchanged)
cSection 85
dSection 63
Answer: D
Section 63 of the BSA replaces old Section 65B of the Evidence Act and now requires a certificate signed both by the person in charge of the device and by an expert.
Q55Indian Evidence Act

Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, the general rule that the burden of proof lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side is contained in:

aSection 102
bSection 106
cSection 104
dSection 101
Answer: C
Section 104 of the BSA (formerly Section 101 of the Evidence Act) lays down the general rule of burden of proof on the party who would fail if no evidence were led.
Q56Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

Under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), so much of the information received from a person accused of an offence may be proved as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, only when the information is received from such accused:

aIn the presence of two independent witnesses, whether or not in custody
bWhether or not he is in custody, provided it leads to a discovery
cWhile he is in the custody of a police officer
dBefore any Magistrate of the first class
Answer: C
The proviso to Section 23(2) BSA operates only where the information is deposed to as received from an accused 'in the custody of a police officer'. So much of that information as relates distinctly to the fact discovered may then be proved.
Q57Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

Under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), a confession made to a police officer:

aShall not be proved as against a person accused of any offence
bMay be proved against the accused if corroborated by an independent witness
cMay be proved if it was made in the presence of a Magistrate
dMay be proved only to the extent it leads to discovery of a fact
Answer: A
Section 23(1) BSA imposes an absolute bar: no confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence. The discovery-based exception lies in the proviso to Section 23(2), not in Section 23(1).
Q58Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

A statement made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, is relevant under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) in:

aSection 26 (b)
bSection 26 (a)
cSection 26 (c)
dSection 27
Answer: B
The dying declaration is admissible under Section 26(a) BSA as a statement made by a person (now dead) as to the cause of his death or the circumstances of the transaction resulting in it, irrespective of whether the person was under expectation of death.
Q59Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

When the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law, or of science or art, or as to the identity of handwriting or finger impressions, the opinions of persons specially skilled in such matters are relevant facts under:

aSection 45 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
bSection 39 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
cSection 38 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
dSection 51 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
Answer: B
Section 39 BSA makes the opinion of experts (persons specially skilled in foreign law, science, art, handwriting or finger impressions) a relevant fact when the Court has to form an opinion upon such a point.
Q60Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

The rule that oral evidence must, in all cases whatever, be direct is contained in the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) in:

aSection 58
bSection 56
cSection 55
dSection 54
Answer: C
Section 55 BSA lays down that oral evidence must be direct: if it refers to a fact which could be seen, heard or perceived, it must be the evidence of the witness who says he saw, heard or perceived it.
Q61Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

An electronic record produced as evidence is admissible only on production of the certificate required under Section 63(4)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA). This requirement of a certificate (earlier under Section 65B(4) of the repealed Indian Evidence Act, 1872) was held to be mandatory by the Supreme Court in:

aState (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu, (2005) 11 SCC 600
bTomaso Bruno v. State of U.P., (2015) 7 SCC 178
cAnvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473
dPooran Mal v. Director of Inspection, AIR 1974 SC 348
Answer: C
In Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473, the Supreme Court held that the certificate is mandatory for admitting electronic records (then under Section 65B(4) IEA, now Section 63(4)(c) BSA), overruling the contrary view in Navjot Sandhu; this was reaffirmed in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (2020).
Q62Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

When a person is accused of any offence, the burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the General Exceptions in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is upon him, and the Court shall presume the absence of such circumstances. Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), this is provided in:

aSection 108 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
bSection 109 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
cSection 106 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
dSection 104 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
Answer: A
Section 108 of the BSA (corresponding to Section 105 of the repealed IEA) places on the accused the burden of proving that his case falls within a General Exception or special exception, and directs the Court to presume the absence of such circumstances.
Q63Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

Section 138 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) provides that an accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person, and that:

aA conviction based solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice is illegal
bA conviction is not illegal if it proceeds upon the corroborated testimony of an accomplice
cAn accomplice can never be examined as a witness for the prosecution
dThe testimony of an accomplice must always be corroborated by another accomplice
Answer: B
Section 138 of the BSA (successor to Section 133 of the repealed IEA) expressly states, as enacted, that a conviction is not illegal if it proceeds upon the 'corroborated' testimony of an accomplice (the BSA replaced the IEA word 'uncorroborated' with 'corroborated'). The allied rule of prudence appears in Illustration (b) to Section 119 BSA.
Q64Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

"No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact." Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), this principle is enacted in:

aSection 140 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
bSection 139 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
cSection 141 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
dSection 138 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)
Answer: B
Section 139 of the BSA (corresponding to Section 134 of the repealed IEA) embodies the rule that evidence is weighed, not counted: no particular number of witnesses is required to prove any fact, the emphasis being on quality rather than quantity.
Q65Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

The Latin maxim 'Omnia praesumuntur rite et solemniter esse acta' is reflected in which illustration to Section 119 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)?

aIllustration (a) - that a man in possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is the thief
bIllustration (e) - that judicial and official acts have been regularly performed
cIllustration (g) - that evidence withheld would be unfavourable to the party withholding it
dIllustration (b) - that an accomplice is unworthy of credit unless corroborated
Answer: B
Illustration (e) to Section 119 of the BSA (corresponding to Section 114 of the repealed IEA) permits the Court to presume that judicial and official acts have been regularly performed, giving effect to the maxim omnia praesumuntur rite et solemniter esse acta (all acts are presumed to have been rightly and regularly done).
Q66Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

Under Section 142 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), the examination of a witness by the party who calls him is called:

aExamination-in-chief
bRe-examination
cCross-examination
dLeading examination
Answer: A
Section 142 of the BSA (corresponding to Section 137 of the repealed IEA) defines examination-in-chief as the examination of a witness by the party who calls him; the examination by the adverse party is cross-examination, and the subsequent examination by the party who called him is re-examination.
Q67Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)

Which of the following statements correctly distinguishes 'may presume', 'shall presume' and 'conclusive proof' as defined in Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)?

aIn 'may presume' the Court must regard the fact as proved unless disproved, while in 'shall presume' it has a discretion to call for proof
bIn 'shall presume' the Court shall regard the fact as proved unless and until it is disproved, while in 'conclusive proof' it shall not allow evidence to disprove the fact
c'Conclusive proof' permits evidence in rebuttal, but 'shall presume' does not
d'May presume' and 'shall presume' have identical effect and both are rebuttable
Answer: B
Under Section 2 of the BSA (which defines these terms in Section 2(1)(h), 2(1)(l) and 2(1)(b) respectively, corresponding to Section 4 of the repealed IEA), 'may presume' gives the Court discretion; 'shall presume' is mandatory unless disproved; and where a fact is 'conclusive proof', the Court shall not allow evidence to be given to disprove it.
Q68Indian Contract Act

An agreement made without consideration is valid under Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 if it is:

aA promise to pay any debt, whether or not barred by limitation, if made in writing
bA promise to compensate a person who has done something which the promisor was legally bound to do
cMade orally out of natural love and affection between near relations
dExpressed in writing and registered, and made on account of natural love and affection between parties standing in a near relation to each other
Answer: D
The first exception in Section 25(1) requires the agreement to be in writing, registered, and made out of natural love and affection between parties standing in a near relation; oral promises do not qualify.
Q69Indian Contract Act

Under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agreement by which a person is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business is:

aVoid to that extent, save in the case of sale of goodwill within specified limits
bValid only if supported by separate consideration
cVoidable at the option of the restrained party
dValid if the restraint is reasonable
Answer: A
Section 27 declares agreements in restraint of trade void to that extent, the only statutory exception being the sale of goodwill, where reasonable local limits may be imposed.
Q70Indian Contract Act

X agrees to sell his car to Y for Rs. 50,000, the car having been destroyed by fire (unknown to both parties) at the time of the agreement. The agreement is:

aVoidable at the option of X
bVoidable at the option of Y
cVoid on the ground of mutual mistake as to an existing fact
dValid and X is bound to compensate Y
Answer: C
Under Section 20, where both parties are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement (here, the existence of the subject matter), the agreement is void.
Q71Indian Contract Act

The rule laid down in Hadley v. Baxendale, that damages recoverable are such as arise naturally from the breach or such as were in the contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting, is embodied in which section of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?

aSection 74
bSection 75
cSection 56
dSection 73
Answer: D
Section 73 codifies the two-limb rule of remoteness from Hadley v. Baxendale and expressly excludes compensation for remote or indirect loss.
Q72Indian Contract Act

Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, where a sum is named in the contract as the amount to be paid in case of breach, the party complaining of breach is entitled to receive:

aOnly the actual loss proved, irrespective of the sum named
bDouble the sum named as a penalty
cThe whole sum named, whether or not actual loss is proved
dReasonable compensation not exceeding the amount so named, whether or not actual loss is proved
Answer: D
Section 74 entitles the aggrieved party to reasonable compensation not exceeding the stipulated amount, without the necessity of proving actual loss, abolishing the English distinction between liquidated damages and penalty.
Q73Indian Contract Act

A coolie lawfully carries B's luggage to B's house without B having asked for it, not intending to act gratuitously, and B accepts the benefit. B's liability to pay arises under:

aSection 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
bSection 68 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
cSection 69 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
dSection 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Answer: A
Section 70 imposes a quasi-contractual obligation to compensate where a person lawfully and non-gratuitously does something for another who enjoys the benefit thereof, preventing unjust enrichment.
Q74Indian Contract Act

Under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract of indemnity is a contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him:

aBy any cause whatsoever, including natural events
bOnly by the conduct of the promisor himself
cOnly by the conduct of a third person, not the promisor
dBy the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person
Answer: D
Section 124 defines indemnity as a promise to save the indemnity-holder from loss caused by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other person.
Q75Indian Contract Act

The right of a banker to retain, as a security for a general balance of account, goods bailed to him, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, is recognised under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as a:

aPledge under Section 172
bParticular lien under Section 170
cRight of stoppage in transit
dGeneral lien under Section 171
Answer: D
Section 171 confers a general lien on bankers, factors, wharfingers, attorneys of a High Court and policy-brokers over goods bailed to them for the general balance of account, unless excluded by contract.
Q76Indian Contract Act

“Delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them” is the definition of:

aBailment under Section 148
bGuarantee under Section 126
cPledge under Section 172
dSale under Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act
Answer: A
Section 148 defines bailment; the delivery is for a purpose and the goods are to be returned or dealt with per the bailor's directions once the purpose is accomplished.
Q77Indian Contract Act

A contracts to marry B, being already married to C and forbidden by the law to which he is subject to practise polygamy. With respect to this agreement:

aThe agreement is void as one to do an act which is impossible in law, and A must make compensation to B for any loss caused by such non-performance
bThe agreement is void and B is entitled to no remedy whatsoever
cA must make compensation to B for the loss caused by non-performance, the agreement being merely voidable
dThe agreement is valid and specifically enforceable against A
Answer: A
Under Section 56, an agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void; the second paragraph and its illustration require A to compensate B for loss caused by non-performance of a promise he knew to be impossible.
Q78Indian Contract Act

When a voidable contract is rescinded under Section 64 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the party rescinding it:

aNeed not perform any promise but may retain benefits already received under it
bIs discharged from all obligations without any duty of restoration
cIs entitled to claim damages but need not restore benefits received
dMust restore any benefit received thereunder to the person from whom it was received
Answer: D
Section 64 provides that when the person at whose option a contract is voidable rescinds it, the other party need not perform, and the rescinding party must restore any benefit received under the contract.
Q79H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, a tenant becomes liable to eviction for non-payment of rent if he has not paid or tendered the rent due, in the absence of any agreement, within:

aTwo months from the date of demand by the landlord
bThirty days from the close of the year of tenancy
cFifteen days after the expiry of the time fixed in the tenancy agreement, or by the last day of the month next following that for which rent is payable
dSeven days from the date the rent fell due
Answer: C
Under Section 14(2)(i) of the Act, a tenant is liable to eviction if he fails to pay or tender the rent within fifteen days after the expiry of the time fixed in the agreement, or, absent such agreement, by the last day of the month next following that for which the rent is payable.
Q80H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, a tenant is liable to be evicted on the ground of sub-letting where he has, after the commencement of the Act, sub-let the whole or any part of the building or rented land:

aEven with the written consent of the landlord
bOnly if the sub-tenant pays a higher rent
cWithout the written consent of the landlord
dOnly where the sub-letting is of a non-residential building
Answer: C
Under Section 14(2)(ii) of the Act, transferring rights under the lease or sub-letting the building or rented land without the written consent of the landlord is a ground for eviction.
Q81H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, no person shall convert a residential building into a non-residential building except with the:

aWritten permission of the Controller
bApproval of the State Government
cConsent of the sub-tenant
dSanction of the Municipal Committee
Answer: A
The Act prohibits conversion of a residential building into a non-residential building except with the prior permission in writing of the Controller.
Q82H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, where a landlord seeks eviction of a tenant from a residential building on the ground of bona fide requirement for his own occupation, he must, among other things, show that he:

aHas owned the building for at least ten years
bHas obtained the prior sanction of the State Government
cIs occupying another residential building of his own in the urban area concerned
dIs not occupying another residential building of his own in the urban area concerned
Answer: D
Under Section 14(3) of the Act, a landlord seeking eviction for his own occupation of a residential building must establish that he requires it bona fide and is not occupying, and has not vacated without sufficient cause, another residential building of his own in the urban area concerned.
Q83H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, a tenant who has ceased to occupy the building or rented land without reasonable cause becomes liable to eviction where such cessation has continued for a period of:

aThree months
bSix months
cTwelve months
dTwo years
Answer: C
Under Section 14(2) of the Act, a tenant who has ceased to occupy the building or rented land for a continuous period of twelve months without reasonable cause is liable to be evicted.
Q84H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, a landlord may recover possession of a building or rented land which is bona fide required for carrying out repairs or for re-building or re-construction. Such a ground falls under:

aSection 14
bSection 21
cSection 11
dSection 13
Answer: A
Section 14 of the Act includes, among the landlord's grounds for recovery of possession, the bona fide requirement of the building or rented land for repairs, re-building or re-construction which cannot be carried out without vacant possession.
Q85H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, the provision dealing with the lease of vacant buildings is contained in:

aSection 16
bSection 24
cSection 18
dSection 20
Answer: C
Section 18 of the Act deals with the lease of vacant buildings, regulating intimation of vacancies and letting of buildings that fall vacant.
Q86H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, where the landlord refuses or neglects to accept the rent lawfully tendered by the tenant, or there is a bona fide doubt as to the person to whom the rent is payable, the tenant may:

aDeposit such rent with the Controller in the prescribed manner
bPay the rent to the Municipal Committee
cWithhold the rent indefinitely without any liability
dDeposit such rent in the nearest civil court
Answer: A
The Act permits the tenant, where the landlord refuses or neglects to accept lawfully tendered rent or where there is a bona fide doubt as to who is entitled to it, to deposit such rent with the Controller in the prescribed manner.
Q87H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, for the purpose of holding an inquiry, the Controller is vested with which of the following?

aNo coercive powers; he may only persuade the parties to settle
bOnly such powers as the District Magistrate may delegate to him
cThe powers of a Court of Session
dThe powers of a civil court in respect of summoning witnesses and compelling the production of documents
Answer: D
The Act confers on the Controller the powers of a civil court for the purposes of summoning and enforcing the attendance of witnesses and compelling the production of documents while holding inquiries under the Act.
Q88H.P. Urban Rent Control Act

Under the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, a specified landlord who, having obtained eviction of a tenant on the ground of his own bona fide requirement, fails to occupy the building for the prescribed continuous period or re-lets it to a person other than the evicted tenant, is punishable with:

aFine up to Rs. 500 only
bImprisonment up to three months, or fine up to Rs. 1,000, or both
cImprisonment up to one year, or fine up to Rs. 5,000, or both
dImprisonment up to six months, or fine up to Rs. 2,000, or both
Answer: D
Under Section 30 of the Act, such a specified landlord is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both.
Q89Hindu Law

Under Section 12 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, which one of the following is a correct effect of a valid adoption?

aThe adopted child may divest any person of an estate vested in him before the adoption
bAll ties of the child in the family of birth are deemed severed from the date of adoption
cProperty which vested in the adopted child before adoption ceases to vest in him
dPerformance of datta homam is essential to the validity of the adoption
Answer: B
Section 12 deems the adopted child to be the child of the adoptive parents from the date of adoption, with all ties in the family of birth severed; proviso (c) bars divesting of any vested estate, proviso (b) preserves property already vested in the child, and Section 11(vi) proviso makes datta homam non-essential.
Q90Hindu Law

Under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother. This is provided in the proviso to:

aSection 6
bSection 4
cSection 8
dSection 13
Answer: A
The proviso to Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 provides that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother; Section 13 separately makes the welfare of the minor the paramount consideration.
Q91Hindu Law

Under Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as amended, a marriage may be solemnised between two Hindus only if the bridegroom and the bride have completed which of the following ages respectively?

aBridegroom 18 years and bride 18 years
bBridegroom 21 years and bride 18 years
cBridegroom 21 years and bride 21 years
dBridegroom 18 years and bride 16 years
Answer: B
Section 5(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 requires that the bridegroom has completed the age of 21 years and the bride the age of 18 years at the time of the marriage.
Q92Hindu Law

As defined in Section 3(f) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the sapinda relationship of a person extends, in the line of ascent, as far as:

aThe third generation (inclusive) through the father and the fifth generation (inclusive) through the mother
bThe third generation (inclusive) through both the father and the mother
cThe fifth generation (inclusive) through both the father and the mother
dThe fifth generation (inclusive) through the father and the third generation (inclusive) through the mother
Answer: D
Section 3(f)(ii) extends sapinda relationship as far as the third generation (inclusive) in the line of ascent through the mother, and the fifth generation (inclusive) in the line of ascent through the father, traced upwards in each case from the person concerned.
Q93Hindu Law

Under Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, where the customary rites and ceremonies include the saptapadi, the marriage becomes complete and binding when:

aThe bride is given away by her father (kanyadan)
bThe ring is exchanged before the assembled guests
cThe seventh step is taken jointly by the bridegroom and the bride before the sacred fire
dThe marriage is registered before the Registrar
Answer: C
Under Section 7(2), where the saptapadi forms part of the ceremonies, the marriage becomes complete and binding when the seventh step is taken jointly by the bride and bridegroom before the sacred fire.
Q94Hindu Law

A Hindu marriage is void under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 if it contravenes which of the following conditions specified in Section 5?

aClause (iii) of Section 5 relating to age
bClause (ii) of Section 5
cAll the six clauses of Section 5
dClauses (i), (iv) and (v) of Section 5
Answer: D
Section 11 declares a marriage void only if it contravenes clause (i) (bigamy), clause (iv) (prohibited degrees) or clause (v) (sapinda relationship) of Section 5; breach of the age condition (iii) does not render the marriage void.
Q95Hindu Law

Which of the following is a ground on which a marriage is voidable under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

aThat either party had a spouse living at the time of the marriage
bThat the parties are within the degrees of prohibited relationship
cThat the marriage has not been consummated owing to the impotence of the respondent
dThat the parties are sapindas of each other
Answer: C
Non-consummation owing to impotence of the respondent is a ground for a voidable marriage under Section 12(1)(a); bigamy, sapinda and prohibited-degree marriages are void under Section 11, not merely voidable.
Q96Hindu Law

Under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the motion for a decree of divorce by mutual consent is to be made by both parties on a petition presented to the court:

aNot earlier than six months and not later than eighteen months after the date of presentation of the petition
bNot earlier than three months and not later than one year after the date of presentation of the petition
cAt any time after the presentation of the petition
dNot earlier than one year and not later than two years after the date of presentation of the petition
Answer: A
Section 13B(2) requires the second motion to be moved not earlier than six months and not later than eighteen months after presentation of the joint petition, provided it is not withdrawn in the meantime.
Q97Hindu Law

In Smt. Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, AIR 2006 SC 1158, the Supreme Court of India directed that:

aMarriages of all persons who are citizens of India belonging to various religions should be made compulsorily registrable in their respective States
bSaptapadi is an essential ceremony for every Hindu marriage
cCruelty includes mental cruelty as a ground for divorce
dA decree of divorce by mutual consent can be granted without any waiting period
Answer: A
In Seema v. Ashwani Kumar the Supreme Court directed the States and Central Government to make registration of marriages of all citizens, irrespective of religion, compulsory.
Q98Transfer of Property Act

Under Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, where on a transfer of property an interest is created for the benefit of a person not in existence at the date of the transfer, the interest created for the benefit of such unborn person:

aMay be limited to take effect for the life of the unborn person only
bMust take effect only after the lifetime of one or more living persons and must comprise the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor
cIs void in every case, as a transfer cannot be made for an unborn person
dTakes effect immediately on the date of transfer
Answer: B
Section 13 allows a transfer for the benefit of an unborn person only through a prior life interest in a living person, and the interest given to the unborn must be the entire remaining interest of the transferor (no further life estate to the unborn).
Q99Transfer of Property Act

Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, while defining 'immovable property', expressly excludes:

aBenefits arising out of land
bHereditary offices
cThings attached to the earth
dStanding timber, growing crops and grass
Answer: D
Section 3 states that 'immovable property' does not include standing timber, growing crops or grass; these are regarded as movable property for the purposes of the Act.
Q100Transfer of Property Act

Under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, in the case of tangible immovable property of a value of one hundred rupees or more, sale can be made only by:

aEither a registered instrument or delivery of possession
bDelivery of possession alone
cA registered instrument
dAn oral agreement followed by mutation in revenue records
Answer: C
Section 54 provides that sale of tangible immovable property of value of one hundred rupees or more can be made only by a registered instrument; where the value is less than one hundred rupees, it may be made by a registered instrument or by delivery of property.
Q101Transfer of Property Act

In the absence of a contract or local usage to the contrary, a lease of immovable property for agricultural or manufacturing purposes under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act is deemed to be a lease:

aFrom year to year, terminable by six months' notice
bFrom month to month, terminable by six months' notice
cFrom month to month, terminable by fifteen days' notice
dFrom year to year, terminable by fifteen days' notice
Answer: A
Section 106 deems a lease for agricultural or manufacturing purposes to be from year to year, terminable by six months' notice; a lease for any other purpose is from month to month, terminable by fifteen days' notice.
Q102Transfer of Property Act

A leading authority on the interplay of Section 6(a) and Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, holding that a transferee who takes a transfer for consideration on the faith of a representation of present ownership is protected by Section 43 even though the transferor in fact had only a spes successionis, is:

aTulk v. Moxhay, (1848) 41 ER 1143
bRajes Kanta Roy v. Santi Debi, AIR 1957 SC 255
cJumma Masjid, Mercara v. Kodimaniandra Deviah, AIR 1962 SC 847
dRamcoomar Koondoo v. John and Maria McQueen, (1872) 11 Beng LR 46
Answer: C
In Jumma Masjid, Mercara v. Kodimaniandra Deviah (AIR 1962 SC 847), the Supreme Court held that a transfer based on an erroneous representation of present ownership is saved by the estoppel in Section 43, even though a bare transfer of spes successionis is void under Section 6(a).
Q103Transfer of Property Act

A, the real owner, allows B to hold himself out as the owner of a house with A's implied consent. B sells the house to C for consideration. C, after taking reasonable care to ascertain B's power to transfer, buys it in good faith. The real owner A later sues to set aside the sale on the ground that B was not authorised to transfer. Under the Transfer of Property Act, the transfer is:

aVoid ab initio as B had no title
bNot voidable on the ground that B was unauthorised, by virtue of Section 41
cVoidable at the option of A, the real owner
dValid only if C also obtains a fresh deed from A
Answer: B
Section 41 (transfer by ostensible owner) protects a transferee for consideration who, after taking reasonable care and acting in good faith, buys from an ostensible owner holding with the consent (express or implied) of the real owner; the transfer is not voidable for want of authority.
Q104Transfer of Property Act

With reference to the Transfer of Property Act, match List I with List II and select the correct answer using the codes below: List I (P) Transfer by ostensible owner (Q) Doctrine of election (R) Doctrine of lis pendens (S) Doctrine of part performance List II (i) Section 35 (ii) Section 41 (iii) Section 53A (iv) Section 52

aP-(iv), Q-(iii), R-(ii), S-(i)
bP-(ii), Q-(iv), R-(i), S-(iii)
cP-(i), Q-(ii), R-(iii), S-(iv)
dP-(ii), Q-(i), R-(iv), S-(iii)
Answer: D
Transfer by ostensible owner is Section 41, doctrine of election is Section 35, doctrine of lis pendens is Section 52, and doctrine of part performance is Section 53A.
Q105Transfer of Property Act

For the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act to apply, the pending suit or proceeding in which a right to immovable property is directly and specifically in question must be:

aAlready decided by a final decree
bNot collusive, the property being affected only with the leave of the court
cCollusive and pending at any stage
dConfined to movable property only
Answer: B
Section 52 applies where the suit is not collusive and a right to immovable property is directly and specifically in question; during its pendency the property cannot be transferred so as to affect the rights of any party, except under the authority of the court.
Q106Transfer of Property Act

Under Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, where a gift of movable or immovable property is made voluntarily and without consideration, but the donee dies before acceptance, the gift is:

aValid and the property vests in the donee's heirs
bValid only if the subject is movable property
cVoid
dVoidable at the option of the donor's heirs
Answer: C
Section 122 requires that acceptance be made during the lifetime of the donor and while he is still capable of giving; if the donee dies before acceptance, the gift is void.
Q107Indian Limitation Act

Under Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a suit instituted after the prescribed period of limitation:

aMay be entertained only with the prior leave of the High Court
bShall be returned to the plaintiff for presentation before the proper forum
cCannot be dismissed unless the defendant specifically pleads limitation as a defence
dShall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence
Answer: D
Section 3(1) provides that every suit instituted, appeal preferred and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence; the bar of limitation must be applied by the court suo motu.
Q108Indian Limitation Act

Where the prescribed period for any suit, appeal or application expires on a day when the court is closed, Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that the proceeding may be instituted, preferred or made:

aOn the last working day immediately preceding the closed day
bOnly after obtaining condonation of delay under Section 5
cOn the day when the court reopens
dWithin seven days of the court reopening, as a matter of right
Answer: C
Section 4 lays down that when the prescribed period expires on a day the court is closed, the suit, appeal or application may be instituted, preferred or made on the day when the court reopens.
Q109Indian Limitation Act

The benefit of condonation of delay on showing 'sufficient cause' under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is available to:

aOnly to appeals, and to no application
bSuits as well as appeals and applications
cOnly to execution applications under Order XXI CPC
dAppeals and applications (other than certain applications under Order XXI CPC), but not to suits
Answer: D
Section 5 enables an appeal or application (except specified applications under Order XXI CPC) to be admitted after the prescribed period on sufficient cause; it does not extend to suits.
Q110Indian Limitation Act

The principle embodied in Section 9 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is best expressed by the maxim that, once time has begun to run:

aFresh limitation begins on every change in the cause of action
bNo subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application stops it
cA subsequent disability or inability to sue stops the running of time
dThe court may at its discretion suspend the running of time
Answer: B
Section 9 declares that where once time has begun to run, no subsequent disability or inability to institute a suit or make an application stops it (subject only to the exception relating to a right to apply for letters of administration).
Q111Indian Limitation Act

In computing the period of limitation for an appeal under Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which of the following is excluded?

aOnly the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree
bThe day from which the period is reckoned, the day of pronouncement of the judgment, and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from
cThe entire vacation period of the court, irrespective of when the copy was sought
dOnly the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced
Answer: B
Section 12 excludes the day from which the period is to be reckoned, the day on which the judgment was pronounced, and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from.
Q112Indian Limitation Act

Where a suit is based upon the fraud of the defendant or the plaintiff seeks relief from the consequences of a mistake, Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that the period of limitation:

aDoes not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud or the mistake, or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it
bBegins to run from the date of execution of the document concerned
cBegins to run from the date the suit is actually instituted
dIs in all cases extended by a further period of three years
Answer: A
Under Section 17, in suits or applications based on fraud or seeking relief from the consequences of a mistake, time does not begin to run until the fraud or mistake is discovered or could, with reasonable diligence, have been discovered.
Q113Indian Limitation Act

For an acknowledgment of liability to furnish a fresh starting point of limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the acknowledgment must be:

aIn writing, but may be made even after the prescribed period has expired
bOral, and made at any time before suit
cIn writing and signed, and made before the expiration of the prescribed period
dAccompanied by part-payment of the debt
Answer: C
Section 18 requires an acknowledgment of liability in writing, signed by the party against whom the property or right is claimed (or his agent), made before the expiration of the prescribed period; a fresh period then runs from the date of the acknowledgment.
Q114Indian Limitation Act

A fresh period of limitation under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 starts on:

aA unilateral entry of the payment made by the creditor in his own books
bAny payment, whether or not evidenced by writing, made at any time
cMere oral promise to pay the debt without any payment
dPayment on account of a debt or of interest on a legacy, made before the expiration of the prescribed period, where an acknowledgment of the payment appears in the handwriting of, or in a writing signed by, the person making it
Answer: D
Section 19 provides that where payment on account of a debt or of interest on a legacy is made before the prescribed period expires, a fresh period runs from the date of payment, provided the acknowledgment of payment is in the handwriting of, or signed by, the payer.
Q115Indian Limitation Act

Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is an exception to the general rule that limitation bars only the remedy, because it provides that on the determination of the period limited for instituting a suit for possession of any property:

aOnly the remedy is barred, the right to the property surviving
bThe suit may still be filed with the leave of the court
cThe person's right to such property shall be extinguished
dA fresh period of twelve years begins automatically
Answer: C
Section 27 provides that at the determination of the period limited for instituting a suit for possession of any property, the person's right to such property is extinguished; it thus destroys the right itself, forming the statutory basis of adverse possession.
Q116Specific Relief Act

A perpetual injunction is granted to prevent the breach of an obligation existing in favour of the plaintiff under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Where such obligation arises from contract, the court shall be guided by:

aThe rules and provisions contained in Chapter II of the Act
bThe provisions relating to cancellation of instruments
cThe principles of the law of torts only
dThe provisions relating to declaratory decrees
Answer: A
Section 38(2) provides that when the obligation arises from contract, the court shall be guided by the rules and provisions contained in Chapter II of the Act.
Q117Specific Relief Act

Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, a person entitled to possession of specific movable property may recover it under Section 8 where the person in possession holds the article:

aOnly where the property has been pledged for a debt
bAs the agent or trustee of the claimant, or where compensation in money would not afford adequate relief
cAs his absolute owner having purchased it for value without notice
dOnly where the property is of a perishable nature
Answer: B
Section 8 allows a person to compel delivery of specific movable property where, among other situations, the defendant holds it as the agent or trustee of the claimant or where money compensation would not be adequate relief.
Q118Specific Relief Act

A person dispossessed of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law may sue to recover possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Such a suit must be brought within:

aTwelve years from the date of dispossession
bOne year from the date of dispossession
cThree years from the date of dispossession
dSix months from the date of dispossession
Answer: D
Section 6(2)(a) bars any suit for recovery of possession under that section after the expiry of six months from the date of dispossession (and no such suit lies against the Government).
Q119Specific Relief Act

With respect to an order or decree passed in a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for recovery of possession, which of the following is correct?

aBoth appeal and review lie against such order or decree
bNo appeal and no review lie, but the order is open to revision
cAn appeal lies but review is barred
dReview lies but no appeal lies
Answer: B
Section 6(3) expressly bars both appeal and review against an order or decree passed in a Section 6 suit; however, the remedy of revision remains available.
Q120Specific Relief Act

After the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018, the nature of the court's jurisdiction to grant specific performance of a contract is best described as:

aWholly abolished in favour of damages
bAvailable only for contracts relating to immovable property
cPurely discretionary, to be granted only where compensation is inadequate
dA general rule, enforceable subject only to the limited bars in Sections 11(2), 14 and 16
Answer: D
The 2018 amendment recast Section 10 so that specific performance of a contract 'shall' be enforced, making it the rule rather than the exception, subject to the bars in Sections 11(2), 14 and 16.
Q121Specific Relief Act

Under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (as amended in 2018), which of the following contracts can NOT be specifically enforced?

aA contract for the sale of immovable property
bA contract to transfer a registered patent
cA contract which is in its nature determinable
dA contract to assign a copyright
Answer: C
Section 14(d) (post-2018) bars specific enforcement of a contract which is in its nature determinable; the other bars include substituted performance already obtained, continuous duties the court cannot supervise, and contracts dependent on personal qualifications.
Q122Specific Relief Act

After the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018, a plaintiff seeking specific performance under Section 16(c) is required to:

aBoth aver and prove his readiness and willingness to perform the contract
bNeither aver nor prove readiness and willingness
cOnly prove his readiness and willingness to perform the contract
dAver readiness and willingness, proof being unnecessary
Answer: C
The 2018 amendment substituted 'who fails to aver and prove' with 'who fails to prove' in Section 16(c); the plaintiff need no longer formally plead but must still prove readiness and willingness.
Q123Indian Stamp Act

A person who is uncertain whether an instrument is chargeable with duty, or as to the amount of duty payable, may bring it to the Collector to determine the proper duty. This adjudication procedure is provided under:

aSection 47 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899
bSection 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899
cSection 62 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899
dSection 31 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Answer: D
Section 31 empowers the Collector, on an instrument being brought to him with the prescribed fee, to adjudicate and determine the duty with which it is chargeable.
Q124Indian Stamp Act

Under Section 29 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, the expense of providing the proper stamp on a lease or agreement to lease shall be borne by:

aThe lessor
bThe lessee or intended lessee
cEqually by the lessor and the lessee
dThe Sub-Registrar
Answer: B
Section 29(c) provides that in the case of a lease or agreement to lease, the duty is payable by the lessee or intended lessee.
Q125Indian Stamp Act

An instrument which is not duly stamped and is therefore inadmissible in evidence under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899:

aShall not be admitted in evidence for any purpose by a person having authority to receive evidence
bBecomes admissible automatically after the lapse of three years
cMay still be admitted in evidence without any condition once objection is waived
dMay be admitted only after a fresh instrument is executed and duly stamped
Answer: A
Section 35 bars admission in evidence of an instrument not duly stamped for any purpose by any person having authority to receive evidence, subject only to the proviso permitting admission on payment of duty and penalty.
Q126Indian Stamp Act

Assertion (A): An instrument executed out of India, not being a bill of exchange or promissory note, may be stamped within three months after it is first received in India. Reason (R): Section 17 of the Indian Stamp Act requires that all instruments executed in India be stamped before or at the time of execution. Choose the correct alternative:

aBoth A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
bBoth A and R are true, but R does not correctly explain A
cA is true, but R is false
dBoth A and R are false
Answer: B
A states the rule under Section 18 for out-of-India instruments; R correctly states the distinct rule under Section 17 for instruments executed in India, but it does not explain the three-month rule in A.
Q127Indian Stamp Act

Match List I (instrument under Section 29 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899) with List II (person liable to bear stamp duty in absence of contrary agreement) and select the correct answer using the codes below: List I: (P) Conveyance (Q) Lease (R) Counterpart of a lease (S) Certificate of sale List II: (i) Lessor (ii) Lessee (iii) Purchaser (iv) Grantee

aP-(iv), Q-(ii), R-(i), S-(iii)
bP-(i), Q-(ii), R-(iv), S-(iii)
cP-(ii), Q-(iv), R-(i), S-(iii)
dP-(iv), Q-(i), R-(ii), S-(iii)
Answer: A
Under Section 29: a conveyance is borne by the grantee, a lease by the lessee, a counterpart of a lease by the lessor, and a certificate of sale by the purchaser.
Q128Negotiable Instruments Act (Ss.138–143)

Under Section 142(1)(c) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, no court inferior to that of a ____ shall try an offence punishable under Section 138:

aMetropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class
bJudicial Magistrate of the second class
cCourt of Session
dExecutive Magistrate
Answer: A
Section 142(1)(c) provides that no court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try a Section 138 offence.
Q129Negotiable Instruments Act (Ss.138–143)

Where a cheque is delivered for collection through an account, Section 142(2)(a) provides that the offence under Section 138 shall be inquired into and tried only by the court within whose local jurisdiction:

athe cheque was originally drawn
bthe registered office of the drawer company is situated
cthe drawer maintains his bank account
dthe branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course maintains the account is situated
Answer: D
Section 142(2)(a), inserted by the 2015 Amendment, fixes territorial jurisdiction at the branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course maintains the account into which the cheque was deposited for collection.
Q130Negotiable Instruments Act (Ss.138–143)

Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 empowers the Magistrate to try offences under Chapter XVII summarily; however, in such a summary trial the Magistrate may pass a sentence of imprisonment not exceeding:

asix months and fine not exceeding five thousand rupees
btwo years and fine exceeding ten thousand rupees
cone year and an amount of fine exceeding five thousand rupees
dthree months and fine exceeding two thousand rupees
Answer: C
The first proviso to Section 143(1) permits the Magistrate, while trying the case summarily, to pass a sentence of imprisonment up to one year and an amount of fine exceeding five thousand rupees (notwithstanding the limits in Section 262 CrPC).
Q131Negotiable Instruments Act (Ss.138–143)

Under Section 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within ____ from the date of filing of the complaint:

asix months
bthree months
cnine months
done year
Answer: A
Section 143(3) directs that an endeavour be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing the complaint, reflecting the expeditious-disposal object of Chapter XVII.
Q132Negotiable Instruments Act (Ss.138–143)

Under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the interim compensation that the court may direct the drawer to pay during the pendency of a Section 138 complaint shall NOT exceed:

atwenty per cent of the amount of the cheque
bfifty per cent of the amount of the cheque
cten per cent of the amount of the cheque
dthe entire amount of the cheque
Answer: A
Section 143A(2), inserted by the 2018 Amendment, caps interim compensation at twenty per cent of the cheque amount, payable within sixty days of the order (extendable by up to thirty days).
Q133H.P. Excise Act, 2011

Under Section 42 of the H.P. Excise Act, 2011, when convicting a person under Section 41, the court may order payment of compensation to the legal representatives of each deceased of an amount not less than:

aThree lakh rupees
bTwo lakh rupees
cOne lakh rupees
dFive lakh rupees
Answer: A
Section 42(1)(a) empowers the court, on conviction under Section 41, to order compensation of not less than three lakh rupees to the legal representatives of each deceased (and not less than two lakh rupees where grievous hurt is caused).
Q134H.P. Excise Act, 2011

Which one of the following statements regarding the bailable character of offences under the H.P. Excise Act, 2011 is correct?

aAll offences under the Act are bailable, but offences under the first and second provisos to Section 39(1) and under Sections 40 and 41 are non-bailable
bAll offences under the Act are non-bailable
cAll offences under the Act are bailable without exception
dOnly offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding three years are non-bailable
Answer: A
Section 53 makes all offences under the Act bailable, with a proviso that offences under the first and second provisos to Section 39(1) and under Sections 40 and 41 are non-bailable.
Q135H.P. Excise Act, 2011

Under the appeal mechanism in Section 68 of the H.P. Excise Act, 2011, a person aggrieved by an order passed by an Excise Officer may, within thirty days of communication of the order, appeal to the:

aFinancial Commissioner
bCollector
cHigh Court
dSessions Judge
Answer: B
Under Section 68(1), an appeal against an order of an Excise Officer lies to the Collector within thirty days; under Section 68(2), an appeal against the Collector's order lies to the Financial Commissioner.
Q136H.P. Excise Act, 2011

Under Section 66 of the H.P. Excise Act, 2011, the Collector may compound certain offences by accepting a sum of money which shall not exceed:

aTwenty-five thousand rupees, subject to a minimum of five thousand rupees
bTen thousand rupees, subject to a minimum of two thousand rupees
cOne lakh rupees, subject to a minimum of twenty-five thousand rupees
dFifty thousand rupees, subject to a minimum of ten thousand rupees
Answer: A
Section 66(1) empowers the Collector to compound specified offences (under Sections 26, 43-47, 59 and attempts/abetment under Section 50) by accepting a sum not exceeding twenty-five thousand rupees, subject to a minimum of five thousand rupees, for each offence.
Q137H.P. Excise Act, 2011

Under the H.P. Excise Act, 2011, the officer in whom the general superintendence and administration of all matters relating to excise vests, and who exercises all the powers of the Financial Commissioner, is:

aThe Excise Officer invested with powers under section 6
bThe Collector appointed under section 5(2)
cThe Excise and Taxation Commissioner appointed under section 5(1)
dThe District Magistrate of the district concerned
Answer: C
Section 2(k) read with section 5(1) provides that the 'Financial Commissioner' is the Excise and Taxation Commissioner appointed by the State Government, in whom the general superintendence and administration of all excise matters vests, subject to the control of the State Government.
Q138Wildlife (Protection) Act

Section 9 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 prohibits the hunting of wild animals specified in:

aAll the Schedules without any exception
bSchedule I, Schedule II, Schedule III and Schedule IV, except as provided under sections 11 and 12
cSchedule I and Part II of Schedule II only
dSchedule I only
Answer: B
Section 9 bars hunting of any wild animal specified in Schedules I, II, III and IV, save as permitted under Section 11 (dangerous animals/disease) and Section 12 (special permit for scientific or other purposes).
Q139Wildlife (Protection) Act

Under Section 11(1)(a) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, permission to hunt a wild animal specified in Schedule I which has become dangerous to human life may be granted by:

aThe State Government
bThe Chief Wild Life Warden
cThe District Magistrate
dAny forest officer not below the rank of a Range Officer
Answer: B
Section 11(1)(a) empowers the Chief Wild Life Warden, if satisfied that a Schedule I animal has become dangerous to human life or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond recovery, to permit any person to hunt such animal by order in writing stating the reasons.
Q140Wildlife (Protection) Act

Under the definition of 'hunting' in Section 2(16) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, which of the following is included?

aOnly capturing of a wild animal for a zoo
bKilling or poisoning of any wild or captive animal and every attempt to do so, and capturing, coursing, snaring, trapping, driving or baiting any wild animal
cOnly the actual killing of a wild animal
dPhotography of wild animals in their natural habitat
Answer: B
Section 2(16) defines 'hunting' to include killing or poisoning of any wild or captive animal and every attempt to do so; capturing, coursing, snaring, trapping, driving or baiting any wild animal; and injuring, destroying or taking any body part, eggs or nests.
Q141Wildlife (Protection) Act

Under the scheme of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, a Sanctuary and a National Park are respectively declared by:

aThe Central Government under Section 18 and the State Government under Section 35
bThe National Board for Wild Life under Section 18 and the State Government under Section 35
cThe State Government under Section 18 and the State Government under Section 35
dThe Chief Wild Life Warden under Section 18 and the Central Government under Section 35
Answer: C
Section 18 empowers the State Government to declare its intention to constitute an area as a Sanctuary, and Section 35 likewise empowers the State Government to declare an area as a National Park by notification.
Q142Indian Forest Act

A person who, in a reserved forest, quarries stone, burns lime or charcoal, or removes any forest-produce in contravention of Section 26 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, is punishable with:

aOnly fine which may extend to five hundred rupees
bImprisonment which may extend to two years, or fine, or both
cImprisonment which may extend to one year, or fine up to one thousand rupees, or both
dImprisonment which may extend to six months, or fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both, in addition to compensation for damage as the Court may direct
Answer: D
Section 26(1) prescribes imprisonment up to six months, or fine up to five hundred rupees, or both, in addition to such compensation for damage done to the forest as the convicting Court may direct.
Q143Indian Forest Act

Under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, a "village-forest" is constituted when the State Government:

aAcquires private forest land under the Land Acquisition Act for public purposes
bDeclares any waste-land which is the property of Government to be a protected forest
cAssigns to any village-community the rights of Government to or over any land which has been constituted a reserved forest
dImposes a duty on timber and forest-produce removed from a reserved forest
Answer: C
Section 28(1) empowers the State Government to assign to any village-community the rights of Government to or over land which has been constituted a reserved forest; all forests so assigned are called village-forests.
Q144Indian Forest Act

Under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, before a notification declaring a forest-land or waste-land to be a "protected forest" is made, the record of the nature and extent of the rights of Government and of private persons therein:

aShall be presumed to be correct until the contrary is proved
bIs conclusive proof and cannot be challenged in any court
cShall be presumed to be incorrect until proved otherwise
dNeed not be made at all, as protected forests carry no recorded rights
Answer: A
Section 29(3) requires the rights to be inquired into and recorded, and provides that every such record shall be presumed to be correct until the contrary is proved.
Q145Indian Forest Act

Penalties for acts in contravention of a notification under Section 30 or of rules under Section 32 (i.e. offences relating to protected forests) are provided in which section of the Indian Forest Act, 1927?

aSection 42
bSection 33
cSection 63
dSection 26
Answer: B
Section 33 prescribes the penalties (imprisonment up to six months, or fine up to five hundred rupees, or both) for acts in contravention of a Section 30 notification or rules made under Section 32 in protected forests. Section 26 deals with reserved forests.
Q146H.P. Courts Act, 1976

In the definition clause of the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976, the expression 'District Judge':

aMeans only a Sessions Judge exercising criminal jurisdiction
bIncludes an Additional District Judge
cExcludes an Additional District Judge in all cases
dMeans the senior-most Subordinate Judge of the district
Answer: B
Under the definitions in the Act, the expression 'District Judge' is defined so as to include an Additional District Judge, who exercises the powers of a District Judge in the matters assigned to him.
Q147H.P. Courts Act, 1976

Under the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976 read with its definition clause, the expression 'Small Cause' is to be construed in accordance with:

aThe Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887
bThe Limitation Act, 1963
cThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
dThe Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Answer: A
The definition clause of the Act adopts the meaning of 'Small Cause' from the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, which classifies suits of a small cause nature.
Q148H.P. Courts Act, 1976

An appeal from a decree or order passed by a District Judge in a suit in the exercise of his original civil jurisdiction under the Himachal Pradesh Courts Act, 1976 lies to:

aThe High Court of Himachal Pradesh
bThe Court of Small Causes of the district
cAnother District Judge nominated by the State Government
dThe Court of the Senior-most Subordinate Judge
Answer: A
An appeal from the decrees and orders of a District Judge in the exercise of original civil jurisdiction lies to the High Court of Himachal Pradesh.
Q149Judicial Sensitivity Module (CEDAW, gender stereotyping, Verma Committee)

In State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996), while emphasising judicial sensitivity towards the prosecutrix, the Supreme Court directed that the trial of rape cases should ordinarily be conducted:

aWith the aid of a jury
bIn open court to ensure transparency
cOnly by a woman judge
dIn camera, to protect the dignity and privacy of the victim
Answer: D
The Court held that trials of sexual-offence cases should be held in camera as envisaged by the proviso to Section 327(2) of the Code, and cautioned against branding the prosecutrix as a woman of easy virtue.
Q150POCSO Act, 2012

The presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, 2012, that the accused has committed the offence unless the contrary is proved, applies where a person is prosecuted for committing, abetting or attempting an offence under:

aSections 11 and 13 only
bSections 19 and 21 only
cAll offences under the Act
dSections 3, 5, 7 and 9
Answer: D
Section 29 raises a statutory presumption of guilt (rebuttable) only for the substantive offences under Sections 3, 5, 7 and 9 (penetrative, aggravated penetrative, sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault).

Practiced enough reading? Attempt Himachal Pradesh Judiciary mocks under real exam conditions and track your weak subjects.

Take the timed test →
Law Mock is an independent preparation resource and is not affiliated with any High Court, Public Service Commission, or government body. All exam information is sourced from official notifications and is updated periodically.